scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Aleksandra Krajewska

Other affiliations: Polish Academy of Sciences
Bio: Aleksandra Krajewska is an academic researcher from Military University of Technology in Warsaw. The author has contributed to research in topics: Graphene & Fiber laser. The author has an hindex of 21, co-authored 53 publications receiving 1448 citations. Previous affiliations of Aleksandra Krajewska include Polish Academy of Sciences.

Papers published on a yearly basis

Papers
More filters
DOI
Claudia Backes1, Claudia Backes2, Amr M. Abdelkader3, Concepción Alonso4, Amandine Andrieux-Ledier5, Raul Arenal6, Raul Arenal7, Jon Azpeitia7, Nilanthy Balakrishnan8, Luca Banszerus9, Julien Barjon5, Ruben Bartali10, Sebastiano Bellani11, Claire Berger12, Claire Berger13, Reinhard Berger14, M.M. Bernal Ortega15, Carlo Bernard16, Peter H. Beton8, André Beyer17, Alberto Bianco18, Peter Bøggild19, Francesco Bonaccorso11, Gabriela Borin Barin20, Cristina Botas, Rebeca A. Bueno7, Daniel Carriazo21, Andres Castellanos-Gomez7, Meganne Christian, Artur Ciesielski18, Tymoteusz Ciuk, Matthew T. Cole, Jonathan N. Coleman1, Camilla Coletti11, Luigi Crema10, Huanyao Cun16, Daniela Dasler22, Domenico De Fazio3, Noel Díez, Simon Drieschner23, Georg S. Duesberg24, Roman Fasel20, Roman Fasel25, Xinliang Feng14, Alberto Fina15, Stiven Forti11, Costas Galiotis26, Costas Galiotis27, Giovanni Garberoglio28, Jorge M. Garcia7, Jose A. Garrido, Marco Gibertini29, Armin Gölzhäuser17, Julio Gómez, Thomas Greber16, Frank Hauke22, Adrian Hemmi16, Irene Hernández-Rodríguez7, Andreas Hirsch22, Stephen A. Hodge3, Yves Huttel7, Peter Uhd Jepsen19, I. Jimenez7, Ute Kaiser30, Tommi Kaplas31, HoKwon Kim29, Andras Kis29, Konstantinos Papagelis32, Konstantinos Papagelis26, Kostas Kostarelos33, Aleksandra Krajewska34, Kangho Lee24, Changfeng Li35, Harri Lipsanen35, Andrea Liscio, Martin R. Lohe14, Annick Loiseau5, Lucia Lombardi3, María Francisca López7, Oliver Martin22, Cristina Martín36, Lidia Martínez7, José A. Martín-Gago7, José I. Martínez7, Nicola Marzari29, Alvaro Mayoral6, Alvaro Mayoral37, John B. McManus1, Manuela Melucci, Javier Méndez7, Cesar Merino, Pablo Merino7, Andreas Meyer22, Elisa Miniussi16, Vaidotas Miseikis11, Neeraj Mishra11, Vittorio Morandi, Carmen Munuera7, Roberto Muñoz7, Hugo Nolan1, Luca Ortolani, A. K. Ott3, A. K. Ott38, Irene Palacio7, Vincenzo Palermo39, John Parthenios26, Iwona Pasternak40, Amalia Patanè8, Maurizio Prato41, Maurizio Prato21, Henri Prevost5, Vladimir Prudkovskiy12, Nicola M. Pugno42, Nicola M. Pugno43, Nicola M. Pugno44, Teófilo Rojo45, Antonio Rossi11, Pascal Ruffieux20, Paolo Samorì18, Léonard Schué5, Eki J. Setijadi10, Thomas Seyller46, Giorgio Speranza10, Christoph Stampfer9, I. Stenger5, Wlodek Strupinski40, Yuri Svirko31, Simone Taioli28, Simone Taioli47, Kenneth B. K. Teo, Matteo Testi10, Flavia Tomarchio3, Mauro Tortello15, Emanuele Treossi, Andrey Turchanin48, Ester Vázquez36, Elvira Villaro, Patrick Rebsdorf Whelan19, Zhenyuan Xia39, Rositza Yakimova, Sheng Yang14, G. Reza Yazdi, Chanyoung Yim24, Duhee Yoon3, Xianghui Zhang17, Xiaodong Zhuang14, Luigi Colombo49, Andrea C. Ferrari3, Mar García-Hernández7 
Trinity College, Dublin1, Heidelberg University2, University of Cambridge3, Autonomous University of Madrid4, Université Paris-Saclay5, University of Zaragoza6, Spanish National Research Council7, University of Nottingham8, RWTH Aachen University9, Kessler Foundation10, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia11, University of Grenoble12, Georgia Institute of Technology13, Dresden University of Technology14, Polytechnic University of Turin15, University of Zurich16, Bielefeld University17, University of Strasbourg18, Technical University of Denmark19, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology20, Ikerbasque21, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg22, Technische Universität München23, Bundeswehr University Munich24, University of Bern25, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas26, University of Patras27, Center for Theoretical Studies, University of Miami28, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne29, University of Ulm30, University of Eastern Finland31, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki32, University of Manchester33, Polish Academy of Sciences34, Aalto University35, University of Castilla–La Mancha36, ShanghaiTech University37, University of Exeter38, Chalmers University of Technology39, Warsaw University of Technology40, University of Trieste41, Queen Mary University of London42, University of Trento43, Instituto Politécnico Nacional44, University of the Basque Country45, Chemnitz University of Technology46, Charles University in Prague47, University of Jena48, University of Texas at Dallas49
