scispace - formally typeset
A

Andrei Shleifer

Researcher at Harvard University

Publications -  519
Citations -  286543

Andrei Shleifer is an academic researcher from Harvard University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Government & Shareholder. The author has an hindex of 171, co-authored 514 publications receiving 271880 citations. Previous affiliations of Andrei Shleifer include National Bureau of Economic Research & University of Chicago.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The quality of government

TL;DR: The authors investigated empirically the determinants of the quality of governments in a large cross-section of countries and found that countries that are poor, close to the equator, ethnolinguistically heterogeneous, use French or socialist laws, or have high proportions of Catholics or Muslims exhibit inferior government performance.
Posted Content

Corporate Ownership Around the World

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present data on ownership structures of large corporations in 27 wealthy economies, making an effort to identify ultimate controlling shareholders of these firms, and suggest that the principal agency problem in large corporations around the world is that of restricting expropriation of minority shareholders by the controlling shareholders.
Posted Content

Growth in Cities

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used a new data set on the growth of large industries in 170 U.S. cities between 1956 and 1987 and found that local competition and urban variety, but not regional specialization, encourage employment growth in industries.
Posted Content

The Limits of Arbitrage

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that arbitrage is performed by a relatively small number of highly specialized investors who take large positions using other people's money, which has a number of interesting implications for security pricing.
Posted Content

Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide evidence that value strategies yield higher returns because these strategies exploit the mistakes of the typical investor, and not because these riskier strategies are fundamentally riskier.