scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Anahí Domínguez

Bio: Anahí Domínguez is an academic researcher from National Scientific and Technical Research Council. The author has contributed to research in topics: No-till farming & Soil biology. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 17 publications receiving 410 citations. Previous affiliations of Anahí Domínguez include National University of Río Cuarto.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Helen Phillips1, Carlos A. Guerra2, Marie Luise Carolina Bartz3, Maria J. I. Briones4, George G. Brown5, Thomas W. Crowther6, Olga Ferlian1, Konstantin B. Gongalsky7, Johan van den Hoogen6, Julia Krebs1, Alberto Orgiazzi, Devin Routh6, Benjamin Schwarz8, Elizabeth M. Bach, Joanne M. Bennett2, Ulrich Brose9, Thibaud Decaëns, Birgitta König-Ries9, Michel Loreau, Jérôme Mathieu, Christian Mulder10, Wim H. van der Putten11, Kelly S. Ramirez, Matthias C. Rillig12, David J. Russell13, Michiel Rutgers, Madhav P. Thakur, Franciska T. de Vries, Diana H. Wall14, David A. Wardle, Miwa Arai15, Fredrick O. Ayuke16, Geoff H. Baker17, Robin Beauséjour, José Camilo Bedano18, Klaus Birkhofer19, Eric Blanchart, Bernd Blossey20, Thomas Bolger21, Robert L. Bradley, Mac A. Callaham22, Yvan Capowiez, Mark E. Caulfield11, Amy Choi23, Felicity Crotty24, Andrea Dávalos20, Andrea Dávalos25, Darío J. Díaz Cosín, Anahí Domínguez18, Andrés Esteban Duhour26, Nick van Eekeren, Christoph Emmerling27, Liliana B. Falco26, Rosa Fernández, Steven J. Fonte14, Carlos Fragoso, André L.C. Franco, Martine Fugère, Abegail T Fusilero28, Shaieste Gholami29, Michael J. Gundale, Mónica Gutiérrez López, Davorka K. Hackenberger30, Luis M. Hernández, Takuo Hishi31, Andrew R. Holdsworth32, Martin Holmstrup33, Kristine N. Hopfensperger34, Esperanza Huerta Lwanga11, Veikko Huhta, Tunsisa T. Hurisso14, Tunsisa T. Hurisso35, Basil V. Iannone, Madalina Iordache36, Monika Joschko, Nobuhiro Kaneko37, Radoslava Kanianska38, Aidan M. Keith39, Courtland Kelly14, Maria Kernecker, Jonatan Klaminder, Armand W. Koné40, Yahya Kooch41, Sanna T. Kukkonen, H. Lalthanzara42, Daniel R. Lammel43, Daniel R. Lammel12, Iurii M. Lebedev7, Yiqing Li44, Juan B. Jesús Lidón, Noa Kekuewa Lincoln45, Scott R. Loss46, Raphaël Marichal, Radim Matula, Jan Hendrik Moos47, Gerardo Moreno48, Alejandro Morón-Ríos, Bart Muys49, Johan Neirynck50, Lindsey Norgrove, Marta Novo, Visa Nuutinen51, Victoria Nuzzo, Mujeeb Rahman P, Johan Pansu17, Shishir Paudel46, Guénola Pérès, Lorenzo Pérez-Camacho52, Raúl Piñeiro, Jean-François Ponge, Muhammad Rashid53, Muhammad Rashid54, Salvador Rebollo52, Javier Rodeiro-Iglesias4, Miguel Á. Rodríguez52, Alexander M. Roth55, Guillaume Xavier Rousseau56, Anna Rożen57, Ehsan Sayad29, Loes van Schaik58, Bryant C. Scharenbroch59, Michael Schirrmann60, Olaf Schmidt21, Boris Schröder61, Julia Seeber62, Maxim Shashkov63, Maxim Shashkov64, Jaswinder Singh65, Sandy M. Smith23, Michael Steinwandter, José Antonio Talavera66, Dolores Trigo, Jiro Tsukamoto67, Anne W. de Valença, Steven J. Vanek14, Iñigo Virto68, Adrian A. Wackett55, Matthew W. Warren, Nathaniel H. Wehr, Joann K. Whalen69, Michael B. Wironen70, Volkmar Wolters71, Irina V. Zenkova, Weixin Zhang72, Erin K. Cameron73, Nico Eisenhauer1 
Leipzig University1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg2, Universidade Positivo3, University of Vigo4, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária5, ETH Zurich6, Moscow State University7, University of Freiburg8, University of Jena9, University of Catania10, Wageningen University and Research Centre11, Free University of Berlin12, Senckenberg Museum13, Colorado State University14, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization15, University of Nairobi16, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation17, National Scientific and Technical Research Council18, Brandenburg University of Technology19, Cornell University20, University College Dublin21, United States Forest Service22, University of Toronto23, Aberystwyth University24, State University of New York at Cortland25, National University of Luján26, University of Trier27, University of the Philippines Mindanao28, Razi University29, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek30, Kyushu University31, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency32, Aarhus University33, Northern Kentucky University34, Lincoln University (Missouri)35, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad36, Fukushima University37, Matej Bel University38, Lancaster University39, Université d'Abobo-Adjamé40, Tarbiat Modares University41, Pachhunga University College42, University of São Paulo43, University of Hawaii at Hilo44, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources45, Oklahoma State University–Stillwater46, Forest Research Institute47, University of Extremadura48, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven49, Research Institute for Nature and Forest50, Natural Resources Institute Finland51, University of Alcalá52, King Abdulaziz University53, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology54, University of Minnesota55, Federal University of Maranhão56, Jagiellonian University57, Technical University of Berlin58, University of Wisconsin-Madison59, Leibniz Association60, Braunschweig University of Technology61, University of Innsbruck62, Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics63, Russian Academy of Sciences64, Khalsa College, Amritsar65, University of La Laguna66, Kōchi University67, Universidad Pública de Navarra68, McGill University69, The Nature Conservancy70, University of Giessen71, Henan University72, University of Saint Mary73
25 Oct 2019-Science
TL;DR: It was found that local species richness and abundance typically peaked at higher latitudes, displaying patterns opposite to those observed in aboveground organisms, which suggest that climate change may have serious implications for earthworm communities and for the functions they provide.
Abstract: Soil organisms, including earthworms, are a key component of terrestrial ecosystems. However, little is known about their diversity, their distribution, and the threats affecting them. We compiled a global dataset of sampled earthworm communities from 6928 sites in 57 countries as a basis for predicting patterns in earthworm diversity, abundance, and biomass. We found that local species richness and abundance typically peaked at higher latitudes, displaying patterns opposite to those observed in aboveground organisms. However, high species dissimilarity across tropical locations may cause diversity across the entirety of the tropics to be higher than elsewhere. Climate variables were found to be more important in shaping earthworm communities than soil properties or habitat cover. These findings suggest that climate change may have serious implications for earthworm communities and for the functions they provide.

