Author
Andreas H. Groll
Other affiliations: Goethe University Frankfurt, University of Münster, National Institutes of Health ...read more
Bio: Andreas H. Groll is an academic researcher from Boston Children's Hospital. The author has contributed to research in topics: Transplantation & Aspergillosis. The author has an hindex of 65, co-authored 279 publications receiving 16795 citations. Previous affiliations of Andreas H. Groll include Goethe University Frankfurt & University of Münster.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
University of Sydney1, University of Michigan2, Duke University3, University of Alabama at Birmingham4, University of Pittsburgh5, University of Florida6, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention7, University of Münster8, University of Udine9, Ankara University10, University of Wisconsin-Madison11, Paris Diderot University12, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences13, University of Paris14, University of Lausanne15, Brown University16, Istituto Giannina Gaslini17, Carlos III Health Institute18, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences19, National Institutes of Health20, University of Pennsylvania21, St George's, University of London22, Heidelberg University23, University of Copenhagen24, University College London25, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center26, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven27, Goethe University Frankfurt28, University of Würzburg29, Johns Hopkins University30, Monash University31, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro32, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart33, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio34, Masaryk University35, RMIT University36, Radboud University Nijmegen37, University of Melbourne38, Stanford University39, University of California, Davis40, Georgia Regents University41, Cornell University42, University of Aberdeen43, University Hospital of Wales44
TL;DR: These updated definitions of IFDs should prove applicable in clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic research of a broader range of patients at high-risk.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) remain important causes of morbidity and mortality. The consensus definitions of the Infectious Diseases Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group have been of immense value to researchers who conduct clinical trials of antifungals, assess diagnostic tests, and undertake epidemiologic studies. However, their utility has not extended beyond patients with cancer or recipients of stem cell or solid organ transplants. With newer diagnostic techniques available, it was clear that an update of these definitions was essential. METHODS: To achieve this, 10 working groups looked closely at imaging, laboratory diagnosis, and special populations at risk of IFD. A final version of the manuscript was agreed upon after the groups' findings were presented at a scientific symposium and after a 3-month period for public comment. There were several rounds of discussion before a final version of the manuscript was approved. RESULTS: There is no change in the classifications of "proven," "probable," and "possible" IFD, although the definition of "probable" has been expanded and the scope of the category "possible" has been diminished. The category of proven IFD can apply to any patient, regardless of whether the patient is immunocompromised. The probable and possible categories are proposed for immunocompromised patients only, except for endemic mycoses. CONCLUSIONS: These updated definitions of IFDs should prove applicable in clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic research of a broader range of patients at high-risk.
1,211 citations
University of Cologne1, Misericordia University2, University Hospital of Lausanne3, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre4, Pasteur Institute5, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital6, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven7, Hacettepe University8, Statens Serum Institut9, Boston Children's Hospital10, Carlos III Health Institute11, University of Strasbourg12, University of Liverpool13, University of Copenhagen14, Innsbruck Medical University15, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens16, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre17, University of Genoa18, University of Würzburg19
TL;DR: This part of the EFISG guidelines focuses on non-neutropenic adult patients, and liposomal amphotericin B and voriconazole are supported with moderate, and fluconazole with marginal strength for the targeted initial treatment of candidaemia.
1,011 citations
Hacettepe University1, Boston Children's Hospital2, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven3, University of Bologna4, Radboud University Nijmegen5, University of Aberdeen6, Claude Bernard University Lyon 17, European Respiratory Society8, Cardiff University9, University Hospital of Lausanne10, Ghent University11, University of Queensland12, University of Paris13, Istituto Giannina Gaslini14, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research15, Carlos III Health Institute16, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens17, University of Rennes18, University Hospital Heidelberg19, University College London20, Goethe University Frankfurt21, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart22, McGill University23
TL;DR: Treatment duration for aspergillosis is strongly recommended based on clinical improvement, degree of immunosuppression and response on imaging, and in refractory disease, where a personalized approach considering reversal of predisposing factors, switching drug class and surgical intervention is also strongly recommended.
848 citations
Carlos III Health Institute1, University of Cologne2, University of Sydney3, Paris Descartes University4, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre5, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul6, University of California, San Diego7, Medical University of Graz8, University of Copenhagen9, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven10, University of Bologna11, University of the Witwatersrand12, RMIT University13, McGill University14, Hacettepe University15, University of Paris16, Utrecht University17, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences18, Tel Aviv University19, Hospital General de México20, Istituto Giannina Gaslini21, Mahidol University22, Federal University of São Paulo23, King's College, Aberdeen24, Comenius University in Bratislava25, Boston Children's Hospital26, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón27, Complutense University of Madrid28, University Hospital Heidelberg29, University of California, Los Angeles30, American University of Beirut31, Innsbruck Medical University32, University of Lausanne33, Catholic University of Korea34, Goethe University Frankfurt35, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens36, Erasmus University Rotterdam37, Monash University38, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro39, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart40, University of Health Sciences Antigua41, National Institutes of Health42, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre43, University of Pittsburgh44, University of Melbourne45, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre46, P. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre47, University of Southern California48, Duke University49, Singapore General Hospital50, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital51, Cardiff University52, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio53, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia54, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research55
TL;DR: Management of mucormycosis depends on recognising disease patterns and on early diagnosis, and limited availability of contemporary treatments burdens patients in low and middle income settings.
