Global strategy for asthma management and prevention

Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma

Asthma is a serious health problem throughout the world During the past two decades, many scientific advances have improved our understanding of asthma and ability to manage and control it effectively However, recommendations for asthma care need to be adapted to local conditions, resources and services Since it was formed in 1993, the Global Initiative for Asthma, a network of individuals, organisations and public health officials, has played a leading role in disseminating information about the care of patients with asthma based on a process of continuous review of published scientific investigations A comprehensive workshop report entitled "A Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention", first published in 1995, has been widely adopted, translated and reproduced, and forms the basis for many national guidelines The 2006 report contains important new themes First, it asserts that "it is reasonable to expect that in most patients with asthma, control of the disease can and should be achieved and maintained," and recommends a change in approach to asthma management, with asthma control, rather than asthma severity, being the focus of treatment decisions The importance of the patient-care giver partnership and guided self-management, along with setting goals for treatment, are also emphasised

https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/31/1/143.full.pdf

Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary.

National Asthma Education and Prevention Program.

Introduction Acute Inflammation and Brief Symptoms Mechanisms: Experimentally Induced Allergic Reactions Clinical Consequences and Treatment Chronic Inflammation Site of the Inflammation in Asthma Cell Survival in Airway Tissues Characteristics of Chronic Inflammation Chronic Inflammation in the Different Forms of Asthma Clinic Consequences Treatment of Exacerbations Onset and Duration of Treatment Remodeling of the Airways Characteristics of Airways Remodeling in Asthma Clinical Consequences Radiographic Findings Treatment and Prevention of Airways Remodeling Conclusions

https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9903102

Asthma. From bronchoconstriction to airways inflammation and remodeling.

Background The role of long-acting, inhaled β2-agonists in treating asthma is uncertain. In a double-blind study, we evaluated the effects of adding inhaled formoterol to both lower and higher doses of the inhaled glucocorticoid budesonide. Methods After a four-week run-in period of treatment with budesonide (800 μg twice daily), 852 patients being treated with glucocorticoids were randomly assigned to one of four treatments given twice daily by means of a dry-powder inhaler (Turbuhaler): 100 μg of budesonide plus placebo, 100 μg of budesonide plus 12 μg of formoterol, 400 μg of budesonide plus placebo, or 400 μg of budesonide plus 12 μg of formoterol. Terbutaline was permitted as needed. Treatment continued for one year; we compared the frequency of exacerbations of asthma, symptoms, and lung function in the four groups. A severe exacerbation was defined by the need for oral glucocorticoids or a decrease in the peak flow to more than 30 percent below the base-line value on two consecutive days. Results T...

Effect of inhaled formoterol and budesonide on exacerbations of asthma. Formoterol and Corticosteroids Establishing Therapy (FACET) International Study Group

The identification, prevention, and prompt treatment of exacerbations are major objectives of asthma management. We looked at change in PEF, symptoms, and use of rescue beta-agonists during the 425 severe exacerbations that occurred during a 12-mo parallel group study (FACET) in which low and high doses of budesonide with and without formoterol were compared in patients with asthma. Oral corticosteroids were prescribed for severe exacerbations, the main study end point, defined as the need for a course of oral corticosteroids (n = 311) or a reduction in morning PEF of > 30% on two consecutive days. PEF, symptoms, and bronchodilator use over the 14 d before and after the exacerbation were obtained from diary cards. Exacerbations were characterized by a gradual fall in PEF over several days, followed by more rapid changes over 2 to 3 d; an increase in symptoms and rescue beta-agonist use occurred in parallel, and both the severity and time course of the changes were similar in all treatment groups. Exacerbations identified by the need for oral corticosteroids were associated with more symptoms and smaller changes in PEF than those identified on the basis of PEF criteria. Female sex was the main patient characteristic associated with an increased risk of having a severe exacerbation. Exacerbations may be characterized predominantly by change in symptoms or change in PEF, but the pattern was not affected by the dose of inhaled corticosteroid or by whether the patient was taking formoterol.

Exacerbations of asthma: a descriptive study of 425 severe exacerbations. The FACET International Study Group.

The Formoterol and Corticosteroids Establishing Therapy (FACET) study has provided the first opportunity to examine the long-term effects of inhaled steroids and long-acting beta2-agonists on asthma-specific quality of life. The objectives of the present study were to: evaluate the effects of long-term (1 yr) formoterol and increasing doses of budesonide on asthma quality of life; 2) to determine whether initial improvements in quality of life are sustained when improvements in clinical indices persist; and 3) to evaluate the long-term relationship between changes in clinical indices and changes in quality of life. Of the 852 asthmatic adults enrolled, 470 from five countries participated in this quality of life evaluation. After a 4-week run-in on 1,600 microg budesonide, patients were randomized to either 200 microg (Bud200) or 800 microg budesonide (Bud800) in combination with either 24 microg formoterol (F) or placebo daily for 1 yr. The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) was completed and conventional clinical indices measured at enrolment and randomization and on seven occasions during the following 12 months. During the run-in, there was an improvement in AQLQ score (changes (delta) in overall score approximately 0.50; p<0.0001). After randomization, there was a further improvement in the Bud800+F group (delta=0.21; p=0.028). One month post-randomization, improvements in all groups stabilized and were sustained throughout the 12 months in a pattern very similar to that observed for the conventional clinical indices. The correlation of individual patient changes in clinical indices and changes in AQLQ score during the 12-month randomized period were weak to moderate (maximum r=0.51). Improvements in quality of life, which were greatest in the 800 microg budesonide plus 24 microg formoterol group, were sustained throughout the 12 months in a similar manner to the clinical indices. Long-term changes in conventional clinical indices cannot be used to predict the effect of treatment on individual patient experience.