223 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated the effect of the application of GAPs under no-till (NT) on invertebrates and assessed whether this effect is different between soil types.
Abstract: Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) under no-till (NT) includes a mixed crop rotation; cover crops; integrated pest, weed and disease management; nutrient restoration; and a rational use of agrochemicals. When applied all together, GAPs promotes high productivity, while maintaining the production capacity of resources. In the Pampas region of Argentina, there is a need to assess the effects of these practices on soils, particularly on soil fauna, as they play an important role in soil functioning. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the application of GAPs under NT on invertebrates and to assess whether this effect is different between soil types. We hypothesized (1) that GAP will produce an increase in the abundance, as well as changes in the faunal composition of litter and soil invertebrates; (2) that the effects will differ with soil type, and (3) that the changes in soil invertebrate fauna will be explained by soil properties. We compared two contrasting NT treatments -with and without GAP application-, replicated in three agricultural areas, on different soil types (Entic Haplustolls to Typic Argiudolls) situated across a west–east transect in the Pampas region of Argentina. A positive (Natural environment) and a negative (Conventional tillage) reference sites were included in the comparison. Litter and soil invertebrates and soil properties were assessed at each sampling site. Overall, our results indicated that the application of GAPs in productive NT fields increases litter and soil invertebrate abundance and modifies faunal composition. In the litter layer, four of the five taxa present were favoured by GAPs with an increase in the abundances of ants, prostigmatid mites, earthworms and collembolans. GAPs also induced changes in invertebrate faunal composition, from the initial NO-GAP situation to the present state under GAP system. The observed changes in litter and soil invertebrates, changes in faunal abundance and composition can be expected to translate to changes in soil functioning. Our last hypothesis was partially confirmed in that soil properties have to be considered in the examination of differences in fauna between treatments with there are only subtle differences in practices, as in the present study.

