Author
Amy B Carroll
Bio: Amy B Carroll is an academic researcher from University of Alaska Fairbanks. The author has contributed to research in topics: Global warming & Tundra. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 1158 citations.
Topics: Global warming, Tundra, Salix arctica, Betula nana, Arctic vegetation
Papers
More filters
United States Department of Agriculture1, La Trobe University2, Grand Valley State University3, University of British Columbia4, Florida International University5, University of Gothenburg6, University of Alaska Fairbanks7, Abisko Scientific Research Station8, University of Virginia9, University Centre in Svalbard10, Colorado State University11, Michigan State University12, Marine Biological Laboratory13, University of California, Irvine14, United States Geological Survey15, Finnish Forest Research Institute16, Norwegian University of Life Sciences17, University of Colorado Boulder18, University of Stirling19
TL;DR: Warming increased height and cover of deciduous shrubs and graminoids, decreased cover of mosses and lichens, and decreased species diversity and evenness, which predict that warming will cause a decline in biodiversity across a wide variety of tundra, at least in the short term.
Abstract: Recent observations of changes in some tundra ecosystems appear to be responses to a warming climate. Several experimental studies have shown that tundra plants and ecosystems can respond strongly to environmental change, including warming; however, most studies were limited to a single location and were of short duration and based on a variety of experimental designs. In addition, comparisons among studies are difficult because a variety of techniques have been used to achieve experimental warming and different measurements have been used to assess responses. We used metaanalysis on plant community measurements from standardized warming experiments at 11 locations across the tundra biome involved in the International Tundra Experiment. The passive warming treatment increased plant-level air temperature by 1-3°C, which is in the range of predicted and observed warming for tundra regions. Responses were rapid and detected in whole plant communities after only two growing seasons. Overall, warming increased height and cover of deciduous shrubs and graminoids, decreased cover of mosses and lichens, and decreased species diversity and evenness. These results predict that warming will cause a decline in biodiversity across a wide variety of tundra, at least in the short term. They also provide rigorous experimental evidence that recently observed increases in shrub cover in many tundra regions are in response to climate warming. These changes have important implications for processes and interactions within tundra ecosystems and between tundra and the atmosphere.
1,232 citations
Cited by
More filters
Aarhus University1, Pennsylvania State University2, University of Alaska Fairbanks3, University of Sheffield4, Abisko Scientific Research Station5, Lund University6, University of Copenhagen7, University Centre in Svalbard8, University of Helsinki9, University of Alberta10, University of Washington11, Canadian Wildlife Service12, University of Aberdeen13, University of Alaska Anchorage14, University of Stirling15
TL;DR: These rapid changes in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine systems, presage changes at lower latitudes that will affect natural resources, food production, and future climate buffering, and highlight areas of ecological research that deserve priority as the Arctic continues to warm.
Abstract: At the close of the Fourth International Polar Year, we take stock of the ecological consequences of recent climate change in the Arctic, focusing on effects at population, community, and ecosystem scales. Despite the buffering effect of landscape heterogeneity, Arctic ecosystems and the trophic relationships that structure them have been severely perturbed. These rapid changes may be a bellwether of changes to come at lower latitudes and have the potential to affect ecosystem services related to natural resources, food production, climate regulation, and cultural integrity. We highlight areas of ecological research that deserve priority as the Arctic continues to warm.
1,157 citations
Université de Sherbrooke1, University of Alberta2, University of Lapland3, University of Victoria4, Wageningen University and Research Centre5, University of Alaska Fairbanks6, University of Oxford7, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières8, Laval University9, St. John's University10, University of Amsterdam11, University of Vermont12, Aarhus University13, University of Zurich14, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research15, University of Edinburgh16, La Trobe University17, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution18, Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory19, University of British Columbia20, University of Tromsø21, University of Alaska Anchorage22, Queen's University23, University of Virginia24
TL;DR: This article used repeat photography, long-term ecological monitoring and dendrochronology to document shrub expansion in arctic, high-latitude and alpine tundra.