29 Jan 2020
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an overview of the main techniques for production and processing of graphene and related materials (GRMs), as well as the key characterization procedures, adopting a 'hands-on' approach, providing practical details and procedures as derived from literature and from the authors' experience, in order to enable the reader to reproduce the results.
Abstract: © 2020 The Author(s). We present an overview of the main techniques for production and processing of graphene and related materials (GRMs), as well as the key characterization procedures. We adopt a 'hands-on' approach, providing practical details and procedures as derived from literature as well as from the authors' experience, in order to enable the reader to reproduce the results. Section I is devoted to 'bottom up' approaches, whereby individual constituents are pieced together into more complex structures. We consider graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) produced either by solution processing or by on-surface synthesis in ultra high vacuum (UHV), as well carbon nanomembranes (CNM). Production of a variety of GNRs with tailored band gaps and edge shapes is now possible. CNMs can be tuned in terms of porosity, crystallinity and electronic behaviour. Section II covers 'top down' techniques. These rely on breaking down of a layered precursor, in the graphene case usually natural crystals like graphite or artificially synthesized materials, such as highly oriented pyrolythic graphite, monolayers or few layers (FL) flakes. The main focus of this section is on various exfoliation techniques in a liquid media, either intercalation or liquid phase exfoliation (LPE). The choice of precursor, exfoliation method, medium as well as the control of parameters such as time or temperature are crucial. A definite choice of parameters and conditions yields a particular material with specific properties that makes it more suitable for a targeted application. We cover protocols for the graphitic precursors to graphene oxide (GO). This is an important material for a range of applications in biomedicine, energy storage, nanocomposites, etc. Hummers' and modified Hummers' methods are used to make GO that subsequently can be reduced to obtain reduced graphene oxide (RGO) with a variety of strategies. GO flakes are also employed to prepare three-dimensional (3d) low density structures, such as sponges, foams, hydro- or aerogels. The assembly of flakes into 3d structures can provide improved mechanical properties. Aerogels with a highly open structure, with interconnected hierarchical pores, can enhance the accessibility to the whole surface area, as relevant for a number of applications, such as energy storage. The main recipes to yield graphite intercalation compounds (GICs) are also discussed. GICs are suitable precursors for covalent functionalization of graphene, but can also be used for the synthesis of uncharged graphene in solution. Degradation of the molecules intercalated in GICs can be triggered by high temperature treatment or microwave irradiation, creating a gas pressure surge in graphite and exfoliation. Electrochemical exfoliation by applying a voltage in an electrolyte to a graphite electrode can be tuned by varying precursors, electrolytes and potential. Graphite electrodes can be either negatively or positively intercalated to obtain GICs that are subsequently exfoliated. We also discuss the materials that can be amenable to exfoliation, by employing a theoretical data-mining approach. The exfoliation of LMs usually results in a heterogeneous dispersion of flakes with different lateral size and thickness. This is a critical bottleneck for applications, and hinders the full exploitation of GRMs produced by solution processing. The establishment of procedures to control the morphological properties of exfoliated GRMs, which also need to be industrially scalable, is one of the key needs. Section III deals with the processing of flakes. (Ultra)centrifugation techniques have thus far been the most investigated to sort GRMs following ultrasonication, shear mixing, ball milling, microfluidization, and wet-jet milling. It allows sorting by size and thickness. Inks formulated from GRM dispersions can be printed using a number of processes, from inkjet to screen printing. Each technique has specific rheological requirements, as well