scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Audun Jøsang

Bio: Audun Jøsang is an academic researcher from University of Oslo. The author has contributed to research in topics: Subjective logic & Computational trust. The author has an hindex of 46, co-authored 207 publications receiving 14280 citations. Previous affiliations of Audun Jøsang include Norwegian Institute of Technology & Telenor.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 2007
TL;DR: Trust and reputation systems represent a significant trend in decision support for Internet mediated service provision as mentioned in this paper, where the basic idea is to let parties rate each other, for example after the completion of a transaction, and use the aggregated ratings about a given party to derive a trust or reputation score.
Abstract: Trust and reputation systems represent a significant trend in decision support for Internet mediated service provision. The basic idea is to let parties rate each other, for example after the completion of a transaction, and use the aggregated ratings about a given party to derive a trust or reputation score, which can assist other parties in deciding whether or not to transact with that party in the future. A natural side effect is that it also provides an incentive for good behaviour, and therefore tends to have a positive effect on market quality. Reputation systems can be called collaborative sanctioning systems to reflect their collaborative nature, and are related to collaborative filtering systems. Reputation systems are already being used in successful commercial online applications. There is also a rapidly growing literature around trust and reputation systems, but unfortunately this activity is not very coherent. The purpose of this article is to give an overview of existing and proposed systems that can be used to derive measures of trust and reputation for Internet transactions, to analyse the current trends and developments in this area, and to propose a research agenda for trust and reputation systems.

3,493 citations

Proceedings Article
01 Jan 2002
TL;DR: A new reputation system based on using beta probability density functions to combine feedback and derive reputation ratings is described which is flexibility and simplicity as well as its foundation on the theory of statistics.
Abstract: Reputation systems can be used to foster good behaviour and to encourage adherence to contracts in e-commerce. Several reputation systems have been deployed in practical applications or proposed in the literature. This paper describes a new system called the beta reputation system which is based on using beta probability density functions to combine feedback and derive reputation ratings. The advantage of the beta reputation system is flexibility and simplicity as well as its foundation on the theory of statistics.

1,638 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the Dempster-Shafer belief theory is used to define a metric for uncertain probabilities called opinion and a set of logical operators that can be used for logical reasoning with uncertain propositions.
Abstract: We first describe a metric for uncertain probabilities called opinion, and subsequently a set of logical operators that can be used for logical reasoning with uncertain propositions. This framework which is called subjective logic uses elements from the Dempster-Shafer belief theory and we show that it is compatible with binary logic and probability calculus.

1,068 citations

01 Jan 2004
TL;DR: In this paper, a statistical ltering technique for excluding unfair ratings is described, and the effectiveness of the technique is demonstrated through simulations. But it is often the case that unfair ratings have a different statistical pattern than fair ratings, which makes it difficult to know when a rater provides such unfair ratings.
Abstract: The quality of a reputation system depends on the integrity of the ratings it receives as input. A fundamental problem is that a rater can rate an agent more positively or more negatively than the real experience with the agent would dictate. When ratings are provided by agents outside the control of the relying party, it is a priori impossible to know when a rater provides such unfair ratings. However, it is often the case that unfair ratings have a different statistical pattern than fair ratings. This paper uses that idea, and describes a statistical ltering technique for excluding unfair ratings, and illustrates its effectiveness through simulations.

585 citations

01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: A method for trust network analysis using subjective logic (TNA-SL), which provides a simple notation for expressing transitive trust relationships, and defines a method for simplifying complex trust networks so that they can be expressed in a concise form and be computationally analysed.
Abstract: Trust networks consist of transitive trust relationships between people, organisations and software agents connected through a medium for communication and interaction. By formalising trust relationships, e.g. as reputation scores or as subjective trust measures, trust between parties within the community can be derived by analysing the trust paths linking the parties together. This article describes a method for trust network analysis using subjective logic (TNA-SL). It provides a simple notation for expressing transitive trust relationships, and defines a method for simplifying complex trust networks so that they can be expressed in a concise form and be computationally analysed. Trust measures are expressed as beliefs, and subjective logic is used to compute trust between arbitrary parties in the network. We show that TNA-SL is efficient, and illustrate possible applications with examples.

345 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

[...]

08 Dec 2001-BMJ
TL;DR: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one, which seems an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.
Abstract: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one. I remember first hearing about it at school. It seemed an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality. Usually familiarity dulls this sense of the bizarre, but in the case of i it was the reverse: over the years the sense of its surreal nature intensified. It seemed that it was impossible to write mathematics that described the real world in …

33,785 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 2007
TL;DR: Trust and reputation systems represent a significant trend in decision support for Internet mediated service provision as mentioned in this paper, where the basic idea is to let parties rate each other, for example after the completion of a transaction, and use the aggregated ratings about a given party to derive a trust or reputation score.
Abstract: Trust and reputation systems represent a significant trend in decision support for Internet mediated service provision. The basic idea is to let parties rate each other, for example after the completion of a transaction, and use the aggregated ratings about a given party to derive a trust or reputation score, which can assist other parties in deciding whether or not to transact with that party in the future. A natural side effect is that it also provides an incentive for good behaviour, and therefore tends to have a positive effect on market quality. Reputation systems can be called collaborative sanctioning systems to reflect their collaborative nature, and are related to collaborative filtering systems. Reputation systems are already being used in successful commercial online applications. There is also a rapidly growing literature around trust and reputation systems, but unfortunately this activity is not very coherent. The purpose of this article is to give an overview of existing and proposed systems that can be used to derive measures of trust and reputation for Internet transactions, to analyse the current trends and developments in this area, and to propose a research agenda for trust and reputation systems.

3,493 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An overview of recommender systems as well as collaborative filtering methods and algorithms is provided, which explains their evolution, provides an original classification for these systems, identifies areas of future implementation and develops certain areas selected for past, present or future importance.
Abstract: Recommender systems have developed in parallel with the web. They were initially based on demographic, content-based and collaborative filtering. Currently, these systems are incorporating social information. In the future, they will use implicit, local and personal information from the Internet of things. This article provides an overview of recommender systems as well as collaborative filtering methods and algorithms; it also explains their evolution, provides an original classification for these systems, identifies areas of future implementation and develops certain areas selected for past, present or future importance.

2,639 citations

Book ChapterDOI
04 Oct 2019
TL;DR: Permission to copy without fee all or part of this material is granted provided that the copies arc not made or distributed for direct commercial advantage.
Abstract: Usually, a proof of a theorem contains more knowledge than the mere fact that the theorem is true. For instance, to prove that a graph is Hamiltonian it suffices to exhibit a Hamiltonian tour in it; however, this seems to contain more knowledge than the single bit Hamiltonian/non-Hamiltonian.In this paper a computational complexity theory of the “knowledge” contained in a proof is developed. Zero-knowledge proofs are defined as those proofs that convey no additional knowledge other than the correctness of the proposition in question. Examples of zero-knowledge proof systems are given for the languages of quadratic residuosity and 'quadratic nonresiduosity. These are the first examples of zero-knowledge proofs for languages not known to be efficiently recognizable.

1,962 citations