Abstract: Recent research using repeat photography, long-term ecological monitoring and dendrochronology has documented shrub expansion in arctic, high-latitude and alpine tundra
1,153 citations
University of British Columbia1, Grand Valley State University2, University of Gothenburg3, University of Sheffield4, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences5, St. John's University6, University of Tromsø7, VU University Amsterdam8, Arizona State University9, American Museum of Natural History10, United States Forest Service11, Agricultural University of Iceland12, University of California, Berkeley13, University of Alberta14, University of Melbourne15, University of Iceland16, Norwegian University of Life Sciences17, Colorado State University18, Hokkaido University19, University of Copenhagen20, Florida International University21, University of Saskatchewan22, Pennsylvania State University23, University of Manchester24, Aarhus University25, Marine Biological Laboratory26, Finnish Forest Research Institute27, La Trobe University28, Michigan State University29, University of Alaska Anchorage30, University of Stirling31
TL;DR: In this article, a synthesis of 61 experimental warming studies, of up to 20 years duration, in tundra sites worldwide, was used to understand the sensitivity of tundras vegetation to climate warming and to forecast future biodiversity and vegetation feedbacks to climate.
Abstract: 35 Abstract Understanding the sensitivity of tundra vegetation to climate warming is critical to forecasting future biodiversity and vegetation feedbacks to climate. In situ warming experiments accelerate climate change on a small scale to forecast responses of local plant communities. Limitations of this approach include the apparent site-specificity of results and uncertainty about the power of short-term studies to anticipate longer term change. We address these issues with a synthesis of 61 experimental warming studies, of up to 20 years duration, in tundra sites worldwide. The response of plant groups to warming often differed with ambient summer temperature, soil moisture and experimental duration. Shrubs increased with warming only where ambient temperature was high, whereas graminoids increased primarily in the coldest study sites. Linear increases in effect size over time were frequently observed. There was little indication of saturating or accelerating effects, as would be predicted if negative or positive vegetation feedbacks were common. These results indicate that tundra vegetation exhibits strong regional variation in response to warming, and that in vulnerable regions, cumulative effects of long-term warming on tundra vegetation - and associated ecosystem consequences - have the potential to be much greater than we have observed to date.
830 citations
TL;DR: A framework guiding the understanding of how dominance affects species interactions within communities, processes within ecosystems, and dynamics on regional scales is proposed and it is proposed that dominance affects regional species coexistence by altering metacommunity dynamics.
Abstract: The composition of communities is strongly altered by anthropogenic manipulations of biogeochemical cycles, abiotic conditions, and trophic structure in all major ecosystems. Whereas the effects of species loss on ecosystem processes have received broad attention, the consequences of altered species dominance for emergent properties of communities and ecosystems are poorly investigated. Here we propose a framework guiding our understanding of how dominance affects species interactions within communities, processes within ecosystems, and dynamics on regional scales. Dominance (or the complementary term, evenness) reflects the distribution of traits in a community, which in turn affects the strength and sign of both intraspecifc and interspecific interactions. Consequently, dominance also mediates the effect of such interactions on species coexistence. We review the evidence for the fact that dominance directly affects ecosystem functions such as process rates via species identity (the dominant trait) and evenness (the frequency distribution of traits), and indirectly alters the relationship between process rates and species richness. Dominance also influences the temporal and spatial variability of aggregate community properties and compositional stability (invasibility). Finally, we propose that dominance affects regional species coexistence by altering metacommunity dynamics. Local dominance leads to high beta diversity, and rare species can persist because of source-sink dynamics, but anthropogenically induced environmental changes result in regional dominance and low beta diversity, reducing regional coexistence. Given the rapid anthropogenic alterations of dominance in many ecosystems and the strong implications of these changes, dominance should be considered explicitly in the analysis of consequences of altered biodiversity.
795 citations
University of British Columbia1, Grand Valley State University2, University of Gothenburg3, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières4, VU University Amsterdam5, Arizona State University6, Umeå University7, Moscow State University8, Environment Canada9, United States Department of Agriculture10, University of California, Berkeley11, University of Alberta12, University of Texas at El Paso13, University of Saskatchewan14, University of Iceland15, United States Fish and Wildlife Service16, Norwegian University of Life Sciences17, Colorado State University18, Hokkaido University19, University of Copenhagen20, Florida International University21, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research22, Aarhus University23, Marine Biological Laboratory24, University of California, Davis25, University of Oulu26, La Trobe University27, Michigan State University28, University of Alaska Anchorage29
TL;DR: In this paper, remote sensing data indicate that contemporary climate warming has already resulted in increased productivity and increased productivity in the tundra biome (Tundra Tundra Bi biome).
Abstract: Temperature is increasing at unprecedented rates across most of the tundra biome(1). Remote-sensing data indicate that contemporary climate warming has already resulted in increased productivity ov ...
782 citations