scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

A.L.M. Verbeek

Bio: A.L.M. Verbeek is an academic researcher from Radboud University Nijmegen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mass screening & Breast cancer. The author has an hindex of 26, co-authored 42 publications receiving 3007 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To assess the potential of breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 82 mastectomy specimens were studied by Egan's serial subgross method and found adequate excision of many DCIS will require a wide excision involving up to a whole quadrant.

561 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results up to the end of 1981 show that the odds ratio of screened vs unscreened subjects among women who died from breast cancer compared with women who did not, was 0·48 (95% confidence interval 0·23-1·00) in all age groups.

448 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The objective was to assess effectiveness of treatment to cure Helicobacter pylori infection and to establish a database of patients treated with this drug.
Abstract: Objective : To assess effectiveness of treatment to cure Helicobacter pylori infection. Data Synthesis : Meta-analysis of 666 manuscripts (full papers, abstracts, letters to the editor) identified through Medline and a manual search (1986 to January 1998). Data were overviewed by regression analysis with weighted random effects models. Subjects : 53 228 patients with H. pylori infection. Interventions : Patients were treated with 132 different medication combinations. Main outcome measure : Cure of H. pylori infection per protocol and intention-to-treat basis at least 28 days after treatment. Results The nationality of the patients and therapeutic regimen have a significant impact on the results, after correction for the heterogeneity in the precision of the cure rate caused by different study sizes and random effect for study. On the basis of the original sample size, cure rates of 80–85% were achieved using combinations of a proton-pump inhibitor or ranitidine bismuth citrate with two antibiotics including clarithromycin, amoxycillin and metronidazole or tinidazole. Comparable cure rates were also achieved using a combination of a proton-pump inhibitor or H2-receptor antagonist with bismuth subcitrate or tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate, metronidazole and tetracycline. The dose of clarithromycin influenced cure rates. Treatment duration did not influence the outcome. Conclusion Several therapeutic regimens are eligible to cure H. pylori infection. However, none of the medication combinations were able to cure H. pylori infection in more than 85% of the patients assessed by intention-to-treat. The countries in which the studies were performed also had a significant impact on eradication rates.

262 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Several methods can be used to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection, and most of them require upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for retrieval of a gastric biopsy specimen.
Abstract: Several methods can be used to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection. Most of them require upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for retrieval of a gastric biopsy specimen. For serology, no upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is required, but blood must be obtained to detect H. pylori antibodies. H. pylori

147 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In the early screening years (rounds 2-4) high breast density had an unfavourable effect on screening performance, and nowadays the situation has improved with respect to PV+, survival and detecting tumours in dense breasts with a lead time of up to one year, but little improvement has occurred in the detection of tumours with a leading time greater than one year.
Abstract: Study objective—To study the implications of breast density on mammographic screening performance. Design—Screening outcomes of women with dense breast patterns were compared with those of women with lucent breast patterns (dense > 25% densities, lucent< 25% densities); the women were screened in diVerent periods (before/after improvement of the mammographic technique in 1982). Setting—Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 1977‐1994. Participants—Between 1977 and 1994, 73 525 repeat screenings were performed in 19 152 participants (aged 50‐69 years) in the Nijmegen breast cancer screening programme (repeat screenings were defined as mammographic examinations that were preceded by an examination in the previous screening round). Participants were screened biennially with mammography.There were 258 screen detected and 145 interval cancers. Main results—Before 1982 (rounds 2‐4) the predictive value of a positive screening test (PV+) was lower in women with dense breasts than in those with lucent breasts (dense 29% v lucent 52%, p=0.003). Also, the ratio of screen detected cancers to the total number of screen detected plus interval cancers (as a proxy for sensitivity) was lower in this group (based on a one year interval: dense 63%vlucent 92%, p=0.001 and based on a two year interval: dense 41% v lucent 68%, p=0.002). Moreover, the survival rate was less favourable for those with dense breasts (p=0.07). In rounds 5‐10, there were no important differences with respect to PV+ (dense 66% v lucent 62%, p=0.57) or survival (p=0.48). Moreover, sensitivity based on a one year interval was nearly as high in women with dense breasts as in those with lucent breasts (85% v 86%, p=0.75). However, based on a two year interval sensitivity was lower (dense 59% v lucent 72%, p=0.04). Conclusions—In the early screening years (rounds 2‐4) high breast density had an unfavourable eVect on screening performance. Nowadays, the situation has improved with respect to PV+, survival and detecting tumours in dense breasts with a lead time of up to one year, but little improvement has occurred in the detection of tumours with a lead time greater than one year. (J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:267‐271)

129 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review considers current knowledge about the epidemiology and transmission of H. pylori, as well as the role of this infectious agent in the pathogenesis of upper gastrointestinal tract disease.
Abstract: H. pylori is one of the most common bacterial infections in human beings, and its discovery 20 years ago altered the diagnosis and treatment of gastroduodenal disease. This review considers current knowledge about the epidemiology and transmission of H. pylori, as well as the role of this infectious agent in the pathogenesis of upper gastrointestinal tract disease. Diagnostic approaches, indications for therapy, and measures of therapeutic efficacy are reviewed.