74 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of organic farming versus conventional farming on litter decomposition was compared under different field conditions by measuring weight loss in litter bags and assessing their abundances in the soil.

57 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results suggest that earthworms coming from parents grown in contaminated soils may have reduced growth, limiting their beneficial roles in key soil ecosystem functions, and further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying the sublethal effects observed here.
Abstract: Aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) - one of glyphosate’s main metabolites - has been classified as persistent in soils, raising concern regarding the widespread use of glyphosate in agriculture and forestry. Glyphosate may have negative or neutral effects on soil biota, but no information is available on the toxicity of AMPA to soil invertebrates. Therefore our aim was to study the effect of AMPA on mortality and reproduction of the earthworm species Eisenia andrei using standard soil ecotoxicological methods (ISO). Field-relevant concentrations of AMPA had no significant effects on mortality in acute or chronic assays. Except at the highest concentration tested, a significant biomass loss was observed compared to controls in the chronic assay. The number of juveniles and cocoons increased with higher concentrations of AMPA applied, but their mean weights decreased. This mass loss indicates higher sensitivity of juveniles than adults to AMPA. Our results suggest that earthworms coming from parents grown in contaminated soils may have reduced growth, limiting their beneficial roles in key soil ecosystem functions. Nevertheless, further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying the sublethal effects observed here.

55 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated the effect of no-till on the litter decomposition process and on soil macrofauna communities and how changes in soil physical, chemical, and physicochemical properties affect litter decompositions and soil macro-fauna.
Abstract: No-till (NT) has been recognized as a management system of low environmental impact when applied in combination with crop residue mulch and rotations involving cover crops. It has been suggested, however, that, if these conditions are not met, NT may result in physical, chemical and biological soil degradation. This study evaluates the effect of NT on the litter decomposition process and on soil macrofauna communities and how changes in soil physical, chemical, and physicochemical properties affect litter decomposition and soil macrofauna. We hypothesised (1) that macrofaunal abundance, richness and diversity would be lower in NT soils than in natural grasslands; (2) that this would be a consequence of unfavourable physical and chemical soil conditions and high inputs of agrochemicals; and (3) that these changes in macrofauna would influence soil functioning, reducing litter decomposition rate. The study was conducted during winter and spring 2007 on Typic Haplustolls from southern Cordoba, Argentina (32°41′ and 32°50′S; 63°58′ and 63°44′W). Macrofauna was sampled twice in NT and in natural grasslands (NA) – as a reference situation – by extracting five soil monoliths of 25 cm × 25 cm × 30 cm at each plot. Soil properties were measured using standard methods. The decomposition rate was determined by the litterbag method, using a 2 mm and a 10 mm size meshes to evaluate litter decomposition mediated by macrofauna. NT greatly reduced richness (from 33 species in NA to 12 species in NT) and abundance (from 1870 ind/m 2 in NA to 475 ind/m 2 in NT) of macroinvertebrates, confirming our first hypothesis. Changes in macrofauna community under NT were mainly explained by high compaction and low organic matter content, confirming our second hypothesis. The reduction in earthworm abundance may also be explained by the influence of the intense use of toxic agrochemicals. No-till increased surface horizon bulk density (from 1.22 to 1.33 g/cm 3 ) and decreased organic matter content (from 3.51% to 2.58%) and pH (from 6.74 to 6.01) compared with NA. The litter decomposition rate was lower in NT, confirming our third hypothesis, and it was correlated with low earthworms abundance and activity. We conclude that in our study area the capacity of soils under NT to maintain ecosystem functions would be at risk.

