Andrew James Culshaw

Bio: Andrew James Culshaw is an academic researcher from Novartis. The author has contributed to research in topics: TRPV1 & Quinazolinone. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 31 publications receiving 527 citations. Previous affiliations of Andrew James Culshaw include University of Edinburgh.

Naphthalen -1 -yl -(4 -pentyloxynaphthalen -1 -yl)methanone : A potent, orally bioavailable human CB1/CB2 dual agonist with antihyperalgesic properties and restricted central nervous system penetration

Abstract: Selective activation of peripheral cannabinoid CB1 receptors has the potential to become a valuable therapy for chronic pain conditions as long as central nervous system effects are attenuated. A new class of cannabinoid ligands was rationally designed from known aminoalkylindole agonists and showed good binding and functional activities at human CB1 and CB2 receptors. This has led to the discovery of a novel CB1/CB2 dual agonist, naphthalen-1-yl-(4-pentyloxynaphthalen-1-yl)methanone (13), which displays good oral bioavailability, potent antihyperalgesic activity in animal models, and limited brain penetration.

Identification and Biological Characterization of 6-Aryl-7-isopropylquinazolinones as Novel TRPV1 Antagonists that Are Effective in Models of Chronic Pain

Abstract: Vanilloid receptor 1 (VR1, TRPV1) is a cation-selective ion channel that is expressed on primary afferent neurons and is upregulated following inflammation and nerve damage. Blockers of this channel may have utility in the treatment of chronic nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Here, we describe the optimization from a high throughput screening hit, of a series of 6-aryl-7-isopropylquinazolinones that are TRPV1 antagonists in vitro. We also demonstrate that one compound is active in vivo against capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia and in models of neuropathic and nociceptive pain in the rat.

Discovery of Orally Bioavailable Cathepsin S Inhibitors for the Reversal of Neuropathic Pain

Abstract: Cathepsin S inhibitors are well-known to be an attractive target as immunological therapeutic agents. Recently, our gene expression analysis identified that cathepsin S inhibitors could also be effective for neuropathic pain. Herein, we describe the efficacy of selective cathepsin S inhibitors as antihyperalgesics in a model of neuropathic pain in rats after oral administration.

7-tert-Butyl-6-(4-Chloro-Phenyl)-2-Thioxo-2,3-Dihydro-1H-Pyrido[2,3-d]Pyrimidin-4-One, a Classic Polymodal Inhibitor of Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid Type 1 with a Reduced Liability for Hyperthermia, Is Analgesic and Ameliorates Visceral Hypersensitivity

Abstract: The therapeutic potential of transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) antagonists for chronic pain has been recognized for more than a decade. However, preclinical and clinical data revealed that acute pharmacological blockade of TRPV1 perturbs thermoregulation, resulting in hyperthermia, which is a major hurdle for the clinical development of these drugs. Here, we describe the properties of 7-tert-butyl-6-(4-chloro-phenyl)-2-thioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-one (BCTP), a TRPV1 antagonist with excellent analgesic properties that does not induce significant hyperthermia in rodents at doses providing maximal analgesia. BCTP is a classic polymodal inhibitor of TRPV1, blocking activation of the human channel by capsaicin and low pH with IC(50) values of 65.4 and 26.4 nM, respectively. Similar activity was observed with rat TRPV1, and the inhibition by BCTP was competitive and reversible. BCTP also blocked heat-induced activation of TRPV1. In rats, the inhibition of capsaicin-induced mechanical hyperalgesia was observed with a D(50) value of 2 mg/kg p.o. BCTP also reversed visceral hypersensitivity and somatic inflammatory pain, and using a model of neuropathic pain in TRPV1 null mice we confirmed that its analgesic properties were solely through the inhibition of TRPV1. We were surprised to find that BCTP administered orally induced only a maximal 0.6°C increase in core body temperature at the highest tested doses (30 and 100 mg/kg), contrasting markedly with N-[4-({6-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]pyrimidin-4-yl}oxy)-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl]acetamide (AMG517), a clinically tested TRPV1 antagonist, which induced marked hyperthermia (>1°C) at doses eliciting submaximal reversal of capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia. The combined data indicate that TRPV1 antagonists with a classic polymodal inhibition profile can be identified where the analgesic action is separated from the effects on body temperature.

Carboxylate-assisted transition-metal-catalyzed C-H bond functionalizations: mechanism and scope.

