scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Bengt Svensson

Bio: Bengt Svensson is an academic researcher from Malmö University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mental health & Mental illness. The author has an hindex of 25, co-authored 92 publications receiving 2215 citations. Previous affiliations of Bengt Svensson include Mental Health Services & Lund University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Structuring patient–clinician dialogue to focus on patients' views positively influenced quality of life, needs for care and treatment satisfaction.
Abstract: Background Patient-clinician communication is central to mental healthcare but neglected in research. Aims To testa new computer-mediated intervention structuring patient-clinician dialogue (DIALOG) focusing on patients' quality of life and needs for care. Method In a cluster randomised controlled trial, 134 key workers in six countries were allocated to DIALOG or treatment as usual; 507 people with schizophrenia or related disorders were included. Every 2 months for I year, clinicians asked patients to rate satisfaction with quality of life and treatment, and request additional or different support. Responses were fed back immediately in screen displays, compared with previous ratings and discussed. Primary outcome was subjective quality of life, and secondary outcomes were unmet needs and treatment satisfaction. Results Of 507 patients, 56 were lost to follow-up and 451 were included in intention-to-treat analyses. Patients receiving the DIALOG intervention had better subjective quality of life, fewer unmet needs and higher treatment satisfaction after 12 months. Conclusions Structuring patient clinician dialogue to focus on patients' views positively influenced quality of life, needs for care and treatment satisfaction.

196 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The suggestion that mental health care staff may hold negative attitudes and beliefs about people with mental illness with tentative implications for treatment of the patient and development and implementation of evidence-based services is pointed to.
Abstract: AIMS: Studies investigating mental health professionals' attitudes towards people with mental illness are scarce and there is a lack of comparative studies including both patients' and mental health professionals' attitudes. The aim of the present study was to investigate mental health staff's attitudes towards people with mental illness and compare these with the attitudes of patients in contact with mental health services. A further aim was to relate staff attitudes to demographic and work characteristics. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed including 140 staff and 141 patients. The study included a random sample of outpatients in contact with mental health services in the southern part of Sweden and staff working in these services. Attitudes were investigated using a questionnaire covering beliefs of devaluation and discrimination of people with a mental illness. RESULTS: Negative attitudes were prevalent among staff. Most negative attitudes concerned whether an employer would accept an application for work, willingness to date a person who had been hospitalized, and hiring a patient to take care of children. Staff treating patients with a psychosis or working in inpatient settings had the most negative attitudes. Patient attitudes were overall similar to staff attitudes and there were significant differences in only three out of 12 dimensions. Patients' most negative attitudes were in the same area as the staff's. CONCLUSIONS: This study points to the suggestion that mental health care staff may hold negative attitudes and beliefs about people with mental illness with tentative implications for treatment of the patient and development and implementation of evidence-based services. Since patients and staff in most respects share these beliefs, it is essential to develop interventions that have an impact on both patients and staff, enabling a more recovery-oriented staff-patient relationship.

183 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Swedish version of MANSA showed a satisfactory reliability in terms of internal consistency and construct validity, and the construct of validity of the scale was satisfactory insofar as associations with validation measures were of considerable magnitude and in expected directions.
Abstract: The Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA) is a short interview, which has received a recent interest in research investigating quality of life in people with mental illness. In the present study, the Swedish version of MANSA is examined with regard to reliability, in terms of internal consistency and construct validity. Ninety-two persons with severe mental illness were interviewed regarding quality of life, social network, psychosocial functioning, psychiatric symptoms, needs for care, empowerment and experiences of stigma. Internal consistency was adequate (alpha = 0.81). Positive correlations were found between MANSA and social network, empowerment and psychosocial functioning, and negative correlations with psychopathology, number of needs for care, perceived devaluation and discrimination, and rejection experiences. Social network, psychosocial functioning and beliefs of devaluation and discrimination altogether explained 67% of the variance in quality of life. The Swedish version of MANSA showed a satisfactory reliability in terms of internal consistency. The construct of validity of the scale was satisfactory insofar as associations with validation measures were of considerable magnitude and in expected directions.

