Beate D. Kretschmer

Bio: Beate D. Kretschmer is an academic researcher from University of Tübingen. The author has contributed to research in topics: NMDA receptor & Dopamine. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 24 publications receiving 906 citations.

Modulation of the mesolimbic dopamine system by glutamate: role of NMDA receptors.

Abstract: Glutamate has been shown to modulate motor behavior, probably via N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors that are involved in the control of the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system, that is, the ventral tegmental area (VTA)-nucleus accumbens (NAC). In the present study, we investigated the effects of uncompetitive (MK-801) and competitive [DL-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP-5), CGP 40116] NMDA receptor antagonists and NMDA and AMPA on DA release in the mesolimbic system and on motor behavior. Systemic injection and intrategmental infusion of MK-801 increased DA levels in the VTA, but the systemic administration enhanced DA exclusively in the NAC and increased motor behavior. In contrast, intrategmental infusion of AP-5, but not the systemic administration of its lipophilic analogue CGP 40116, decreased the DA release in the two regions without affecting motor behavior. NMDA and AMPA infusion into the VTA increased DA levels in both areas. This increase was accompanied by a strong motor behavioral stimulation after NMDA but only a moderate increase after AMPA infusion. The present results indicate that mesolimbic DA neurons are controlled by the glutamatergic system and that the effects of uncompetitive and competitive NMDA receptor antagonists on DA release are mediated by an interaction with different brain areas. These findings may account for the different effects of NMDA receptor ligands on motor behavior.

Riluzole, a glutamate release inhibitor, and motor behavior

Abstract: Riluzole (2-amino-6-trigluoromethoxy benzothiazole) has neuroprotective, anticonvulsant, anxiolytic and anesthetic qualities. These effects are mediated by blockade of glutamate transmission, stabilizing of sodium channels and blockade of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) reuptake. The action profile of riluzole is dominated by its effects on glutamate transmission which are predominately mediated by N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-linked processes in vitro. In vivo studies show that blockade and stimulation of the different NMDA receptor complex binding sites or AMPA receptors modulate motor behavior in a characteristic manner. It was therefore interesting to examine if blockade of glutamatergic transmission by riluzole induced similar behavioral effects as direct NMDA/AMPA receptor antagonists and if these effects are mediated by a specific receptor. The effects of riluzole alone and in combination with several other neuroactive compounds on the central nervous system was assessed by behavioral paradigms to evaluate sniffing behavior, locomotion, ataxia and rigidity. Accompanying compounds included the NMDA receptor agonist NMDA, the partial glycine site agonist D-cycloserine (DCS), and the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-phenyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist GYKI 52466 [1-(4-aminophenyl)-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzo-diazepine HCl]. Riluzole influenced neither stereotyped sniffing behavior nor locomotion but impaired motor coordination and attenuated rigidity induced by blockade of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists when given alone. At higher doses spontaneous behavioral activity decreased and motor coordination was more impaired. Augmentation of the riluzole effects were observed when NMDA, but not GYKI 52466, was coadministered. The glycine site agonist DCS increased the anticataleptic properties of riluzole. The results indicate that when given alone, riluzole has a behavioral profile resembling that of competitive NMDA receptor antagonists. However, coadministration of riluzole with NMDA/AMPA receptor ligands suggests that this assumption is incorrect, and that riluzole affects glutamatergic transmission by a more indirect mechanism. Nevertheless, the profile of riluzole together with its pre- and postsynaptic blockade of glutamatergic transmission implies beneficial properties in diseases where an overactive glutamate system induces chronic neurotoxicity and/or acute behavioral effects.

Pharmacological studies of prepulse inhibition models of sensorimotor gating deficits in schizophrenia: a decade in review.

