Adel Gad

Bio: Adel Gad is an academic researcher from Karolinska Institutet. The author has contributed to research in topics: Breast cancer & Mass screening. The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 20 publications receiving 3551 citations. Previous affiliations of Adel Gad include National Board of Health and Welfare & International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results swedish two-county trial

Abstract: Background. Several studies have found a smaller effect of breast cancer screening on breast cancer mortality in women aged younger than 50 years compared with older women. Various possible reasons have been suggested for this, but none firmly is established. Methods. The Swedish Two-County Study is a randomized trial of breast cancer screening of women aged 40-74 years, comprising with 133,065 women with a 13-year follow-up of 2467 cancers. The Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project (BCDDP) is a nonrandomized screening program in the United States, with a 14-year follow-up of 3778 cancers in women aged 40-74 years. The Swedish results by age were updated. The lesser effect of screening at ages 40-49 years was investigated in terms of sojourn time (the duration of the preclinical but detectable phase) size, lymph node status, and histologic type of the tumors diagnosed in the Swedish Study and their subsequent effect on survival using survival data from both studies. Results. In the Swedish Trial, a 30% reduction in mortality associated with the invitation to screening of women aged 40-74 years was maintained after 13-years of follow-up. The reduction was 34% for women aged 50-74 years and 13% for women aged 40-49 years. Results indicated that the reduced effect on mortality for women aged 40-49 years was due to a differential effect of screening on the prognostic factors of tumor size, lymph node status, and histologic type. The mean sojourn times in the age groups 40-49 years, 50-59 years, 60-69 years, and 70-74 years were 1.7, 3.3, 3.8, and 2.6 years, respectively. Conclusions. These results suggest that much, although not all, of the smaller effect of screening on mortality in women aged 40-49 years is due to faster progression of a substantial proportion of tumors in this age group and the rapid increase in incidence during this decade of life. It is concluded that the interval between screenings should be shortened to achieve a greater benefit in this age group. It is estimated that a 19% reduction in mortality would result from an annual screening regime. Cancer 1995 ;75 :2507-17.

Breast screening, prognostic factors and survival--results from the Swedish two county study.

Abstract: The results of the Swedish two-county study are analysed with respect to tumour size, nodal status and malignancy grade, and the relationship of these prognostic factors to screening and to survival. It is shown that these factors can account for much of the differences in survival between incidence screen detected, interval and control group cancers but to a lesser extent for cancers detected at the prevalence screen where length bias is greatest. Furthermore, examination of the relationships among the prognostic factors and mode of detection indicates that malignancy grade, as a measure of inherent malignant capacity, evolves as a tumour grows. The proportion of cancers with poor malignancy grade is several fold lower for cancers of diameter less than 15 cm than for cancers greater than 30 cm, independent of the length bias of screening. The implications of these findings for screening frequency are briefly discussed.

Tumour development, histology and grade of breast cancers: Prognosis and progression

Abstract: Using 1,973 breast tumours from women aged 40-69 participating in the Swedish two-county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer, we examined the effect of histological type on prognosis and sojourn time (the duration of the preclinical screen-detectable phase) by age. The hypothesis of dedifferentiation, according to which a cancer of mixed malignancy grade drifts towards grade 3 as the more poorly differentiated part of the tumour grows faster than the well-differentiated part, was also assessed. Ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive ductal carcinoma of grade 1, mucinous carcinoma and tubular carcinoma were all associated with good survival. Ductal carcinoma of grade 3 was associated with poor survival. Ductal carcinoma of grade 2, lobular and medullary carcinoma were associated with intermediate survival. These patterns were much the same in women aged 40-49 as in women aged 50-69. In women aged 40-49, sojourn time was estimated at about 2 years regardless of histological type. For women aged 50-69, there was a marked association of sojourn time with histological type, the shortest sojourn time being observed for lobular (2 years) and medullary (1.2 years) carcinoma, and the longest for ductal carcinoma grade 1 (7.7 years) and tubular carcinoma (7.1 years). There was strong evidence of a potential to dedifferentiation. A mover-stayer mixture of Markov chain models estimated that, in women aged 40-54, 91% of ductal tumours have the potential to dedifferentiate and, in women aged 55-69, 38% of ductal tumours have such a potential.

American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer.