2,817 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jun 2007-Gut
TL;DR: H pylori eradication is less effective than proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment in preventing ulcer recurrence in long term NSAID users and a test and treat strategy using a non-invasive test is recommended in adult patients with persistent dyspepsia under the age of 45.
Abstract: Background: Guidelines on the management of Helicobacter pylori , which cover indications for management and treatment strategies, were produced in 2000. Aims: To update the guidelines at the European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG) Third Maastricht Consensus Conference, with emphasis on the potential of H pylori eradication for the prevention of gastric cancer. Results: Eradication of H pylori infection is recommended in ( a ) patients with gastroduodenal diseases such as peptic ulcer disease and low grade gastric, mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma; ( b ) patients with atrophic gastritis; ( c ) first degree relatives of patients with gastric cancer; ( d ) patients with unexplained iron deficiency anaemia; and ( e ) patients with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Recurrent abdominal pain in children is not an indication for a “test and treat” strategy if other causes are excluded. Eradication of H pylori infection ( a ) does not cause gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) or exacerbate GORD, and ( b ) may prevent peptic ulcer in patients who are naive users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). H pylori eradication is less effective than proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment in preventing ulcer recurrence in long term NSAID users. In primary care a test and treat strategy using a non-invasive test is recommended in adult patients with persistent dyspepsia under the age of 45. The urea breath test, stool antigen tests, and serological kits with a high accuracy are non-invasive tests which should be used for the diagnosis of H pylori infection. Triple therapy using a PPI with clarithromycin and amoxicillin or metronidazole given twice daily remains the recommended first choice treatment. Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, if available, is also a first choice treatment option. Rescue treatment should be based on antimicrobial susceptibility. Conclusion: The global burden of gastric cancer is considerable but varies geographically. Eradication of H pylori infection has the potential to reduce the risk of gastric cancer development.

2,266 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2017-Gut
TL;DR: This fifth edition of the Maastricht Consensus Report describes how experts from 24 countries examined new data related to H. pylori infection in the various clinical scenarios and provided recommendations on the basis of the best available evidence and relevance.
Abstract: Important progress has been made in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection and in this fifth edition of the Maastricht Consensus Report, key aspects related to the clinical role of H. pylori were re-evaluated in 2015. In the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Conference, 43 experts from 24 countries examined new data related to H. pylori in five subdivided workshops: (1) Indications/Associations, (2) Diagnosis, (3) Treatment, (4) Prevention/Public Health, (5) H. pylori and the Gastric Microbiota. The results of the individual workshops were presented to a final consensus voting that included all participants. Recommendations are provided on the basis of the best available evidence and relevance to the management of H. pylori infection in the various clinical scenarios.

2,219 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review explains some of the heterogeneity in associations of breast density with breast cancer risk and shows that, in well-conducted studies, this is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer.
Abstract: Mammographic features are associated with breast cancer risk, but estimates of the strength of the association vary markedly between studies, and it is uncertain whether the association is modified by other risk factors. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of publications on mammographic patterns in relation to breast cancer risk. Random effects models were used to combine study-specific relative risks. Aggregate data for > 14,000 cases and 226,000 noncases from 42 studies were included. Associations were consistent in studies conducted in the general population but were highly heterogeneous in symptomatic populations. They were much stronger for percentage density than for Wolfe grade or Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification and were 20% to 30% stronger in studies of incident than of prevalent cancer. No differences were observed by age/menopausal status at mammography or by ethnicity. For percentage density measured using prediagnostic mammograms, combined relative risks of incident breast cancer in the general population were 1.79 (95% confidence interval, 1.48-2.16), 2.11 (1.70-2.63), 2.92 (2.49-3.42), and 4.64 (3.64-5.91) for categories 5% to 24%, 25% to 49%, 50% to 74%, and > or = 75% relative to < 5%. This association remained strong after excluding cancers diagnosed in the first-year postmammography. This review explains some of the heterogeneity in associations of breast density with breast cancer risk and shows that, in well-conducted studies, this is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer. It also refutes the suggestion that the association is an artifact of masking bias or that it is only present in a restricted age range.

1,887 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: 7 years after the start of the study the excess of stage I cancers in the study group largely outweighs the deficit of advanced cancers, and the results to the end of 1984 show a 31% reduction in mortality from breast cancer and a 25% reduced in the rate of stage II or more advanced breast cancers.

1,696 citations