Abstract: Mucormycosis is a difficult to diagnose rare disease with high morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is often delayed, and disease tends to progress rapidly. Urgent surgical and medical intervention is lifesaving. Guidance on the complex multidisciplinary management has potential to improve prognosis, but approaches differ between health-care settings. From January, 2018, authors from 33 countries in all United Nations regions analysed the published evidence on mucormycosis management and provided consensus recommendations addressing differences between the regions of the world as part of the "One World One Guideline" initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM). Diagnostic management does not differ greatly between world regions. Upon suspicion of mucormycosis appropriate imaging is strongly recommended to document extent of disease and is followed by strongly recommended surgical intervention. First-line treatment with high-dose liposomal amphotericin B is strongly recommended, while intravenous isavuconazole and intravenous or delayed release tablet posaconazole are recommended with moderate strength. Both triazoles are strongly recommended salvage treatments. Amphotericin B deoxycholate is recommended against, because of substantial toxicity, but may be the only option in resource limited settings. Management of mucormycosis depends on recognising disease patterns and on early diagnosis. Limited availability of contemporary treatments burdens patients in low and middle income settings. Areas of uncertainty were identified and future research directions specified.
842 citations
TL;DR: Significant changes in frequency, aetiology and underlying disease processes in invasive fungal infections at autopsy are document and underscore the continuing need for more effective prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.
747 citations
Cited by
More filters
01 Jan 2020
TL;DR: Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future.
Abstract: Summary Background Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described. Methods In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death. Findings 191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients). Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03–1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61–12·23; p Interpretation The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage. Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future. Funding Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.
4,408 citations
St George's Hospital1, New York University2, McMaster University3, Brown University4, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart5, Hebron University6, University of Manitoba7, Emory University Hospital8, Hebrew University of Jerusalem9, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre10, University of Pittsburgh11, Saint Thomas - West Hospital12, University College London13, Vanderbilt University Medical Center14, Keio University15, Memorial Hospital of South Bend16, Cooper University Hospital17, University of Mississippi Medical Center18, Rush University Medical Center19, University of Ulsan20, Federal University of São Paulo21, Regions Hospital22, St. Michael's Hospital23, Washington University in St. Louis24, Ottawa Hospital25, University of Sydney26, Mount Sinai Hospital27, University of New South Wales28, Fujita Health University29, Christiana Care Health System30, Stanford University31, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology32, University of Kansas33, Harvard University34, California Pacific Medical Center35, University of Amsterdam36, Houston Methodist Hospital37
TL;DR: Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.
Abstract: To provide an update to “Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012”. A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in December 2015. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development. The panel consisted of five sections: hemodynamics, infection, adjunctive therapies, metabolic, and ventilation. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Each subgroup generated a list of questions, searched for best available evidence, and then followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or best practice statement when applicable. The Surviving Sepsis Guideline panel provided 93 statements on early management and resuscitation of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, 32 were strong recommendations, 39 were weak recommendations, and 18 were best-practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions. Substantial agreement exists among a large cohort of international experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best care of patients with sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.
4,303 citations
TL;DR: Improved non-culture-based diagnostics are needed to expand the potential for preemptive (or early directed) therapy and improve diagnostic, preventive, and therapeutic strategies is necessary to reduce the considerable morbidity and mortality associated with IC.
Abstract: Invasive candidiasis (IC) is a leading cause of mycosis-associated mortality in the United States. We examined data from the National Center for Health Statistics and reviewed recent literature in order to update the epidemiology of IC. IC-associated mortality has remained stable, at approximately 0.4 deaths per 100,000 population, since 1997, while mortality associated with invasive aspergillosis has continued to decline. Candida albicans remains the predominant cause of IC, accounting for over half of all cases, but Candida glabrata has emerged as the second most common cause of IC in the United States, and several less common Candida species may be emerging, some of which can exhibit resistance to triazoles and/or amphotericin B. Crude and attributable rates of mortality due to IC remain unacceptably high and unchanged for the past 2 decades. Nonpharmacologic preventive strategies should be emphasized, including hand hygiene; appropriate use, placement, and care of central venous catheters; and prudent use of antimicrobial therapy. Given that delays in appropriate antifungal therapy are associated with increased mortality, improved use of early empirical, preemptive, and prophylactic therapies should also help reduce IC-associated mortality. Several studies have now identified important variables that can be used to predict risk of IC and to help guide preventive strategies such as antifungal prophylaxis and early empirical therapy. However, improved non-culture-based diagnostics are needed to expand the potential for preemptive (or early directed) therapy. Further research to improve diagnostic, preventive, and therapeutic strategies is necessary to reduce the considerable morbidity and mortality associated with IC.
3,723 citations
Journal Article•
3,097 citations
University of Alabama at Birmingham1, University of Michigan2, University of Wisconsin-Madison3, Duke University4, University of Lausanne5, University of California, Los Angeles6, Georgia Regents University7, Radboud University Nijmegen8, University of Texas at Austin9, Rowan University10, AstraZeneca11, National Institutes of Health12, Wayne State University13
TL;DR: These updated guidelines replace the previous guidelines published in the 15 January 2004 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases and are intended for use by health care providers who care for patients who either have or are at risk of these infections.
Abstract: Guidelines for the management of patients with invasive candidiasis and mucosal candidiasis were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. These updated guidelines replace the previous guidelines published in the 15 January 2004 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases and are intended for use by health care providers who care for patients who either have or are at risk of these infections. Since 2004, several new antifungal agents have become available, and several new studies have been published relating to the treatment of candidemia, other forms of invasive candidiasis, and mucosal disease, including oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis. There are also recent prospective data on the prevention of invasive candidiasis in high-risk neonates and adults and on the empiric treatment of suspected invasive candidiasis in adults. This new information is incorporated into this revised document.
3,016 citations