scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Angelika Landgraf

Bio: Angelika Landgraf is an academic researcher from Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg. The author has contributed to research in topics: Pseudomonas syringae & TAL effector. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 5 publications receiving 2760 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
11 Dec 2009-Science
TL;DR: The functionality of a distinct type of DNA binding domain is described and allows the design ofDNA binding domains for biotechnology.
Abstract: The pathogenicity of many bacteria depends on the injection of effector proteins via type III secretion into eukaryotic cells in order to manipulate cellular processes. TAL (transcription activator-like) effectors from plant pathogenic Xanthomonas are important virulence factors that act as transcriptional activators in the plant cell nucleus, where they directly bind to DNA via a central domain of tandem repeats. Here, we show how target DNA specificity of TAL effectors is encoded. Two hypervariable amino acid residues in each repeat recognize one base pair in the target DNA. Recognition sequences of TAL effectors were predicted and experimentally confirmed. The modular protein architecture enabled the construction of artificial effectors with new specificities. Our study describes the functionality of a distinct type of DNA binding domain and allows the design of DNA binding domains for biotechnology.

2,656 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The abstracts are presented at the European Society of Gene and Cell Therapy and the British Society for Gene Therapy meeting in Brussels on Tuesday, 2 March to discuss the future of gene therapy and its role in medicine.
Abstract: 593 18. Comins, C. et al. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 5564–5572 (2010). 19. Breitbach, C.J. et al. Hum. Gene Ther. 22, A12 (2011). 20. Kaufman, H.L. & Bines, S.D. Future Oncol. 6, 941– 949 (2010). 21. Heo, J. et al. Mol. Ther. 19, 1170–1179 (2011). 22. Breitbach, C.J. et al. Nature 477, 99–102 (2011). 23. Gaspar, H.B. et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 97ra79 (2011). 24. Hacein-Bey-Abina, S. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 355–364 (2010). 25. Gaspar, H.B. et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 97ra80 (2011). 26. Aiuti, A. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 447–458 (2009). 27. Grez, M. et al. Mol. Ther. 19, 28–35 (2011). 28. Boztug, K. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 1918–1927 (2010). 29. Galy, A. & Thrasher, A.J. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 11, 545–550 (2011). 30. Cavazzana-Calvo, M. et al. Nature 467, 318–322 (2010). 31. Porter, D.L., Levine, B.L., Kalos, M., Bagg, A. & June, C.H. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 725–733 (2011). 32. Kochenderfer, J.N. et al. Blood 119, 2709–2720 (2012). 33. Di Stasi, A. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 1673–1683 (2011). 34. Harrington, K.J. et al. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 4005– 4015 (2010). 35. Senzer, N.N. et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 5763–5771 (2009). 1. Abstracts Collaborative Meeting of the European Society of Gene and Cell Therapy and the British Society for Gene Therapy. Hum. Gene Ther. 22, A1– A138 (2011). 2. Bainbridge, J.W. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 2231– 2239 (2008). 3. Maguire, A.M. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 2240–2248 (2008). 4. Maguire, A.M. et al. Lancet 374, 1597–1605 (2009). 5. Nathwani, A.C. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 2357– 2365 (2011). 6. Raj, D., Davidoff, A.M. & Nathwani, A.C. Expert Rev. Hematol. 4, 539–549 (2011). 7. Booth, C., Gaspar, H.B. & Thrasher, A.J. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 23, 659–666 (2011). 8. Cartier, N. et al. Science 326, 818–823 (2009). 9. Cirak, S. et al. Lancet 378, 595–605 (2011). 10. Aartsma-Rus, A. et al. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 18, 889– 894 (2010). 11. Jessup, M. et al. Circulation 124, 304–313 (2011). 12. Sheehy, S.H. et al. Mol. Ther. 19, 2269–2276 (2011). 13. Schaller, T. et al. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002439 (2011). 14. Li, H. et al. Nature 475, 217–221 (2011). 15. Perez, E.E. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 808–816 (2008). 16. Stroncek, D.F. et al. J. Transl. Med. 10, 48 (2012). 17. Gollamudi, R. et al. Invest. New Drugs 28, 641–649 (2010). be controlled by cognate promoters to allow physiological regulation of activity. Indeed, for many disorders the profile of gene expression required to achieve significant therapeutic effect is achievable with relatively simple expression systems. For example, the frequency of spontaneous hemorrhage is greatly reduced in hemophilia B with a small fraction of normal circulating levels of FIX. Similarly, a fraction of functional circulating phagocytes is sufficient to offer substantial protection against infection in some inherited immunodeficiencies. Diseases most amenable to effective treatment with current gene therapy approaches may therefore be those where the therapeutic window for functional protein expression is relatively broad, and where a large number of target cells are accessible to transduction. Previous expectations that gene therapy would produce a ‘cure-all’ solution for intractable diseases were unrealistic. The agents in question are a diverse spectrum of nucleic-acid based medicines that are formulated in very different ways, yet can be used to prevent, alleviate and provide long-lasting treatments for a wide variety of diseases both inherited and acquired. In some cases they can now realistically provide physicians and patients with new therapeutic options where more conventional approaches have failed, a testament to the huge amount of scientific research in the field over the last 10–20 years. By decreasing the requirement for frequent repeated interventions, many gene therapy approaches can lead to substantial savings in the costs of lifetime medication. However, it is also noteworthy that without clinical trials, the field would not have progressed nearly so rapidly. The fact that some gene therapy strategies are finally beginning to deliver on their potential may well herald a raft of new and imaginative interventional approaches designed to exploit recent insights into cell biology and disease processes.

