scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Anat Shalmon

Bio: Anat Shalmon is an academic researcher from Sheba Medical Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Breast cancer & Mammography. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 12 publications receiving 133 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Self‐reported levels of anxiety for the group, regardless of biopsy results, fell within the normal range by 30 days, while patients undergoing CNB reported significant levels of state anxiety which were greatest at the time ofBiopsy.
Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate and document pain and psychological distress related to imaging-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) of the breast. This prospective study of 52 consecutive patients undergoing CNB of the breast assessed anxiety, pain, acute stress disorder, and activities of daily living both preprocedure and at 24 hours, 5 days, and 30 days postprocedure. Survey instruments included the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), a visual analog pain scale, the SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale, and DSM IV criteria for acute stress disorder. Preprocedure the mean scores for self-reported levels of state and trait anxiety were 47.11 ( SD = 13.53) and 37.71 ( SD = 11.24), respectively. At 24 hours postprocedure, the mean score for self-reported state anxiety was 38.74 ( SD = 17.77), a significant reduction from the preprocedure level reported by patients (p < 0.005). Further reductions in state anxiety levels were reported at 5 and 30 days postprocedure. The mean scores for state anxiety fell within the normal range at 30 days postprocedure (mean 32.75, SD = 10.97). However, at 5 days post-CNB, patients with confirmed malignancies reported significantly more anxiety than patients without malignancies ( p = 0.002). This difference was not present at 30 days post-CNB ( p = 0.17). Patients reported average pain scores of 2.0 (on a scale of 0–10) during the biopsy. This decreased to 1.3 at 24 hours, 0.3 at 5 days, and 0.2 at 30 days. Reported symptoms of acute stress related to the procedure significantly increased over the period between the 5-day interview and the 30-day interview. One (2%) patient reported avoidance of thoughts about CNB 5 days postprocedure and 5 (12%) patients reported this at 30 days postprocedure (p < 0.05). Patients undergoing CNB reported significant levels of state anxiety which were greatest at the time of biopsy. A significant decrease was observed at 24 hours postprocedure, despite the fact that biopsy results were not available to the patients. Self-reported levels of anxiety for the group, regardless of biopsy results, fell within the normal range by 30 days. Further research and interventions are recommended to address the management of anxiety for patients undergoing CNB.

61 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, an increase in axillary-lymphadenopathy attributed to vaccination was found in 163 women undergoing breast-imaging, including BRCA-carriers.

35 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Two main artefacts commonly seen on CESM are rim and ripple artefacts, which do not hamper with image interpretation and are important to be aware of and prevent misinterpretation of these artefacts as real breast pathology.

26 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: BPE at CESM was associated with breast density, and women with increased BPE had increased odds for breast cancer, independently of other potential risk factors.

23 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Investigation of the effect of lactation on breast cancer conspicuity on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI in comparison with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parametric maps suggested an additive value in the diagnostic workup of PABC.
Abstract: To investigate the effect of lactation on breast cancer conspicuity on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI in comparison with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parametric maps. Eleven lactating patients with 16 biopsy-confirmed pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) lesions were prospectively evaluated by DCE and DTI on a 1.5-T MRI for pre-treatment evaluation. Additionally, DCE datasets of 16 non-lactating age-matched breast cancer patients were retrospectively reviewed, as control. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) comprising two regions of interests of the normal parenchyma was used to assess the differences in the tumor conspicuity on DCE subtraction images between lactating and non-lactating patients, as well as in comparison against DTI parametric maps of λ1, λ2, λ3, mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), and maximal anisotropy index, λ1–λ3. CNR values of breast cancer on DCE MRI among lactating patients were reduced by 62% and 58% (p < 0.001) in comparison with those in non-lactating patients, when taking into account the normal contralateral parenchyma and an area of marked background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), respectively. Among the lactating patients, DTI parameters of λ1, λ2, λ3, MD, and λ1–λ3 were significantly decreased, and FA was significantly increased in PABC, relative to the normal lactating parenchyma ROIs. When compared against DCE in the lactating cohort, the CNR on λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD was significantly superior, providing up to 138% more tumor conspicuity, on average. Breast cancer conspicuity on DCE MRI is markedly reduced during lactation owing to the marked BPE. However, the additional application of DTI can improve the visualization and quantitative characterization of PABC, therefore possibly suggesting an additive value in the diagnostic workup of PABC. • Breast cancer conspicuity on DCE MRI has decreased by approximately 60% among lactating patients compared with non-lactating controls. • DTI-derived diffusion coefficients and the anisotropy indices of PABC lesions were significantly different than those of the normal lactating fibroglandular tissue. • Among lactating patients, breast cancer conspicuity on DTI-derived parametric maps provided up to 138% increase in contrast-to-noise ratio compared with DCE imaging.

22 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
15 Dec 2006-Pain
TL;DR: It is concluded that, while both structured empathy and hypnosis decrease procedural pain and anxiety, hypnosis provides more powerful anxiety relief without undue cost and thus appears attractive for outpatient pain management.
Abstract: Medical procedures in outpatient settings have limited options of managing pain and anxiety pharmacologically. We therefore assessed whether this can be achieved by adjunct self-hypnotic relaxation in a common and particularly anxiety provoking procedure. Two hundred and thirty-six women referred for large core needle breast biopsy to an urban tertiary university-affiliated medical center were prospectively randomized to receive standard care (n=76), structured empathic attention (n=82), or self-hypnotic relaxation (n=78) during their procedures. Patients' self-ratings at 1 min-intervals of pain and anxiety on 0-10 verbal analog scales with 0=no pain/anxiety at all, 10=worst pain/anxiety possible, were compared in an ordinal logistic regression model. Women's anxiety increased significantly in the standard group (logit slope=0.18, p<0.001), did not change in the empathy group (slope=-0.04, p=0.45), and decreased significantly in the hypnosis group (slope=-0.27, p<0.001). Pain increased significantly in all three groups (logit slopes: standard care=0.53, empathy=0.37, hypnosis=0.34; all p<0.001) though less steeply with hypnosis and empathy than standard care (p=0.024 and p=0.018, respectively). Room time and cost were not significantly different in an univariate ANOVA despite hypnosis and empathy requiring an additional professional: 46 min/161 dollars for standard care, 43 min/163 dollars for empathy, and 39 min/152 dollars for hypnosis. We conclude that, while both structured empathy and hypnosis decrease procedural pain and anxiety, hypnosis provides more powerful anxiety relief without undue cost and thus appears attractive for outpatient pain management.

