scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

A. Moretti

Bio: A. Moretti is an academic researcher from Brera Astronomical Observatory. The author has contributed to research in topics: Gamma-ray burst & Afterglow. The author has an hindex of 26, co-authored 93 publications receiving 6097 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Swift Gamma-Ray Explorer (XRT) as mentioned in this paper uses a mirror set built for JET-X and an XMM/EPIC MOS CCD detector to provide a sensitive broad-band (0.2-10 keV) X-ray imager with effective area of > 120 cm^2 at 1.5 keV, field of view of 23.6 x23.6 arcminutes, and angular resolution of 18 arcseconds (HPD).
Abstract: The Swift Gamma-Ray Explorer is designed to make prompt multiwavelength observations of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and GRB afterglows. The X-ray Telescope (XRT) enables Swift to determine GRB positions with a few arcseconds accuracy within 100 seconds of the burst onset. The XRT utilizes a mirror set built for JET-X and an XMM/EPIC MOS CCD detector to provide a sensitive broad-band (0.2-10 keV) X-ray imager with effective area of > 120 cm^2 at 1.5 keV, field of view of 23.6 x 23.6 arcminutes, and angular resolution of 18 arcseconds (HPD). The detection sensitivity is 2x10^-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 in 10^4 seconds. The instrument is designed to provide automated source detection and position reporting within 5 seconds of target acquisition. It can also measure the redshifts of GRBs with Fe line emission or other spectral features. The XRT operates in an auto-exposure mode, adjusting the CCD readout mode automatically to optimize the science return for each frame as the source intensity fades. The XRT will measure spectra and lightcurves of the GRB afterglow beginning about a minute after the burst and will follow each burst for days or weeks.

2,104 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Neil Gehrels1, Craig L. Sarazin2, P. T. O'Brien3, Bing Zhang4, L. M. Barbier1, Scott Barthelmy1, A. J. Blustin5, David N. Burrows6, J. K. Cannizzo7, J. K. Cannizzo1, Jay Cummings1, Jay Cummings8, Michael R. Goad3, Stephen T. Holland1, Stephen T. Holland9, Cheryl Hurkett3, J. A. Kennea6, Andrew J. Levan3, C. B. Markwardt10, C. B. Markwardt1, Keith O. Mason5, Peter Mészáros6, M. J. Page5, David Palmer11, Evert Rol3, T. Sakamoto1, T. Sakamoto8, Richard Willingale3, Lorella Angelini1, Lorella Angelini7, Andrew P. Beardmore3, Patricia T. Boyd7, Patricia T. Boyd1, A. A. Breeveld5, Sergio Campana12, M. M. Chester6, Guido Chincarini13, Guido Chincarini14, L. R. Cominsky15, Giancarlo Cusumano14, M. de Pasquale5, Edward E. Fenimore11, Paolo Giommi, Caryl Gronwall6, Dirk Grupe6, Joanne E. Hill6, D. Hinshaw1, Jens Hjorth16, D. Hullinger10, D. Hullinger1, Kevin Hurley17, Sylvio Klose, Shiho Kobayashi6, Chryssa Kouveliotou18, Hans A. Krimm1, Hans A. Krimm9, Vanessa Mangano12, F. E. Marshall1, Katherine E. McGowan5, A. Moretti12, Richard Mushotzky1, Kazuhiro Nakazawa, Jay P. Norris1, John A. Nousek6, J. P. Osborne3, K. L. Page3, A. M. Parsons1, Sandeep K. Patel9, M. Perri, T. S. Poole5, P. Romano12, P. W. A. Roming6, Stuart Rosen5, G. Sato, Patricia Schady5, Alan P. Smale, Jesper Sollerman19, R. L. C. Starling20, Martin Still9, Martin Still1, Masaya Suzuki21, Gianpiero Tagliaferri12, Tadayuki Takahashi, Makoto Tashiro21, Jack Tueller1, Alan A. Wells3, Nicholas E. White1, Ralph A. M. J. Wijers20 
06 Oct 2005-Nature
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reported the detection of the X-ray afterglow from the short burst GRB 050509B and its location on the sky is near a luminous, non-star-forming elliptical galaxy at a redshift of 0.225.
Abstract: Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are either ‘long and soft’, or ‘short and hard’. The long-duration type leave a strong afterglow and have been extensively studied. So we have a good idea of what causes them: explosions of massive stars in distant star-forming galaxies. Short GRBs, with no strong afterglow, were harder to pin down. The Swift satellite, launched last November, is designed to study bursts as soon as they happen. Having shown its worth with long GRBs (reported in the 18 August issue of Nature), Swift has now bagged a short burst, GRB 050509B, precisely measured its location and detected the X-ray afterglow. Four papers this week report on this and another recent short burst. Now, over 20 years after they were first recognized, the likely origin of the short GRBs is revealed as a merger between neutron stars of a binary system and the instantaneous production of a black hole. Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) come in two classes1: long (> 2 s), soft-spectrum bursts and short, hard events. Most progress has been made on understanding the long GRBs, which are typically observed at high redshift (z ≈ 1) and found in subluminous star-forming host galaxies. They are likely to be produced in core-collapse explosions of massive stars2. In contrast, no short GRB had been accurately (< 10″) and rapidly (minutes) located. Here we report the detection of the X-ray afterglow from—and the localization of—the short burst GRB 050509B. Its position on the sky is near a luminous, non-star-forming elliptical galaxy at a redshift of 0.225, which is the location one would expect3,4 if the origin of this GRB is through the merger of neutron-star or black-hole binaries. The X-ray afterglow was weak and faded below the detection limit within a few hours; no optical afterglow was detected to stringent limits, explaining the past difficulty in localizing short GRBs.

