scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Benoit Sassolas

Other affiliations: University of Lyon
Bio: Benoit Sassolas is an academic researcher from Centre national de la recherche scientifique. The author has contributed to research in topics: Gravitational wave & LIGO. The author has an hindex of 25, co-authored 66 publications receiving 13080 citations. Previous affiliations of Benoit Sassolas include University of Lyon.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
B. P. Abbott1, Richard J. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2, Fausto Acernese3  +1131 moreInstitutions (123)
TL;DR: The association of GRB 170817A, detected by Fermi-GBM 1.7 s after the coalescence, corroborates the hypothesis of a neutron star merger and provides the first direct evidence of a link between these mergers and short γ-ray bursts.
Abstract: On August 17, 2017 at 12∶41:04 UTC the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo gravitational-wave detectors made their first observation of a binary neutron star inspiral. The signal, GW170817, was detected with a combined signal-to-noise ratio of 32.4 and a false-alarm-rate estimate of less than one per 8.0×10^{4} years. We infer the component masses of the binary to be between 0.86 and 2.26 M_{⊙}, in agreement with masses of known neutron stars. Restricting the component spins to the range inferred in binary neutron stars, we find the component masses to be in the range 1.17-1.60 M_{⊙}, with the total mass of the system 2.74_{-0.01}^{+0.04}M_{⊙}. The source was localized within a sky region of 28 deg^{2} (90% probability) and had a luminosity distance of 40_{-14}^{+8} Mpc, the closest and most precisely localized gravitational-wave signal yet. The association with the γ-ray burst GRB 170817A, detected by Fermi-GBM 1.7 s after the coalescence, corroborates the hypothesis of a neutron star merger and provides the first direct evidence of a link between these mergers and short γ-ray bursts. Subsequent identification of transient counterparts across the electromagnetic spectrum in the same location further supports the interpretation of this event as a neutron star merger. This unprecedented joint gravitational and electromagnetic observation provides insight into astrophysics, dense matter, gravitation, and cosmology.

7,327 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
B. P. Abbott1, Richard J. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2, Fausto Acernese3  +1062 moreInstitutions (115)
TL;DR: The magnitude of modifications to the gravitational-wave dispersion relation is constrain, the graviton mass is bound to m_{g}≤7.7×10^{-23} eV/c^{2} and null tests of general relativity are performed, finding that GW170104 is consistent with general relativity.
Abstract: We describe the observation of GW170104, a gravitational-wave signal produced by the coalescence of a pair of stellar-mass black holes. The signal was measured on January 4, 2017 at 10∶11:58.6 UTC by the twin advanced detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory during their second observing run, with a network signal-to-noise ratio of 13 and a false alarm rate less than 1 in 70 000 years. The inferred component black hole masses are 31.2^(8.4) _(−6.0)M_⊙ and 19.4^(5.3)_( −5.9)M_⊙ (at the 90% credible level). The black hole spins are best constrained through measurement of the effective inspiral spin parameter, a mass-weighted combination of the spin components perpendicular to the orbital plane, χ_(eff) = −0.12^(0.21)_( −0.30). This result implies that spin configurations with both component spins positively aligned with the orbital angular momentum are disfavored. The source luminosity distance is 880^(450)_(−390) Mpc corresponding to a redshift of z = 0.18^(0.08)_( −0.07) . We constrain the magnitude of modifications to the gravitational-wave dispersion relation and perform null tests of general relativity. Assuming that gravitons are dispersed in vacuum like massive particles, we bound the graviton mass to m_g ≤ 7.7 × 10^(−23) eV/c^2. In all cases, we find that GW170104 is consistent with general relativity.

