There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one. I remember first hearing about it at school. It seemed an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.

Usually familiarity dulls this sense of the bizarre, but in the case of i it was the reverse: over the years the sense of its surreal nature intensified. It seemed that it was impossible to write mathematics that described the real world in …

I and i

关于Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations的两个注解

5. M. Green, J. Schwarz, and E. Witten, Superstring theory, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987. 6. J. Isenberg, P. Yasskin, and P. Green, Non-self-dual gauge fields, Phys. Lett. 78B (1978), 462-464. 7. B. Kostant, Graded manifolds, graded Lie theory, and prequantization, Differential Geometric Methods in Mathematicas Physics, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 570, SpringerVerlag, Berlin and New York, 1977. 8. C. LeBrun, Thickenings and gauge fields, Class. Quantum Grav. 3 (1986), 1039-1059. 9. , Thickenings and conformai gravity, preprint, 1989. 10. C. LeBrun and M. Rothstein, Moduli of super Riemann surfaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 117(1988), 159-176. 11. Y. Manin, Critical dimensions of string theories and the dualizing sheaf on the moduli space of (super) curves, Funct. Anal. Appl. 20 (1987), 244-245. 12. R. Penrose and W. Rindler, Spinors and space-time, V.2, spinor and twistor methods in space-time geometry, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1986. 13. R. Ward, On self-dual gauge fields, Phys. Lett. 61A (1977), 81-82. 14. E. Witten, An interpretation of classical Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Lett. 77NB (1978), 394-398. 15. , Twistor-like transform in ten dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B266 (1986), 245-264. 16. , Physics and geometry, Proc. Internat. Congr. Math., Berkeley, 1986, pp. 267302, Amer. Math. Soc, Providence, R.I., 1987.

Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics (Roger Temam)

Boundary Control of PDEs

Backstepping boundary control for first-order hyperbolic PDEs and application to systems with actuator and sensor delays

In this paper, a problem of boundary stabilization of a class of linear parabolic partial integro-differential equations (P(I)DEs) in one dimension is considered using the method of backstepping, avoiding spatial discretization required in previous efforts. The problem is formulated as a design of an integral operator whose kernel is required to satisfy a hyperbolic P(I)DE. The kernel P(I)DE is then converted into an equivalent integral equation and by applying the method of successive approximations, the equation's well posedness and the kernel's smoothness are established. It is shown how to extend this approach to design optimally stabilizing controllers. An adaptation mechanism is developed to reduce the conservativeness of the inverse optimal controller, and the performance bounds are derived. For a broad range of physically motivated special cases feedback laws are constructed explicitly and the closed-loop solutions are found in closed form. A numerical scheme for the kernel P(I)DE is proposed; its numerical effort compares favorably with that associated with operator Riccati equations.

/pdf/closed-form-boundary-state-feedbacks-for-a-class-of-1-d-3lr6i5iz18.pdf

Closed-form boundary State feedbacks for a class of 1-D partial integro-differential equations

http://flyingv.ucsd.edu/papers/PDF/76.pdf

Backstepping observers for a class of parabolic PDEs

/pdf/adaptive-control-of-parabolic-pdes-5ce0qp8zzl.pdf

Andrey Smyshlyaev

Papers

Boundary Control of PDEs

Backstepping boundary control for first-order hyperbolic PDEs and application to systems with actuator and sensor delays

Closed-form boundary State feedbacks for a class of 1-D partial integro-differential equations

Backstepping observers for a class of parabolic PDEs

Adaptive Control of Parabolic PDEs