Author
A. Di Leo
Other affiliations: Breast International Group, Université libre de Bruxelles, Institut Jules Bordet
Bio: A. Di Leo is an academic researcher from Academy for Urban School Leadership. The author has contributed to research in topics: Breast cancer & Cancer. The author has an hindex of 34, co-authored 109 publications receiving 11977 citations. Previous affiliations of A. Di Leo include Breast International Group & Université libre de Bruxelles.
Topics: Breast cancer, Cancer, Metastatic breast cancer, Population, Docetaxel
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: The 10-year and 15-year effects of various systemic adjuvant therapies on breast cancer recurrence and survival are reported and it is found that the cumulative reduction in mortality is more than twice as big at 15 years as at 5 years after diagnosis.
6,309 citations
TL;DR: In meta-analyses involving taxane-based or anthracycline-based regimens, proportional risk reductions were little affected by age, nodal status, tumour diameter or differentiation (moderate or poor; few were well differentiated), oestrogen receptor status, or tamoxifen use.
1,647 citations
Harvard University1, Medical University of Vienna2, Institut Jules Bordet3, University of St. Gallen4, Kantonsspital St. Gallen5, Institut Gustave Roussy6, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center7, Karolinska Institutet8, University of Bordeaux9, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill10, Queen Mary University of London11, Charité12, Marmara University13, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto14, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich15, University of Michigan16, National Taiwan University17, University of Ulm18, National Institutes of Health19, Gdańsk Medical University20, Sahlgrenska University Hospital21, Baylor College of Medicine22, University of Toronto23, Netherlands Cancer Institute24, Paracelsus Private Medical University of Salzburg25, Fudan University26, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust27, Kyoto University28, Institute of Cancer Research29, University of Milan30, McMaster University31
TL;DR: The 15th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference 2017 in Vienna, Austria reviewed substantial new evidence on loco-regional and systemic therapies for early breast cancer, and recommended bisphosphonate use in postmenopausal women to prevent breast cancer recurrence.
777 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conducted a collaborative meta-analysis to clarify the risks and benefits of adjuvant bisphosphonate treatment in early breast cancer, and found that the reduction in bone recurrence was more definite (0.73-0.94; 2p=0.004).
554 citations
University of Melbourne1, University of Newcastle2, University of Chicago3, University of Calgary4, Complutense University of Madrid5, University of Bordeaux6, Virginia Commonwealth University7, Mayo Clinic8, Johns Hopkins University9, University of Udine10, University of Regensburg11, University of St. Gallen12, University of Washington13, University of Bern14, University of Sydney15
TL;DR: Among premenopausal women with breast cancer, the addition of ovarian suppression to tamoxifen resulted in significantly higher 8‐year rates of both disease‐free and overall survival than tamox ifen alone and the use of exemestane plus ovarian suppression resulted in even higher rates of freedom from recurrence.
Abstract: Background In the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT) and the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Trial (TEXT), the 5-year rates of recurrence of breast cancer were significantly lower among premenopausal women who received the aromatase inhibitor exemestane plus ovarian suppression than among those who received tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression. The addition of ovarian suppression to tamoxifen did not result in significantly lower recurrence rates than those with tamoxifen alone. Here, we report the updated results from the two trials. Methods Premenopausal women were randomly assigned to receive 5 years of tamoxifen, tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression, or exemestane plus ovarian suppression in SOFT and to receive tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression or exemestane plus ovarian suppression in TEXT. Randomization was stratified according to the receipt of chemotherapy. Results In SOFT, the 8-year disease-free survival rate was 78.9% with tamoxifen alone, 83.2% with tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression,...
385 citations
Cited by
More filters
McGill University1, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich2, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust3, Autonomous University of Barcelona4, Geelong Hospital5, University of Marburg6, University of Edinburgh7, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul8, National Taiwan University9, University of Copenhagen10, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center11, Russian Academy12, University of Düsseldorf13, University of Hamburg14, University of British Columbia15, University of Bern16, Hoffmann-La Roche17, Université libre de Bruxelles18, Harvard University19
TL;DR: One year of treatment with trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves disease-free survival among women with HER2-positive breast cancer.
Abstract: background Trastuzumab, a recombinant monoclonal antibody against HER2, has clinical activity in advanced breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. We investigated its efficacy and safety after excision of early-stage breast cancer and completion of chemotherapy. methods This international, multicenter, randomized trial compared one or two years of trastuzumab given every three weeks with observation in patients with HER2-positive and either node-negative or node-positive breast cancer who had completed locoregional therapy and at least four cycles of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. results Data were available for 1694 women randomly assigned to two years of treatment with trastuzumab, 1694 women assigned to one year of trastuzumab, and 1693 women assigned to observation. We report here the results only of treatment with trastuzumab for one year or observation. At the first planned interim analysis (median follow-up of one year), 347 events (recurrence of breast cancer, contralateral breast cancer, second nonbreast malignant disease, or death) were observed: 127 events in the trastuzumab group and 220 in the observation group. The unadjusted hazard ratio for an event in the trastuzumab group, as compared with the observation group, was 0.54 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.43 to 0.67; P<0.0001 by the log-rank test, crossing the interim analysis boundary), representing an absolute benefit in terms of disease-free survival at two years of 8.4 percentage points. Overall survival in the two groups was not significantly different (29 deaths with trastuzumab vs. 37 with observation). Severe cardiotoxicity developed in 0.5 percent of the women who were treated with trastuzumab. conclusions One year of treatment with trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves disease-free survival among women with HER2-positive breast cancer. (clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT 00045032.)
