scispace - formally typeset
Á

Álvaro Labella

Researcher at University of Jaén

Publications -  33
Citations -  967

Álvaro Labella is an academic researcher from University of Jaén. The author has contributed to research in topics: Group decision-making & Fuzzy logic. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 32 publications receiving 520 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An Overview on Fuzzy Modelling of Complex Linguistic Preferences in Decision Making

TL;DR: This paper provides an overview of the broadest fuzzy linguistic approaches for modelling complex linguistic preferences together some challenges that future proposals should achieve to improvecomplex linguistic preferences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Analyzing the performance of classical consensus models in large scale group decision making: A comparative study

TL;DR: A comparative study of different classical CRPs applied to large-scale GDM in order to analyze their performance and find out which are the main challenges that these processes face in large- scale GDM.
Journal ArticleDOI

A large scale consensus reaching process managing group hesitation

TL;DR: A new adaptive CRP model to deal with LS-GDM is presented which includes a clustering process to weight experts’ sub-groups taking into account their size and cohesion, and it uses hesitant fuzzy sets to fuse expert’s sub-group preferences to keep as much information as possible.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Cost Consensus Metric for Consensus Reaching Processes based on a comprehensive minimum cost model

TL;DR: A new and comprehensive minimum cost consensus model that considers distance to global opinion and consensus degree is presented and will be used to evaluate CRPs in which experts’ opinion evolution is considered to achieve an agreed solution for the GDM.
Journal ArticleDOI

A cohesion-driven consensus reaching process for large scale group decision making under a hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets environment

TL;DR: A new cohesion measure for HFLTS based on restricted equivalence functions for measuring the experts’ sub-group cohesiveness is introduced to drive the consensus process together the majority and thus reduce the impact of internal disagreements risen in majority driven CRPs.