as geometrical constraints. The solvent choice is critical, not only for the GRM stability, but also in terms of optimizing printing on different substrates, such as glass, Si, plastic, paper, etc, all with different surface energies. Chemical modifications of such substrates is also a key step. Sections IV-VII are devoted to the growth of GRMs on various substrates and their processing after growth to place them on the surface of choice for specific applications. The substrate for graphene growth is a key determinant of the nature and quality of the resultant film. The lattice mismatch between graphene and substrate influences the resulting crystallinity. Growth on insulators, such as SiO2, typically results in films with small crystallites, whereas growth on the close-packed surfaces of metals yields highly crystalline films. Section IV outlines the growth of graphene on SiC substrates. This satisfies the requirements for electronic applications, with well-defined graphene-substrate interface, low trapped impurities and no need for transfer. It also allows graphene structures and devices to be measured directly on the growth substrate. The flatness of the substrate results in graphene with minimal strain and ripples on large areas, allowing spectroscopies and surface science to be performed. We also discuss the surface engineering by intercalation of the resulting graphene, its integration with Si-wafers and the production of nanostructures with the desired shape, with no need for patterning. Section V deals with chemical vapour deposition (CVD) onto various transition metals and on insulators. Growth on Ni results in graphitized polycrystalline films. While the thickness of these films can be optimized by controlling the deposition parameters, such as the type of hydrocarbon precursor and temperature, it is difficult to attain single layer graphene (SLG) across large areas, owing to the simultaneous nucleation/growth and solution/precipitation mechanisms. The differing characteristics of polycrystalline Ni films facilitate the growth of graphitic layers at different rates, resulting in regions with differing numbers of graphitic layers. High-quality films can be grown on Cu. Cu is available in a variety of shapes and forms, such as foils, bulks, foams, thin films on other materials and powders, making it attractive for industrial production of large area graphene films. The push to use CVD graphene in applications has also triggered a research line for the direct growth on insulators. The quality of the resulting films is lower than possible to date on metals, but enough, in terms of transmittance and resistivity, for many applications as described in section V. Transfer technologies are the focus of section VI. CVD synthesis of graphene on metals and bottom up molecular approaches require SLG to be transferred to the final target substrates. To have technological impact, the advances in production of high-quality large-area CVD graphene must be commensurate with those on transfer and placement on the final substrates. This is a prerequisite for most applications, such as touch panels, anticorrosion coatings, transparent electrodes and gas sensors etc. New strategies have improved the transferred graphene quality, making CVD graphene a feasible option for CMOS foundries. Methods based on complete etching of the metal substrate in suitable etchants, typically iron chloride, ammonium persulfate, or hydrogen chloride although reliable, are time- and resourceconsuming, with damage to graphene and production of metal and etchant residues. Electrochemical delamination in a low-concentration aqueous solution is an alternative. In this case metallic substrates can be reused. Dry transfer is less detrimental for the SLG quality, enabling a deterministic transfer. There is a large range of layered materials (LMs) beyond graphite. Only few of them have been already exfoliated and fully characterized. Section VII deals with the growth of some of these materials. Amongst them, h-BN, transition metal tri- and di-chalcogenides are of paramount importance. The growth of h-BN is at present considered essential for the development of graphene in (opto) electronic applications, as h-BN is ideal as capping layer or substrate. The interesting optical and electronic properties of TMDs also require the development of scalable methods for their production. Large scale growth using chemical/physical vapour deposition or thermal assisted conversion has been thus far limited to a small set, such as h-BN or some TMDs. Heterostructures could also be directly grown.