590 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Judith Racusin1, S. V. Karpov2, Marcin Sokolowski, Jonathan Granot3, Xue-Feng Wu4, Xue-Feng Wu1, V. Pal'Shin, Stefano Covino5, A. J. van der Horst, S. R. Oates6, Patricia Schady6, Robert J. Smith7, J. Cummings8, R. L. C. Starling9, Lech Wiktor Piotrowski10, Bing Zhang11, P. A. Evans9, Stephen T. Holland12, Stephen T. Holland8, Katarzyna Małek, M. T. Page6, L. Vetere1, Raffaella Margutti13, C. Guidorzi7, C. Guidorzi5, Atish Kamble14, P. A. Curran14, A. P. Beardmore9, Chryssa Kouveliotou15, Lech Mankiewicz, A. Melandri7, P. T. O'Brien9, K. L. Page9, Tsvi Piran16, Nial R. Tanvir9, Grzegorz Wrochna, R. Aptekar, Scott Barthelmy8, Corrado Bartolini17, G. M. Beskin2, S. Bondar, Malcolm N. Bremer, Sergio Campana5, A. J. Castro-Tirado18, A. Cucchiara1, M. Cwiok10, P. D'Avanzo5, Valerio D'Elia, M. Della Valle19, A. de Ugarte Postigo19, W. Dominik10, A. D. Falcone1, Fabrizio Fiore, D. B. Fox1, D. D. Frederiks, Andrew S. Fruchter20, Dino Fugazza5, M. A. Garrett21, M. A. Garrett22, M. A. Garrett23, Neil Gehrels8, S. Golenetskii, Andreja Gomboc24, Javier Gorosabel18, G. Greco17, Adriano Guarnieri17, Stefan Immler8, Martin Jelínek18, Grzegorz Kasprowicz25, V. La Parola26, Andrew J. Levan27, V. Mangano26, E. P. Mazets, E. Molinari5, A. Moretti5, Krzysztof Nawrocki, P. Oleynik, J. P. Osborne9, C. Pagani1, S. B. Pandey28, Zsolt Paragi29, M. Perri, Adalberto Piccioni17, Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz30, P. W. A. Roming1, Iain A. Steele7, Richard G. Strom14, Richard G. Strom21, Vincenzo Testa, Gino Tosti31, M. Ulanov, Klaas Wiersema9, Ralph A. M. J. Wijers14, J. M. Winters, Aleksander Filip Zarnecki10, F. M. Zerbi5, Peter Mészáros1, Guido Chincarini5, Guido Chincarini13, David N. Burrows1 
11 Sep 2008-Nature
TL;DR: Observations of the extraordinarily bright prompt optical and γ-ray emission of GRB 080319B that provide diagnostics within seconds of its formation, followed by broadband observations of the afterglow decay that continued for weeks.
Abstract: Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) release copious amounts of energy across the entire electromagnetic spectrum, and so provide a window into the process of black hole formation from the collapse of massive stars Previous early optical observations of even the most exceptional GRBs (990123 and 030329) lacked both the temporal resolution to probe the optical flash in detail and the accuracy needed to trace the transition from the prompt emission within the outflow to external shocks caused by interaction with the progenitor environment Here we report observations of the extraordinarily bright prompt optical and gamma-ray emission of GRB 080319B that provide diagnostics within seconds of its formation, followed by broadband observations of the afterglow decay that continued for weeks We show that the prompt emission stems from a single physical region, implying an extremely relativistic outflow that propagates within the narrow inner core of a two-component jet

