scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

A. Gennai

Bio: A. Gennai is an academic researcher from University of Birmingham. The author has contributed to research in topics: Einstein Telescope & Gravitational-wave astronomy. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 5 publications receiving 1682 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
M. Punturo, M. R. Abernathy1, Fausto Acernese2, Benjamin William Allen3, Nils Andersson4, K. G. Arun5, Fabrizio Barone2, B. Barr1, M. Barsuglia6, M. G. Beker7, N. Beveridge1, S. Birindelli8, Suvadeep Bose9, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, Tomasz Bulik10, Enrico Calloni, G. Cella, E. Chassande Mottin6, Simon Chelkowski11, Andrea Chincarini, John A. Clark12, E. Coccia13, C. N. Colacino, J. Colas, A. Cumming1, L. Cunningham1, E. Cuoco, S. L. Danilishin14, Karsten Danzmann3, G. De Luca, R. De Salvo15, T. Dent12, R. De Rosa, L. Di Fiore, A. Di Virgilio, M. Doets7, V. Fafone13, Paolo Falferi16, R. Flaminio17, J. Franc17, F. Frasconi, Andreas Freise11, Paul Fulda11, Jonathan R. Gair18, G. Gemme, A. Gennai11, A. Giazotto, Kostas Glampedakis19, M. Granata6, Hartmut Grote3, G. M. Guidi20, G. D. Hammond1, Mark Hannam21, Jan Harms22, D. Heinert23, Martin Hendry1, Ik Siong Heng1, Eric Hennes7, Stefan Hild1, J. H. Hough, Sascha Husa24, S. H. Huttner1, Gareth Jones12, F. Y. Khalili14, Keiko Kokeyama11, Kostas D. Kokkotas19, Badri Krishnan24, M. Lorenzini, Harald Lück3, Ettore Majorana, Ilya Mandel25, Vuk Mandic22, I. W. Martin1, C. Michel17, Y. Minenkov13, N. Morgado17, Simona Mosca, B. Mours26, H. Müller–Ebhardt3, P. G. Murray1, Ronny Nawrodt1, John Nelson1, Richard O'Shaughnessy27, Christian D. Ott15, C. Palomba, A. Paoli, G. Parguez, A. Pasqualetti, R. Passaquieti28, D. Passuello, L. Pinard17, Rosa Poggiani28, P. Popolizio, Mirko Prato, P. Puppo, D. S. Rabeling7, P. Rapagnani29, Jocelyn Read24, Tania Regimbau8, H. Rehbein3, Stuart Reid1, Luciano Rezzolla24, F. Ricci29, F. Richard, A. Rocchi, Sheila Rowan1, Albrecht Rüdiger3, Benoit Sassolas17, Bangalore Suryanarayana Sathyaprakash12, Roman Schnabel3, C. Schwarz, Paul Seidel, Alicia M. Sintes24, Kentaro Somiya15, Fiona C. Speirits1, Kenneth A. Strain1, S. E. Strigin14, P. J. Sutton12, S. P. Tarabrin14, Andre Thüring3, J. F. J. van den Brand7, C. van Leewen7, M. van Veggel1, C. Van Den Broeck12, Alberto Vecchio11, John Veitch11, F. Vetrano20, A. Viceré20, Sergey P. Vyatchanin14, Benno Willke3, Graham Woan1, P. Wolfango30, Kazuhiro Yamamoto3 
TL;DR: The third-generation ground-based observatory Einstein Telescope (ET) project as discussed by the authors is currently in its design study phase, and it can be seen as the first step in this direction.
Abstract: Advanced gravitational wave interferometers, currently under realization, will soon permit the detection of gravitational waves from astronomical sources. To open the era of precision gravitational wave astronomy, a further substantial improvement in sensitivity is required. The future space-based Laser Interferometer Space Antenna and the third-generation ground-based observatory Einstein Telescope (ET) promise to achieve the required sensitivity improvements in frequency ranges. The vastly improved sensitivity of the third generation of gravitational wave observatories could permit detailed measurements of the sources' physical parameters and could complement, in a multi-messenger approach, the observation of signals emitted by cosmological sources obtained through other kinds of telescopes. This paper describes the progress of the ET project which is currently in its design study phase.