50 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

1,610 citations

01 Jan 2011
TL;DR: The GMTED2010 layer extents (minimum and maximum latitude and longitude) are a result of the coordinate system inherited from the 1-arcsecond SRTM.
Abstract: For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. 10. Diagram showing the GMTED2010 layer extents (minimum and maximum latitude and longitude) are a result of the coordinate system inherited from the 1-arc-second SRTM

802 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that understanding the role that plant–soil feedback plays in shaping the responses of plant community composition and ecosystem processes to global environmental changes requires unravelling the individual contributions of enemies, symbionts and decomposers.
Abstract: Summary It is increasingly acknowledged that plant–soil feedbacks may play an important role in driving the composition of plant communities and functioning of terrestrial ecosystems. However, the mechanistic understanding of plant–soil feedbacks, as well as their roles in natural ecosystems in proportion to other possible drivers, is still in its infancy. Such knowledge will enhance our capacity to determine the contribution of plant–soil feedback to community and ecosystem responses under global environmental change. Here, we review how plant–soil feedbacks may develop under extreme drought and precipitation events, CO2 and nitrogen enrichment, temperature increase, land use change and plant species loss vs. gain. We present a framework for opening the ‘black box of soil’ considering the responses of the various biotic components (enemies, symbionts and decomposers) of plant–soil feedback to the global environmental changes, and we discuss how to integrate these components to understand and predict the net effects of plant–soil feedbacks under the various scenarios of change. To gain an understanding of how plant–soil feedback plays out in realistic settings, we also use the framework to discuss its interaction with other drivers of plant community composition, including competition, facilitation, herbivory, and soil physical and chemical properties. We conclude that understanding the role that plant–soil feedback plays in shaping the responses of plant community composition and ecosystem processes to global environmental changes requires unravelling the individual contributions of enemies, symbionts and decomposers. These biotic factors may show different response rates and strengths, thereby resulting in different net magnitudes and directions of plant–soil feedbacks under various scenarios of global change. We also need tests of plant–soil feedback under more realistic conditions to determine its contribution to changes in patterns and processes in the field, both at ecologically and evolutionary relevant time-scales.

356 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the importance of preserving soil capital and its relationship to human civilization and food security, and discuss trends concerning the availability of arable agricultural land, different scenarios, and their limitations, analyzed and discussed.
Abstract: Soil health, along with water supply, is the most valuable resource for humans, as human life depends on the soil’s generosity. Soil degradation, therefore, poses a threat to food security, as it reduces yield, forces farmers to use more inputs, and may eventually lead to soil abandonment. Unfortunately, the importance of preserving soil health appears to be overlooked by policy makers. In this paper, I first briefly introduce the present situation concerning agricultural production, natural resources, soil degradation, land use and the challenge ahead, to show how these issues are strictly interwoven. Then, I define soil degradation and present a review of its typologies and estimates at a global level. I discuss the importance of preserving soil capital, and its relationship to human civilization and food security. Trends concerning the availability of arable agricultural land, different scenarios, and their limitations, are analyzed and discussed. The possible relation between an increase in a country’s GNP, population and future availability of arable land is also analyzed, using the World Bank’s database. I argue that because of the many sources of uncertainty in the data, and the high risks at stake, a precautionary approach should be adopted when drawing scenarios. The paper ends with a discussion on the key role of preserving soil organic matter, and the need to adopt more sustainable agricultural practices. I also argue that both our relation with nature and natural resources and our lifestyle need to be reconsidered.

350 citations