scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

B. A. Meylan

Bio: B. A. Meylan is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Shrinkage. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 144 citations.
Topics: Shrinkage

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, Boutelje et al. considered that the microfibril angle is a factor of only secondary importance, and suggested that the greater part of the adsorbed water is contained between these laminations.
Abstract: Introduction It is well known that when wood dries it shrinks very unequally in the three main directions. Kelsey (8) has given an excellent review of the subject and of theories that have been advanced. The present article attributes the anisotropy to the presence of crystalline microfibrils in the cell walls and attempts to predict mathematically how the shrinkage should depend on their orientation. Wood, particularly softwoods, may be thought of, with some idealisation, äs an aggregation of long parallel cells firmly bonded together by an amorphous material, the middle lamella. In the cells themselves one can distinguish a thin primary wall enclosing a thick threelayer secondary wall. These walls appear to be a mass of amorphous lignin and hemicelluloses in which are embedded long microfibrils of crystalline cellulose. In the middle layer of the secondary wall, which is the major part of the cell, the microfibrils are arranged in a steep helix around the cell axis, making some angle (from here referred to äs the microfibril angle) with the cell axis that may ränge from zero to perhaps 50° according to the species of tree and the position of the wood within the tree. The arrangement of microfibrils is not entirely regulär, they scatter somewhat in direction and it has been suggested that there are regions of greater or less disorder in the array (\"fringed micelle\" theory). On the walls lying parallel to the direction of the wood rays (the radial walls) the microfibrils wind past numerous pits which it has been suggested can lead to the effective microfibril angle being different from that in the walls lying at right angles to the direction of the wood rays (the tangential walls). It seems to be generally agreed that the amount of shrinkage and the anisotropy is governed in some way by the \"fine structure\" of the cell walls and the wood anatomy. There is, however, some divergence äs to what is meant by \"fine structure\". In this paper we are principally concerned with the part played by the cellulose microfibrils and in particular the way in which the shrinkage is affected by changes in the microfibril angle. Although, when the helical structure of the wall became known, it was expected that shrinkage anisotropy could be explained almost entirely in terms of the helix angle, this has not found favour with recent workers. Thus Boutelje (3) considers that the microfibril angle is a factor of only secondary importance. His picture of the cell wall is that it is a structure of concentric laminations and he suggests that the greater part of the adsorbed water is contained between these laminations. It is this laminate structure, he suggests, which leads to the transverse shrinkage anisotropy and to the very small amount of longitudinal shrinkage.