2,569 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
M. Punturo, M. R. Abernathy1, Fausto Acernese2, Benjamin William Allen3, Nils Andersson4, K. G. Arun5, Fabrizio Barone2, B. Barr1, M. Barsuglia6, M. G. Beker7, N. Beveridge1, S. Birindelli8, Suvadeep Bose9, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, Tomasz Bulik10, Enrico Calloni, G. Cella, E. Chassande Mottin6, Simon Chelkowski11, Andrea Chincarini, John A. Clark12, E. Coccia13, C. N. Colacino, J. Colas, A. Cumming1, L. Cunningham1, E. Cuoco, S. L. Danilishin14, Karsten Danzmann3, G. De Luca, R. De Salvo15, T. Dent12, R. De Rosa, L. Di Fiore, A. Di Virgilio, M. Doets7, V. Fafone13, Paolo Falferi16, R. Flaminio17, J. Franc17, F. Frasconi, Andreas Freise11, Paul Fulda11, Jonathan R. Gair18, G. Gemme, A. Gennai11, A. Giazotto, Kostas Glampedakis19, M. Granata6, Hartmut Grote3, G. M. Guidi20, G. D. Hammond1, Mark Hannam21, Jan Harms22, D. Heinert23, Martin Hendry1, Ik Siong Heng1, Eric Hennes7, Stefan Hild1, J. H. Hough, Sascha Husa24, S. H. Huttner1, Gareth Jones12, F. Y. Khalili14, Keiko Kokeyama11, Kostas D. Kokkotas19, Badri Krishnan24, M. Lorenzini, Harald Lück3, Ettore Majorana, Ilya Mandel25, Vuk Mandic22, I. W. Martin1, C. Michel17, Y. Minenkov13, N. Morgado17, Simona Mosca, B. Mours26, H. Müller–Ebhardt3, P. G. Murray1, Ronny Nawrodt1, John Nelson1, Richard O'Shaughnessy27, Christian D. Ott15, C. Palomba, A. Paoli, G. Parguez, A. Pasqualetti, R. Passaquieti28, D. Passuello, L. Pinard17, Rosa Poggiani28, P. Popolizio, Mirko Prato, P. Puppo, D. S. Rabeling7, P. Rapagnani29, Jocelyn Read24, Tania Regimbau8, H. Rehbein3, Stuart Reid1, Luciano Rezzolla24, F. Ricci29, F. Richard, A. Rocchi, Sheila Rowan1, Albrecht Rüdiger3, Benoit Sassolas17, Bangalore Suryanarayana Sathyaprakash12, Roman Schnabel3, C. Schwarz, Paul Seidel, Alicia M. Sintes24, Kentaro Somiya15, Fiona C. Speirits1, Kenneth A. Strain1, S. E. Strigin14, P. J. Sutton12, S. P. Tarabrin14, Andre Thüring3, J. F. J. van den Brand7, C. van Leewen7, M. van Veggel1, C. Van Den Broeck12, Alberto Vecchio11, John Veitch11, F. Vetrano20, A. Viceré20, Sergey P. Vyatchanin14, Benno Willke3, Graham Woan1, P. Wolfango30, Kazuhiro Yamamoto3 
TL;DR: The third-generation ground-based observatory Einstein Telescope (ET) project as discussed by the authors is currently in its design study phase, and it can be seen as the first step in this direction.
Abstract: Advanced gravitational wave interferometers, currently under realization, will soon permit the detection of gravitational waves from astronomical sources. To open the era of precision gravitational wave astronomy, a further substantial improvement in sensitivity is required. The future space-based Laser Interferometer Space Antenna and the third-generation ground-based observatory Einstein Telescope (ET) promise to achieve the required sensitivity improvements in frequency ranges. The vastly improved sensitivity of the third generation of gravitational wave observatories could permit detailed measurements of the sources' physical parameters and could complement, in a multi-messenger approach, the observation of signals emitted by cosmological sources obtained through other kinds of telescopes. This paper describes the progress of the ET project which is currently in its design study phase.

