scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Basil Al-Amleh

Bio: Basil Al-Amleh is an academic researcher from University of Otago. The author has contributed to research in topics: Crown (dentistry) & Residual stress. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 14 publications receiving 667 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Based on the limited number of short-term in vivo studies, zirconia appears to be suitable for the fabrication of single crowns, and fixed partial dentures and implant abutments providing strict protocols during the manufacturing and delivery process are adhered to.
Abstract: Zirconia is unique in its polymorphic crystalline makeup, reported to be sensitive to manufacturing and handling processes, and there is debate about which processing method is least harmful to the final product. Currently, zirconia restorations are manufactured by either soft or hard-milling processes, with the manufacturer of each claiming advantages over the other. Chipping of the veneering porcelain is reported as a common problem and has been labelled as its main clinical setback. The objective of this systematic review is to report on the clinical success of zirconia-based restorations fabricated by both milling processes, in regard to framework fractures and veneering porcelain chipping. A comprehensive review of the literature was completed for in vivo trials on zirconia restorations in MEDLINE and PubMed between 1950 and 2009. A manual hand search of relevant dental journals was also completed. Seventeen clinical trials involving zirconia-based restorations were found, 13 were conducted on fixed partial dentures, two on single crowns and two on zirconia implant abutments, of which 11 were based on soft-milled zirconia and six on hard-milled zirconia. Chipping of the veneering porcelain was a common occurrence, and framework fracture was only observed in soft-milled zirconia. Based on the limited number of short-term in vivo studies, zirconia appears to be suitable for the fabrication of single crowns, and fixed partial dentures and implant abutments providing strict protocols during the manufacturing and delivery process are adhered to. Further long-term prospective studies are necessary to establish the best manufacturing process for zirconia-based restorations.

439 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Overall additive manufacturing produces little material waste and is energy efficient when compared to subtractive manufacturing, due to passivity and the additive layering nature of the build process.
Abstract: Additive manufacturing or 3D printing is becoming an alternative to subtractive manufacturing or milling in the area of computer-aided manufacturing. Research on material for use in additive manufacturing is ongoing, and a wide variety of materials are being used or developed for use in dentistry. Some materials, however, such as cobalt chromium, still lack sufficient research to allow definite conclusions about the suitability of their use in clinical dental practice. Despite this, due to the wide variety of machines that use additive manufacturing, there is much more flexibility in the build material and geometry when building structures compared with subtractive manufacturing. Overall additive manufacturing produces little material waste and is energy efficient when compared to subtractive manufacturing, due to passivity and the additive layering nature of the build process. Such features make the technique suitable to be used with fabricating structures out of hard to handle materials such as cobalt chromium. The main limitations of this technology include the appearance of steps due to layering of material and difficulty in fabricating certain material generally used in dentistry for use in 3D printing such as ceramics. The current pace of technological development, however, promises exciting possibilities.

194 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Cooling rate and geometric influences in a crown anatomy have substantially different effects on residual stress profiles with increasing veneering porcelain thickness compared to the basic flat plate model.

47 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A standardized measurement method based on the cross sections of crown preparations and standardized reporting be developed for future studies analyzing preparation geometry is recommended.
Abstract: Statement of problem The geometries of tooth preparations are important features that aid in the retention and resistance of cemented complete crowns. The clinically relevant values and the methods used to measure these are not clear. Purpose The purpose of this systematic review was to retrieve, organize, and critically appraise studies measuring clinical tooth preparation parameters, specifically the methodology used to measure the preparation geometry. Material and methods A database search was performed in Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect with an additional hand search on December 5, 2013. The articles were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria and information regarding the total occlusal convergence (TOC) angle, margin design, and associated measuring methods were extracted. The values and associated measuring methods were tabulated. Results A total of 1006 publications were initially retrieved. After removing duplicates and filtering by using exclusion and inclusion criteria, 983 articles were excluded. Twenty-three articles reported clinical tooth preparation values. Twenty articles reported the TOC, 4 articles reported margin designs, 4 articles reported margin angles, and 3 articles reported the abutment height of preparations. A variety of methods were used to measure these parameters. Conclusions TOC values seem to be the most important preparation parameter. Recommended TOC values have increased over the past 4 decades from an unachievable 2- to 5-degree taper to a more realistic 10 to 22 degrees. Recommended values are more likely to be achieved under experimental conditions if crown preparations are performed outside of the mouth. We recommend that a standardized measurement method based on the cross sections of crown preparations and standardized reporting be developed for future studies analyzing preparation geometry.