148 citations


Cited by
More filters
Book
20 Dec 1983
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of changes in pressure and temperature on relative Humidity of wood is investigated. But, the authors focus on the effects of these changes on the cell wall and not on the rest of the wood.
Abstract: 1 Basic Wood-Moisture Relationships.- 1.1 Introduction.- 1.2 Saturated Vapor Pressure.- 1.3 Relative Humidity.- 1.3.1 Use of the Psychrometric Chart.- 1.3.2 Measurement of Relative Humidity.- 1.3.3 Control of Relative Humidity.- 1.4 Equilibrium Moisture Content and the Sorption Isotherm.- 1.5 The Effect of Changes in Pressure and Temperature on Relative Humidity.- 1.6 Specific Gravity and Density.- 1.7 Specific Gravity of the Cell Wall and Porosity of Wood.- 1.8 Swelling and Shrinkage of the Cell Wall.- 1.9 Swelling and Shrinkage of Wood.- 2 Wood Structure and Chemical Composition.- 2.1 Introduction.- 2.2 The Cell Wall.- 2.3 Structure of Softwoods.- 2.4 Types of Pit Pairs.- 2.5 Softwood Pitting.- 2.6 Microscopic Studies of Flow in Softwoods.- 2.7 Structure of Hardwoods.- 2.8 Hardwood Pitting.- 2.9 Microscopic Studies of Flow in Hardwoods.- 2.10 Chemical Composition of Normal Wood.- 2.10.1 Cellulose.- 2.10.2 Hemicelluloses.- 2.10.2.1 Introduction.- 2.10.2.2 Softwood Hemicelluloses.- 2.10.2.3 Hardwood Hemicelluloses.- 2.10.3 Lignins.- 2.11 Chemical Composition of Reaction Wood.- 2.11.1 Introduction.- 2.11.2 Compression Wood.- 2.11.3 Tension Wood.- 2.12 Topochemistry of Wood.- 3 Permeability.- 3.1 Introduction.- 3.2 Darcy's Law.- 3.3 Kinds of Flow.- 3.4 Specific Permeability.- 3.5 Poiseuille's Law of Viscous Flow.- 3.6 Turbulent Flow.- 3.7 Nonlinear Flow Due to Kinetic-Energy Losses at the Entrance of a Short Capillary.- 3.8 Knudsen Diffusion or Slip Flow.- 3.9 Corrections for Short Capillaries.- 3.10 Permeability Models Applicable to Wood.- 3.10.1 Simple Parallel Capillary Model.- 3.10.2 Petty Model for Conductances in Series.- 3.10.3 Comstock Model for Softwoods.- 3.10.4 Characterization of Wood Structure from Permeability Measurements.- 3.11 Measurement of Liquid Permeability.- 3.12 Measurement of Gas Permeability.- 3.13 The Effect of Drying on Wood Permeability.- 3.14 Treatments to Increase Permeability.- 3.15 The Effect of Moisture Content on Permeability.- 3.16 The Influence of Specimen Length on Permeability.- 3.17 Permeability of the Cell Wall.- 3.18 Zones of Widely Differing Permeabilities in Wood.- 3.19 General Permeability Variation with Species.- 4 Capillary and Water Potential.- 4.1 Surface Tension.- 4.2 Capillary Tension and Pressure.- 4.3 Mercury Porosimetry.- 4.4 Influence of Capillary Forces on the Pressure Impregnation of Woods with Liquids.- 4.5 Collapse in Wood.- 4.6 Pit Aspiration.- 4.7 The Relationship Between Water Potential and Moisture Movement.- 4.8 Notes on Water Potential. Equilibrium Moisture Content, and Fiber Saturation Point of Wood.- 5 Thermal Conductivity.- 5.1 Fourier's Law.- 5.2 Empirical Equations for Thermal Conductivity.- 5.3 Conductivity Model.- 5.4 Resistance and Resistivity Conductance and Conductivity.- 5.5 Derivation of Theoretical Transverse Conductivity Equation.- 5.6 Derivation of Theoretical Longitudinal Conductivity Equation.- 5.7 R and U Values Convection and Radiation.- 5.8 Application to Electrical Resistivity Calculations.- 5.9 Application to Dielectric Constant Calculations.- 6 Steady-State Moisture Movement.- 6.1 Fick's First Law Under Isothermal Conditions.- 6.2 Bound-Water Diffusion Coefficient of Cell-Wall Substance.- 6.3 The Combined Effect of Moisture Content and Temperature on the Diffusion Coefficient of Cell-Wall Substance.- 6.4 Water-Vapor Diffusion Coefficient of Air in the Lumens.- 6.5 The Transverse Moisture Diffusion Model.- 6.6 The Importance of Pit Pairs in Water-Vapor Diffusion.- 6.7 Longitudinal Moisture Diffusion Model.- 6.8 Nonisothermal Moisture Movement.- 6.9 Measurement of Diffusion Coefficients by Steady-State Method.- 7 Unsteady-State Transport.- 7.1 Derivation of Unsteady-State Equations for Heat and Moisture Flow.- 7.2 Derivation of Unsteady-State Equations for Gaseous Flow in Parallel-Sided Bodies.- 7.3 Graphical and Analytical Solutions of Diffusion-Differential Equations with Constant Coefficients.- 7.3.1 Solutions of Equations for Parallel-Sided Bodies.- 7.3.2 Solutions of Equations for Cylinders.- 7.3.3 Simultaneous Diffusion in Different Flow Directions.- 7.3.4 Significance of Flow in Different Directions.- 7.3.5 Special Considerations Relating to the Heating of Wood.- 7.4 Relative Values of Diffusion Coefficients.- 7.5 Retention.- 7.6 Unsteady-State Transport of Liquids.- 7.6.1 Parallel-Sided Bodies, Permeability Assumed Constant with Length.- 7.6.2 Parallel-Sided Bodies with Permeability Decreasing with Length (Bramhall Model).- 7.6.3 Cylindrical Specimens.- 7.6.4 Square and Rectangular Specimens.- 7.7 Unsteady-State Transport of Moisture Under Noniso-thermal Conditions.- 7.8 Heat Transfer Through Massive Walls.- References.- Symbols and Abbreviations.