182 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The CAN seems to be a instrument with a high interrater reliability also when used under routine conditions as in this study, and seems to have a high degree of feasibility with regard to different types of patients and settings and a sensitivity concerning differences in needs in subgroups of patients.
Abstract: The assessment of needs has been put forth as an important dimension in both the planning, development and evaluation of psychiatric services. A needs assessment tool for routine use should ideally be brief, not require additional staff, be valid and reliable with respect to setting, gender and culture, and also be sensitive to changes in needs and differences in needs between subgroups of patients. In this study, the interrater reliability of the Swedish version of the Camberwell Assessment of Needs instruments (CAN), measuring needs in 22 areas, was investigated in a cross-sectional sample consisting of 119 psychiatric inpatients and outpatients. The prevalence and severity of needs, prevalence of unmet needs, as well as current help received was also investigated. The interrater reliability of the instrument was found to be good both measured as total percentages of agreement in ratings, where an agreement of 80% or above was found in 90% of the comparisons, and as measured by Cohen's kappa. Predominant needs in the sample were in addition to clinical needs concerning psychological distress and psychotic symptoms, social needs such as the need for company, daytime activities and information concerning condition and treatment. The CAN seems to be a instrument with a high interrater reliability also when used under routine conditions as in this study. It also seems to have a high degree of feasibility with regard to different types of patients and settings and a sensitivity concerning differences in needs in subgroups of patients.

134 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
27 Apr 2012-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: A better TR is associated with better adherence to medication among patients with schizophrenia, and patients' and clinicians' perspectives of the TR are both important, but may reflect distinct aspects.
Abstract: Objective: Previous research has shown that a better therapeutic relationship (TR) predicts more positive attitudes towards antipsychotic medication, but did not address whether it is also linked with actual adherence. This study investigated whether the TR is associated with adherence to antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia. Methods: 134 clinicians and 507 of their patients with schizophrenia or a related psychotic disorder participated in a European multi-centre study. A logistic regression model examined how the TR as rated by patients and by clinicians is associated with medication adherence, adjusting for clinician clustering and symptom severity. Results: Patient and clinician ratings of the TR were weakly inter-correlated (r(s) = 0.13, p = 0.004), but each was independently linked with better adherence. After adjusting for patient rated TR and symptom severity, each unit increase in clinician rated TR was associated with an increase of the odds ratio of good compliance by 65.9% (95% CI: 34.6% to 104.5%). After adjusting for clinician rated TR and symptom severity, for each unit increase in patient rated TR the odds ratio of good compliance was increased by 20.8% (95% CI: 4.4% to 39.8%). Conclusions: A better TR is associated with better adherence to medication among patients with schizophrenia. Patients' and clinicians' perspectives of the TR are both important, but may reflect distinct aspects.

120 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The present report presents much improved cost estimates for the total cost of disorders of the brain in Europe in 2010, covering 19 major groups of disorders, 7 more than previously, of an increased range of age groups and more cost items.

1,325 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The review uncovered a striking and robust negative relationship between internalized stigma and a range of psychosocial variables (e.g., hope, self-esteem, and empowerment) and a lack of longitudinal research in this area of study has inhibited the clinical relevance of findings related tointernalized stigma.

1,263 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Therapist's personal attributes such as being flexible, honest, respectful, trustworthy, confident, warm, interested, and open were found to contribute positively to the alliance.

1,015 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The upshot of these needs for change is both dismaying and exciting, both disturbing in the destruction of long-familiar patterns of dealing with human suffering, and paradoxically hopeful in raising the possibility that significant failures in health care systems of the past may now be addressed more successfully.
Abstract: The upshot of these needs for change is both dismaying and exciting, both disturbing in the destruction of long-familiar patterns of dealing with human suffering, and paradoxically hopeful in raising the possibility that significant failures in our health care systems of the past — limited access to medical care and grossly inadequate public sector “non-systems”, for example — may now be addressed more successfully.

635 citations