1,497 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
B. P. Abbott1, Richard J. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2, Fausto Acernese3  +1151 moreInstitutions (125)
TL;DR: In this article, a GW signal from the merger of two stellar-mass black holes was observed by the two Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory detectors with a network signal-to-noise ratio of 13.5%.
Abstract: On 2017 June 8 at 02:01:16.49 UTC, a gravitational-wave (GW) signal from the merger of two stellar-mass black holes was observed by the two Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory detectors with a network signal-to-noise ratio of 13. This system is the lightest black hole binary so far observed, with component masses of ${12}_{-2}^{+7}\,{M}_{\odot }$ and ${7}_{-2}^{+2}\,{M}_{\odot }$ (90% credible intervals). These lie in the range of measured black hole masses in low-mass X-ray binaries, thus allowing us to compare black holes detected through GWs with electromagnetic observations. The source's luminosity distance is ${340}_{-140}^{+140}\,\mathrm{Mpc}$, corresponding to redshift ${0.07}_{-0.03}^{+0.03}$. We verify that the signal waveform is consistent with the predictions of general relativity.

1,268 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Stefan Hild1, M. R. Abernathy1, Fausto Acernese2, Pau Amaro-Seoane3, Nils Andersson4, K. G. Arun5, Fabrizio Barone2, B. Barr1, M. Barsuglia, Mark Beker, N. Beveridge1, S. Birindelli6, Suvadeep Bose7, L. Bosi, S. Braccini8, C. Bradaschia8, Tomasz Bulik9, Enrico Calloni10, Giancarlo Cella8, E. Chassande Mottin, S. Chelkowski11, Andrea Chincarini, James S. Clark12, E. Coccia13, C. Colacino8, J. Colas, A. Cumming1, L. Cunningham1, E. Cuoco, S. L. Danilishin14, Karsten Danzmann3, R. De Salvo15, T. Dent12, R. De Rosa10, L. Di Fiore10, A. Di Virgilio8, M. Doets16, V. Fafone13, Paolo Falferi17, R. Flaminio, J. Franc, F. Frasconi8, Andreas Freise11, D. Friedrich18, Paul Fulda11, Jonathan R. Gair19, Gianluca Gemme, E. Genin, A. Gennai11, A. Giazotto8, Kostas Glampedakis20, Christian Gräf3, M. Granata, Hartmut Grote3, G. M. Guidi21, A. Gurkovsky14, G. D. Hammond1, Mark Hannam12, Jan Harms15, D. Heinert22, Martin Hendry1, Ik Siong Heng1, E. Hennes, J. H. Hough, Sascha Husa23, S. H. Huttner1, G. T. Jones12, F. Y. Khalili14, Keiko Kokeyama11, Kostas D. Kokkotas20, Badri Krishnan3, Tjonnie G. F. Li, M. Lorenzini, H. Lück3, Ettore Majorana, Ilya Mandel24, Vuk Mandic25, M. Mantovani8, I. W. Martin1, Christine Michel, Y. Minenkov13, N. Morgado, S. Mosca10, B. Mours26, Helge Müller-Ebhardt18, P. G. Murray1, Ronny Nawrodt1, Ronny Nawrodt22, John Nelson1, Richard O'Shaughnessy27, Christian D. Ott15, C. Palomba, Angela Delli Paoli, G. Parguez, A. Pasqualetti, R. Passaquieti8, R. Passaquieti28, D. Passuello8, Laurent Pinard, Wolfango Plastino29, Rosa Poggiani28, Rosa Poggiani8, P. Popolizio, Mirko Prato, M. Punturo, P. Puppo, D. S. Rabeling16, P. Rapagnani30, Jocelyn Read31, Tania Regimbau6, H. Rehbein3, S. Reid1, F. Ricci30, F. Richard, A. Rocchi, Sheila Rowan1, A. Rüdiger3, Lucía Santamaría15, Benoit Sassolas, Bangalore Suryanarayana Sathyaprakash12, Roman Schnabel3, C. Schwarz22, Paul Seidel22, Alicia M. Sintes23, Kentaro Somiya15, Fiona C. Speirits1, Kenneth A. Strain1, S. E. Strigin14, P. J. Sutton12, S. P. Tarabrin18, Andre Thüring3, J. F. J. van den Brand16, M. van Veggel1, C. Van Den Broeck, Alberto Vecchio11, John Veitch12, F. Vetrano21, A. Viceré21, S. P. Vyatchanin14, Benno Willke3, Graham Woan1, Kazuhiro Yamamoto 
TL;DR: In this article, a special focus is set on evaluating the frequency band below 10 Hz where a complex mixture of seismic, gravity gradient, suspension thermal and radiation pressure noise dominates, including the most relevant fundamental noise contributions.
Abstract: Advanced gravitational wave detectors, currently under construction, are expected to directly observe gravitational wave signals of astrophysical origin. The Einstein Telescope (ET), a third-generation gravitational wave detector, has been proposed in order to fully open up the emerging field of gravitational wave astronomy. In this paper we describe sensitivity models for ET and investigate potential limits imposed by fundamental noise sources. A special focus is set on evaluating the frequency band below 10 Hz where a complex mixture of seismic, gravity gradient, suspension thermal and radiation pressure noise dominates. We develop the most accurate sensitivity model, referred to as ET-D, for a third-generation detector so far, including the most relevant fundamental noise contributions.

