scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Anupam Bhandari

Bio: Anupam Bhandari is an academic researcher from Dhulikhel Hospital. The author has contributed to research in topics: Epilepsy & Population. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 22 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Initial validation suggests that this has the potential to enable health workers to diagnose episodes as epileptic or not, and this now needs to be tested in different populations.
Abstract: Purpose The epilepsy treatment gap in resource-poor countries is so large that existing numbers of doctors are unlikely to be able to close it. Other health workers are likely to be needed but they will need help. The diagnosis of an attack as epileptic or not is an essential step in the management of epilepsy. It should be possible to devise a tool to give the probability of episodes being epileptic based on a Bayesian analysis of the results of history taking. Method We asked about the nature of episodes in patients referred to epilepsy camps in Nepal. Answers were then compared to the final clinical diagnosis of epilepsy and the likelihood ratio (LR) of the episode being epileptic obtained for each answer. The most informative LRs, tested sequentially, formed the basis for a tool which was validated in a different Nepalese population. Results Data was obtained from 67 patients. The pre-test probability of having epilepsy was 0.76. Answers to 11 questions with the most informative LRs were then combined into a tool. This was tested on 14 different patients. Post-test probability scores in those with epilepsy ranged from 0.88 to 1 and for those with non-epilepsy from 0.07 to 0.42. Conclusion It is possible to devise a tool based on simple clinical information using Bayesian principles. Initial validation suggests that this has the potential to enable health workers to diagnose episodes as epileptic or not. This now needs to be tested in different populations. The tool is easily converted to a mobile phone app.

27 citations


Cited by
More filters
01 Jan 2001
TL;DR: The probability of any event is the ratio between the value at which an expectation depending on the happening of the event ought to be computed, and the value of the thing expected upon it’s 2 happening.
Abstract: Problem Given the number of times in which an unknown event has happened and failed: Required the chance that the probability of its happening in a single trial lies somewhere between any two degrees of probability that can be named. SECTION 1 Definition 1. Several events are inconsistent, when if one of them happens, none of the rest can. 2. Two events are contrary when one, or other of them must; and both together cannot happen. 3. An event is said to fail, when it cannot happen; or, which comes to the same thing, when its contrary has happened. 4. An event is said to be determined when it has either happened or failed. 5. The probability of any event is the ratio between the value at which an expectation depending on the happening of the event ought to be computed, and the value of the thing expected upon it’s 2 happening.

368 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Investigation of the effects of intranasal administration of extracellular vesicles secreted from human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on SE-induced adverse changes demonstrated that A1-exosome treatment after SE led to reduced neuron loss and inflammation, maintenance of normal neurogenesis, and preservation of cognitive and memory function.
Abstract: Status epilepticus (SE), a medical emergency that is typically terminated through antiepileptic drug treatment, leads to hippocampus dysfunction typified by neurodegeneration, inflammation, altered neurogenesis, as well as cognitive and memory deficits. Here, we examined the effects of intranasal (IN) administration of extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted from human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on SE-induced adverse changes. The EVs used in this study are referred to as A1-exosomes because of their robust antiinflammatory properties. We subjected young mice to pilocarpine-induced SE for 2 h and then administered A1-exosomes or vehicle IN twice over 24 h. The A1-exosomes reached the hippocampus within 6 h of administration, and animals receiving them exhibited diminished loss of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons and greatly reduced inflammation in the hippocampus. Moreover, the neuroprotective and antiinflammatory effects of A1-exosomes were coupled with long-term preservation of normal hippocampal neurogenesis and cognitive and memory function, in contrast to waned and abnormal neurogenesis, persistent inflammation, and functional deficits in animals receiving vehicle. These results provide evidence that IN administration of A1-exosomes is efficient for minimizing the adverse effects of SE in the hippocampus and preventing SE-induced cognitive and memory impairments.

261 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The importance of the use of TH for all aspects of epilepsy, either for the scientific aspects or for the social matters is highlighted, which has the potential of addressing limited resources and improving access to PWE across the globe.

57 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Clinical decision-support apps have considerable potential to enhance access to care and quality of care, but the medical community must rise to the challenge of modernising its approach if it is truly committed to capitalising on the opportunities of digitalisation.

47 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A pragmatic algorithm is developed aimed at facilitating medication selection for individuals whose epilepsy begins at age 10 years and older.
Abstract: Objective Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are the first-line treatment for epilepsy. Many ASMs are available; this offers the opportunity to improve therapy by tailoring it to individual characteristics, but also increases the possibility of healthcare professionals making inappropriate treatment choices. To assist healthcare professionals, we developed a pragmatic algorithm aimed at facilitating medication selection for individuals whose epilepsy begins at age 10 years and older. Methods Utilizing available evidence and a Delphi panel-based consensus process, a group of epilepsy experts developed an algorithm for selection of ASMs, depending on the seizure type(s) and the presence of relevant clinical variables (age, gender, comorbidities, and comedications). The algorithm was implemented into a web-based application that was tested and improved in an iterative process. Results The algorithm categorizes ASMs deemed to be appropriate for each seizure type or combination of seizure types into three groups, with group 1 ASMs considered preferred, group 2 considered second line, and group 3 considered third line. Depending on the presence of relevant clinical variables, the ranking of individual ASMs is adjusted in the prioritization scheme to tailor recommendations to the characteristics of the individual. The algorithm is available on a web-based application at: https://epipick.org/#/. Significance The proposed algorithm is user-friendly, requires less than 2 minutes to complete, and provides the user with a range of appropriate treatment options from which to choose. This should facilitate its broad utilization and contribute to improve epilepsy management for healthcare providers who desire advice, particularly those who lack special expertise in the field.

31 citations