On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain.

This contribution is a completely updated and expanded version of the four prior analogous reviews that were published in this journal in 1997, 2003, 2007, and 2012. In the case of all approved therapeutic agents, the time frame has been extended to cover the 34 years from January 1, 1981, to December 31, 2014, for all diseases worldwide, and from 1950 (earliest so far identified) to December 2014 for all approved antitumor drugs worldwide. As mentioned in the 2012 review, we have continued to utilize our secondary subdivision of a “natural product mimic”, or “NM”, to join the original primary divisions and the designation “natural product botanical”, or “NB”, to cover those botanical “defined mixtures” now recognized as drug entities by the U.S. FDA (and similar organizations). From the data presented in this review, the utilization of natural products and/or their novel structures, in order to discover and develop the final drug entity, is still alive and well. For example, in the area of cancer, over t...

Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs from 1981 to 2014

T e purpose of this review is to assess the nature and magnitudes of the dominant forces in protein folding. Since proteins are only marginally stable at room temperature,’ no type of molecular interaction is unimportant, and even small interactions can contribute significantly (positively or negatively) to stability (Alber, 1989a,b; Matthews, 1987a,b). However, the present review aims to identify only the largest forces that lead to the structural features of globular proteins: their extraordinary compactness, their core of nonpolar residues, and their considerable amounts of internal architecture. This review explores contributions to the free energy of folding arising from electrostatics (classical charge repulsions and ion pairing), hydrogen-bonding and van der Waals interactions, intrinsic propensities, and hydrophobic interactions. An earlier review by Kauzmann (1959) introduced the importance of hydrophobic interactions. His insights were particularly remarkable considering that he did not have the benefit of known protein structures, model studies, high-resolution calorimetry, mutational methods, or force-field or statistical mechanical results. The present review aims to provide a reassessment of the factors important for folding in light of current knowledge. Also considered here are the opposing forces, conformational entropy and electrostatics. The process of protein folding has been known for about 60 years. In 1902, Emil Fischer and Franz Hofmeister independently concluded that proteins were chains of covalently linked amino acids (Haschemeyer & Haschemeyer, 1973) but deeper understanding of protein structure and conformational change was hindered because of the difficulty in finding conditions for solubilization. Chick and Martin (191 1) were the first to discover the process of denaturation and to distinguish it from the process of aggregation. By 1925, the denaturation process was considered to be either hydrolysis of the peptide bond (Wu & Wu, 1925; Anson & Mirsky, 1925) or dehydration of the protein (Robertson, 1918). The view that protein denaturation was an unfolding process was

/pdf/dominant-forces-in-protein-folding-42bjzlldw4.pdf

Dominant forces in protein folding

Publisher Summary This chapter investigates the anatomy and taxonomy of protein structures. A protein is a polypeptide chain made up of amino acid residues linked together in a definite sequence. Amino acids are “handed,” and naturally occurring proteins contain only L-amino acids. A simple mnemonic for that purpose is the “corncrib.” The sequence of side chains determines all that is unique about a particular protein, including its biological function and its specific three-dimensional structure. The major possible routes to knowledge of three-dimensional protein structure are prediction from the amino acid sequence and analysis of spectroscopic measurements such as circular dichroism, laser Raman spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance. The analysis and discussion of protein structure is based on the results of three-dimensional X-ray crystallography of globular proteins. The basic elements of protein structures are discussed. The most useful level at which protein structures are to be categorized is the domain, as there are many cases of multiple-domain proteins in which each separate domain resembles other entire smaller proteins. The simplest type of stable protein structure consists of polypeptide backbone wrapped more or less uniformly around the outside of a single hydrophobic core. The outline of the taxonomy is also provided in the chapter.

The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure.

Publisher Summary This chapter deals with the recent developments regarding the description and nature of the conformation of proteins and polypeptides with special reference to the stereochemical aspects of the problem. This chapter considers the parameters that are required for an adequate description of a polypeptide chain. This chapter focuses the attention on what may be called “internal parameters”—that is, those which can be defined in terms of the relationships among atoms or units that form the building blocks of the polypeptide chains. This chapter also provides an account of the mathematical method of utilizing these parameters for calculating the coordinates of all the atoms in a suitable frame of reference, so that all the interatomic distances, and bond angles, can be calculated and their consequences worked out. This chapter observes conformations in amino acids, peptides, polypeptides, and proteins.

Conformation of Polypeptides and Proteins

On the active site of proteases. III. Mapping the active site of papain; specific peptide inhibitors of papain

On the size of the active site in proteases: Pronase

The Configurational Changes of Poly-L-proline in Solution

The conformational properties of poly-L-alanine have been examined in aqueous solutions in order to investigate the influence of hydrophobic interactions on the helix–random coil transition. Since water is a poor solvent for poly-L-alanine, water-soluble copolymers of the type (D, L-lysine)m–(Lalanine)n-(D, L-lysine)m, having 10, 160, 450, and 1000 alanyl residues, respectively, in the central block, were synthezised. The optical rotatory dispersion of the samples was investigated in the range 190–500 mμ, and the rotation at 231 mμ was related to the α-helix content, θH, of the alanine section. In salt-free solutions, at neutral pH, the three large polymers show high θH values, which are greatly reduced when the temperature is increased from 5 to 80°C. No helicity was observed for the small (n = 10) polymer. By applying the Lifson-Roig theory, the following parameters were obtained for the transition of a residue from a coil to a helical state: ν = 0.012; ΔH = −190 ± 40 cal./mole; ΔS = −0.55 ± 0.12 e.u. Since ΔH and ΔS differ from the values expected for a process involving only the formation of a hydrogen bond, and in a manner predicted by theories for the influence of hydrophobic bonding on helix stability, it is concluded that a hydrophobic interaction is also involved. In the presence of salt (0.2M NaCl), or when the e-amino groups of the lysyl residues are not protonated (pH = 12), the helical form of the two large polymers (n = 450 and n = 1000) is more stable than in water. Since the electrostatic repulsion between the lysine end blocks is greatly reduced under these conditions, the alanine helical sections fold back on themselves, and this conformation is stabilized by interchain hydrophobia bonds. This structure was predicted by the theory for the equilibrium between such interacting helices, non-interacting helices, and the random coil.

Arieh Berger

Papers

On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain.

On the active site of proteases. III. Mapping the active site of papain; specific peptide inhibitors of papain

On the size of the active site in proteases: Pronase

The Configurational Changes of Poly-L-proline in Solution

Conformational studies of poly‐L‐alanine in water