682 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

[...]

08 Dec 2001-BMJ
TL;DR: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one, which seems an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.
Abstract: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one. I remember first hearing about it at school. It seemed an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality. Usually familiarity dulls this sense of the bizarre, but in the case of i it was the reverse: over the years the sense of its surreal nature intensified. It seemed that it was impossible to write mathematics that described the real world in …

33,785 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: SciPy as discussed by the authors is an open source scientific computing library for the Python programming language, which includes functionality spanning clustering, Fourier transforms, integration, interpolation, file I/O, linear algebra, image processing, orthogonal distance regression, minimization algorithms, signal processing, sparse matrix handling, computational geometry, and statistics.
Abstract: SciPy is an open source scientific computing library for the Python programming language. SciPy 1.0 was released in late 2017, about 16 years after the original version 0.1 release. SciPy has become a de facto standard for leveraging scientific algorithms in the Python programming language, with more than 600 unique code contributors, thousands of dependent packages, over 100,000 dependent repositories, and millions of downloads per year. This includes usage of SciPy in almost half of all machine learning projects on GitHub, and usage by high profile projects including LIGO gravitational wave analysis and creation of the first-ever image of a black hole (M87). The library includes functionality spanning clustering, Fourier transforms, integration, interpolation, file I/O, linear algebra, image processing, orthogonal distance regression, minimization algorithms, signal processing, sparse matrix handling, computational geometry, and statistics. In this work, we provide an overview of the capabilities and development practices of the SciPy library and highlight some recent technical developments.

12,774 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
B. P. Abbott1, Richard J. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2, Fausto Acernese3  +1131 moreInstitutions (123)
TL;DR: The association of GRB 170817A, detected by Fermi-GBM 1.7 s after the coalescence, corroborates the hypothesis of a neutron star merger and provides the first direct evidence of a link between these mergers and short γ-ray bursts.
Abstract: On August 17, 2017 at 12∶41:04 UTC the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo gravitational-wave detectors made their first observation of a binary neutron star inspiral. The signal, GW170817, was detected with a combined signal-to-noise ratio of 32.4 and a false-alarm-rate estimate of less than one per 8.0×10^{4} years. We infer the component masses of the binary to be between 0.86 and 2.26 M_{⊙}, in agreement with masses of known neutron stars. Restricting the component spins to the range inferred in binary neutron stars, we find the component masses to be in the range 1.17-1.60 M_{⊙}, with the total mass of the system 2.74_{-0.01}^{+0.04}M_{⊙}. The source was localized within a sky region of 28 deg^{2} (90% probability) and had a luminosity distance of 40_{-14}^{+8} Mpc, the closest and most precisely localized gravitational-wave signal yet. The association with the γ-ray burst GRB 170817A, detected by Fermi-GBM 1.7 s after the coalescence, corroborates the hypothesis of a neutron star merger and provides the first direct evidence of a link between these mergers and short γ-ray bursts. Subsequent identification of transient counterparts across the electromagnetic spectrum in the same location further supports the interpretation of this event as a neutron star merger. This unprecedented joint gravitational and electromagnetic observation provides insight into astrophysics, dense matter, gravitation, and cosmology.

