scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Alexander Barg

Other affiliations: Russian Academy of Sciences, Rutgers University, Bell Labs  ...read more
Bio: Alexander Barg is an academic researcher from University of Maryland, College Park. The author has contributed to research in topics: Linear code & Block code. The author has an hindex of 39, co-authored 250 publications receiving 6371 citations. Previous affiliations of Alexander Barg include Russian Academy of Sciences & Rutgers University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a family of locally recoverable (LRC) codes is presented that attain the maximum possible value of the distance for a given locality parameter and code cardinality.
Abstract: A code over a finite alphabet is called locally recoverable (LRC) if every symbol in the encoding is a function of a small number (at most r ) other symbols. We present a family of LRC codes that attain the maximum possible value of the distance for a given locality parameter and code cardinality. The codewords are obtained as evaluations of specially constructed polynomials over a finite field, and reduce to a Reed-Solomon code if the locality parameter r is set to be equal to the code dimension. The size of the code alphabet for most parameters is only slightly greater than the code length. The recovery procedure is performed by polynomial interpolation over r points. We also construct codes with several disjoint recovering sets for every symbol. This construction enables the system to conduct several independent and simultaneous recovery processes of a specific symbol by accessing different parts of the codeword. This property enables high availability of frequently accessed data (“hot data”).

456 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A family of LRC codes that attain the maximum possible value of the distance for a given locality parameter and code cardinality are presented.
Abstract: A code over a finite alphabet is called locally recoverable (LRC) if every symbol in the encoding is a function of a small number (at most $r$) other symbols. We present a family of LRC codes that attain the maximum possible value of the distance for a given locality parameter and code cardinality. The codewords are obtained as evaluations of specially constructed polynomials over a finite field, and reduce to a Reed-Solomon code if the locality parameter $r$ is set to be equal to the code dimension. The size of the code alphabet for most parameters is only slightly greater than the code length. The recovery procedure is performed by polynomial interpolation over $r$ points. We also construct codes with several disjoint recovering sets for every symbol. This construction enables the system to conduct several independent and simultaneous recovery processes of a specific symbol by accessing different parts of the codeword. This property enables high availability of frequently accessed data ("hot data").

408 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that for even codes the set of zero neighbors is strictly optimal in this class of algorithms, which implies that general asymptotic improvements of the zero-neighbors algorithm in the frame of gradient-like approach are impossible.
Abstract: Minimal vectors in linear codes arise in numerous applications, particularly, in constructing decoding algorithms and studying linear secret sharing schemes. However, properties and structure of minimal vectors have been largely unknown. We prove basic properties of minimal vectors in general linear codes. Then we characterize minimal vectors of a given weight and compute their number in several classes of codes, including the Hamming codes and second-order Reed-Muller codes. Further, we extend the concept of minimal vectors to codes over rings and compute them for several examples. Turning to applications, we introduce a general gradient-like decoding algorithm of which minimal-vectors decoding is an example. The complexity of minimal-vectors decoding for long codes is determined by the size of the set of minimal vectors. Therefore, we compute this size for long randomly chosen codes. Another example of algorithms in this class is given by zero-neighbors decoding. We discuss relations between the two decoding methods. In particular, we show that for even codes the set of zero neighbors is strictly optimal in this class of algorithms. This also implies that general asymptotic improvements of the zero-neighbors algorithm in the frame of gradient-like approach are impossible. We also discuss a link to secret-sharing schemes.

313 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Sep 2002
TL;DR: Minimum distances, distance distributions, and error exponents on a binary-symmetric channel (BSC) are given for typical codes from Shannon's random code ensemble and from a random linear code ensemble.
Abstract: Minimum distances, distance distributions, and error exponents on a binary-symmetric channel (BSC) are given for typical codes from Shannon's random code ensemble and for typical codes from a random linear code ensemble. A typical random code of length N and rate R is shown to have minimum distance N/spl delta//sub GV/(2R), where /spl delta//sub GV/(R) is the Gilbert-Varshamov (GV) relative distance at rate R, whereas a typical linear code (TLC) has minimum distance N/spl delta//sub GV/(R). Consequently, a TLC has a better error exponent on a BSC at low rates, namely, the expurgated error exponent.

262 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Alexander Barg1, D.Yu. Nogin
TL;DR: The Gilbert-Varshamov and Hamming bounds for packings of spheres (codes) in the Grassmann manifolds over R and C are derived.
Abstract: We derive the Gilbert-Varshamov and Hamming bounds for packings of spheres (codes) in the Grassmann manifolds over R and C. Asymptotic expressions are obtained for the geodesic metric and projection Frobenius (chordal) metric on the manifold.

