scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Abbasali Karimi

Bio: Abbasali Karimi is an academic researcher from Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The author has contributed to research in topics: Coronary artery disease & Coronary artery bypass surgery. The author has an hindex of 21, co-authored 113 publications receiving 2317 citations. Previous affiliations of Abbasali Karimi include Sharif University of Technology & University of Cologne.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present guidelines for the management of severe head injury in adults as evolved by the European Brain Injury Consortium (EBC) and discuss the importance of preventing and treating secondary insults and the principles on which treatment is based.
Abstract: Guidelines for the management of severe head injury in adults as evolved by the European Brain Injury Consortium are presented and discussed. The importance of preventing and treating secondary insults is emphasized and the principles on which treatment is based are reviewed. Guidelines presented are of a pragmatic nature, based on consensus and expert opinion, covering the treatment from accident site to intensive care unit. Specific aspects pertaining to the conduct of clinical trials in head injury are highlighted. The adopted approach is further discussed in relation to other approaches to the development of guidelines, such as evidence based analysis.

550 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Comparisons of the data from different parts of Europe showed substantial similarities and also differences that may reflect variations in policy for admission of the head injury to `neuro' units, and evolution in methods of assessment, investigation and management.
Abstract: To provide a picture of contemporary practice, a survey was carried out of severely and moderately head injured patients admitted to 67 'neuro' centres in 12 European countries 1,005 adult head injuries were recruited over a three month period Sixty items of information on demography, clinical features, investigations, management and early complications were captured on a simple, two-page questionnaire and, information on outcome at six months on a third page The median age of the subjects was 38 years, 74% were male and 51% injured in road traffic accidents; 57% of patients were transferred to the 'neuro' centre from another hospital Assessment of clinical responsiveness was limited by the use of sedation and intubation and information from four early time points (pre-hospital, arrival at the Accident and Emergency department, post-resuscitation, and arrival at the 'neuro' unit) was combined to stratify the subjects as severe (58%), moderate (17%) or intermediate (19%) In 48% of patients classified the CT scan showed features of a 'mass lesion' and in 40% showed a subarachnoid haemorrhage Fifty-five centres provided the data on outcome for 94% of the cases recruited in these centres six months after injury 31% died, 3% were vegetative, 16% severely disabled, 20% moderately disabled and 31% had made a good recovery Comparison of the data from different parts of Europe showed differences in the frequency of secondary transfer, cause of injury, occurrence of major extracranial injury, CT scan findings, intracranial operation, clinical severity of injury and utilisation of the components of intensive care and the occurrence of a favourable outcome, although the latter difference was not statistically significant when variations in the initial severity of injury were taken into account The findings in the present survey are compared with newly analysed information for three previous large series: the International Data Bank involving the UK, the Netherlands and the USA, the North American Traumatic Coma Data Bank, and data from four centres in the UK The comparisons showed substantial similarities and also differences that may reflect variations in policy for admission of the head injury to 'neuro' units, and evolution in methods of assessment, investigation and management The effects of these differences on outcome requires further, rigorous prospective study

376 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Rarely reported previously, the two risk factors of hypertension and the female gender were significant risk factors for developingternal wound infection in 9201 patients who underwent CABG at Tehran Heart Center between January 2002 and February 2006.
Abstract: Sternal wound infection (SWI) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication of cardiac surgery. Predisposing factors for SWI are multiple with varied frequencies in different studies. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, risk factors, and mortality of SWI after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at Tehran Heart Center. This study prospectively evaluated multiple risk factors for SWI in 9201 patients who underwent CABG at Tehran Heart Center between January 2002 and February 2006. Cases of SWI were confirmed based on the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Deep SWI (bone and mediastinitis) was categorized according to the Oakley classification. In the study period, 9201 CABGs were performed with a total SWI rate of 0.47 percent (44 cases) and deep SWI of 0.22 percent (21 cases). Perioperative (in-hospital) mortality was 9.1% for total SWI and about 14% for deep SWI versus 1.1% for non-SWI CABG patients. Female gender, preoperative hypertension, high functional class, diabetes mellitus, obesity, prolonged intubation time (more than 48 h), and re-exploration for bleeding were significant risk factors for developing SWI (p = 0.05) in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, hypertension (OR = 10.7), re-exploration (OR = 13.4), and female gender (OR = 2.7) were identified as significant predictors of SWI (p < 0.05 for all). The rate of SWI was relatively similar in 3 groups of prophylactic antibiotic regimen (Cefazolin, Cefazolin + Gentamycin and Cefazolin + Amikacin: 0.5%, 0.5%, and 0.34% respectively). Rarely reported previously, the two risk factors of hypertension and the female gender were significant risk factors in our study. Conversely, some other risk factors such as cigarette smoking and age mentioned as significant in other reports were not significant in our study. Further studies are needed for better documentation.

171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a cross-sectional study was conducted on 2405 patients admitted to the Angiographic Ward at Tehran Hospital to investigate the effects of opium consumption on coronary artery disease.
Abstract: BackgroundThe effects of opium consumption on coronary artery disease are still unknown.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 2405 patients admitted to the Angiographic Ward at Tehran Hea...

103 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that hyperhomocysteinemia is an independent risk factor for CAD in young patients (bellow 45 years old) – especially in men -and vitamin B12 deficiency is a preventable cause of hyperhomocytesteinemia.
Abstract: Background Hyperhomocysteinemia is known as an independent risk factor of atherosclerosis, but the probable role of hyperhomocysteinemia in premature Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is not well studied. The aim of this study was to assess the role of hyperhomocysteinemia, folate and Vitamin B12 deficiency in the development of premature CAD.