1,008 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The variation of MFA within the tree and the biological reason for the large differences found between juvenile (or core) wood and mature (or outer) wood are considered.
Abstract: The term microfibril angle (MFA) in wood science refers to the angle between the direction of the helical windings of cellulose microfibrils in the secondary cell wall of fibres and tracheids and the long axis of cell. Technologically, it is usually applied to the orientation of cellulose microfibrils in the S2 layer that makes up the greatest proportion of the wall thickness, since it is this which most affects the physical properties of wood. This review describes the organisation of the cellulose component of the secondary wall of fibres and tracheids and the various methods that have been used for the measurement of MFA. It considers the variation of MFA within the tree and the biological reason for the large differences found between juvenile (or core) wood and mature (or outer) wood. The ability of the tree to vary MFA in response to environmental stress, particularly in reaction wood, is also described. Differences in MFA have a profound effect on the properties of wood, in particular its stiffness. The large MFA in juvenile wood confers low stiffness and gives the sapling the flexibility it needs to survive high winds without breaking. It also means, however, that timber containing a high proportion of juvenile wood is unsuitable for use as high-grade structural timber. This fact has taken on increasing importance in view of the trend in forestry towards short rotation cropping of fast grown species. These trees at harvest may contain 50% or more of timber with low stiffness and therefore, low economic value. Although they are presently grown mainly for pulp, pressure for increased timber production means that ways will be sought to improve the quality of their timber by reducing juvenile wood MFA. The mechanism by which the orientation of microfibril deposition is controlled is still a matter of debate. However, the application of molecular techniques is likely to enable modification of this process. The extent to which these techniques should be used to improve timber quality by reducing MFA in juvenile wood is, however, uncertain, since care must be taken to avoid compromising the safety of the tree.

437 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: MFA, in combination with basic density, shows a strong relationship to longitudinal modulus of elasticity, and to longitudinal shrinkage, which are the main reasons for interest in this cell wall property in conifers.
Abstract: Microfibril angle (MFA) is perhaps the easiest ultrastructural variable to measure for wood cell walls, and certainly the only such variable that has been measured on a large scale. Because cellulose is crystalline, the MFA of the S2 layer can be measured by X-ray diffraction. Automated X-ray scanning devices such as SilviScan have produced large datasets for a range of timber species using increment core samples. In conifers, microfibril angles are large in the juvenile wood and small in the mature wood. MFA is larger at the base of the tree for a given ring number from the pith, and decreases with height, increasing slightly at the top tree. In hardwoods, similar patterns occur, but with much less variation and much smaller microfibril angles in juvenile wood. MFA has significant heritability, but is also influenced by environmental factors as shown by its increased values in compression wood, decreased values in tension wood and, often, increased values following nutrient or water supplementation. Adjacent individual tracheids can show moderate differences in MFA that may be related to tracheid length, but not to lumen diameter or cell wall thickness. While there has been strong interest in the MFA of the S2 layer, which dominates the axial stiffness properties of tracheids and fibres, there has been little attention given to the microfibril angles of S1 and S3 layers, which may influence collapse resistance and other lateral properties. Such investigations have been limited by the much greater difficulty of measuring angles for these wall layers. MFA, in combination with basic density, shows a strong relationship to longitudinal modulus of elasticity, and to longitudinal shrinkage, which are the main reasons for interest in this cell wall property in conifers. In hardwoods, MFA is of more interest in relation to growth stress and shrinkage behaviour.

304 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the plant cell wall is treated as a two phase fiber composite material in which the fibres are dispersed, in an isotropic matrix, in the plane of the cell wall with an angular distribution f(θ).
Abstract: The plant cell wall is treated as a two phase fibre composite material in which the fibres are dispersed, in an isotropic matrix, in the plane of the cell wall with an angular distribution f(θ). If f (θ) can be represented by a gaussian it is shown that the elastic stiffness constants of the cell wall can be easily evaluated. The theory is applied to a model of the earlywood of Pinus radiata and the theoretical variation of the longitudinal Young's Modulus with mean fibrilar direction is compared with that determined experimentally.

248 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the variation of the longitudinal Young's modulus with mean cellulose microfibril angle of the wood substance of the earlywood of a softwood has been determined from small clear samples.
Abstract: The variation of the longitudinal Young's modulus with mean cellulose microfibril angle of the wood substance of the earlywood of a softwood has been determined from small clear samples. The longitudinal Young's modulus falls steeply as the angle between the longitudinal axis and the mean microfibril direction in the cell walls increases. The variation has been explained in both form and magnitude by applying the elastic theory of a fibre composite material with distributed fibre directions to a model of the experimental material. It confirms the two phase concepts of the plant cell wall, as far as the elastic properties are concerned, of rigid crystalline microfibrils embedded in an isotropic matrix of amorphous and paracrystalline materials.

157 citations