194 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is necessary to understand the impact of factors on distress so that heightened levels can be predicted and targeted by interventions initiated at the first mention of the possibility of the presence of malignancy.
Abstract: montgomery m. & mccrone s.h. (2010) Psychological distress associated with the diagnostic phase for suspected breast cancer: systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing66(11), 2372–2390. Abstract Aim. This paper is a report of a review conducted to define the manifestations that characterize psychological distress during the diagnostic phase for suspected breast cancer, define the extent of psychological distress associated with the threat of potential cancer, and identify factors influencing psychological distress levels. Background. Raising the possibility that a malignancy might be present is threatening. The resulting distress is believed to influence treatment outcomes in those diagnosed with cancer and result in behavioural changes in those with benign disease. Data sources. Research papers published between January 1983 and May 2009 were identified in CINAHL, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. The search was performed using the following terms: breast cancer diagnosis, mammography, breast biopsy, breast diagnostic, anxiety, distress and uncertainty. Review methods. A systematic review was conducted of 30 studies meeting the inclusion criteria of a quantitative design with at least one standardized measure of distress and specifically addressing distress during the evaluation period. Results. It is well-documented that distress, manifested as anxiety, exists. In a small cohort of women, distress levels are heightened to worrying levels that may have long-term implications. There was strong evidence for relationships among medical history, education and trait anxiety with distress. There was no substantiation of the association between younger age and increased psychological distress that has been consistently reported with other cancers. Conclusion. It is necessary to understand the impact of factors on distress so that heightened levels can be predicted and targeted by interventions initiated at the first mention of the possibility of the presence of malignancy.

142 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The optimal policy of the model shows that the decision to biopsy should take the age of patient into account; particularly, an older patient's risk threshold for biopsies should be higher than that of a younger patient.
Abstract: Breast cancer is the most common non-skin cancer affecting women in the United States, where every year more than 20 million mammograms are performed. Breast biopsy is commonly performed on the suspicious findings on mammograms to confirm the presence of cancer. Currently, 700,000 biopsies are performed annually in the U.S.; 55%--85% of these biopsies ultimately are found to be benign breast lesions, resulting in unnecessary treatments, patient anxiety, and expenditures. This paper addresses the decision problem faced by radiologists: When should a woman be sent for biopsy based on her mammographic features and demographic factors? This problem is formulated as a finite-horizon discrete-time Markov decision process. The optimal policy of our model shows that the decision to biopsy should take the age of patient into account; particularly, an older patient's risk threshold for biopsy should be higher than that of a younger patient. When applied to the clinical data, our model outperforms radiologists in the biopsy decision-making problem. This study also derives structural properties of the model, including sufficiency conditions that ensure the existence of a control-limit type policy and nondecreasing control-limits with age.

110 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Residency training in breast imaging has improved in terms of time and curriculum, however, a majority of the residents would not consider a fellowship and did not want to interpret mammograms in their future practices.
Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the training and attitudes of residents regarding breast imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A telephone survey was conducted with 201 4th-year residents (postgraduate medical school year 5) and 10 3rd-year residents (postgraduate medical school year 4) at 211 accredited radiology residencies in the United States and Canada. Survey topics included organization of the breast imaging section, residents’ role in the section, clinical practice protocols of the training institution, residents’ personal thoughts about breast imaging, and their interest in performing breast imaging in the future. RESULTS: Of 211 programs, 203 (96%) had dedicated breast imaging rotations; 196 (93%) rotations were 8 weeks or longer; 153 (73%), 12 weeks or longer. Residents dictated reports in 199 (94%) programs. Residents performed real-time ultrasonography (US) in 186 (88%) programs, needle localization in 199 (94%), US-guided biopsy in 174 (82%), and stereotactically guided biopsy in 181 (86%). One hundred ei...

83 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Contrastenhanced mammography (CEM) has emerged as a viable alternative to contrast-enhanced breast MRI, and it may increase access to vascular imaging while reducing examination cost as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has emerged as a viable alternative to contrast-enhanced breast MRI, and it may increase access to vascular imaging while reducing examination cost. Intravenous iodinated contrast materials are used in CEM to enhance the visualization of tumor neovascularity. After injection, imaging is performed with dual-energy digital mammography, which helps provide a low-energy image and a recombined or iodine image that depict enhancing lesions in the breast. CEM has been demonstrated to help improve accuracy compared with digital mammography and US in women with abnormal screening mammographic findings or symptoms of breast cancer. It has also been demonstrated to approach the accuracy of breast MRI in preoperative staging of patients with breast cancer and in monitoring response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There are early encouraging results from trials evaluating CEM in the screening of women who are at an increased risk of breast cancer. Although CEM is a promising tool, it slightly increases radiation dose and carries a small risk of adverse reactions to contrast materials. This review details the CEM technique, diagnostic and screening uses, and future applications, including artificial intelligence and radiomics.

75 citations