238 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown analytically that the maximal rate achievable with error probability ¿ isclosely approximated by C - ¿(V/n) Q-1(¿) where C is the capacity, V is a characteristic of the channel referred to as channel dispersion, and Q is the complementary Gaussian cumulative distribution function.
Abstract: This paper investigates the maximal channel coding rate achievable at a given blocklength and error probability. For general classes of channels new achievability and converse bounds are given, which are tighter than existing bounds for wide ranges of parameters of interest, and lead to tight approximations of the maximal achievable rate for blocklengths n as short as 100. It is also shown analytically that the maximal rate achievable with error probability ? isclosely approximated by C - ?(V/n) Q-1(?) where C is the capacity, V is a characteristic of the channel referred to as channel dispersion , and Q is the complementary Gaussian cumulative distribution function.

3,242 citations

Journal ArticleDOI

2,415 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Tamar Frankel1
TL;DR: The Essay concludes that practitioners theorize, and theorists practice, use these intellectual tools differently because the goals and orientations of theorists and practitioners, and the constraints under which they act, differ.
Abstract: Much has been written about theory and practice in the law, and the tension between practitioners and theorists. Judges do not cite theoretical articles often; they rarely "apply" theories to particular cases. These arguments are not revisited. Instead the Essay explores the working and interaction of theory and practice, practitioners and theorists. The Essay starts with a story about solving a legal issue using our intellectual tools - theory, practice, and their progenies: experience and "gut." Next the Essay elaborates on the nature of theory, practice, experience and "gut." The third part of the Essay discusses theories that are helpful to practitioners and those that are less helpful. The Essay concludes that practitioners theorize, and theorists practice. They use these intellectual tools differently because the goals and orientations of theorists and practitioners, and the constraints under which they act, differ. Theory, practice, experience and "gut" help us think, remember, decide and create. They complement each other like the two sides of the same coin: distinct but inseparable.

2,077 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Expander graphs were first defined by Bassalygo and Pinsker in the early 1970s, and their existence was proved in the late 1970s as discussed by the authors and early 1980s.
Abstract: A major consideration we had in writing this survey was to make it accessible to mathematicians as well as to computer scientists, since expander graphs, the protagonists of our story, come up in numerous and often surprising contexts in both fields But, perhaps, we should start with a few words about graphs in general They are, of course, one of the prime objects of study in Discrete Mathematics However, graphs are among the most ubiquitous models of both natural and human-made structures In the natural and social sciences they model relations among species, societies, companies, etc In computer science, they represent networks of communication, data organization, computational devices as well as the flow of computation, and more In mathematics, Cayley graphs are useful in Group Theory Graphs carry a natural metric and are therefore useful in Geometry, and though they are “just” one-dimensional complexes, they are useful in certain parts of Topology, eg Knot Theory In statistical physics, graphs can represent local connections between interacting parts of a system, as well as the dynamics of a physical process on such systems The study of these models calls, then, for the comprehension of the significant structural properties of the relevant graphs But are there nontrivial structural properties which are universally important? Expansion of a graph requires that it is simultaneously sparse and highly connected Expander graphs were first defined by Bassalygo and Pinsker, and their existence first proved by Pinsker in the early ’70s The property of being an expander seems significant in many of these mathematical, computational and physical contexts It is not surprising that expanders are useful in the design and analysis of communication networks What is less obvious is that expanders have surprising utility in other computational settings such as in the theory of error correcting codes and the theory of pseudorandomness In mathematics, we will encounter eg their role in the study of metric embeddings, and in particular in work around the Baum-Connes Conjecture Expansion is closely related to the convergence rates of Markov Chains, and so they play a key role in the study of Monte-Carlo algorithms in statistical mechanics and in a host of practical computational applications The list of such interesting and fruitful connections goes on and on with so many applications we will not even

2,037 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This tutorial provides a broad look at the field of limited feedback wireless communications, and reviews work in systems using various combinations of single antenna, multiple antenna, narrowband, broadband, single-user, and multiuser technology.
Abstract: It is now well known that employing channel adaptive signaling in wireless communication systems can yield large improvements in almost any performance metric. Unfortunately, many kinds of channel adaptive techniques have been deemed impractical in the past because of the problem of obtaining channel knowledge at the transmitter. The transmitter in many systems (such as those using frequency division duplexing) can not leverage techniques such as training to obtain channel state information. Over the last few years, research has repeatedly shown that allowing the receiver to send a small number of information bits about the channel conditions to the transmitter can allow near optimal channel adaptation. These practical systems, which are commonly referred to as limited or finite-rate feedback systems, supply benefits nearly identical to unrealizable perfect transmitter channel knowledge systems when they are judiciously designed. In this tutorial, we provide a broad look at the field of limited feedback wireless communications. We review work in systems using various combinations of single antenna, multiple antenna, narrowband, broadband, single-user, and multiuser technology. We also provide a synopsis of the role of limited feedback in the standardization of next generation wireless systems.

1,605 citations