47 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Comparing clinically achieved tooth preparations for ceramic crowns by general dentists with the recommended values in the literature with an objective measuring method found these values are not based on clinical trials, and the effects of observed shortfalls on the clinical longevity of these restorations are not predictable.
Abstract: Statement of problem An implemented objective measuring system for measuring clinical tooth preparations does not exist. Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare clinically achieved tooth preparations for ceramic crowns by general dentists with the recommended values in the literature with an objective measuring method. Material and methods Two hundred thirty-six stone dies prepared for anterior and posterior complete ceramic crown restorations (IPS e.max Press; Ivoclar Vivadent) were collected from dental laboratories. The dies were scanned and analyzed using the coordinate geometry method. Cross-sectioned images were captured, and the average total occlusal convergence angle, margin width, and abutment height for each preparation was measured and presented with associated 95% confidence intervals. Results The average total occlusal convergence angles for each tooth type was above the recommended values reported in the literature. The average margin widths (0.40 to 0.83 mm) were below the minimum recommended values (1 to 1.5 mm). The tallest preparations were maxillary canines (5.25 mm), while the shortest preparations were mandibular molars (1.87 mm). Conclusions Complete crown preparations produced in general practice do not achieve the recommended values found in the literature. However, these recommended values are not based on clinical trials, and the effects of observed shortfalls on the clinical longevity of these restorations are not predictable.

23 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The outcomes of the meta-analysis demonstrated high implant survival rates for both the single tooth implants and the respective single crowns after 5 and 10 years, however, technical, biological, and aesthetic complications were frequent.
Abstract: Objective To assess the 5-year survival of implant-supported single crowns (SCs) and to describe the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications. The focused question was: What is the survival rate of implants supporting single crowns and implant-supported crowns with a mean follow-up of 5 years and to which extent do biological, technical, and aesthetic complications occur? Methods A Medline search (2006–2011) was performed for clinical studies focusing on implant-supported SCs with a mean follow-up of at least 5 years. The search was complemented by an additional hand search and the inclusion of 24 studies from a previous systematic review (Jung et al. 2008a). Survival and complication rates were analyzed using random-effects Poisson's regression models to obtain summary estimates of 5- and 10-year proportions. Results Forty-six studies derived from an initial search count of 1083 titles and the complementary publications from the previous systematic review (Jung et al. 2008a) were selected and the data were extracted. Based on the meta-analysis, survival of implants supporting SCs at 5 years amounted to 97.2% (95% CI: 96.3–97.9%), and at 10 years amounted to 95.2% (95% CI: 91.8–97.2%). The survival of implant-supported SCs was 96.3% (95% CI: 94.2–97.6%) after 5 years and 89.4% (95% CI: 82.8–93.6%) after 10 years. For biological complications, a 5-year cumulative soft tissue complication rate of 7.1% (95% CI: 4.4–11.3%) and a cumulative complication rate for implants with bone loss >2 mm of 5.2% (95% CI: 3.1–8.6%) were calculated. Technical complications reached a cumulative incidence of 8.8% (95% CI: 5.1–15.0%) for screw-loosening, 4.1% (95% CI: 2.2–7.5%) for loss of retention, and 3.5% (95% CI: 2.4–5.2%) for fracture of the veneering material after 5 years. The cumulative 5-year aesthetic complication rate amounted to 7.1% (95% CI: 3.6–13.6%). Conclusions The outcomes of the meta-analysis demonstrated high implant survival rates for both the single tooth implants and the respective single crowns after 5 and 10 years. However, technical, biological, and aesthetic complications were frequent.

762 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that highly polished zirconia yielded lower antagonist wear compared with porcelains, and combined application of silica coating and/or silane coupler, and 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate is currently one of the most reliable bonding systems for zirConia.

529 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The use of zirconia frameworks for long-span fixed partial dentures or for implant-supported restorations is currently under evaluation and further in vivo, long-term clinical studies will be needed to provide scientific evidence for drawing solid guidelines as discussed by the authors.

403 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An overview of the current knowledge of monolithic and bilayer dental all-ceramic systems, addressing composition and processing mechanisms, laboratory and clinical performance, and possible future trends for all-cersamic materials is explored.

255 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Although the translucency improvement by La2O3 doping was less effective than for introducing a substantial amount of cubic zirconia, this strategy was able to maintain the mechanical properties of typical 3Y-TZP ceramics.

245 citations