Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos

Bio: Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos is an academic researcher from University of Westminster. The author has contributed to research in topics: Environmental law & Philosophy of law. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 90 publications receiving 1020 citations. Previous affiliations of Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos include University of London.

Spatial Justice: Body, Lawscape, Atmosphere

Abstract: Introduction, Chapter One Law's Spatial Turn, Chapter Two Welcome to the Lawscape, Chapter TAUhree From Lawscape to Atmosphere: Affects, Bodies, Air, Chapter Four A Change of Air: The Posthuman Atmosphere, Chapter Five Spatial Justice, Chapter Six The Islands, Bibliography

Law's Spatial Turn: Geography, Justice and a Certain Fear of Space

Abstract: This is a critical reading of the current literature on law and geography. The article argues that the literature is characterized by an undertheorization of the concept of space. Instead, the focus is either on the specific geography of law in the form of jurisdiction, or as a simple terminological innovation. Instead, the article suggests that law's spatial turn ought to consider space as a singular parameter to the hitherto legal preoccupation with time, history and waiting. This forces law into dealing with a new, peculiarly spatial kind of uncertainty in terms of simultaneity, disorientation, materiality and exclusionary corporeal emplacement. The main area in which this undertheorization forcefully manifests itself is that of spatial justice. Despite its critical potential, the concept has been reduced by the majority of the relevant literature into another version of social, distributive or regional justice. On the contrary, if the peculiar characteristics of space are to be taken into account, a concept of justice will have to be rethought on a much more fundamental level than that.

Law’s Spatial Turn: Geography, Justice and a Certain Fear of Space:

Abstract: This is a critical reading of the current literature on law and geography. The article argues that the literature is characterized by an undertheorization of the concept of space. The focus is either on the specific geography of law in the form of jurisdiction, or as a simple terminological innovation. Instead, the article suggests that law’s spatial turn ought to consider space as a singular parameter to the hitherto legal preoccupation with time, history and waiting. This forces law into dealing with a new, peculiarly spatial kind of uncertainty in terms of simultaneity, disorientation, materiality and exclusionary corporeal emplacement. The main area in which this undertheorization forcefully manifests itself is that of spatial justice. Despite its critical potential, the concept has been reduced by the majority of the relevant literature into another version of social, distributive or regional justice. On the contrary, if the peculiar characteristics of space are to be taken into account, a concept of justice will have to be rethought on a much more fundamental level than that.

Withdrawing from atmosphere: An ontology of air partitioning and affective engineering

Abstract: The main objective of this text is to warn against atmospherics. However comfortable it might appear, an atmosphere is politically suspicious because it numbs a body into an affective embrace of stability and permanence. It becomes doubly suspicious because a body desires to be part of the atmosphere. For this reason, I rethink both affect and atmosphere ontologically rather than phenomenologically. I argue that an atmosphere is engineered by subsuming individual affects to what I call, following Sloterdijk, an atmospheric glasshouse. I suggest that this happens in four steps: a distinction between inside and outside through partitioning; inclusion of the outside inside; illusion of synthesis; and dissimulation. In order to do this, I begin with air as the elemental paradox of ontological continuum and rupture. I carry on with the passage from air to atmosphere while retaining the discourse around continuum and rupture. Finally, I indicate a way of rupturing the atmospheric continuum through the ontological movement of withdrawal from the atmosphere. The ultimate goal of the article is to sketch a problematic of atmospherics that puts together without synthesising an elemental ontology of continuum and rupture.

Atmospheres of Law: Senses, Affects, Lawscapes

Abstract: In this article, I deal with airs and sounds and scents, while keeping an eye on the law. My field of enquiry is the interstitial area between sensory and affective occurrences, namely sensory experiences that are traditionally thought to be a causal result of external stimuli, and affective experiences that are mostly associated with emotional changes and generally allude to something internal. I am arguing that there is no constructive difference between internal and external origin of occurrences. In its stead, I suggest the concept of atmosphere, namely an attempt at understanding affective occurrences as excessive, collective, spatial and elemental. However, it quickly becomes apparent that an atmosphere is legally determined. The law controls affective occurrences by regulating property of sensory stimulation. At the same time, the law guides bodies into corridors of sensory compulsion e an aspect of which is consumerism in capitalist societies. The law achieves this by allowing certain sensory options to come forth while suppressing others, something which is particularly obvious in cases of intellectual property protection that capture the sensorial. I deal with the law in its material, spatial manifestation and in particular through what I have called the ‘lawscape’, namely the fusion of space and normativity. I employ a broadly Deleuzian methodology with insights from radical geography, affective studies, urban and critical legal theory in order to develop and link the various parts of the text.

The Production of Space

Abstract: ‘The Production of Space’, in: Frans Jacobi, Imagine, Space Poetry, Copenhagen, 1996, unpaginated.

Difference and Repetition

Abstract: The best ebooks about Difference And Repetition that you can get for free here by download this Difference And Repetition and save to your desktop. This ebooks is under topic such as gilles deleuze difference and repetition difference and repetition mariusj preparing to learn from difference and repetition protevi gilles deleuze difference and repetition difference and repetition: on guy debord's films difference and repetition wrmail difference and repetition uksfp difference and repetition pdf book library deleuzeâ€ÂTMs difference and repetition (phil 615) crn: 27134 gilles deleuzes difference and repetition gilles deleuzes deleuzeà ̄¿¢à ̄Â3⁄4ۈ ̄Â3⁄4ÂTMs difference and repetition by henry somers-hall repetition pdf difference and deleuze wordpress difference, repetition, and the n[on(e)-all]: the repetition and difference: a rhythmanalysis of pedagogic outline of gilles deleuze, différence et répétition from colonization to globalization: difference or repetition and difference: a rhythmanalysis of pedagogic reading on the move geneseo migrant center and national the difference and repetition of gabriel tarde repetition and refrain your new wiki! wikispaces difference and repetition 310 conclusion: the postulate difference and repetition in deleuzeâ€ÂTMs proustian sign and differences in the nonword repetition performance of which are the layers of difference and repetition? gilles deleuzes difference and repetition gilles deleuzes gilles deleuze's 'difference and repetition': a critical difference and repetition deleuze pdf kepbeenpdf difference and repetition pdf kepbeenpdfleswordpress difference and repetition european perspectives a series rhetorical analysis university academic success programs what difference does deleuze's difference make? difference and repetition wikipedia difference and repetition gilles deleuze google books deleuze, gilles | internet encyclopedia of philosophy

What is philosophy

Abstract: Doing philosophy means reasoning about questions that are of basic importance to the human experience—questions like, What is a good life? What is reality? How are knowledge and understanding possible? What should we believe? What norms should govern our societies, our relationships, and our activities? Philosophers critically analyze ideas and practices that often are assumed without reflection. Wesleyan’s philosophy faculty draws on multiple traditions of inquiry, offering a wide variety of perspectives and methods for addressing these questions.