scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Angie Lockwood

Bio: Angie Lockwood is an academic researcher from University of Georgia. The author has contributed to research in topics: Maturity (psychological) & Test validity. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 10 publications receiving 3838 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A review of 190 work-family studies published in IO/OB journals from 1980 to 2002 is presented in this paper, with a discussion of recurring themes in the literature and the identification of blind spots in the IO/O perspective on work and family.

1,886 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article examined three classes of career competencies proposed as important predictors of success in the boundaryless career: perceived career satisfaction, perceived internal marketability, and perceived external marketability.
Abstract: Summary The present study examines three classes of career competencies proposed as important predictors of success in the boundaryless career. Three criteria of career success were examined: perceived career satisfaction, perceived internal marketability, and perceived external marketability. Using data from 458 alumni from a large southeastern university, predictions were tested using partial correlations and dominance analysis. The results found support for the importance of ‘knowing why,’ ‘knowing whom,’ and ‘knowing how’ as suggested by previous theoretical work. The findings are discussed in reference to future research and theorizing on the boundaryless career. Copyright # 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

785 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results support many of the criticisms of work-family research and suggest that scholars publishing WF research in industrial-organizational psychology and organizational behavior journals could make greater use of longitudinal and experimental research designs, gather more multisource data, and move beyond the individual level of analysis.
Abstract: A methodological review was conducted of work-family (WF) research published in industrial-organizational psychology and organizational behavior journals over a period of 24 years (1980-2003). Content analysis was conducted on 225 individual studies published in 210 articles to categorize methodological features, including the research design, sources of data used, data analysis techniques, reliability and validity of measures used, and sociodemographic characteristics of the samples. Results support many of the criticisms of WF research and suggest that scholars publishing WF research in industrial-organizational psychology and organizational behavior journals could make greater use of longitudinal and experimental research designs, gather more multisource data, and move beyond the individual level of analysis. Adopting more diverse conceptualizations of family, including a greater proportion of racial and ethnic minorities, and studying workers in occupations other than managerial or professional positions also appear warranted. Finally, methodological trends varied across specific WF content areas, which suggests that distinct methodologies might be useful to advance knowledge of specific WF topics.

541 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Mentors and proteges from two formal mentoring programs were interviewed about the benefits associated with program participation, problems encountered in the program, and recommendations for program improvements as mentioned in this paper.

409 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, two studies were conducted to operationalize the construct of negative mentoring experiences, establish content validity, and test theory-based predictions associated with a nomological network of related variables.
Abstract: Two studies were conducted to operationalize the construct of negative mentoring experiences, establish content validity, and test theory-based predictions associated with a nomological network of related variables. As predicted, the negative experiences of mentor Distancing Behavior and Lack of Mentor Expertise were more often reported in the separation phase and among proteges in formally arranged mentoring relationships. All types of experiences were related to career-related support, psychosocial support, and learning, with Distancing Behavior being most highly related to career support and learning. Significant correlations were also found with relational complementarity, social exchange perceptions, intentions to leave the relationship, depressed mood, and psychological job withdrawal. Negative mentoring was also distinct from positive mentoring, general workplace stress, and dissatisfying social relationships at work, providing discriminant validity evidence. Finally, negative mentoring had explanatory power in predicting protegeoutcomes over and above positive mentoring. The findings are discussed in terms of future research on mentoring as well as applied practice.

269 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a meta-analysis reviewed four categories of predictors of objective and subjective career success: human capital, organizational sponsorship, sociodemographic status, and stable individual differences.
Abstract: Using the contest- and sponsored-mobility perspectives as theoretical guides, this meta-analysis reviewed 4 categories of predictors of objective and subjective career success: human capital, organizational sponsorship, sociodemographic status, and stable individual differences. Salary level and promotion served as dependent measures of objective career success, and subjective career success was represented by career satisfaction. Results demonstrated that both objective and subjective career success were related to a wide range of predictors. As a group, human capital and sociodemographic predictors generally displayed stronger relationships with objective career success, and organizational sponsorship and stable individual differences were generally more strongly related to subjective career success. Gender and time (date of the study) moderated several of the relationships examined.

1,987 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a meta-analytic review combines the results of more than 60 studies to help determine the relative effects of work, non-work, and demographic and individual factors on work interference with family (WIF) and family interference with work (FIW).

1,820 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A review of the literature that summarizes what is known about the antecedents and consequences of abusive supervision, provides the basis for an emergent model that integrates extant empirical work and suggests directions for future research as mentioned in this paper.

1,319 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Work-family conflict was analyzed bidirectionally in terms of work interference with family (WIF) and family interference with work (FIW), and it was shown that WIF and FIW are consistently related to all 3 types of outcomes.
Abstract: A literature review of studies analyzing work-family conflict and its consequences was conducted, and 427 effect sizes were analyzed meta-analytically. Work-family conflict was analyzed bidirectionally in terms of work interference with family (WIF) and family interference with work (FIW). We assessed 3 categories of potential outcomes: work-related outcomes, family-related outcomes, and domain-unspecific outcomes. Results show that WIF and FIW are consistently related to all 3 types of outcomes. Both types of interrole conflict showed stronger relationships to same-domain outcomes than to cross-domain outcomes. Thus, WIF was more strongly associated with work-related than with family-related outcomes, and FIW was more strongly associated with family-related than with work-related outcomes. In moderator analyses, parenthood could not explain variability in effect sizes. However, time spent at work did moderate the relationships between WIF and family-related outcomes, as well as FIW and domain-unspecific outcomes.

1,224 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 2005
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare contemporary career theory with the theory applied in recent career success research, and offer new guidelines for bringing about a rapprochement between career theory and career success.
Abstract: This paper compares contemporary career theory with the theory applied in recent career success research. The research makes inconsistent use of career theory, and in particular neglects the interdependence of the objective and subjective careers, and boundaryless career issues of inter-organizational mobility and extra-organizational support. The paper offers new guidelines for bringing about a rapprochement between career theory and career success research. These guidelines cover adequacy of research designs, further dimensions of career success, broader peer group comparisons, deeper investigation of the subjectively driven person, and seeing new connections between boundaryless career theory and career success research.

1,110 citations