1,497 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Stefan Hild1, M. R. Abernathy1, Fausto Acernese2, Pau Amaro-Seoane3, Nils Andersson4, K. G. Arun5, Fabrizio Barone2, B. Barr1, M. Barsuglia, Mark Beker, N. Beveridge1, S. Birindelli6, Suvadeep Bose7, L. Bosi, S. Braccini8, C. Bradaschia8, Tomasz Bulik9, Enrico Calloni10, Giancarlo Cella8, E. Chassande Mottin, S. Chelkowski11, Andrea Chincarini, James S. Clark12, E. Coccia13, C. Colacino8, J. Colas, A. Cumming1, L. Cunningham1, E. Cuoco, S. L. Danilishin14, Karsten Danzmann3, R. De Salvo15, T. Dent12, R. De Rosa10, L. Di Fiore10, A. Di Virgilio8, M. Doets16, V. Fafone13, Paolo Falferi17, R. Flaminio, J. Franc, F. Frasconi8, Andreas Freise11, D. Friedrich18, Paul Fulda11, Jonathan R. Gair19, Gianluca Gemme, E. Genin, A. Gennai11, A. Giazotto8, Kostas Glampedakis20, Christian Gräf3, M. Granata, Hartmut Grote3, G. M. Guidi21, A. Gurkovsky14, G. D. Hammond1, Mark Hannam12, Jan Harms15, D. Heinert22, Martin Hendry1, Ik Siong Heng1, E. Hennes, J. H. Hough, Sascha Husa23, S. H. Huttner1, G. T. Jones12, F. Y. Khalili14, Keiko Kokeyama11, Kostas D. Kokkotas20, Badri Krishnan3, Tjonnie G. F. Li, M. Lorenzini, H. Lück3, Ettore Majorana, Ilya Mandel24, Vuk Mandic25, M. Mantovani8, I. W. Martin1, Christine Michel, Y. Minenkov13, N. Morgado, S. Mosca10, B. Mours26, Helge Müller-Ebhardt18, P. G. Murray1, Ronny Nawrodt1, Ronny Nawrodt22, John Nelson1, Richard O'Shaughnessy27, Christian D. Ott15, C. Palomba, Angela Delli Paoli, G. Parguez, A. Pasqualetti, R. Passaquieti8, R. Passaquieti28, D. Passuello8, Laurent Pinard, Wolfango Plastino29, Rosa Poggiani28, Rosa Poggiani8, P. Popolizio, Mirko Prato, M. Punturo, P. Puppo, D. S. Rabeling16, P. Rapagnani30, Jocelyn Read31, Tania Regimbau6, H. Rehbein3, S. Reid1, F. Ricci30, F. Richard, A. Rocchi, Sheila Rowan1, A. Rüdiger3, Lucía Santamaría15, Benoit Sassolas, Bangalore Suryanarayana Sathyaprakash12, Roman Schnabel3, C. Schwarz22, Paul Seidel22, Alicia M. Sintes23, Kentaro Somiya15, Fiona C. Speirits1, Kenneth A. Strain1, S. E. Strigin14, P. J. Sutton12, S. P. Tarabrin18, Andre Thüring3, J. F. J. van den Brand16, M. van Veggel1, C. Van Den Broeck, Alberto Vecchio11, John Veitch12, F. Vetrano21, A. Viceré21, S. P. Vyatchanin14, Benno Willke3, Graham Woan1, Kazuhiro Yamamoto 
TL;DR: In this article, a special focus is set on evaluating the frequency band below 10 Hz where a complex mixture of seismic, gravity gradient, suspension thermal and radiation pressure noise dominates, including the most relevant fundamental noise contributions.
Abstract: Advanced gravitational wave detectors, currently under construction, are expected to directly observe gravitational wave signals of astrophysical origin. The Einstein Telescope (ET), a third-generation gravitational wave detector, has been proposed in order to fully open up the emerging field of gravitational wave astronomy. In this paper we describe sensitivity models for ET and investigate potential limits imposed by fundamental noise sources. A special focus is set on evaluating the frequency band below 10 Hz where a complex mixture of seismic, gravity gradient, suspension thermal and radiation pressure noise dominates. We develop the most accurate sensitivity model, referred to as ET-D, for a third-generation detector so far, including the most relevant fundamental noise contributions.