524 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the X-ray source number counts in two energy bands (0.5-2 and 2-10 keV) from a very large source sample: they combine data of six different surveys, both shallow wide field and deep pencil beam, performed with three different satellites (ROSAT, Chandra and XMM-Newton).
Abstract: We present the X-ray source number counts in two energy bands (0.5-2 and 2-10 keV) from a very large source sample: we combine data of six different surveys, both shallow wide field and deep pencil beam, performed with three different satellites (ROSAT, Chandra and XMM-Newton). The sample covers with good statistics the largest possible flux range so far: [2.4*10^-17 - 10^-11] cgs in the soft band and [2.1*10^-16 - 8*10^{-12}]cgs in the hard band. Integrating the flux distributions over this range and taking into account the (small) contribution of the brightest sources we derive the flux density generated by discrete sources in both bands. After a critical review of the literature values of the total Cosmic X--Ray Background (CXB) we conclude that, with the present data, the 94.3%, and 88.8% of the soft and hard CXB can be ascribed to discrete source emission. If we extrapolate the analytical form of the Log N--Log S distribution beyond the flux limit of our catalog in the soft band we find that the flux from discrete sources at ~3*10^-18 cgs is consistent with the entire CXB, whereas in the hard band it accounts for only 93% of the total CXB at most, hinting for a faint and obscured population to arise at even fainter fluxes.

404 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors presented the X-ray source number counts in two energy bands (0.5-2 and 2-10 keV) from a very large source sample: they combine data of six different surveys, both shallow wide field and deep pencil-beam, performed with three different satellites (ROSAT, Chandra, and XMM-Newton).
Abstract: We present the X-ray source number counts in two energy bands (0.5-2 and 2-10 keV) from a very large source sample: we combine data of six different surveys, both shallow wide-field and deep pencil-beam, performed with three different satellites (ROSAT, Chandra, and XMM-Newton). The sample covers with good statistics the largest possible flux range so far: 2.4 × 10-17 to 10-11 ergs s-1 cm-2 in the soft band and 2.1 × 10-16 to 8 × 10-12 ergs s-1 cm-2 in the hard band. Integrating the flux distributions over this range and taking into account the (small) contribution of the brightest sources, we derive the flux density generated by discrete sources in both bands. After a critical review of the literature values of the total cosmic X-ray background (CXB) we conclude that, with the present data, 94.3 % and 88.8 % of the soft and hard CXB can be ascribed to discrete source emission. If we extrapolate the analytical form of the log N-log S distribution beyond the flux limit of our catalog in the soft band we find that the flux from discrete sources at ~3 × 10-18 ergs s-1 cm-2 is consistent with the entire CXB, whereas in the hard band it accounts for only 93% of the total CXB at most, hinting at a faint and obscured population to arise at even fainter fluxes.

373 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A binary neutron star coalescence candidate (later designated GW170817) with merger time 12:41:04 UTC was observed through gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors.
Abstract: On 2017 August 17 a binary neutron star coalescence candidate (later designated GW170817) with merger time 12:41:04 UTC was observed through gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors. The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor independently detected a gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A) with a time delay of $\sim 1.7\,{\rm{s}}$ with respect to the merger time. From the gravitational-wave signal, the source was initially localized to a sky region of 31 deg2 at a luminosity distance of ${40}_{-8}^{+8}$ Mpc and with component masses consistent with neutron stars. The component masses were later measured to be in the range 0.86 to 2.26 $\,{M}_{\odot }$. An extensive observing campaign was launched across the electromagnetic spectrum leading to the discovery of a bright optical transient (SSS17a, now with the IAU identification of AT 2017gfo) in NGC 4993 (at $\sim 40\,{\rm{Mpc}}$) less than 11 hours after the merger by the One-Meter, Two Hemisphere (1M2H) team using the 1 m Swope Telescope. The optical transient was independently detected by multiple teams within an hour. Subsequent observations targeted the object and its environment. Early ultraviolet observations revealed a blue transient that faded within 48 hours. Optical and infrared observations showed a redward evolution over ~10 days. Following early non-detections, X-ray and radio emission were discovered at the transient's position $\sim 9$ and $\sim 16$ days, respectively, after the merger. Both the X-ray and radio emission likely arise from a physical process that is distinct from the one that generates the UV/optical/near-infrared emission. No ultra-high-energy gamma-rays and no neutrino candidates consistent with the source were found in follow-up searches. These observations support the hypothesis that GW170817 was produced by the merger of two neutron stars in NGC 4993 followed by a short gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A) and a kilonova/macronova powered by the radioactive decay of r-process nuclei synthesized in the ejecta.

