scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Antonino Palumbo

Bio: Antonino Palumbo is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Pluralism (political theory) & Regulatory state. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 17 publications receiving 145 citations.

Papers
More filters
Book
28 May 2010
TL;DR: Palumbo et al. as mentioned in this paper discuss the role of the regulatory state and network governance in the development of the European foodstuffs sector in the 21st century, and discuss the challenges and benefits of these modes of governance.
Abstract: Contents: Introduction: governance: meanings, themes, narratives and questions, Antonino Palumbo Part I Meanings, Themes and Narratives: The new governance: governing without government, R.A.W. Rhodes Self-governance as a mode of societal governance, Jan Kooiman and Martijn van Vliet Tipping the balance: autopoiesis and governance, Andrew Dunsire Democratic governance: systems and radical perspectives, Mark Bevir. Part II The Rise of the Regulatory State and Network Governance: From the positive to the regulatory state: causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance, Giandomenico Majone Games real actors could play: positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations, Fritz W. Scharpf The networked polity: regional development in Western Europe, Chris Ansell The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development, Bob Jessop. Part III Regional Integration and the Development of Multilevel Governance: European integration since the 1980s: state-centric versus multi-level governance, Gary Marks, Liesbet Hooghe and Kermit Blank Transforming strategic interaction into deliberative problem-solving: European comitology in the foodstuffs sector, Christian Joerges and JA rgen Neyer The open method of coordination, Philippe Pochet New modes of governance and the participatory myth, Stijn Smismans. Part IV Globalization and the Quest for Global Governance: Governance in the 21st century, James N. Rosenau Neither global nor national: novel assemblages of territory, authority and rights, Saskia Sassen Global government networks, global information agencies and disaggregated democracy, Anne-Marie Slaughter Neoliberalism and multilevel governance, Adam Harmes. Part V Governance and Democracy Issues and Questions: Directly-deliberative polyarchy, Joshua Cohen and Charles Sabel Democratic governance for a globalized world, Reiner Eichenberger and Bruno S. Frey Transnational democracy, John S. Dryzek A democratic dilemma: system effectiveness versus citizen participation, Robert A. Dahl Name Index.

63 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Aug 2003
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors define three main models of the state: an instrumentalist, a realist and a pluralist, and these models can be respectively represented by the names Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim.
Abstract: Modern social theory offers three main models of the state: an instrumentalist, a realist and a pluralist. These models can be respectively represented by the names Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim. Of those three theorists, perhaps only Marx can claim to be a key originator of ‘his’ model of the state. In Weber’s political sociology the influence of political realism stretching back at least as far as Machiavelli and Hobbes is quite transparent. Furthermore, while rejecting any form of socialism and what he took to be the economic reductionism of Marxist theory, Weber nevertheless sought to retain elements of a materialist methodology denuded of its original political aim. Finally, Weber’s conception of power as an expression of will, and his view of both politics and society as increasingly rationalised (and ‘disenchanted’) and as sites of eternal struggle owe a great deal to his reading of Nietzsche. His achievement might be described as one of synthesising elements of realism, materialism and nihilism, and of translating these into the language of the modern social sciences. In Durkheim’s political sociology the influence of both French and German political theory is no less evident. His view of the state as the deliberative organ of political societies and as the guardian of their conscience collective echoes Rousseau’s general will, French socialist thought (in particular Saint–Simon’s) and Comte’s positivist approach to the study of society. Moreover, his emphasis upon the normative role of secondary associations (as both a source of identity and as a counter-balance to the growing power of the state) has precedence not only in Montesquieu and Tocqueville, but also in those German political theorists who tried to rescue elements of the ‘ Standestaat ’ (polity of estates) for a modern pluralist society. Durkheim’s objective was to use scientific method to show how the individual and the social, the value of freedom and the requirement of solidarity, might be reconciled.

32 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, two distinct visions of democratic politics, both of which are in sharp contrast to Schumpeter's competitive leadership model, are found at the heart of governance theory: anti-democratic solutions, aiming to depoliticize public policy, and ultra-democratic reforms promoting the involvement of citizens in policy-making.
Abstract: Two distinct visions of democratic politics, both of which are in sharp contrast to Schumpeter's competitive leadership model, are to be found at the heart of governance theory. The first advocates anti-democratic solutions, aiming to depoliticize public policy, while the second supports ultra-democratic reforms promoting the involvement of citizens in policy-making. The article pursues three main aims. First, it proposes a reading of the weaknesses attributed to Schumpeter's competitive leadership model. Second, it clarifies the nature of the innovations advocated by the anti-democratic camp in its attempt to build a regulatory state, and by the ultra-democratic camp in its struggle to engender a networked polity. Lastly, a critical evaluation of these solutions and their democratic visions is carried out. I argue that while anti-democratic solutions rest ultimately on disputed notions of social efficiency and contradictory appeals to pluralism, ultra-democratic solutions are either likely to undermine p...