682 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
M. Punturo, M. R. Abernathy1, Fausto Acernese2, Benjamin William Allen3, Nils Andersson4, K. G. Arun5, Fabrizio Barone2, B. Barr1, M. Barsuglia, M. G. Beker6, N. Beveridge1, S. Birindelli7, Suvadeep Bose8, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, Tomasz Bulik9, Enrico Calloni, G. Cella, E. Chassande Mottin, Simon Chelkowski10, Andrea Chincarini, John A. Clark11, E. Coccia12, C. N. Colacino, J. Colas, A. Cumming1, L. Cunningham1, E. Cuoco, S. L. Danilishin13, Karsten Danzmann3, G. De Luca, R. De Salvo14, T. Dent11, R. T. DeRosa, L. Di Fiore, A. Di Virgilio, M. Doets6, V. Fafone12, Paolo Falferi15, R. Flaminio16, J. Franc16, F. Frasconi, Andreas Freise10, Paul Fulda10, Jonathan R. Gair17, G. Gemme, A. Gennai10, A. Giazotto, Kostas Glampedakis18, M. Granata, Hartmut Grote3, G. M. Guidi19, G. D. Hammond1, Mark Hannam20, Jan Harms21, D. Heinert22, Martin Hendry1, Ik Siong Heng1, Eric Hennes6, Stefan Hild3, J. H. Hough, Sascha Husa3, S. H. Huttner1, Gareth Jones11, F. Y. Khalili13, Keiko Kokeyama10, Kostas D. Kokkotas18, Badri Krishnan3, M. Lorenzini, Harald Lück3, Ettore Majorana, Ilya Mandel23, Vuk Mandic21, I. W. Martin1, C. Michel16, Y. Minenkov12, N. Morgado16, Simona Mosca, B. Mours24, Helge Müller-Ebhardt3, P. G. Murray1, Ronny Nawrodt1, John Nelson1, Richard O'Shaughnessy25, Christian D. Ott14, C. Palomba, A. Paoli, G. Parguez, A. Pasqualetti, R. Passaquieti26, D. Passuello, L. Pinard16, Rosa Poggiani26, P. Popolizio, Mirko Prato, P. Puppo, D. S. Rabeling6, P. Rapagnani27, Jocelyn Read3, Tania Regimbau7, H. Rehbein3, Stuart Reid1, Luciano Rezzolla3, F. Ricci27, F. Richard, A. Rocchi, Sheila Rowan1, Albrecht Rüdiger3, Benoit Sassolas16, Bangalore Suryanarayana Sathyaprakash11, Roman Schnabel3, C. Schwarz28, Paul Seidel28, Alicia M. Sintes3, Kentaro Somiya3, Fiona C. Speirits1, Kenneth A. Strain3, S. E. Strigin13, P. J. Sutton11, S. P. Tarabrin13, J. F. J. van den Brand6, C. van Leewen6, M. van Veggel1, C. Van Den Broeck11, Alberto Vecchio10, John Veitch10, F. Vetrano19, A. Viceré19, Sergey P. Vyatchanin13, Benno Willke3, Graham Woan1, P. Wolfango29, Kazuhiro Yamamoto3 
TL;DR: The status of the project Einstein Telescope (ET), a design study of a third-generation gravitational wave observatory, is reported in this paper, where an overview of the possible science reaches and the technological progress needed to realize a third generation observatory are discussed.
Abstract: Large gravitational wave interferometric detectors, like Virgo and LIGO, demonstrated the capability to reach their design sensitivity, but to transform these machines into an effective observational instrument for gravitational wave astronomy a large improvement in sensitivity is required. Advanced detectors in the near future and third-generation observatories in more than one decade will open the possibility to perform gravitational wave astronomical observations from the Earth. An overview of the possible science reaches and the technological progress needed to realize a third-generation observatory are discussed in this paper. The status of the project Einstein Telescope (ET), a design study of a third-generation gravitational wave observatory, will be reported.