84 citations


Cited by
More filters
01 Mar 2007
TL;DR: An initiative to develop uniform standards for defining and classifying AKI and to establish a forum for multidisciplinary interaction to improve care for patients with or at risk for AKI is described.
Abstract: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complex disorder for which currently there is no accepted definition. Having a uniform standard for diagnosing and classifying AKI would enhance our ability to manage these patients. Future clinical and translational research in AKI will require collaborative networks of investigators drawn from various disciplines, dissemination of information via multidisciplinary joint conferences and publications, and improved translation of knowledge from pre-clinical research. We describe an initiative to develop uniform standards for defining and classifying AKI and to establish a forum for multidisciplinary interaction to improve care for patients with or at risk for AKI. Members representing key societies in critical care and nephrology along with additional experts in adult and pediatric AKI participated in a two day conference in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, in September 2005 and were assigned to one of three workgroups. Each group's discussions formed the basis for draft recommendations that were later refined and improved during discussion with the larger group. Dissenting opinions were also noted. The final draft recommendations were circulated to all participants and subsequently agreed upon as the consensus recommendations for this report. Participating societies endorsed the recommendations and agreed to help disseminate the results. The term AKI is proposed to represent the entire spectrum of acute renal failure. Diagnostic criteria for AKI are proposed based on acute alterations in serum creatinine or urine output. A staging system for AKI which reflects quantitative changes in serum creatinine and urine output has been developed. We describe the formation of a multidisciplinary collaborative network focused on AKI. We have proposed uniform standards for diagnosing and classifying AKI which will need to be validated in future studies. The Acute Kidney Injury Network offers a mechanism for proceeding with efforts to improve patient outcomes.

5,467 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Quantification of cerebral perfusion by monitoring of intracranial pressure and treatment of cerebral hypoperfusion decrease secondary injury and an organised trauma system that allows rapid resuscitation and transport directly to an experienced trauma centre significantly lowers mortality and morbidity.

2,400 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: New developments and current knowledge and controversies, focusing on moderate and severe TBI in adults, are summarised, with an emphasis on epidemiological monitoring, trauma organisation, and approaches to management.
Abstract: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major health and socioeconomic problem that affects all societies. In recent years, patterns of injury have been changing, with more injuries, particularly contusions, occurring in older patients. Blast injuries have been identified as a novel entity with specific characteristics. Traditional approaches to the classification of clinical severity are the subject of debate owing to the widespread policy of early sedation and ventilation in more severely injured patients, and are being supplemented with structural and functional neuroimaging. Basic science research has greatly advanced our knowledge of the mechanisms involved in secondary damage, creating opportunities for medical intervention and targeted therapies; however, translating this research into patient benefit remains a challenge. Clinical management has become much more structured and evidence based since the publication of guidelines covering many aspects of care. In this Review, we summarise new developments and current knowledge and controversies, focusing on moderate and severe TBI in adults. Suggestions are provided for the way forward, with an emphasis on epidemiological monitoring, trauma organisation, and approaches to management.

1,863 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The case burden of TBI across World Health Organization regions and World Bank income groups was sought to promote advocacy, understanding, and targeted intervention, and study quality was higher in the high-income countries (HICs) than in the low- and middle- Income countries (LMICs).
Abstract: OBJECTIVETraumatic brain injury (TBI)—the “silent epidemic”—contributes to worldwide death and disability more than any other traumatic insult. Yet, TBI incidence and distribution across regions and socioeconomic divides remain unknown. In an effort to promote advocacy, understanding, and targeted intervention, the authors sought to quantify the case burden of TBI across World Health Organization (WHO) regions and World Bank (WB) income groups.METHODSOpen-source epidemiological data on road traffic injuries (RTIs) were used to model the incidence of TBI using literature-derived ratios. First, a systematic review on the proportion of RTIs resulting in TBI was conducted, and a meta-analysis of study-derived proportions was performed. Next, a separate systematic review identified primary source studies describing mechanisms of injury contributing to TBI, and an additional meta-analysis yielded a proportion of TBI that is secondary to the mechanism of RTI. Then, the incidence of RTI as published by the Global...

1,353 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In adults with severe diffuse traumatic brain injury and refractory intracranial hypertension, early bifrontotemporoparietal decompressive craniectomy decreased intrac Cranial pressure and the length of stay in the ICU but was associated with more unfavorable outcomes.
Abstract: Patients in the craniectomy group, as compared with those in the standard-care group, had less time with intracranial pressures above the treatment threshold (P<0.001), fewer interventions for increased intracranial pressure (P<0.02 for all comparisons), and fewer days in the intensive care unit (ICU) (P<0.001). However, patients undergoing craniectomy had worse scores on the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale than those receiving standard care (odds ratio for a worse score in the craniectomy group, 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 to 3.24; P = 0.03) and a greater risk of an unfavorable outcome (odds ratio, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.14 to 4.26; P = 0.02). Rates of death at 6 months were similar in the craniectomy group (19%) and the standard-care group (18%). Conclusions In adults with severe diffuse traumatic brain injury and refractory intracranial hypertension, early bifrontotemporoparietal decompressive craniectomy decreased intracranial pressure and the length of stay in the ICU but was associated with more unfavorable outcomes. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and others; DECRA Australian Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN012605000009617.)

1,224 citations