330 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
28 Apr 2015-ACS Nano
TL;DR: Graphene layers grown on copper foils by chemical vapor deposition and transferred to silicon wafers by wet etching and electrochemical delamination methods with respect to residual submonolayer metallic contaminations are investigated.
Abstract: Integration of graphene with Si microelectronics is very appealing by offering a potentially broad range of new functionalities. New materials to be integrated with the Si platform must conform to stringent purity standards. Here, we investigate graphene layers grown on copper foils by chemical vapor deposition and transferred to silicon wafers by wet etching and electrochemical delamination methods with respect to residual submonolayer metallic contaminations. Regardless of the transfer method and associated cleaning scheme, time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and total reflection X-ray fluorescence measurements indicate that the graphene sheets are contaminated with residual metals (copper, iron) with a concentration exceeding 1013 atoms/cm2. These metal impurities appear to be partially mobile upon thermal treatment, as shown by depth profiling and reduction of the minority charge carrier diffusion length in the silicon substrate. As residual metallic impurities can significantly alter elect...

252 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This is the shortest reported pulse duration achieved from a Tm-doped laser mode-locked by graphene saturable absorber and such cost-effective and stable fiber lasers might be considered as sources for mid-infrared spectroscopy and remote sensing.
Abstract: We report an all-fiber Tm-doped fiber laser mode-locked by graphene saturable absorber. The laser emits 1.2 ps pulses at 1884 nm center wavelength with 4 nm of bandwidth and 20.5 MHz mode spacing. The graphene layers were grown on copper foils by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and transferred onto the fiber connector end. Up to date this is the shortest reported pulse duration achieved from a Tm-doped laser mode-locked by graphene saturable absorber. Such cost-effective and stable fiber lasers might be considered as sources for mid-infrared spectroscopy and remote sensing.

113 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A stretched-pulse, mode-locked Er-doped fiber laser based on graphene saturable absorber (SA) is presented and chirped pulses were compressed outside the cavity to the 88 fs using a piece of standard single mode fiber.
Abstract: In this paper a stretched-pulse, mode-locked Er-doped fiber laser based on graphene saturable absorber (SA) is presented. A 60 layer graphene/polymer composite was used as a SA. The all-fiber dispersion managed laser resonator with the repetition frequency of 21.15 MHz allows for Gaussian pulses generation with the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 48 nm. The generated chirped pulses were compressed outside the cavity to the 88 fs using a piece of standard single mode fiber. The average output power and pulse energy were of 1.5 mW and 71 pJ, respectively.

82 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors demonstrate an experimental study on the influence of the parameters of a graphene-based saturable absorber (SA) on the performance of mode-locked Er- and Tm-doped fiber lasers.
Abstract: We demonstrate an experimental study on the influence of the parameters of a graphene-based saturable absorber (SA) on the performance of mode-locked Er- and Tm-doped fiber lasers. We have fabricated a set of saturable absorbers with different number of graphene layers: 9, 12, 24, 37 and 48. Each SA was characterized in terms of nonlinear optical parameters (modulation depth, saturation intensity, saturation fluence) and tested in two state-of-the-art, low-power Er- and Tm-doped fiber lasers. Our results show, that in the Er-laser the broadest output spectrum (11 nm) and shortest pulses (345 fs) are generated using 37 layers of graphene in the SA. In case of a Tm-laser, the best performance (737 fs pulses with 5.82 nm bandwidth) was achieved with 24 layers. Additionally, we show that the modulation depth of a 9-layer SA is insufficient to initiate mode-locking in both lasers. This is the first reported comprehensive study on controlling of the parameters of a SA by scaling the number of graphene layers.

78 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors address the nature of these height fluctuations by means of straightforward atomistic Monte Carlo simulations based on a very accurate many-body interatomic potential for carbon and find that ripples spontaneously appear due to thermal fluctuations with a size distribution peaked around 70 \AA which is compatible with experimental findings (50-100 \AA) but not with the current understanding of flexible membranes.
Abstract: The stability of two-dimensional (2D) layers and membranes is subject of a long standing theoretical debate. According to the so called Mermin-Wagner theorem, long wavelength fluctuations destroy the long-range order for 2D crystals. Similarly, 2D membranes embedded in a 3D space have a tendency to be crumpled. These dangerous fluctuations can, however, be suppressed by anharmonic coupling between bending and stretching modes making that a two-dimensional membrane can exist but should present strong height fluctuations. The discovery of graphene, the first truly 2D crystal and the recent experimental observation of ripples in freely hanging graphene makes these issues especially important. Beside the academic interest, understanding the mechanisms of stability of graphene is crucial for understanding electronic transport in this material that is attracting so much interest for its unusual Dirac spectrum and electronic properties. Here we address the nature of these height fluctuations by means of straightforward atomistic Monte Carlo simulations based on a very accurate many-body interatomic potential for carbon. We find that ripples spontaneously appear due to thermal fluctuations with a size distribution peaked around 70 \AA which is compatible with experimental findings (50-100 \AA) but not with the current understanding of stability of flexible membranes. This unexpected result seems to be due to the multiplicity of chemical bonding in carbon.

1,367 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Generally defects degrade the figures of merit for devices, such as carrier mobility and conductivity, whereas doping provides a means to tune the carrier concentration in graphene thereby enabling the engineering of novel material systems.
Abstract: In this article we review Raman studies of defects and dopants in graphene as well as the importance of both for device applications. First a brief overview of Raman spectroscopy of graphene is presented. In the following section we discuss the Raman characterization of three defect types: point defects, edges, and grain boundaries. The next section reviews the dependence of the Raman spectrum on dopants and highlights several common doping techniques. In the final section, several device applications are discussed which exploit doping and defects in graphene. Generally defects degrade the figures of merit for devices, such as carrier mobility and conductivity, whereas doping provides a means to tune the carrier concentration in graphene thereby enabling the engineering of novel material systems. Accurately measuring both the defect density and doping is critical and Raman spectroscopy provides a powerful tool to accomplish this task.

566 citations