scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Alexander Satel

Bio: Alexander Satel is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Urban forest & Urban forestry. The author has an hindex of 3, co-authored 3 publications receiving 84 citations.

Papers
More filters
01 Jan 2012
TL;DR: In this article, a collaborative, long-term, strategic urban forest management planning framework is presented, which includes a high-level, 20-year strategic plan with four five-year management plans, and 20 annual operating plans.
Abstract: With global climate change, ever-increasing urban populations and rapidly spreading invasive species and pests, the challenges facing urban forests today are immense. To address these challenges and achieve true sustainability, urban forest management programmes need to transition from a reactive maintenance approach to one of proactive management. The clear solution is collaborative, long-term, strategic urban forest management planning. This paper outlines a threetiered planning framework comprising a high-level, 20-year strategic plan, with four five-year management plans, and 20 annual operating plans. The concept of active adaptive management is firmly embedded in this framework, providing managers with the opportunity to review the successes and shortcomings of their management activities on a systematic basis, and integrate new approaches or address new issues as required. The framework is further supported by a comprehensive set of criteria and indicators for performance assessment. These 25 criteria and indicators support the process of adaptive management by providing clear and consistent measures by which progress can be gauged, and are positioned as tools for improving the development and implementation of urban forest management plans over time. Finally, the flexibility of the framework and its applicability at different scales is highlighted with several case studies, including the development of strategic urban forest management plans for municipalities and golf courses.

11 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: In this article, Van Wassenaer et al. discuss how Criteria and Indicators (C&I) for success in sustainable urban forest management can be successfully applied as tools to improve Strategic Urban Forest Management planning.
Abstract: This poster discusses how Criteria and Indicators (C&I) for success in sustainable urban forest management, first outlined by Clark et al. (1997), can be successfully applied as tools to improve Strategic Urban Forest Management planning. It presents updates and modifications to the original tables, developed by van Wassenaer, Kenney and Satel (in press) to improve their application in strategic planning. A case study demonstrates how C&I were used to evaluate current management practices in the Town of Oakville, Ontario. This poster also outlines the strategic planning framework used in the preparation of the Oakville Plan, and presents it as a model applicable to any size of community interested in sustainably managing its urban forest resources.

4 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper analyzed 14 Canadian urban forest management plans published during the last decade and found that most of them rely on single-tree maintenance, canopy-cover enhancement, tree-diversity enhancement, and planting-oriented educational programs.

117 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored tree species selection criteria used by practitioners involved in urban tree planting and supply to better understand current planting activities and highlight the need for conversations about ways different actors can select species to contribute to a diverse and healthy urban forest.

114 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a working definition of institutions that uniquely defines rules, norms, and strategies, by recognizing the nested nature of operational, collective choice, and constitutional institutions, and by applying the Institutional Analysis and Development framework for analysis of urban social-ecological systems.
Abstract: A decline in urban forest structure and function in the United States jeopardizes the current focus on developing sustainable cities. A number of social dilemmas—for example, free-rider problems—restrict the sustainable production of ecosystem services and the stock of urban trees from which they flow. However, institutions, or the rules, norms, and strategies that affect human decision-making, resolve many such social dilemmas, and thus, institutional analysis is imperative for understanding urban forest management outcomes. Unfortunately, we find that the definition of institutions varies greatly across and within disciplines, and conceptual frameworks in urban forest management and urban ecosystems research often embed institutions as minor variables. Given the significance of institutional analysis to understanding sustainable rural resource management, this paper attempts to bring clarity to defining, conceptually framing, and operationally analyzing institutions in urban settings with a specific focus on sustainable urban forest management. We conclude that urban ecologists and urban forest management researchers could benefit from applying a working definition of institutions that uniquely defines rules, norms, and strategies, by recognizing the nested nature of operational, collective choice, and constitutional institutions, and by applying the Institutional Analysis and Development framework for analysis of urban social-ecological systems (SESs). Such work promises to spur the desired policy-based research agenda of urban forestry and urban ecology and provide cross-disciplinary fertilization of institutional analysis between rural SESs and urban ecosystems.

79 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The findings suggest that the adoption of a proactive urban forest strategy, underpinned by quantified and valued urban forest‐based ecosystem services provision data, and innovative private sector funding mechanisms, can facilitate a change to a proactive, ecosystem services approach to urban forest management.

71 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore how tree species diversity varies across different urban land uses and municipal boundaries to better understand the role of land use types in shaping urban forest patterns, and suggest that urban forest managers should adopt land use-specific strategies to meet species composition goals within the urban forest.
Abstract: Recent research has focused on the ways urban forest patterns vary in relation to level of urbanization and socioeconomic characteristics, with most studies limited to one urban land use type or multiple non-differentiate land uses. Additionally, the majority of studies examining urban forest patterns focus on canopy cover extent, with less attention given to patterns of species diversity. This study explores how tree species diversity varies across different urban land uses and municipal boundaries to better understand the role of land use types in shaping urban forest patterns. The goal is addressed through an exploration of plot-level tree data in the urban municipalities of Peel Region located in the Greater Toronto Area (Ontario, Canada). Species composition and standard diversity metrics are calculated for eight land use types and four municipalities. Our results show that differences in diversity metrics and species composition are greater between urban land uses than municipalities. Moreover, Peel’s urban forest has relatively high alpha diversity but many species are present on only one land use type. The results suggest that different causal processes are associated with each land use type, and that urban forest managers should adopt land use-specific strategies to meet species composition goals within the urban forest.

63 citations