https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/14/5/1038.full.pdf

Asthma quality of life during 1 year of treatment with budesonide with or without formoterol

BACKGROUND--Formoterol and salmeterol are new long acting beta 2 adrenoceptor agonists. The maximum relaxant effect, potency and functional antagonism against carbachol induced contraction for salmeterol, formoterol and salbutamol have been compared in the guinea pig isolated trachea. In addition, the possibility of inducing a non-beta adrenoceptor mediated relaxation by salmeterol was studied. METHODS--Concentration response experiments were conducted with isolated tracheal preparations (n = 4-6 in all experiments), precontracted by carbachol to cause either 40% (60 nmol/l), 80% (0.3 mumol/l) or 100% (3 mumol/l, supramaximal) of the maximum contraction. Each beta agonist was added cumulatively at each level of precontraction. Additional cumulative concentration response experiments were conducted for salmeterol alone at the highest level of precontraction, with and without beta blockade by sotalol (1 mmol/l). With the drug concentrations which produced the maximum response and the highest level of precontraction, the relaxation of formoterol (10 nmol/l) and salmeterol (1 mumol/l) was also compared non-cumulatively. Finally, with the corresponding drug concentrations and precontraction, the relaxant effect was compared for formoterol (10 nmol/l) in salmeterol relaxed airways with that of salmeterol (1 mumol/l) in formoterol relaxed airways. RESULTS--The increase in carbachol concentration from 60 nmol/l to 3 mumol/l induced a rightward shift in the mean (SE) concentration (log steps) causing 50% maximum relaxation for salmeterol (0.73 (0.17)), formoterol (0.85 (0.18)), and salbutamol (1.13 (0.11)). Significant differences in the maximum relaxant effect were shown at the highest level of precontraction only, with a remaining active tension of percentage precontraction of 27% (4%) for 1 mumol/l salbutamol and 35% (3%) for 10 nmol/l formoterol compared with 50% (2%) for 1 mumol/l salmeterol. The rank order of potency was: formoterol > salbutamol approximately salmeterol at all levels of precontraction (-log EC50: 9.32 (0.05) for formoterol, 7.82 (0.08) for salbutamol, and 7.50 (0.13) for salmeterol at 80% maximum precontraction). Beta blockade by sotalol (1 mmol/l) significantly inhibited the relaxation induced by salmeterol (1 mumol/l) (remaining active tension: 104% (1%) v 71% (11%) of precontraction) but not the relaxation induced by salmeterol (10 mumol/l) (remaining active tension: 75% (5%) v 71% (12%) of precontraction). In the non-cumulative experiments, formoterol displayed more relaxant effect than salmeterol (remaining active tension: 51% (6%) v 65% (6%) of precontraction). Finally, formoterol significantly relaxed salmeterol relaxed airways (relaxant effect: 22% (8%) of precontraction) whereas there was no significant response to salmeterol in formoterol relaxed airways (relaxant effect: 5% (12%) of precontraction). CONCLUSIONS--In the guinea pig isolated trachea, formoterol and salbutamol produce more relaxant effect than salmeterol, suggesting that salmeterol is a partial beta 2 agonist. Very high concentrations of salmeterol may induce non-beta adrenoceptor mediated relaxation. Formoterol is more potent than both salbutamol and salmeterol. There is no pronounced difference in the magnitude of antagonism against carbachol induced contractions between salmeterol, formoterol, and salbutamol.

https://thorax.bmj.com/content/thoraxjnl/48/5/547.full.pdf

Salmeterol, formoterol, and salbutamol in the isolated guinea pig trachea: differences in maximum relaxant effect and potency but not in functional antagonism

A Ullman

Papers

Effect of inhaled formoterol and budesonide on exacerbations of asthma. Formoterol and Corticosteroids Establishing Therapy (FACET) International Study Group

Exacerbations of asthma: a descriptive study of 425 severe exacerbations. The FACET International Study Group.

Asthma quality of life during 1 year of treatment with budesonide with or without formoterol

Salmeterol, formoterol, and salbutamol in the isolated guinea pig trachea: differences in maximum relaxant effect and potency but not in functional antagonism

Effects of Early Intervention With Inhaled Budesonide on Lung Function in Newly Diagnosed Asthma