4,815 citations
TL;DR: It is found that variations in local treatment that substantially affect the risk of locoregional recurrence could also affect long-term breast cancer mortality, and that avoidance of a local recurrence in the conserved breast is recommended.
4,743 citations
TL;DR: A testing algorithm that relies on accurate, reproducible assay performance, including newly available types of brightfield ISH, is proposed and strongly recommends validation of laboratory assay or modifications, use of standardized operating procedures, and compliance with new testing criteria to be monitored.
Abstract: Purpose To develop a guideline to improve the accuracy of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in invasive breast cancer and its utility as a predictive marker. Methods The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel, which conducted a systematic review of the literature and developed recommendations for optimal HER2 testing performance. The guideline was reviewed by selected experts and approved by the board of directors for both organizations. Results Approximately 20% of current HER2 testing may be inaccurate. When carefully validated testing is performed, available data do not clearly demonstrate the superiority of either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH) as a predictor of benefit from anti-HER2 therapy. Recommendations The panel recommends that HER2 status should be determined for all invasive breast cancer. A testing algorithm that relies on accurate, reproducible assay performance, including newly...
4,560 citations
University of Utah1, University of Michigan2, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust3, Ohio State University4, Indiana University5, St. Jude Medical Center6, University of Queensland7, Beaumont Hospital8, BC Cancer Agency9, University of Rochester10, Harvard University11, American Society of Clinical Oncology12, National Institutes of Health13, Baylor College of Medicine14, Sungkyunkwan University15, University of the West of England16, Tohoku University17, Radboud University Nijmegen18, University of Toronto19, Saint Joseph Mercy Health System20, Mayo Clinic21, University of Washington22, Memorial Hospital of South Bend23, University of Texas at Austin24, Johns Hopkins University25
TL;DR: An international Expert Panel that conducted a systematic review and evaluation of the literature and developed recommendations for optimal IHC ER/PgR testing performance recommended that ER and PgR status be determined on all invasive breast cancers and breast cancer recurrences.
Abstract: Purpose To develop a guideline to improve the accuracy of immunohistochemical (IHC) estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) testing in breast cancer and the utility of these receptors as predictive markers. Methods The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists convened an international Expert Panel that conducted a systematic review and evaluation of the literature in partnership with Cancer Care Ontario and developed recommendations for optimal IHC ER/PgR testing performance. Results Up to 20% of current IHC determinations of ER and PgR testing worldwide may be inaccurate (false negative or false positive). Most of the issues with testing have occurred because of variation in preanalytic variables, thresholds for positivity, and interpretation criteria. Recommendations The Panel recommends that ER and PgR status be determined on all invasive breast cancers and breast cancer recurrences. A testing algorithm that relies on accurate, reproducible assay performance is proposed. Elements to reliably reduce assay variation are specified. It is recommended that ER and PgR assays be considered positive if there are at least 1% positive tumor nuclei in the sample on testing in the presence of expected reactivity of internal (normal epithelial elements) and external controls. The absence of benefit from endocrine therapy for women with ER-negative invasive breast cancers has been confirmed in large overviews of randomized clinical trials.
3,902 citations
TL;DR: Using the GLOBOCAN and Cancer Incidence in Five Continents databases, overall cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence, age-adjusted temporal trends, and age-specific incidence patterns in selected geographic regions of the world are described.
Abstract: Efforts to reduce global cancer disparities begin with an understanding of geographic patterns in cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence. Using the GLOBOCAN (2002) and Cancer Incidence in Five Continents databases, we describe overall cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence, age-adjusted temporal trends, and age-specific incidence patterns in selected geographic regions of the world. For the eight most common malignancies-cancers of lung, breast, colon and rectum, stomach, prostate, liver, cervix, and esophagus-the most important risk factors, cancer prevention and control measures are briefly reviewed. In 2002, an estimated 11 million new cancer cases and 7 million cancer deaths were reported worldwide; nearly 25 million persons were living with cancer. Among the eight most common cancers, global disparities in cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence are evident, likely due to complex interactions of nonmodifiable (ie, genetic susceptibility and aging) and modifiable risk factors (ie, tobacco, infectious agents, diet, and physical activity). Indeed, when risk factors among populations are intertwined with differences in individual behaviors, cultural beliefs and practices, socioeconomic conditions, and health care systems, global cancer disparities are inevitable. For the eight most common cancers, priorities for reducing cancer disparities are discussed.
3,433 citations