Author
Anne Peasey
Other affiliations: University of London
Bio: Anne Peasey is an academic researcher from University College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Eastern european. The author has an hindex of 33, co-authored 91 publications receiving 5071 citations. Previous affiliations of Anne Peasey include University of London.
Topics: Population, Eastern european, Cohort study, Binge drinking, Cohort
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University College London1, University of Cambridge2, University of Cologne3, Leiden University4, Utrecht University5, National Institutes of Health6, University of Pennsylvania7, University of Glasgow8, University of Edinburgh9, Mayo Clinic10, University of London11, University of Bristol12, Cardiff University13, University of Oxford14, University of Ioannina15, University of Hamburg16, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences17, Jagiellonian University18, Russian Academy19, Karolinska Institutet20, Memorial Hospital of South Bend21, University of Groningen22, MedStar Washington Hospital Center23, Swansea University24, Brown University25, University of Iowa26, Harvard University27, University of Exeter28, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill29, Boston University30, Medical Research Council31, University of California, San Diego32, University of Mississippi33, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center34
TL;DR: IL6R blockade could provide a novel therapeutic approach to prevention of coronary heart disease that warrants testing in suitably powered randomised trials and could help to validate and prioritise novel drug targets or to repurpose existing agents and targets for new therapeutic uses.
891 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the causal role of alcohol consumption in cardiovascular disease was investigated using a Mendelian randomisation meta-analysis of 56 epidemiological studies, including 20 259 coronary heart disease cases and 10 164 stroke events.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To use the rs1229984 variant in the alcohol dehydrogenase 1B gene (ADH1B) as an instrument to investigate the causal role of alcohol in cardiovascular disease. DESIGN: Mendelian randomisation meta-analysis of 56 epidemiological studies. PARTICIPANTS: 261 991 individuals of European descent, including 20 259 coronary heart disease cases and 10 164 stroke events. Data were available on ADH1B rs1229984 variant, alcohol phenotypes, and cardiovascular biomarkers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratio for coronary heart disease and stroke associated with the ADH1B variant in all individuals and by categories of alcohol consumption. RESULTS: Carriers of the A-allele of ADH1B rs1229984 consumed 17.2% fewer units of alcohol per week (95% confidence interval 15.6% to 18.9%), had a lower prevalence of binge drinking (odds ratio 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.84)), and had higher abstention (odds ratio 1.27 (1.21 to 1.34)) than non-carriers. Rs1229984 A-allele carriers had lower systolic blood pressure (-0.88 (-1.19 to -0.56) mm Hg), interleukin-6 levels (-5.2% (-7.8 to -2.4%)), waist circumference (-0.3 (-0.6 to -0.1) cm), and body mass index (-0.17 (-0.24 to -0.10) kg/m(2)). Rs1229984 A-allele carriers had lower odds of coronary heart disease (odds ratio 0.90 (0.84 to 0.96)). The protective association of the ADH1B rs1229984 A-allele variant remained the same across all categories of alcohol consumption (P=0.83 for heterogeneity). Although no association of rs1229984 was identified with the combined subtypes of stroke, carriers of the A-allele had lower odds of ischaemic stroke (odds ratio 0.83 (0.72 to 0.95)). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with a genetic variant associated with non-drinking and lower alcohol consumption had a more favourable cardiovascular profile and a reduced risk of coronary heart disease than those without the genetic variant. This suggests that reduction of alcohol consumption, even for light to moderate drinkers, is beneficial for cardiovascular health.
571 citations
••
University College London1, University of Glasgow2, University of Cambridge3, Utrecht University4, University of Groningen5, University of Pennsylvania6, University of London7, University of Edinburgh8, Imperial College London9, Jackson State University10, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences11, Jagiellonian University12, Russian Academy13, University of Milan14, Karolinska Institutet15, Translational Genomics Research Institute16, Leiden University17, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island18, University of Iowa19, University of Oslo20, University of Texas at San Antonio21, Veterans Health Administration22, Cornell University23, University of Sydney24, University of Paris25, Harvard University26, St George's, University of London27, University of Minnesota28, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston29, University of Washington30, University of Vermont31, GlaxoSmithKline32, Broad Institute33, Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute34, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill35, University of Bristol36, Johns Hopkins University37, Cardiff University38, University of Mississippi39, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center40
TL;DR: The increased risk of type 2 diabetes noted with statins is at least partially explained by HMGCR inhibition.
545 citations
••
German Cancer Research Center1, University Hospital of North Norway2, University of Tromsø3, University College London4, Centre for Health Protection5, Wageningen University and Research Centre6, Heidelberg University7, University of Düsseldorf8, Jagiellonian University Medical College9, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences10, Queen's University Belfast11, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens12, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai13
TL;DR: The association between 25(OH)D level and all-cause and cause-specific mortality was remarkably consistent, andalyses using all quintiles suggest curvilinear, inverse, dose-response curves for the aforementioned relationships.
