scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Ainul Yaqin

Bio: Ainul Yaqin is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Moral reasoning. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 3 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a dilemma discussion method was used in learning syntax from Dilemma Discussion Method (DDM) with a mean score of 4.38 (greater than the criteria).

4 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
16 Aug 2021-Religion
TL;DR: The Konstanz Method of Dilemma Discussion (KMDD) as discussed by the authors is one of the most effective methods that are designed to foster moral competence and promote tolerance and equality, regardless of cultural background, religion, or views.

5 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2019
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared moral reasoning levels that Kohlberg compiled to be juxtaposed with al-Ghazali and other moslem scholars (ulama), and examined its congruence, in order to discover its similarities and differences.
Abstract: This moral reasoning study presents Islamic education perspective. In this literature study, I tried to present the concept of moral reasoning levels that Kohlberg compiled to be juxtaposed with al-Ghazali and other moslem scholars (ulama), and also examined its congruence, in order to be discovered its similarities and differences. This study will compare that moral reasoning in Ilmu al-Akhlaq had some levels as well as Kohlberg’s moral reasoning. The morals’ level; Awam, Khawas, Khawas al-khawas which refers to the concept of Tasawuf, the dimension of Islamic teaching, can be juxtaposed with the level of moral reasoning; Pre-conventional, Conventional, Post-conventional. The theoretical base of morals’ level Ilmu al-Akhlaq can be taken from the concept of taqlid (ittiba’) and ijtihad which comes from the Ushul Fiqh theory that can be matched with heteronomous and autonomous concepts in the cognitive moral theory which is being the theoretical basis of moral reasoning. Keywords—moral reasoning; Kohlberg’s theory; Islamic education perpsective

3 citations

01 Apr 2017
TL;DR: In this article, Maliki Malang et al. conducted an experimental research with a 2 x 2 factorial experimental design to evaluate the effect of moral dilemma discussion on students' moral considerations.
Abstract: Abstrak: Penggunaan metode pembelajaran moral yang sesuai akan lebih mampu meningkatkan pertimbangan moral mahasiswa. Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian eksperimen dengan desain eksperimen factorial 2 x 2. Subjek penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Maliki Malang jurusan PGMI semester dua. Jumlah mahasiswa sebagai subjek penelitian adalah 159 mahasiswa, terdiri dari kelas; IIA, IIB, IIC,IID. Penentuan kelas yang menjadi subjek penelitian dilakukan secara acak, Prosedur acak dilakukan dalam dua tahapan, yaitu random selection dan random assignment. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada rentang waktu 8 kali pertemuan yakni 18 Maret sampai dengan 6 Mei 2013. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) tingkat pertimbangan moral mahasiswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan metode diskusi dilema moral berbeda secara signifikan, bila dibandingkan dengan mahasiswa yang diajar dengan metode ceramah tanya jawab. (2) Tingkat pertimbangan moral subjek religiusitas tinggi berbeda secara signifikan, bila dibandingkan dengan subjek religiusitas rendah. (3) Tidak terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan metode dengan religiusitas terhadap tingkat pertimbangan moral mahasiswa. Abstract: The use of appropriate moral learning methods will be better able to improve students' moral considerations. This research is an experimental research with a 2 x 2 factorial experimental design. The subjects of this study were students of the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, UIN Maliki Malang, majoring in the second semester of PGMI. The number of students as research subjects was 159 students, consisting of classes; IIA, IIB, IIC, IID. The determination of the class to be the research subject was carried out randomly. The random procedure was carried out in two stages, namely random selection and random assignment. The study was conducted in a span of 8 meetings, namely March 18 to May 6, 2013. The results showed that (1) the level of moral consideration of students taught using the moral dilemma discussion method was significantly different, when compared to students taught using the question-lecture method. answer. (2) The level of moral consideration in the subject of high religiosity is significantly different, when compared with the subject of low religiosity. (3) There is no interaction between method use and religiosity towards the level of student moral considerations.

2 citations