Abstract: The site-selective formation of carbon-carbon bonds through direct functionalizations of otherwise unreactive carbon-hydrogen bonds constitutes an economically attractive strategy for an overall streamlining of sustainable syntheses. In recent decades, intensive research efforts have led to the development of various reaction conditions for challenging C-H bond functionalizations, among which transition-metal-catalyzed transformations arguably constitute thus far the most valuable tool. For instance, the use of inter alia palladium, ruthenium, rhodium, copper, or iron complexes set the stage for chemo-, site-, diastereo-, and/or enantioselective C-H bond functionalizations. Key to success was generally a detailed mechanistic understanding of the elementary C-H bond metalation step, which depending on the nature of the metal fragment can proceed via several distinct reaction pathways. Traditionally, three different modes of action were primarily considered for CH bond metalations, namely, (i) oxidative addition with electronrich late transition metals, (ii) σ-bond metathesis with early transition metals, and (iii) electrophilic activation with electrondeficient late transition metals (Scheme 1). However, more recent mechanistic studies indicated the existence of a continuum of electrophilic, ambiphilic, and nucleophilic interactions. Within this continuum, detailed experimental and computational analysis provided strong evidence for novel C-H bond metalationmechanisms relying on the assistance of a bifunctional ligand bearing an additional Lewis-basic heteroatom, such as that found in (heteroatom-substituted) secondary phosphine oxides or most prominently carboxylates (Scheme 1, iv). This novel insight into the nature of stoichiometric metalations has served as stimulus for the development of novel transformations based on cocatalytic amounts of carboxylates, which significantly broadened the scope of C-H bond functionalizations in recent years, with most remarkable progress being made in palladiumor ruthenium-catalyzed direct arylations and direct alkylations. These carboxylate-assisted C-H bond transformations were mostly proposed to proceed via a mechanism in which metalation takes place via a concerted base-assisted deprotonation. To mechanistically differentiate these intramolecular metalations new acronyms have recently been introduced into the literature, such as CMD (concerted metalationdeprotonation), IES (internal electrophilic substitution), or AMLA (ambiphilic metal ligand activation), which describe related mechanisms and will be used below where appropriate. This review summarizes the development and scope of carboxylates as cocatalysts in transition-metal-catalyzed C-H functionalizations until autumn 2010. Moreover, experimental and computational studies on stoichiometric metalation reactions being of relevance to the mechanism of these catalytic processes are discussed as well. Mechanistically related C-H bond cleavage reactions with ruthenium or iridium complexes bearing monodentate ligands are, however, only covered with respect to their working mode, and transformations with stoichiometric amounts of simple acetate bases are solely included when their mechanism was suggested to proceed by acetate-assisted metalation.

Transition-metal-catalyzed direct arylation of (hetero)arenes by C-H bond cleavage.

Abstract: The area of transition-metal-catalyzed direct arylation through cleavage of CH bonds has undergone rapid development in recent years, and is becoming an increasingly viable alternative to traditional cross-coupling reactions with organometallic reagents In particular, palladium and ruthenium catalysts have been described that enable the direct arylation of (hetero)arenes with challenging coupling partners—including electrophilic aryl chlorides and tosylates as well as simple arenes in cross-dehydrogenative arylations Furthermore, less expensive copper, iron, and nickel complexes were recently shown to be effective for economically attractive direct arylations

C-H bond functionalization: emerging synthetic tools for natural products and pharmaceuticals

Abstract: The direct functionalization of C-H bonds in organic compounds has recently emerged as a powerful and ideal method for the formation of carbon-carbon and carbon-heteroatom bonds. This Review provides an overview of C-H bond functionalization strategies for the rapid synthesis of biologically active compounds such as natural products and pharmaceutical targets.

Organic Synthesis “On Water”