303 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This is the first report that describes an active effector-transposon of Pseudomonas syringae pv, and it was shown that the element is functional and produces a target site duplication of 5 bp.
Abstract: SUMMARY The plant pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 is a key model organism to study plant–pathogen interactions. We realized that two versions of this strain, which carry plasmids of different sizes, exist in our strain collections. The difference was located to a 9.4-kb deletion within the larger of the two endogenous plasmids encompassing the partitioning genes parA and parB and a putative mobile element encoding the type III effector hopAM1-2 (formerly avrPpiB2). Both plasmid variants are lost in similar frequency, indicating that the partitioning genes are not essential for stability of the plasmid. In addition, the deletion derivative strain DC3001 exhibited the same virulence towards Arabidopsis as strain DC3000. The deletion site in DC3001 is located immediately adjacent to a putative transposon that carries the effector hopX1 (formerly avrPphE), suggesting that the deletion originated from an aberrant transposition event of this element. By tagging the hopX1 transposon with an antibiotic resistance cassette on a suicide plasmid it was shown that the element is functional and produces a target site duplication of 5 bp. The plasmid also integrated into the chromosome in several cases, possibly mediated by one-ended transposition of the hopX1 transposon. This is the first report that describes an active effector-transposon. Comparison of DC3000 strains from several sources revealed that strains exist with differences in the endogenous plasmid composition.

24 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Yeast two-hybrid interaction studies demonstrate that ShcS1 and ShcO1 are exceptional class IA TTS chaperones because they can bind more than one target effector.
Abstract: The hrp-type III secretion (TTS) system is a key pathogenicity factor of the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 that translocates effector proteins into the cytosol of the eukaryotic host cell. The translocation of a subset of effectors is dependent on specific chaperones. In this study an operon encoding a TTS chaperone (ShcS1) and the truncated effector HopS1' was characterized. Yeast two-hybrid analysis and pull-down assays demonstrated that these proteins interact. Using protein fusions to AvrRpt2 it was shown that ShcS1 facilitates the translocation of HopS1', suggesting that ShcS1 is a TTS chaperone for HopS1' and that amino acids 1 to 118 of HopS1' are required for translocation. P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 carries two shcS1 homologues, shcO1 and shcS2, which are located in different operons, and both operons include additional putative effector genes. Transcomplementation experiments showed that ShcS1 and ShcO1, but not ShcS2, can facilitate the translocation of HopS1' :: AvrRpt2. To characterize the specificities of the putative chaperones, yeast two-hybrid interaction studies were performed between the three chaperones and putative target effectors. These experiments showed that both ShcS1 and ShcO1 bind to two different effectors, HopS1' and HopO1-1, that share only 16% amino acid sequence identity. Using gel filtration it was shown that ShcS1 forms homodimers, and this was confirmed by yeast two-hybrid experiments. In addition, ShcS1 is also able to form heterodimers with ShcO1. These data demonstrate that ShcS1 and ShcO1 are exceptional class IA TTS chaperones because they can bind more than one target effector.

17 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2003
TL;DR: A subset of the hrp-coregulated ipx genes encode known effectors that are translocated by the Hrp-system into the plant cell as well as putative effectors, which were able to identify two novel effectors.
Abstract: Plant pathogenic bacteria carry a large set of virulence genes that enables them to exploit plant hosts to support their growth. A genetic screen (IVET) was established to identify bacterial genes that are expressed during the infection process. About one third of the in planta expressed (ipx) genes were shown to be coregulated with the Hrp-type III secretion system. The hrp-coregulated ipx genes were compared to putative virulence genes that were identified by other genomic screens. A subset of the hrp-coregulated ipx genes encode known effectors that are translocated by the Hrp-system into the plant cell as well as putative effectors. Using a reporter system for translocation we were able to identify two novel effectors. Further studies will be aimed at characterizing the effect of these virulence factors in the plant cell.