319 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Stefan Hild1, M. R. Abernathy1, Fausto Acernese2, Pau Amaro-Seoane3, Nils Andersson4, K. G. Arun5, Fabrizio Barone2, B. Barr1, M. Barsuglia, Mark Beker, N. Beveridge1, S. Birindelli6, Suvadeep Bose7, L. Bosi, S. Braccini8, C. Bradaschia8, Tomasz Bulik9, Enrico Calloni10, Giancarlo Cella8, E. Chassande Mottin, S. Chelkowski11, Andrea Chincarini, James S. Clark12, E. Coccia13, C. Colacino8, J. Colas, A. Cumming1, L. Cunningham1, E. Cuoco, S. L. Danilishin14, Karsten Danzmann3, R. De Salvo15, T. Dent12, R. De Rosa10, L. Di Fiore10, A. Di Virgilio8, M. Doets16, V. Fafone13, Paolo Falferi17, R. Flaminio, J. Franc, F. Frasconi8, Andreas Freise11, D. Friedrich18, Paul Fulda11, Jonathan R. Gair19, Gianluca Gemme, E. Genin, A. Gennai11, A. Giazotto8, Kostas Glampedakis20, Christian Gräf3, M. Granata, Hartmut Grote3, G. M. Guidi21, A. Gurkovsky14, G. D. Hammond1, Mark Hannam12, Jan Harms15, D. Heinert22, Martin Hendry1, Ik Siong Heng1, E. Hennes, J. H. Hough, Sascha Husa23, S. H. Huttner1, G. T. Jones12, F. Y. Khalili14, Keiko Kokeyama11, Kostas D. Kokkotas20, Badri Krishnan3, Tjonnie G. F. Li, M. Lorenzini, H. Lück3, Ettore Majorana, Ilya Mandel24, Vuk Mandic25, M. Mantovani8, I. W. Martin1, Christine Michel, Y. Minenkov13, N. Morgado, S. Mosca10, B. Mours26, Helge Müller-Ebhardt18, P. G. Murray1, Ronny Nawrodt1, Ronny Nawrodt22, John Nelson1, Richard O'Shaughnessy27, Christian D. Ott15, C. Palomba, Angela Delli Paoli, G. Parguez, A. Pasqualetti, R. Passaquieti28, R. Passaquieti8, D. Passuello8, Laurent Pinard, Wolfango Plastino29, Rosa Poggiani28, Rosa Poggiani8, P. Popolizio, Mirko Prato, M. Punturo, P. Puppo, D. S. Rabeling16, P. Rapagnani30, Jocelyn Read31, Tania Regimbau6, H. Rehbein3, S. Reid1, F. Ricci30, F. Richard, A. Rocchi, Sheila Rowan1, A. Rüdiger3, Lucía Santamaría15, Benoit Sassolas, Bangalore Suryanarayana Sathyaprakash12, Roman Schnabel3, C. Schwarz22, Paul Seidel22, Alicia M. Sintes23, Kentaro Somiya15, Fiona C. Speirits1, Kenneth A. Strain1, S. E. Strigin14, P. J. Sutton12, S. P. Tarabrin18, Andre Thüring3, J. F. J. van den Brand16, M. van Veggel1, C. Van Den Broeck, Alberto Vecchio11, John Veitch12, F. Vetrano21, A. Viceré21, S. P. Vyatchanin14, Benno Willke3, Graham Woan1, Kazuhiro Yamamoto 
TL;DR: In this article, a special focus is set on evaluating the frequency band below 10Hz where a complex mixture of seismic, gravity gradient, suspension thermal and radiation pressure noise dominates, including the most relevant fundamental noise contributions.
Abstract: Advanced gravitational wave detectors, currently under construction, are expected to directly observe gravitational wave signals of astrophysical origin. The Einstein Telescope, a third-generation gravitational wave detector, has been proposed in order to fully open up the emerging field of gravitational wave astronomy. In this article we describe sensitivity models for the Einstein Telescope and investigate potential limits imposed by fundamental noise sources. A special focus is set on evaluating the frequency band below 10Hz where a complex mixture of seismic, gravity gradient, suspension thermal and radiation pressure noise dominates. We develop the most accurate sensitivity model, referred to as ET-D, for a third-generation detector so far, including the most relevant fundamental noise contributions.

