scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Andy M Y Chan

Bio: Andy M Y Chan is an academic researcher from Centre for Health Protection. The author has contributed to research in topics: Nonsynonymous substitution & Coronavirus. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 6 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors summarize the S protein mutations detected among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in Hong Kong in 2020, and the full encoding region of the S proteins was sequenced.
Abstract: In 2020, numerous fast-spreading severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants have been reported. These variants had unusually high genetic changes in the spike (S) protein. In an attempt to understand the genetic background of SARS-CoV-2 viruses in Hong Kong, especially before vaccination, the purpose of this study is to summarize the S protein mutations detected among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in Hong Kong in 2020. COVID-19 cases were selected every month in 2020. One virus from each case was analyzed. The full encoding region of the S proteins was sequenced. From January 2020 to December 2020, a total of 340 COVID-19 viruses were sequenced. The amino acids of the S protein for 44 (12.9%) were identical to the reference sequence, WIV04 (GenBank accession MN996528). For the remaining 296 sequences (87.1%), a total of 43 nonsynonymous substitution patterns were found. Of the nonsynonymous substitutions found, some of them were only detected at specific time intervals and then they disappeared. The ongoing genetic surveillance system is important. It would facilitate early detection of mutations that can increase infectivity as well as mutations that are selected for the virus to escape immunological restraint.

9 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in South Asian populations when either the D614 or the G614 virus was dominant, and found that populations infected predominantly with the G-614 virus had a much higher prevalence of anosmia (pooled prevalence of 31.8%) compared with the same ethnic populations infected mostly with the D-6G mutation.
Abstract: The prevalence of chemosensory dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 varies greatly between populations. It is unclear whether such differences are due to factors at the level of the human host, or at the level of the coronavirus, or both. At the host level, the entry proteins which allow virus binding and entry have variants with distinct properties, and the frequency of such variants differs between ethnicities. At the level of the virus, the D614G mutation enhances virus entry to the host cell. Since the two virus strains (D614 and G614) coexisted in the first six months of the pandemic in most populations, it has been difficult to distinguish between contributions of the virus and contributions of the host for anosmia. To answer this question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in South Asian populations when either the D614 or the G614 virus was dominant. We show that populations infected predominantly with the G614 virus had a much higher prevalence of anosmia (pooled prevalence of 31.8%) compared with the same ethnic populations infected mostly with the D614 virus strain (pooled anosmia prevalence of 5.3%). We conclude that the D614G mutation is a major contributing factor that increases the prevalence of anosmia in COVID-19, and that this enhanced effect on olfaction constitutes a previously unrecognized phenotype of the D614G mutation. The new virus strains that have additional mutations on the background of the D614G mutation can be expected to cause a similarly increased prevalence of chemosensory dysfunctions.

35 citations

Posted ContentDOI
12 Aug 2021-medRxiv
TL;DR: In this article, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in South Asian populations when either the D614 or the G614 virus was dominant and found that populations infected predominantly with the G6G mutation had a much higher prevalence of chemosensory dysfunction (pooled prevalence of 31.8%) compared with the same ethnic populations infected mostly with the D6g mutation.
Abstract: The prevalence of chemosensory dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 varies greatly between populations. It is unclear whether such differences are due to factors at the level of the human host, or at the level of the coronavirus, or both. At the host level, the entry proteins which allow virus binding and entry have variants with distinct properties, and the frequency of such variants differs between ethnicities. At the level of the virus, the D614G mutation enhances virus entry to the host cell. Since the two virus strains (D614 and G614) co-existed in the first six months of the pandemic in most populations, it has been difficult to distinguish between contributions of the virus and contributions of the host for anosmia. To answer this question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in South Asian populations when either the D614 or the G614 virus was dominant. We show that populations infected predominantly with the G614 virus had a much higher prevalence of anosmia (pooled prevalence of 31.8%) compared with the same ethnic populations infected mostly with the D614 virus strain (pooled anosmia prevalence of 5.3%). We conclude that the D614G mutation is a major contributing factor that increases the prevalence of anosmia in COVID-19, and that this enhanced effect on olfaction constitutes a previously unrecognized phenotype of the D614G mutation. The new virus strains that have additional mutations on the background of the D614G mutation can be expected to cause a similarly increased prevalence of chemosensory dysfunctions. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=119 SRC="FIGDIR/small/21261934v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (39K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f2cc42org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@401e43org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@182e7d1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1414d2a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

32 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Sep 2021
TL;DR: In this article, SARS-CoV-2 cases were screened for the key non-synonymous substitutions in spike protein by different assays and preliminary positive cases were further tested by whole genome sequencing.
Abstract: Background Prior to this report, variants of concern for SARS-CoV-2 were only detected from imported cases in Hong Kong. Objective Multiple cases of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.351 have been identified in local community. We reported the phylogenetic relationship of these cases. Study design SARS-CoV-2 cases were screened for the key non-synonymous substitutions in spike protein by different assays. Preliminary positive cases were further tested by whole genome sequencing. Results From Dec 2020 to May 2021, 55 SARS-CoV-2 cases belonged to lineage B.1.351. Among them, eight genomes were clustered together, all of them were local cases with epidemiological link. Conclusions To track variants of SARS-CoV-2 and to allow early implementation of control measures, SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance must be consistently performed.

5 citations