1 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
15 Feb 2013-Science
TL;DR: The type II prokaryotic CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas adaptive immune system has been shown to facilitate RNA-guided site-specific DNA cleavage as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Functional elucidation of causal genetic variants and elements requires precise genome editing technologies. The type II prokaryotic CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas adaptive immune system has been shown to facilitate RNA-guided site-specific DNA cleavage. We engineered two different type II CRISPR/Cas systems and demonstrate that Cas9 nucleases can be directed by short RNAs to induce precise cleavage at endogenous genomic loci in human and mouse cells. Cas9 can also be converted into a nicking enzyme to facilitate homology-directed repair with minimal mutagenic activity. Lastly, multiple guide sequences can be encoded into a single CRISPR array to enable simultaneous editing of several sites within the mammalian genome, demonstrating easy programmability and wide applicability of the RNA-guided nuclease technology.

12,265 citations

01 Feb 2013
TL;DR: Two different type II CRISPR/Cas systems are engineered and it is demonstrated that Cas9 nucleases can be directed by short RNAs to induce precise cleavage at endogenous genomic loci in human and mouse cells, demonstrating easy programmability and wide applicability of the RNA-guided nuclease technology.
Abstract: Genome Editing Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) function as part of an adaptive immune system in a range of prokaryotes: Invading phage and plasmid DNA is targeted for cleavage by complementary CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) bound to a CRISPR-associated endonuclease (see the Perspective by van der Oost). Cong et al. (p. 819, published online 3 January) and Mali et al. (p. 823, published online 3 January) adapted this defense system to function as a genome editing tool in eukaryotic cells. A bacterial genome defense system is adapted to function as a genome-editing tool in mammalian cells. [Also see Perspective by van der Oost] Functional elucidation of causal genetic variants and elements requires precise genome editing technologies. The type II prokaryotic CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas adaptive immune system has been shown to facilitate RNA-guided site-specific DNA cleavage. We engineered two different type II CRISPR/Cas systems and demonstrate that Cas9 nucleases can be directed by short RNAs to induce precise cleavage at endogenous genomic loci in human and mouse cells. Cas9 can also be converted into a nicking enzyme to facilitate homology-directed repair with minimal mutagenic activity. Lastly, multiple guide sequences can be encoded into a single CRISPR array to enable simultaneous editing of several sites within the mammalian genome, demonstrating easy programmability and wide applicability of the RNA-guided nuclease technology.

10,746 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A set of tools for Cas9-mediated genome editing via nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR) in mammalian cells, as well as generation of modified cell lines for downstream functional studies are described.
Abstract: Targeted nucleases are powerful tools for mediating genome alteration with high precision. The RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease from the microbial clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) adaptive immune system can be used to facilitate efficient genome engineering in eukaryotic cells by simply specifying a 20-nt targeting sequence within its guide RNA. Here we describe a set of tools for Cas9-mediated genome editing via nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR) in mammalian cells, as well as generation of modified cell lines for downstream functional studies. To minimize off-target cleavage, we further describe a double-nicking strategy using the Cas9 nickase mutant with paired guide RNAs. This protocol provides experimentally derived guidelines for the selection of target sites, evaluation of cleavage efficiency and analysis of off-target activity. Beginning with target design, gene modifications can be achieved within as little as 1-2 weeks, and modified clonal cell lines can be derived within 2-3 weeks.

8,663 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
15 Feb 2013-Science
TL;DR: The type II bacterial CRISPR system is engineer to function with custom guide RNA (gRNA) in human cells to establish an RNA-guided editing tool for facile, robust, and multiplexable human genome engineering.
Abstract: Bacteria and archaea have evolved adaptive immune defenses, termed clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems, that use short RNA to direct degradation of foreign nucleic acids. Here, we engineer the type II bacterial CRISPR system to function with custom guide RNA (gRNA) in human cells. For the endogenous AAVS1 locus, we obtained targeting rates of 10 to 25% in 293T cells, 13 to 8% in K562 cells, and 2 to 4% in induced pluripotent stem cells. We show that this process relies on CRISPR components; is sequence-specific; and, upon simultaneous introduction of multiple gRNAs, can effect multiplex editing of target loci. We also compute a genome-wide resource of ~190 K unique gRNAs targeting ~40.5% of human exons. Our results establish an RNA-guided editing tool for facile, robust, and multiplexable human genome engineering.

8,197 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
28 Nov 2014-Science
TL;DR: The power of the CRISPR-Cas9 technology to systematically analyze gene functions in mammalian cells, study genomic rearrangements and the progression of cancers or other diseases, and potentially correct genetic mutations responsible for inherited disorders is illustrated.
Abstract: The advent of facile genome engineering using the bacterial RNA-guided CRISPR-Cas9 system in animals and plants is transforming biology. We review the history of CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeat) biology from its initial discovery through the elucidation of the CRISPR-Cas9 enzyme mechanism, which has set the stage for remarkable developments using this technology to modify, regulate, or mark genomic loci in a wide variety of cells and organisms from all three domains of life. These results highlight a new era in which genomic manipulation is no longer a bottleneck to experiments, paving the way toward fundamental discoveries in biology, with applications in all branches of biotechnology, as well as strategies for human therapeutics.

4,774 citations