13 citations

Book
30 Jun 2017
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an analytical framework that identifies the key instruments of neoliberal governance, such as privatization, marketization, and liberalization, as well as the coalitions that supported the post-war welfare-state settlement.
Abstract: Neoliberalism has been one of the most hotly contested themes in academic and political debate over the last 30 years. Given the global and persistent influence of neoliberal ideas on contemporary styles of governance, social-service provision, and public policy, this intensive interest is understandable. At the same time, the use of the term has become loose, vague, and over-extended, particularly in the extensive critical literature. Rather than engage in further critique, or in the reconstruction of the history of neoliberalism, this volume seeks to bring analytical clarity to the ongoing debate. Drawing inspiration from the work of the Hungarian economic historian, Karl Polanyi, Remaking Market Society combines critique, original formulations, and case studies to form an analytical framework that identifies the key instruments of neoliberal governance. These include privatization, marketization, and liberalization. The case studies examine the development of neoliberal instruments (reform of the British civil service); their refinement (reform of higher education in England and Wales); and their dissemination across national borders (EU integration policies). Rather than look back nostalgically on the post-war welfare-state settlement, in the final chapter the authors ask why the coalitions that supported that settlement broke down in the face of the neoliberal reform movement. This highly original work offers a distinctive transdisciplinary approach to political economy, and therefore is an important read for students and academics who are interested in political economy as well as social theory and political philosophy.

12 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal Article
TL;DR: This research examines the interaction between demand and socioeconomic attributes through Mixed Logit models and the state of art in the field of automatic transport systems in the CityMobil project.
Abstract: 2 1 The innovative transport systems and the CityMobil project 10 1.1 The research questions 10 2 The state of art in the field of automatic transport systems 12 2.1 Case studies and demand studies for innovative transport systems 12 3 The design and implementation of surveys 14 3.1 Definition of experimental design 14 3.2 Questionnaire design and delivery 16 3.3 First analyses on the collected sample 18 4 Calibration of Logit Multionomial demand models 21 4.1 Methodology 21 4.2 Calibration of the “full” model. 22 4.3 Calibration of the “final” model 24 4.4 The demand analysis through the final Multinomial Logit model 25 5 The analysis of interaction between the demand and socioeconomic attributes 31 5.1 Methodology 31 5.2 Application of Mixed Logit models to the demand 31 5.3 Analysis of the interactions between demand and socioeconomic attributes through Mixed Logit models 32 5.4 Mixed Logit model and interaction between age and the demand for the CTS 38 5.5 Demand analysis with Mixed Logit model 39 6 Final analyses and conclusions 45 6.1 Comparison between the results of the analyses 45 6.2 Conclusions 48 6.3 Answers to the research questions and future developments 52

4,784 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is impossible that the rulers now on earth should make any benefit, or derive any the least shadow of authority from that, which is held to be the fountain of all power, Adam's private dominion and paternal jurisdiction.
Abstract: All these premises having, as I think, been clearly made out, it is impossible that the rulers now on earth should make any benefit, or derive any the least shadow of authority from that, which is held to be the fountain of all power, Adam's private dominion and paternal jurisdiction; so that he that will not give just occasion to think that all government in the world is the product only of force and violence, and that men live together by no other rules but that of beasts, where the strongest carries it, and so lay a foundation for perpetual disorder and mischief, tumult, sedition and rebellion, (things that the followers of that hypothesis so loudly cry out against) must of necessity find out another rise of government, another original of political power, and another way of designing and knowing the persons that have it, than what Sir Robert Filmer hath taught us.

3,076 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In their new Introduction, the authors relate the argument of their book both to the current realities of American society and to the growing debate about the country's future as mentioned in this paper, which is a new immediacy.
Abstract: Meanwhile, the authors' antidote to the American sicknessa quest for democratic community that draws on our diverse civic and religious traditionshas contributed to a vigorous scholarly and popular debate. Attention has been focused on forms of social organization, be it civil society, democratic communitarianism, or associative democracy, that can humanize the market and the administrative state. In their new Introduction the authors relate the argument of their book both to the current realities of American society and to the growing debate about the country's future. With this new edition one of the most influential books of recent times takes on a new immediacy.\

2,940 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a judge in some representative American jurisdiction is assumed to accept the main uncontroversial constitutive and regulative rules of the law in his jurisdiction and to follow earlier decisions of their court or higher courts whose rationale, as l
Abstract: 1.. HARD CASES 5. Legal Rights A. Legislation . . . We might therefore do well to consider how a philosophical judge might develop, in appropriate cases, theories of what legislative purpose and legal principles require. We shall find that he would construct these theories in the same manner as a philosophical referee would construct the character of a game. I have invented, for this purpose, a lawyer of superhuman skill, learning, patience and acumen, whom I shall call Hercules. I suppose that Hercules is a judge in some representative American jurisdiction. I assume that he accepts the main uncontroversial constitutive and regulative rules of the law in his jurisdiction. He accepts, that is, that statutes have the general power to create and extinguish legal rights, and that judges have the general duty to follow earlier decisions of their court or higher courts whose rationale, as l

2,050 citations