scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Basile G. Rabbat

Bio: Basile G. Rabbat is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Serviceability (structure) & Precast concrete. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 1964 citations.

Papers
More filters
01 Jan 2011
TL;DR: The Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (Code) as mentioned in this paper covers the materials, design, and construction of structural concrete used in buildings and where applicable in nonbuilding structures, including the strength evaluation of existing concrete structures.
Abstract: The “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete” (“Code”) covers the materials, design, and construction of structural concrete used in buildings and where applicable in nonbuilding structures. The Code also covers the strength evaluation of existing concrete structures. Among the subjects covered are: contract documents; inspection; materials; durability requirements; concrete quality, mixing, and placing; formwork; embedded pipes; construction joints; reinforcement details; analysis and design; strength and serviceability; flexural and axial loads; shear and torsion; development and splices of reinforcement; slab systems; walls; footings; precast concrete; composite flexural members; prestressed concrete; shells and folded plate members; strength evaluation of existing structures; provisions for seismic design; structural plain concrete; strut-and-tie modeling in Appendix A; alternative design provisions in Appendix B; alternative load and strength reduction factors in Appendix C; and anchoring to concrete in Appendix D. The quality and testing of materials used in construction are covered by reference to the appropriate ASTM standard specifications. Welding of reinforcement is covered by reference to the appropriate American Welding Society (AWS) standard. Uses of the Code include adoption by reference in general building codes, and earlier editions have been widely used in this manner. The Code is written in a format that allows such reference without change to its language. Therefore, background details or suggestions for carrying out the requirements or intent of the Code portion cannot be included. The Commentary is provided for this purpose. Some of the considerations of the committee in developing the Code portion are discussed within the Commentary, with emphasis given to the explanation of new or revised provisions. Much of the research data referenced in preparing the Code is cited for the user desiring to study individual questions in greater detail. Other documents that provide suggestions for carrying out the requirements of the Code are also cited.

2,239 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a finite element (FE) model for CFST stub columns under axial compression is presented. But the model is not suitable to be used in some cases, especially when considering the fast development and utilisation of high-strength concrete and/or thin-walled steel tubes in recent times.

585 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a nonlinear finite element analysis of reinforced concrete slab-column connections under static and pseudo-dynamic loadings was conducted to investigate their failures modes in terms of ultimate load and cracking patterns.

436 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the effects of RCA use on concrete material properties, and the large scale impact of the RCA on structural members are discussed, and it is confirmed that RCA is likely a viable option for structural use.
Abstract: This paper discusses the properties of RCA, the effects of RCA use on concrete material properties, and the large scale impact of RCA on structural members. The review study yielded the following findings in regards to concrete material properties: (1) replacing NA in concrete with RCA decreases the compressive strength, but yields comparable splitting tensile strength; (2) the modulus of rupture for RCA concrete was slightly less than that of conventional concrete, likely due to the weakened the interfacial transition zone from residual mortar; and (3) the modulus of elasticity is also lower than expected, caused by the more ductile aggregate. As far as the structural performance is concerned, beams with RCA did experience greater midspan deflections under a service load and smaller cracking moments. However, structural beams did not seem to be as affected by RCA content as materials tests. Most of all, the ultimate moment was moderately affected by RCA content. All in all, it is confirmed that the use of RCA is likely a viable option for structural use.

331 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a series of experiments were carried out to measure workability, setting time, compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, flexural strength and dynamic elastic modulus of AAFS concrete.

267 citations