2,746 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
B. P. Abbott1, Richard J. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2, Fausto Acernese3  +1195 moreInstitutions (139)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used the observed time delay of $(+1.74\pm 0.05)\,{\rm{s}}$ between GRB 170817A and GW170817 to constrain the difference between the speed of gravity and speed of light to be between $-3
Abstract: On 2017 August 17, the gravitational-wave event GW170817 was observed by the Advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors, and the gamma-ray burst (GRB) GRB 170817A was observed independently by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor, and the Anti-Coincidence Shield for the Spectrometer for the International Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory. The probability of the near-simultaneous temporal and spatial observation of GRB 170817A and GW170817 occurring by chance is $5.0\times {10}^{-8}$. We therefore confirm binary neutron star mergers as a progenitor of short GRBs. The association of GW170817 and GRB 170817A provides new insight into fundamental physics and the origin of short GRBs. We use the observed time delay of $(+1.74\pm 0.05)\,{\rm{s}}$ between GRB 170817A and GW170817 to: (i) constrain the difference between the speed of gravity and the speed of light to be between $-3\times {10}^{-15}$ and $+7\times {10}^{-16}$ times the speed of light, (ii) place new bounds on the violation of Lorentz invariance, (iii) present a new test of the equivalence principle by constraining the Shapiro delay between gravitational and electromagnetic radiation. We also use the time delay to constrain the size and bulk Lorentz factor of the region emitting the gamma-rays. GRB 170817A is the closest short GRB with a known distance, but is between 2 and 6 orders of magnitude less energetic than other bursts with measured redshift. A new generation of gamma-ray detectors, and subthreshold searches in existing detectors, will be essential to detect similar short bursts at greater distances. Finally, we predict a joint detection rate for the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor and the Advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors of 0.1–1.4 per year during the 2018–2019 observing run and 0.3–1.7 per year at design sensitivity.

2,633 citations

01 Jan 2005
TL;DR: The Monthly Notices as mentioned in this paper is one of the three largest general primary astronomical research publications in the world, published by the Royal Astronomical Society (RAE), and it is the most widely cited journal in astronomy.
Abstract: Monthly Notices is one of the three largest general primary astronomical research publications. It is an international journal, published by the Royal Astronomical Society. This article 1 describes its publication policy and practice.

2,091 citations

15 Mar 1979
TL;DR: In this article, the experimental estimation of parameters for models can be solved through use of the likelihood ratio test, with particular attention to photon counting experiments, and procedures presented solve a greater range of problems than those currently in use, yet are no more difficult to apply.
Abstract: Many problems in the experimental estimation of parameters for models can be solved through use of the likelihood ratio test. Applications of the likelihood ratio, with particular attention to photon counting experiments, are discussed. The procedures presented solve a greater range of problems than those currently in use, yet are no more difficult to apply. The procedures are proved analytically, and examples from current problems in astronomy are discussed.

1,748 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A homogeneous X-rays analysis of all 318 gamma-ray bursts detected by the X-ray telescope (XRT) on the Swift satellite up to 2008 July 23 is presented; this represents the largest sample ofX-ray GRB data published to date.
Abstract: We present a homogeneous X-ray analysis of all 318 gamma-ray bursts detected by the X-ray telescope (XRT) on the Swift satellite up to 2008 July 23; this represents the largest sample of X-ray GRB data published to date. In Sections 2-3, we detail the methods which the Swift-XRT team has developed to produce the enhanced positions, light curves, hardness ratios and spectra presented in this paper. Software using these methods continues to create such products for all new GRBs observed by the Swift-XRT. We also detail web-based tools allowing users to create these products for any object observed by the XRT, not just GRBs. In Sections 4-6, we present the results of our analysis of GRBs, including probability distribution functions of the temporal and spectral properties of the sample. We demonstrate evidence for a consistent underlying behaviour which can produce a range of light-curve morphologies, and attempt to interpret this behaviour in the framework of external forward shock emission. We find several difficulties, in particular that reconciliation of our data with the forward shock model requires energy injection to continue for days to weeks.

1,613 citations