Abstract: Each year the American Cancer Society publishes a summary of existing recommendations for early cancer detection, including updates, and/or emerging issues that are relevant to screening for cancer. In last year's article, the guidelines regarding screening for the early detection of prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers were updated, as was the narrative pertaining to testing for early lung cancer detection. Although none of the ACS's guidelines were updated in 2001, work is proceeding on an update of screening recommendations for breast and cervical cancer and an update of these guidelines will be announced in the January/February 2003 issue of CA. As in previous issues, we review recommendations for the "cancer-related check-up," in which clinical encounters provide case-finding and health counseling opportunities. Finally, we provide an update of the most recent data pertaining to participation rates in cancer screening by age, gender, and ethnicity from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).

Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Abstract: Screening with mammography uses X-ray imaging to find breast cancer before a lump can be felt. The goal is to treat cancer earlier, when a cure is more likely. The review includes seven trials that involved 600,000 women in the age range 39 to 74 years who were randomly assigned to receive screening mammograms or not. The studies which provided the most reliable information showed that screening did not reduce breast cancer mortality. Studies that were potentially more biased (less carefully done) found that screening reduced breast cancer mortality. However, screening will result in some women getting a cancer diagnosis even though their cancer would not have led to death or sickness. Currently, it is not possible to tell which women these are, and they are therefore likely to have breasts or lumps removed and to receive radiotherapy unnecessarily. If we assume that screening reduces breast cancer mortality by 15% after 13 years of follow-up and that overdiagnosis and overtreatment is at 30%, it means that for every 2000 women invited for screening throughout 10 years, one will avoid dying of breast cancer and 10 healthy women, who would not have been diagnosed if there had not been screening, will be treated unnecessarily. Furthermore, more than 200 women will experience important psychological distress including anxiety and uncertainty for years because of false positive findings. Women invited to screening should be fully informed of both the benefits and harms. To help ensure that the requirements for informed choice for women contemplating whether or not to attend a screening programme can be met, we have written an evidence-based leaflet for lay people that is available in several languages on www.cochrane.dk. Because of substantial advances in treatment and greater breast cancer awareness since the trials were carried out, it is likely that the absolute effect of screening today is smaller than in the trials. Recent observational studies show more overdiagnosis than in the trials and very little or no reduction in the incidence of advanced cancers with screening.

Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, Physical Examination, and Breast US and Evaluation of Factors that Influence Them: An Analysis of 27,825 Patient Evaluations

Abstract: PURPOSE: To (a) determine the performance of screening mammography, ultrasonography (US), and physical examination (PE); (b) analyze the influence of age, hormonal status, and breast density; (c) compare the size and stage of tumors detected with each modality; and (d) determine which modality or combination of modalities optimize cancer detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 11,130 asymptomatic women underwent 27,825 screening sessions, (mammography and subsequent PE). Women with dense breasts subsequently underwent screening US. Abnormalities were deemed positive if biopsy findings revealed malignancy and negative if findings from biopsy or all screening examinations were negative. RESULTS: In 221 women, 246 cancers were found. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and accuracy of mammography were 77.6%, 98.8%, 99.8%, 35.8%, and 98.6%, respectively; those of PE, 27.6%, 99.4%, 99.4%, 28.9%, and 98.8%, respectively; and those of US, 75.3%, 96.8%, 99.7%, 20.5%, and 96.6%,...

An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment.

Abstract: WITH neither the time nor the resources available to prevent, detect, or treat every disorder in every patient, which preventive, diagnostic, or therapeutic interventions should take priority? When

Pathologic Basis of Disease

Abstract: Pathologic Basis of Diseaseby Stanley L. Robbins is really the fourth edition of hisPathology. Appropriate updating and addition enhance the otherwise identical format, sequence, writing, and illustrations. So many medical students have benefited from this source that it may be the best known general book in the field. I recommend it even more now. Like his former texts, this will be enjoyed for its readability. He clearly lays out a great deal of information. When he includes minutiae, the reasons are clear and one feels that all the material is pertinent. Robbins keeps the whole field in perspective—that is, he does not dwell so long or so heavily on pathologic anatomy or pathogenesis as to tempt the reader to overlook clinical presentation or prognosis. A great strength of the subject of pathology is that it bonds strongly with many other medical sciences and specialties and thus occupies the