Allison Dornbach-Bender

Bio: Allison Dornbach-Bender is an academic researcher from University of North Texas. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mood & Discriminant validity. The author has an hindex of 3, co-authored 5 publications receiving 72 citations.

Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice

Abstract: Author(s): Ruggero, Camilo J; Kotov, Roman; Hopwood, Christopher J; First, Michael; Clark, Lee Anna; Skodol, Andrew E; Mullins-Sweatt, Stephanie N; Patrick, Christopher J; Bach, Bo; Cicero, David C; Docherty, Anna; Simms, Leonard J; Bagby, R Michael; Krueger, Robert F; Callahan, Jennifer L; Chmielewski, Michael; Conway, Christopher C; De Clercq, Barbara; Dornbach-Bender, Allison; Eaton, Nicholas R; Forbes, Miriam K; Forbush, Kelsie T; Haltigan, John D; Miller, Joshua D; Morey, Leslie C; Patalay, Praveetha; Regier, Darrel A; Reininghaus, Ulrich; Shackman, Alexander J; Waszczuk, Monika A; Watson, David; Wright, Aidan GC; Zimmermann, Johannes | Abstract: ObjectiveDiagnosis is a cornerstone of clinical practice for mental health care providers, yet traditional diagnostic systems have well-known shortcomings, including inadequate reliability, high comorbidity, and marked within-diagnosis heterogeneity. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) is a data-driven, hierarchically based alternative to traditional classifications that conceptualizes psychopathology as a set of dimensions organized into increasingly broad, transdiagnostic spectra. Prior work has shown that using a dimensional approach improves reliability and validity, but translating a model like HiTOP into a workable system that is useful for health care providers remains a major challenge.MethodThe present work outlines the HiTOP model and describes the core principles to guide its integration into clinical practice.ResultsPotential advantages and limitations of the HiTOP model for clinical utility are reviewed, including with respect to case conceptualization and treatment planning. A HiTOP approach to practice is illustrated and contrasted with an approach based on traditional nosology. Common barriers to using HiTOP in real-world health care settings and solutions to these barriers are discussed.ConclusionsHiTOP represents a viable alternative to classifying mental illness that can be integrated into practice today, although research is needed to further establish its utility. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Positive and negative affect in the daily life of world trade center responders with PTSD: An ecological momentary assessment study.

Abstract: Objective The ability to experience positive affect (PA) has clinical and quality of life implications, particularly in vulnerable populations such as trauma-exposed disaster responders. Low PA is included in the diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), however evidence for PA reduction in PTSD has been mixed. In contrast, negative affect (NA) has consistently been found to be elevated among individuals with PTSD. Multiday, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) can provide more ecologically valid evidence about experiences of affect; however, no such studies have been conducted in traumatized individuals with PTSD to date. Method World Trade Center (WTC) responders (N = 202) oversampled for the presence of PTSD were recruited from the WTC Health Program. Participants were administrated the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 at baseline, then completed EMA surveys of affect four times a day over seven consecutive days. Results Participants with current PTSD (19.3% of the sample) showed significantly higher levels of daily NA compared with those without PTSD. However, there was no group difference in daily PA, nor was PA associated with a dimensional measure of PTSD. Conclusion Results suggest that for chronic PTSD among disaster responders, positive emotions are not inhibited across daily living. Such findings add to evidence suggesting that PA reduction may not be diagnostically relevant to PTSD, whereas NA remains an important target for therapeutic interventions. Moreover, results show that WTC responders can experience and benefit from positive emotion, even if they continue to have PTSD symptoms. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Attention for emotion associated with hypomanic personality traits: Eye-tracking reveals a positive bias independent of mood

Abstract: Background Previous research has identified altered processing of emotional information associated with the bipolar spectrum, but results have been inconsistent. The current study assessed whether hypomanic personality traits, a potential indicator of bipolar risk, are associated with biases in attention to emotional facial stimuli, even after controlling for mood state. Methods Participants (N = 135) completed measures assessing current mood symptoms, positive and negative affect, and hypomanic personality traits. They then completed an eye-tracking task measuring two indices of attention (i.e., mean initial orientation latency, mean total gaze duration) for happy, sad, angry, and neutral facial expressions. Results Even after controlling for mood state, hypomanic personality traits were associated with a bias for emotion faces as well as a trend towards faster orientation to happy facial expressions. Limitations Due to relatively low levels of mania in this sample, further work is needed to assess the extent to which these effects exist at clinical levels of depression or mania. Additionally, further work is needed to determine if such a bias represents a risk factor for the development of bipolar disorder. Conclusions Hypomanic personality traits appear to be associated with differences in early attention for emotional information.

Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.

Abstract: In this update of Clark and Watson (1995), we provide a synopsis of major points of our earlier article and discuss issues in scale construction that have become more salient as clinical and personality assessment has progressed over the past quarter-century. It remains true that the primary goal of scale development is to create valid measures of underlying constructs and that Loevinger's theoretical scheme provides a powerful model for scale development. We still discuss practical issues to help developers maximize their measures' construct validity, reiterating the importance of (a) clear conceptualization of target constructs, (b) an overinclusive initial item pool, (c) paying careful attention to item wording, (d) testing the item pool against closely related constructs, (e) choosing validation samples thoughtfully, and (f) emphasizing unidimensionality over internal consistency. We have added (g) consideration of the hierarchical structures of personality and psychopathology in scale development, discussion of (h) codeveloping scales in the context of these structures, (i) "orphan," and "interstitial" constructs, which do not fit neatly within these structures, (j) problems with "conglomerate" constructs, and (k) developing alternative versions of measures, including short forms, translations, informant versions, and age-based adaptations. Finally, we have expanded our discussions of (l) item-response theory and of external validity, emphasizing (m) convergent and discriminant validity, (n) incremental validity, and (o) cross-method analyses, such as questionnaires and interviews. We conclude by reaffirming that all mature sciences are built on the bedrock of sound measurement and that psychology must redouble its efforts to develop reliable and valid measures. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Transdiagnostic approaches to mental health problems: Current status and future directions.

Abstract: Despite a longstanding and widespread influence of the diagnostic approach to mental ill health, there is an emerging and growing consensus that such psychiatric nosologies may no longer be fit for purpose in research and clinical practice. In their place, there is gathering support for a "transdiagnostic" approach that cuts across traditional diagnostic boundaries or, more radically, sets them aside altogether, to provide novel insights into how we might understand mental health difficulties. Removing the distinctions between proposed psychiatric taxa at the level of classification opens up new ways of classifying mental health problems, suggests alternative conceptualizations of the processes implicated in mental health, and provides a platform for novel ways of thinking about onset, maintenance, and clinical treatment and recovery from experiences of disabling mental distress. In this Introduction to a Special Section on Transdiagnostic Approaches to Psychopathology, we provide a narrative review of the transdiagnostic literature in order to situate the Special Section articles in context. We begin with a brief history of the diagnostic approach and outline several challenges it currently faces that arguably limit its applicability in current mental health science and practice. We then review several recent transdiagnostic approaches to classification, biopsychosocial processes, and clinical interventions, highlighting promising novel developments. Finally, we present some key challenges facing transdiagnostic science and make suggestions for a way forward. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

What is classification

Abstract: There were many months when overseas requirements for personnel and increased training demands left the Army Air Forces stations in the continental United States short of qualified specialists in many occupational fields. At that time everything possible was done to assist the operating officers in getting the greatest amount of productive work out of the personnel available to them. This article was written to show them the part played by the Army Air Forces personnel classification and assignment system and how 4