Abstract: Rationale: Patients with schizophrenia exhibit deficits in an operational measure of sensorimotor gating: prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle. Similar deficits in PPI are produced in rats by pharmacological or developmental manipulations. These experimentally induced PPI deficits in rats are clearly not animal models of schizophrenia per se, but appear to provide models of sensorimotor gating deficits in schizophrenia patients that have face, predictive, and construct validity. In rodents, disruptions in PPI of startle are produced by: stimulation of D2 dopamine (DA) receptors, produced by amphetamine or apomorphine; activation of serotonergic systems, produced by serotonin (5-HT) releasers or direct agonists at multiple serotonin receptors; and blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, produced by drugs such as phencyclidine (PCP). Accordingly, dopaminergic, serotonergic, and glutamatergic models of disrupted PPI have evolved and have been applied to the identification of potential antipsychotic treatments. In addition, some developmental manipulations, such as isolation rearing, have provided non-pharmacological animal models of the PPI deficits seen in schizophrenia. Objective: This review summarizes and evaluates studies assessing the effects of systemic drug administrations on PPI in rats. Methods: Studies examining systemic drug effects on PPI in rats prior to January 15, 2001 were compiled and organized into six annotated appendices. Based on this catalog of studies, the specific advantages and disadvantages of each of the four main PPI models used in the study of antipsychotic drugs were critically evaluated. Results: Despite some notable inconsistencies, the literature provides strong support for significant disruptions in PPI in rats produced by DA agonists, 5-HT2 agonists, NMDA antagonists, and isolation rearing. Each of these models exhibits sensitivity to at least some antipsychotic medications. While the PPI model based on the effects of direct DA agonists is the most well-validated for the identification of known antipsychotics, the isolation rearing model also appears to be sensitive to both typical and atypical antipsychotics. The 5-HT PPI model is less generally sensitive to antipsychotic medications, but can provide insight into the contribution of serotonergic systems to the actions of newer antipsychotics that act upon multiple receptors. The deficits in PPI produced by NMDA antagonists appear to be more sensitive to clozapine-like atypical antipsychotics than to typical antipsychotics. Hence, despite some exceptions to this generalization, the NMDA PPI model might aid in the identification of novel or atypical antipsychotic medications. Conclusions: Studies of drug effects on PPI in rats have generated four distinctive models that have utility in the identification of antipsychotic medications. Because each of these models has specific advantages and disadvantages, the choice of model to be used depends upon the question being addressed. This review should help to guide such decisions.

Neural circuit regulation of prepulse inhibition of startle in the rat: current knowledge and future challenges.

Abstract: Rationale: Sensorimotor gating of the startle reflex can be assessed across species, using similar stimuli to elicit similar responses. Prepulse inhibition (PPI), a measure of sensorimotor gating, is reduced in patients with some neuropsychiatric disorders, and in rats after manipulations of limbic cortex, striatum, pallidum or pontine tegmentum ("CSPP" circuitry). Objective: To review the current knowledge of the neural circuit regulation of PPI in rats, and to anticipate the future challenges facing this line of inquiry. Methods: The published literature was reviewed and critically evaluated. Results: Limbic CSPP circuitry has been studied in rats to reveal the neurochemical and neuroanatomical substrates regulating PPI at a high level of resolution. In translational cross-species research, this detailed circuit information is used as a "blueprint" to identify substrates that may lead to PPI deficits in psychiatrically disordered humans. Some human disorders with identifiable, localized lesions in CSPP circuitry may provide direct validation for the contribution of CSPP circuitry to this cross-species model. The rapid collection of experimental data supporting this cross-species PPI circuit "blueprint" has supported continuing advances in the development of theoretical models for understanding how this circuitry normally functions to regulate PPI. Such models are needed for building a conceptual framework for understanding the role of this circuitry in the regulation of sensorimotor gating in normal humans, and in the relative loss of sensorimotor gating, and the resulting clinical consequences, in individuals with particular neuropsychiatric disorders. Conclusions: Our understanding of the neural regulation of PPI has increased tremendously over the past 15 years. Progress has come in "broad strokes", and a number of important details and complex questions remain to be addressed. It is anticipated that this is a "work in progress", and that the precise models for the neural regulation of PPI will evolve substantially in the coming years.

Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits.

Abstract: Background Over the last several years, it has become apparent that there are critical problems with the hypothesis that brain dopamine (DA) systems, particularly in the nucleus accumbens, directly mediate the rewarding or primary motivational characteristics of natural stimuli such as food. Hypotheses related to DA function are undergoing a substantial restructuring, such that the classic emphasis on hedonia and primary reward is giving way to diverse lines of research that focus on aspects of instrumental learning, reward prediction, incentive motivation, and behavioral activation.