7,327 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: SciPy as discussed by the authors is an open-source scientific computing library for the Python programming language, which has become a de facto standard for leveraging scientific algorithms in Python, with over 600 unique code contributors, thousands of dependent packages, over 100,000 dependent repositories and millions of downloads per year.
Abstract: SciPy is an open-source scientific computing library for the Python programming language. Since its initial release in 2001, SciPy has become a de facto standard for leveraging scientific algorithms in Python, with over 600 unique code contributors, thousands of dependent packages, over 100,000 dependent repositories and millions of downloads per year. In this work, we provide an overview of the capabilities and development practices of SciPy 1.0 and highlight some recent technical developments.

6,244 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Nabila Aghanim1, Yashar Akrami2, Yashar Akrami3, Yashar Akrami4  +229 moreInstitutions (70)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present cosmological parameter results from the full-mission Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, combining information from the temperature and polarization maps and the lensing reconstruction.
Abstract: We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, combining information from the temperature and polarization maps and the lensing reconstruction Compared to the 2015 results, improved measurements of large-scale polarization allow the reionization optical depth to be measured with higher precision, leading to significant gains in the precision of other correlated parameters Improved modelling of the small-scale polarization leads to more robust constraints on manyparameters,withresidualmodellinguncertaintiesestimatedtoaffectthemonlyatthe05σlevelWefindgoodconsistencywiththestandard spatially-flat6-parameter ΛCDMcosmologyhavingapower-lawspectrumofadiabaticscalarperturbations(denoted“base ΛCDM”inthispaper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in combination A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ωch2 = 0120±0001, baryon density Ωbh2 = 00224±00001, scalar spectral index ns = 0965±0004, and optical depth τ = 0054±0007 (in this abstract we quote 68% confidence regions on measured parameters and 95% on upper limits) The angular acoustic scale is measured to 003% precision, with 100θ∗ = 10411±00003Theseresultsareonlyweaklydependentonthecosmologicalmodelandremainstable,withsomewhatincreasederrors, in many commonly considered extensions Assuming the base-ΛCDM cosmology, the inferred (model-dependent) late-Universe parameters are: HubbleconstantH0 = (674±05)kms−1Mpc−1;matterdensityparameterΩm = 0315±0007;andmatterfluctuationamplitudeσ8 = 0811±0006 We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the base-ΛCDM model Combining with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements (and consideringsingle-parameterextensions)weconstraintheeffectiveextrarelativisticdegreesoffreedomtobe Neff = 299±017,inagreementwith the Standard Model prediction Neff = 3046, and find that the neutrino mass is tightly constrained toPmν < 012 eV The CMB spectra continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudesthan predicted in base ΛCDM at over 2σ, which pulls some parameters that affect thelensing amplitude away from the ΛCDM model; however, this is not supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the background geometry) BAOdataThejointconstraintwithBAOmeasurementsonspatialcurvatureisconsistentwithaflatuniverse, ΩK = 0001±0002Alsocombining with Type Ia supernovae (SNe), the dark-energy equation of state parameter is measured to be w0 = −103±003, consistent with a cosmological constant We find no evidence for deviations from a purely power-law primordial spectrum, and combining with data from BAO, BICEP2, and Keck Array data, we place a limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio r0002 < 006 Standard big-bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the helium and deuterium abundances for the base-ΛCDM cosmology are in excellent agreement with observations The Planck base-ΛCDM results are in good agreement with BAO, SNe, and some galaxy lensing observations, but in slight tension with the Dark Energy Survey’s combined-probe results including galaxy clustering (which prefers lower fluctuation amplitudes or matter density parameters), and in significant, 36σ, tension with local measurements of the Hubble constant (which prefer a higher value) Simple model extensions that can partially resolve these tensions are not favoured by the Planck data

4,688 citations