Abstract: Objective To investigate the association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations (25(OH)D) and mortality in a large consortium of cohort studies paying particular attention to potential age, sex, season, and country differences. Design Meta-analysis of individual participant data of eight prospective cohort studies from Europe and the US. Setting General population. Participants 26 018 men and women aged 50-79 years Main outcome measures All-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality. Results 25(OH)D concentrations varied strongly by season (higher in summer), country (higher in US and northern Europe) and sex (higher in men), but no consistent trend with age was observed. During follow-up, 6695 study participants died, among whom 2624 died of cardiovascular diseases and 2227 died of cancer. For each cohort and analysis, 25(OH)D quintiles were defined with cohort and subgroup specific cut-off values. Comparing bottom versus top quintiles resulted in a pooled risk ratio of 1.57 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.81) for all-cause mortality. Risk ratios for cardiovascular mortality were similar in magnitude to that for all-cause mortality in subjects both with and without a history of cardiovascular disease at baseline. With respect to cancer mortality, an association was only observed among subjects with a history of cancer (risk ratio, 1.70 (1.00 to 2.88)). Analyses using all quintiles suggest curvilinear, inverse, dose-response curves for the aforementioned relationships. No strong age, sex, season, or country specific differences were detected. Heterogeneity was low in most meta-analyses. Conclusions Despite levels of 25(OH)D strongly varying with country, sex, and season, the association between 25(OH)D level and all-cause and cause-specific mortality was remarkably consistent. Results from a long term randomised controlled trial addressing longevity are being awaited before vitamin D supplementation can be recommended in most individuals with low 25(OH)D levels.
360 citations
••
TL;DR: Three different approaches for establishing guidelines for the microbiological quality of treated wastewater that is reused for agriculture are reviewed and a combined approach is more cost-effective than the first approach and adequately protects public health.
Abstract: Three different approaches for establishing guidelines for the microbiological quality of treated wastewater that is reused for agriculture are reviewed. These approaches have different objectives as their outcomes: the absence of faecal indicator organisms in the wastewater, the absence of a measurable excess of cases of enteric disease in the exposed population and a model-generated estimated risk below a defined acceptable risk. If the second approach (using empirical epidemiological studies supplemented by microbiological studies of the transmission of pathogens) is used in conjunction with the third approach (using a model-based quantitative risk assessment for selected pathogens) a powerful tool is produced that aids the development of regulations. This combined approach is more cost-effective than the first approach and adequately protects public health. The guideline limit for faecal coliform bacteria in unrestricted irrigation (41000 faecal coliform bacteria/ 100 ml) is valid, but for restricted irrigation 410 5 faecal coliform bacteria/100 ml is recommended when adult farmworkers are exposed to spray irrigation. A limit of 410 3 faecal coliform bacteria/100 ml is recommended if flood irrigation is used or children are exposed. The guideline limit for nematode eggs for both types of irrigation is adequate except when conditions favour the survival of nematode eggs and where children are exposed; in these cases it should be reduced from 41 egg/l to 40.1 egg/l.
346 citations
Cited by
More filters
01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payors, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care.
Abstract: XI. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING DIABETES CARE D iabetes is a chronic illness that requires continuing medical care and patient self-management education to prevent acute complications and to reduce the risk of long-term complications. Diabetes care is complex and requires that many issues, beyond glycemic control, be addressed. A large body of evidence exists that supports a range of interventions to improve diabetes outcomes. These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payors, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care. While individual preferences, comorbidities, and other patient factors may require modification of goals, targets that are desirable for most patients with diabetes are provided. These standards are not intended to preclude more extensive evaluation and management of the patient by other specialists as needed. For more detailed information, refer to Bode (Ed.): Medical Management of Type 1 Diabetes (1), Burant (Ed): Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes (2), and Klingensmith (Ed): Intensive Diabetes Management (3). The recommendations included are diagnostic and therapeutic actions that are known or believed to favorably affect health outcomes of patients with diabetes. A grading system (Table 1), developed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and modeled after existing methods, was utilized to clarify and codify the evidence that forms the basis for the recommendations. The level of evidence that supports each recommendation is listed after each recommendation using the letters A, B, C, or E.
9,618 citations
••
5,737 citations
••
Mohammad H. Forouzanfar1, Lily Alexander, H. Ross Anderson, Victoria F Bachman1 +733 more•Institutions (289)
TL;DR: The Global Burden of Disease, Injuries, and Risk Factor study 2013 (GBD 2013) as discussed by the authors provides a timely opportunity to update the comparative risk assessment with new data for exposure, relative risks, and evidence on the appropriate counterfactual risk distribution.
5,668 citations
••
Brigham and Women's Hospital1, Novartis2, Baylor College of Medicine3, Federal University of São Paulo4, Technische Universität München5, University of Amsterdam6, St. John's University7, University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik8, McGill University9, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague10, University of Szeged11, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy12, University of East Anglia13, Tohoku University14, Sahlgrenska University Hospital15
TL;DR: Antiinflammatory therapy targeting the interleukin‐1β innate immunity pathway with canakinumab at a dose of 150 mg every 3 months led to a significantly lower rate of recurrent cardiovascular events than placebo, independent of lipid‐level lowering.
Abstract: BackgroundExperimental and clinical data suggest that reducing inflammation without affecting lipid levels may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Yet, the inflammatory hypothesis of atherothrombosis has remained unproved. MethodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of canakinumab, a therapeutic monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-1β, involving 10,061 patients with previous myocardial infarction and a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level of 2 mg or more per liter. The trial compared three doses of canakinumab (50 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg, administered subcutaneously every 3 months) with placebo. The primary efficacy end point was nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. ResultsAt 48 months, the median reduction from baseline in the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level was 26 percentage points greater in the group that received the 50-mg dose of canakinumab, 37 percentage points greater in the 150-mg group, and 41 percentage points greater in t...
5,660 citations
••
TL;DR: ABI is ankle-brachial (blood pressure) index and ABPM is ambulatory blood pressure monitoring as mentioned in this paper ; ACCORD is action to control cardiovascular risk in Diabetes and Vascular disease.
Abstract: ABI
: ankle–brachial (blood pressure) index
ABPM
: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
ACCORD
: Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes
ACE-I
: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor
ACS
: acute coronary syndromes
ADVANCE
: Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: PreterAx
4,352 citations