194 citations

Bangalore Suryanarayana Sathyaprakash, M. R. Abernathy1, Fausto Acernese2, P. Amaro-Seoane3, P. Amaro-Seoane4, Nils Andersson5, K. Arun6, Fabrizio Barone2, B. Barr1, M. Barsuglia7, M. G. Beker, N. Beveridge1, S. Birindelli, Suvadeep Bose8, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, Tomasz Bulik9, Enrico Calloni10, G. Cella, E. Chassande-Mottin7, Simon Chelkowski11, Andrea Chincarini, John A. Clark12, E. Coccia13, C. N. Colacino, J. Colas, A. Cumming1, Liam Cunningham1, E. Cuoco, S. L. Danilishin14, Karsten Danzmann15, R. De Salvo16, T. Dent12, R. De Rosa10, L. Di Fiore10, A. Di Virgilio, M. Doets17, V. Fafone13, Paolo Falferi18, R. Flaminio, J. Franc, F. Frasconi, Andreas Freise11, D. Friedrich15, Paul Fulda11, Jonathan R. Gair19, G. Gemme, E. Genin, A. Gennai11, A. Giazotto, Kostas Glampedakis20, C. Gräf15, M. Granata7, Hartmut Grote15, G. M. Guidi21, A. Gurkovsky, G. D. Hammond1, Mark Hannam12, Jan Harms16, D. Heinert22, Martin Hendry1, Ik Siong Heng1, Eric Hennes, Stefan Hild1, J. H. Hough, Sascha Husa23, S. H. Huttner1, Gareth Jones12, F. Y. Khalili14, Keiko Kokeyama11, Kostas D. Kokkotas20, Badri Krishnan15, Tenglin Li, M. Lorenzini, Harald Lück15, Ettore Majorana, Ilya Mandel11, Ilya Mandel24, Vuk Mandic25, M. Mantovani, I. W. Martin1, C. Michel, Y. Minenkov13, N. Morgado, S. Mosca10, B. Mours26, H. Müller-Ebhardt15, P. G. Murray1, Ronny Nawrodt1, Ronny Nawrodt22, John Nelson1, Richard O'Shaughnessy27, Christian D. Ott16, C. Palomba, A. Paoli, G. Parguez, A. Pasqualetti, R. Passaquieti28, D. Passuello, L. Pinard, Wolfango Plastino29, Rosa Poggiani28, P. Popolizio, Mirko Prato, M. Punturo, P. Puppo, D. S. Rabeling17, István Rácz, P. Rapagnani30, Jocelyn Read31, T. Regimbau, H. Rehbein15, Stuart Reid1, Luciano Rezzolla4, F. Ricci30, F. Richard, A. Rocchi, Sheila Rowan1, A. Rüdiger15, Lucía Santamaría16, B. Sassolas, Roman Schnabel15, C. Schwarz22, Paul Seidel22, A. M. Sintes32, Kentaro Somiya16, F. C. Speirits1, K. Speirits1, K. A. Strain1, S. E. Strigin14, Patrick J. Sutton12, S. P. Tarabrin15, A. Thüring15, J. F. J. van den Brand17, M. van Veggel1, C. Van Den Broeck, Alberto Vecchio11, John Veitch12, F. Vetrano21, A. Viceré21, Sergey P. Vyatchanin14, B. Vyatchanin1, Graham Woan1, Kazuhiro Yamamoto 
05 Aug 2011
TL;DR: The advanced interferometer network will herald a new era in observational astronomy as mentioned in this paper, and there is a very strong science case to go beyond the advanced detector network and build detectors that operate in a frequency range from 1 Hz to 10 kHz, with sensitivity a factor 10 better in amplitude.
Abstract: The advanced interferometer network will herald a new era in observational astronomy. There is a very strong science case to go beyond the advanced detector network and build detectors that operate in a frequency range from 1 Hz to 10 kHz, with sensitivity a factor 10 better in amplitude. Such detectors will be able to probe a range of topics in nuclear physics, astronomy, cosmology and fundamental physics, providing insights into many unsolved problems in these areas.