Abstract: Water is the lingua franca of life on our planet and is the solvent of choice for Nature to carry out her syntheses.1 In contrast, our methods of making complex organic molecules have taken us far away from the watery milieu of biosynthesis. Indeed, it is fair to say that most organic reactions commonly used both in academic laboratories and in industry fail in the presence of water or oxygen. As a direct consequence of our attempts to mimick Nature's way of making new chemical bonds, we learned to rely on highly reactive nucleophilic and electrophilic reagents to gain control of the chemical reactivity and to channel chemical reactions down a desired pathway. The requirement for the protection of all protic functional groups, such as alcohols and amines, is another corollary of our reliance on these energetic species. Nevertheless, chemical transformations in aqueous solvents are not new to organic chemists. On the contrary, they have attracted attention of scientists for many years: the first use of water for an organic reaction could be dated back to Wohler's synthesis of urea from ammonium cyanate.2 From a true organic synthesis perspective, the earliest example could be the synthesis of indigo by Baeyer and Drewsen in 1882 (Scheme 1).3 In their synthesis, a suspension of o-nitrobenzaldehyde 1 in aqueous acetone was treated with a solution of sodium hydroxide. The immediate formation of the characteristic blue color of indigo 2 ensued, and the product subsequently precipitated. Scheme 1 Water possesses many unique physical and chemical properties: large temperature window in which it remains in the liquid state, extensive hydrogen bonding, high heat capacity, large dielectric constant, and optimum oxygen solubility to maintain aquatic life forms. These distinctive properties are the consequence of the unique structure of water.4,5 The structure and properties of water have been studied by scientists representing almost all fields of knowledge, and new theoretical models continue to emerge.6,7 Water is also known to enhance the rates and to affect the selectivity of a wide variety of organic reactions.8,9 In spite of these potential advantages, water is still not commonly used as a sole solvent for organic synthesis, at least in part because most organic compounds do not dissolve in water to a significant extent, and solubility is generally considered a prerequisite for reactivity: “corpora non agunt nisi soluta” (substances do not react unless dissolved). Consequently, in the many examples of “aqueous reactions” organic co-solvents are employed in order to increase the solubility of organic reactants in water.9,10 Alternatively, hydrophilicity of the reactants is increased by the introduction of polar functional groups, again to make the resulting compound at least partially water soluble.11 However, these manipulations tend to diminish and even negate the advantages of low cost, simplicity of reaction conditions, ease of workup, and product isolation that water has over traditional solvents. Therefore, the currently burgeoning field of organic synthesis in aqueous media encompasses a large family of reactions. The solubility of reacting species and products can range from complete to partial to practically none, so that reaction mixtures can be both homogeneous and heterogeneous. The amount of water can also range widely, from substoichiometric quantities to a large volume in which the reactants are suspended or dissolved. Several terms have been used in the literature to describe reactions in aqueous millieu. In water, in the presence of water, and on water are commonly found in the recent publications and are often used interchangeably to describe reactions that proceed under very different conditions.12,13 There is also a growing number of examples micellar catalysis in the presence of non-ionic surfactants, such as Triton X-100 and PTS (a tocopherol-based amphiphile).14-18 In this review, we attempt to survey organic transformations that benefit from being performed on water under the conditions defined by Sharpless and co-workers: when insoluble reactant(s) are stirred in aqueous emulsions or suspensions without the addition of any organic co-solvents. In many cases, it is impossible to ascertain whether the reaction is occuring in or on water, but as long as the reaction mixture remains heterogeneous and the overall process appears to benefit from it (either in terms of increased reaction rate or enhanced selectivity), it qualifies. The ‘on water’ moniker reflects the defining attribute of these reactions: the lack of solubility of the reactant(s) in water. A considerable rate acceleration is often observed in reactions carried out under these conditions over those in organic solvents.19 Furthermore, in many cases a significant rate increase of on water reactions over reactions carried out neat indicates that rate acceleration is not merely a consequence of increased concentration of the reacting species. Naturally, the degree of on water acceleration varies between different reaction classes, and even when it is modest, there are other advantages to carrying out reactions in this manner. Firstly, water is an excellent heat sink due to its large heat capacity, making exothermic processes safer and more selective, especially when they are carried out on large scale. Secondly, reactions of water-insoluble substrates usually lead to the formation of water-insoluble products. In such cases, product isolation simply involves filtration of solid products (or phase separation in case of liquids). Finally, the growing list of examples wherein reactions performed on water are not only faster but also more selective (whether chemo-, regio-, or enantio-) underscores the significant potential for process intensification for reactions performed on water. Although claims of the ecological advantages and “greenness” of water are almost invariably found in the opening paragraphs of reports describing aqueous reactions, they should be taken with a grain of salt. The low cost, relative abundance, and inherent safety of water notwithstanding, the environmental impact of a process is determined by many factors, such as the efficiency of the reaction in terms of atom economy,20 the nature of solvents used in the reaction workup, the residual concentration of regulated organic compounds and metal catalysts remaining in the aqueous waste, and the costs of its clean up or disposal.21,22 The mere finding that a process performs as well in water as it does in an organic solvent tells us little about its potential environmental impact. The field of aqueous organic synthesis has been regularly and comprehensively reviewed.9,10,23-27 In addition, recent reviews focusing on microwave assisted organic synthesis in water,28 reactions in near-critical water,29 and biocatalysis in water30 have been published. Accordingly, these topics are not covered in the present review.

Water: Nature’s Reaction Enforcer—Comparative Effects for Organic Synthesis “In-Water” and “On-Water”

Abstract: 3.1.2. Huisgen [3 + 2] Cycloaddition Reaction 6313 3.1.3. Claisen Rearrangement 6315 3.2. Multicomponent Reactions 6316 3.3. Nucleophilic Ring-Opening Reactions 6316 3.4. Wittig Reaction 6318 3.5. Bioorthogonal Reactions 6318 4. Catalyzed Reactions 6319 4.1. Metal-Catalyzed Reactions 6319 4.1.1. Pericyclic Reactions 6320 4.1.2. Arylation Reactions 6321 4.1.3. Olefin Metathesis 6323 4.1.4. Mizoroki-Heck Reaction 6324 4.1.5. Suzuki Reaction 6325 4.1.6. Sonogashira Reaction 6327 4.1.7. Transfer Hydrogenation 6327 4.1.8. Lewis Acid Catalysis 6328 4.2. Organocatalyzed Reactions 6330 4.2.1. Pericyclic Reactions 6330 4.2.2. Michael Reaction 6331 4.2.3. Mannich Reaction 6332 4.2.4. Aldol Reaction 6333 5. Conclusion 6334 6. Supporting Information Available 6335 7. References 6335