scispace - formally typeset
A

Amit Kiran

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  40
Citations -  1626

Amit Kiran is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Cohort study. The author has an hindex of 18, co-authored 40 publications receiving 1387 citations. Previous affiliations of Amit Kiran include University of London & Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The association between hip morphology parameters and nineteen-year risk of end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip: a nested case-control study.

TL;DR: Measurements are described that predict the risk of THA for end-stage OA by year 20, independently of the presence of radiographic hip OA at year 2, according to the alpha angle and lateral center edge angle.
Journal ArticleDOI

Subclinical deformities of the hip are significant predictors of radiographic osteoarthritis and joint replacement in women. A 20 year longitudinal cohort study.

TL;DR: This study demonstrates that Cam-type FAI and mild Acetabular Dysplasia are predictive of subsequent OA and THR in a large female population cohort and significantly improve current predictive models of hip OA development.
Journal ArticleDOI

Anatomical distribution of synovitis in knee osteoarthritis and its association with joint effusion assessed on non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI.

TL;DR: Definite synovitis was present in the majority of knees with or without effusion with the commonest sites being posterior to the PCL and in the suprapatellar recess and joint effusion as measured on PD fs images does not only represent effusion but also synovial thickening.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: Identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery

TL;DR: The data suggest that the choice of a six-month follow-up to assess patient-reported outcomes of THR/TKR is acceptable, and the thresholds help to differentiate between patients with different levels of satisfaction, but external validation will be required prior to general implementation in clinical practice.