8 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
M. Punturo, M. R. Abernathy1, Fausto Acernese2, Benjamin William Allen3, Nils Andersson4, K. G. Arun5, Fabrizio Barone2, B. Barr1, M. Barsuglia6, M. G. Beker7, N. Beveridge1, S. Birindelli8, Suvadeep Bose9, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, Tomasz Bulik10, Enrico Calloni, G. Cella, E. Chassande Mottin6, Simon Chelkowski11, Andrea Chincarini, John A. Clark12, E. Coccia13, C. N. Colacino, J. Colas, A. Cumming1, L. Cunningham1, E. Cuoco, S. L. Danilishin14, Karsten Danzmann3, G. De Luca, R. De Salvo15, T. Dent12, R. De Rosa, L. Di Fiore, A. Di Virgilio, M. Doets7, V. Fafone13, Paolo Falferi16, R. Flaminio17, J. Franc17, F. Frasconi, Andreas Freise11, Paul Fulda11, Jonathan R. Gair18, G. Gemme, A. Gennai11, A. Giazotto, Kostas Glampedakis19, M. Granata6, Hartmut Grote3, G. M. Guidi20, G. D. Hammond1, Mark Hannam21, Jan Harms22, D. Heinert23, Martin Hendry1, Ik Siong Heng1, Eric Hennes7, Stefan Hild1, J. H. Hough, Sascha Husa24, S. H. Huttner1, Gareth Jones12, F. Y. Khalili14, Keiko Kokeyama11, Kostas D. Kokkotas19, Badri Krishnan24, M. Lorenzini, Harald Lück3, Ettore Majorana, Ilya Mandel25, Vuk Mandic22, I. W. Martin1, C. Michel17, Y. Minenkov13, N. Morgado17, Simona Mosca, B. Mours26, H. Müller–Ebhardt3, P. G. Murray1, Ronny Nawrodt1, John Nelson1, Richard O'Shaughnessy27, Christian D. Ott15, C. Palomba, A. Paoli, G. Parguez, A. Pasqualetti, R. Passaquieti28, D. Passuello, L. Pinard17, Rosa Poggiani28, P. Popolizio, Mirko Prato, P. Puppo, D. S. Rabeling7, P. Rapagnani29, Jocelyn Read24, Tania Regimbau8, H. Rehbein3, Stuart Reid1, Luciano Rezzolla24, F. Ricci29, F. Richard, A. Rocchi, Sheila Rowan1, Albrecht Rüdiger3, Benoit Sassolas17, Bangalore Suryanarayana Sathyaprakash12, Roman Schnabel3, C. Schwarz, Paul Seidel, Alicia M. Sintes24, Kentaro Somiya15, Fiona C. Speirits1, Kenneth A. Strain1, S. E. Strigin14, P. J. Sutton12, S. P. Tarabrin14, Andre Thüring3, J. F. J. van den Brand7, C. van Leewen7, M. van Veggel1, C. Van Den Broeck12, Alberto Vecchio11, John Veitch11, F. Vetrano20, A. Viceré20, Sergey P. Vyatchanin14, Benno Willke3, Graham Woan1, P. Wolfango30, Kazuhiro Yamamoto3 
TL;DR: The third-generation ground-based observatory Einstein Telescope (ET) project as discussed by the authors is currently in its design study phase, and it can be seen as the first step in this direction.
Abstract: Advanced gravitational wave interferometers, currently under realization, will soon permit the detection of gravitational waves from astronomical sources. To open the era of precision gravitational wave astronomy, a further substantial improvement in sensitivity is required. The future space-based Laser Interferometer Space Antenna and the third-generation ground-based observatory Einstein Telescope (ET) promise to achieve the required sensitivity improvements in frequency ranges. The vastly improved sensitivity of the third generation of gravitational wave observatories could permit detailed measurements of the sources' physical parameters and could complement, in a multi-messenger approach, the observation of signals emitted by cosmological sources obtained through other kinds of telescopes. This paper describes the progress of the ET project which is currently in its design study phase.

1,497 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a review of recent achievements on various aspects of black hole perturbations are discussed such as decoupling of variables in the perturbation equations, quasinormal modes (with special emphasis on various numerical and analytical methods of calculations), late-time tails, gravitational stability, anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory interpretation, and holographic superconductors.
Abstract: Perturbations of black holes, initially considered in the context of possible observations of astrophysical effects, have been studied for the past 10 years in string theory, brane-world models, and quantum gravity. Through the famous gauge/gravity duality, proper oscillations of perturbed black holes, called quasinormal modes, allow for the description of the hydrodynamic regime in the dual finite temperature field theory at strong coupling, which can be used to predict the behavior of quark-gluon plasmas in the nonperturbative regime. On the other hand, the brane-world scenarios assume the existence of extra dimensions in nature, so that multidimensional black holes can be formed in a laboratory experiment. All this stimulated active research in the field of perturbations of higher-dimensional black holes and branes during recent years. In this review recent achievements on various aspects of black hole perturbations are discussed such as decoupling of variables in the perturbation equations, quasinormal modes (with special emphasis on various numerical and analytical methods of calculations), late-time tails, gravitational stability, anti--de Sitter/conformal field theory interpretation of quasinormal modes, and holographic superconductors. We also touch on state-of-the-art observational possibilities for detecting quasinormal modes of black holes.

