scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Bastiaan E. de Galan published in 2008"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A strategy of intensive glucose control, involving gliclazide (modified release) and other drugs as required, that lowered the glycated hemoglobin value to 6.5% yielded a 10% relative reduction in the combined outcome of major macrovascular and microvascular events, primarily as a consequence of a 21%relative reduction in nephropathy.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: In patients with type 2 diabetes, the effects of intensive glucose control on vascular outcomes remain uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes to undergo either standard glucose control or intensive glucose control, defined as the use of gliclazide (modified release) plus other drugs as required to achieve a glycated hemoglobin value of 6.5% or less. Primary end points were composites of major macrovascular events (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) and major microvascular events (new or worsening nephropathy or retinopathy), assessed both jointly and separately. RESULTS: After a median of 5 years of follow-up, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was lower in the intensive-control group (6.5%) than in the standard-control group (7.3%). Intensive control reduced the incidence of combined major macrovascular and microvascular events (18.1%, vs. 20.0% with standard control; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 0.98; P=0.01), as well as that of major microvascular events (9.4% vs. 10.9%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), primarily because of a reduction in the incidence of nephropathy (4.1% vs. 5.2%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P=0.006), with no significant effect on retinopathy (P=0.50). There were no significant effects of the type of glucose control on major macrovascular events (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.06; P=0.32), death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.04; P=0.12), or death from any cause (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.06; P=0.28). Severe hypoglycemia, although uncommon, was more common in the intensive-control group (2.7%, vs. 1.5% in the standard-control group; hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.40; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of intensive glucose control, involving gliclazide (modified release) and other drugs as required, that lowered the glycated hemoglobin value to 6.5% yielded a 10% relative reduction in the combined outcome of major macrovascular and microvascular events, primarily as a consequence of a 21% relative reduction in nephropathy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00145925.)

6,477 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that patients with type 1 diabetes who carry two alleles of the Gly16 variant of ADRB2 are at increased risk of developing hypoglycemia unawareness.
Abstract: Hypoglycemia unawareness has been linked to desensitization of the beta2-adrenergic receptor. Desensitization of the beta2-adrenergic receptor (ADRB2) is genetically determined by the Arg16Gly variant of this receptor. We tested the hypothesis that hypoglycemia unawareness is more common among patients homozygous for the Gly16 variant. We performed genotyping of the A265G (Arg16Gly) polymorphism in the ADRB2 gene in 85 patients with type 1 diabetes and classified them according to hypoglycemia awareness status. A total of 45 patients (53%) were homozygous for Gly16, 32 patients (38%) were heterozygous and eight patients (9%) were homozygous for Arg16. Hypoglycemia unawareness was 3.4-fold more common among patients homozygous for Gly16 than among patients with other variants of the Arg16Gly polymorphism (P=0.014). We conclude that patients with type 1 diabetes who carry two alleles of the Gly16 variant of ADRB2 are at increased risk of developing hypoglycemia unawareness. Future studies are required to confirm these results in larger, independent populations.

12 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results of this study suggest that blood pressure lowering treatment is to be recommended for everyone with diabetes at sufficient risk, and recommend revision of the Dutch guidelines that agree with these findings.
Abstract: De Galan, BE, Tack CJ, Grobbee DE. Iedereen met diabetes heeft recht op bloeddrukverlaging. Huisarts Wet 2008;51(12):596-7. Bloeddruk is een belangrijke determinant van een verhoogde kans op hart- en vaatziekten bij mensen met type 2 diabetes. De huidige Nederlandse richtlijn beveelt bloeddrukverlagende medicatie aan voor iedereen met een systolische bloeddruk boven de 140 mmHg, terwijl internationale richtlijnen voor mensen met diabetes lagere drempelwaarden hanteren. Recent onderzoek laat zien dat routinematige behandeling van mensen met type 2 diabetes de risico’s op vasculaire complicaties en overlijden verder verlaagt. Patienten met een uitgangsbloeddruk onder de 140 mmHg systolisch bereikten evenveel gezondheidswinst als patienten met een hogere bloeddruk. De resultaten van dit onderzoek suggereren dat bloeddrukbehandeling aan te raden is voor iedereen met diabetes en voldoende risico. Wij bevelen daarom aan om de Nederlandse richtlijnen met deze bevindingen in overeenstemming te brengen.

1 citations