1,070 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
R. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2, Sheelu Abraham3, Fausto Acernese4  +1332 moreInstitutions (150)
TL;DR: It is inferred that the primary black hole mass lies within the gap produced by (pulsational) pair-instability supernova processes, with only a 0.32% probability of being below 65 M⊙, which can be considered an intermediate mass black hole (IMBH).
Abstract: On May 21, 2019 at 03:02:29 UTC Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo observed a short duration gravitational-wave signal, GW190521, with a three-detector network signal-to-noise ratio of 14.7, and an estimated false-alarm rate of 1 in 4900 yr using a search sensitive to generic transients. If GW190521 is from a quasicircular binary inspiral, then the detected signal is consistent with the merger of two black holes with masses of 85_{-14}^{+21} M_{⊙} and 66_{-18}^{+17} M_{⊙} (90% credible intervals). We infer that the primary black hole mass lies within the gap produced by (pulsational) pair-instability supernova processes, with only a 0.32% probability of being below 65 M_{⊙}. We calculate the mass of the remnant to be 142_{-16}^{+28} M_{⊙}, which can be considered an intermediate mass black hole (IMBH). The luminosity distance of the source is 5.3_{-2.6}^{+2.4} Gpc, corresponding to a redshift of 0.82_{-0.34}^{+0.28}. The inferred rate of mergers similar to GW190521 is 0.13_{-0.11}^{+0.30} Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}.

876 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
J. Abadie1, B. P. Abbott1, R. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2  +611 moreInstitutions (63)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors demonstrate the squeezed-light enhancement of GEO600, which will be the GW observatory operated by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration in its search for GWs for the next 3-4 years.
Abstract: Around the globe several observatories are seeking the first direct detection of gravitational waves (GWs). These waves are predicted by Einstein’s general theory of relativity1 and are generated, for example, by black-hole binary systems2. Present GW detectors are Michelson-type kilometre-scale laser interferometers measuring the distance changes between mirrors suspended in vacuum. The sensitivity of these detectors at frequencies above several hundred hertz is limited by the vacuum (zero-point) fluctuations of the electromagnetic field. A quantum technology—the injection of squeezed light3—offers a solution to this problem. Here we demonstrate the squeezed-light enhancement of GEO 600, which will be the GW observatory operated by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration in its search for GWs for the next 3–4 years. GEO 600 now operates with its best ever sensitivity, which proves the usefulness of quantum entanglement and the qualification of squeezed light as a key technology for future GW astronomy4.

810 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
B. P. Abbott1, Richard J. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2, M. R. Abernathy3  +1135 moreInstitutions (139)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present possible observing scenarios for the Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA gravitational-wave detectors over the next decade, with the intention of providing information to the astronomy community to facilitate planning for multi-messenger astronomy with gravitational waves.
Abstract: We present possible observing scenarios for the Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA gravitational-wave detectors over the next decade, with the intention of providing information to the astronomy community to facilitate planning for multi-messenger astronomy with gravitational waves. We estimate the sensitivity of the network to transient gravitational-wave signals, and study the capability of the network to determine the sky location of the source. We report our findings for gravitational-wave transients, with particular focus on gravitational-wave signals from the inspiral of binary neutron star systems, which are the most promising targets for multi-messenger astronomy. The ability to localize the sources of the detected signals depends on the geographical distribution of the detectors and their relative sensitivity, and 90% credible regions can be as large as thousands of square degrees when only two sensitive detectors are operational. Determining the sky position of a significant fraction of detected signals to areas of 5– 20 deg2 requires at least three detectors of sensitivity within a factor of ∼2 of each other and with a broad frequency bandwidth. When all detectors, including KAGRA and the third LIGO detector in India, reach design sensitivity, a significant fraction of gravitational-wave signals will be localized to a few square degrees by gravitational-wave observations alone.

804 citations