Bernard M. Bass

Bio: Bernard M. Bass is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Leadership & Situational leadership theory. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 3272 citations.

Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership

Abstract: Introduction - Bernard M Bass and Bruce J Avolio Transforming Leadership - Karl W Kuhnert Developing People Through Delegation Indirect Leadership - Francis J Yammarino Transformational Leadership at a Distance Transformational Leadership in Teams - David C Atwater and Bernard M Bass Transformational Leadership in Multifunctional Teams - David A Waldman Transformational Leadership and Team and Organizational Decision Making - Bernard M Bass The Alliance of Total Quality and the Full Range of Leadership - Bruce J Avolio Organizational Transformation - Leanne E Atwater and David C Atwater Strategies for Change and Improvement Corporate Reorganization and Transformations in Human Resource Management - K Galen Kroeck Conclusions and Implications - Bruce J Avolio and Bernard M Bass

Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity.

Abstract: This study provided a comprehensive examination of the full range of transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership. Results (based on 626 correlations from 87 sources) revealed an overall validity of .44 for transformational leadership, and this validity generalized over longitudinal and multisource designs. Contingent reward (.39) and laissez-faire (-.37) leadership had the next highest overall relations; management by exception (active and passive) was inconsistently related to the criteria. Surprisingly, there were several criteria for which contingent reward leadership had stronger relations than did transformational leadership. Furthermore, transformational leadership was strongly correlated with contingent reward (.80) and laissez-faire (-.65) leadership. Transformational and contingent reward leadership generally predicted criteria controlling for the other leadership dimensions, although transformational leadership failed to predict leader job performance.

Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct Issues

Abstract: The leader-member exchange (LMX) literature is reviewed using meta-analysis. Relationships between LMX and its correlates are examined, as are issues related to the LMX construct, including measurement and leader-member agreement. Results suggest significant relationships between LMX and job performance, satisfaction with supervision, overall satisfaction, commitment, role conflict, role clarity, member competence, and turnover intentions. The relationship between LMX and actual turnover was not significant. Leader and member LMX perceptions were only moderately related. Partial support was found for measurement instrument and perspective (i.e., leader vs. member) as moderators of the relationships between LMX and its correlates. Meta-analysis showed that the LMX7 (7-item LMX) measure has the soundest psychometric properties of all instruments and that LMX is congruent with numerous empirical relationships associated with transformational leadership. Within the broad area of organizationa l leadership, leader-member exchange (LMX) theory has evolved into one of the more interesting and useful approaches for studying hypothesized linkages between leadership processes and outcomes. First proposed by Graeri and colleagues (Dansereau, Cashman, & Graen, 1973; Dansereau, Graen, & Haga, 1975; Graen, 1976; Graen & Cashman, 1975), LMX is distinguished from other leadership theories by its focus on the dyadic relationship between a leader and a member. Unlike traditional theories that seek to explain leadership as a function of personal characteristics of the leader, features of the situation, or an interaction between the two, LMX is unique in its adoption of the dyadic relationship as the level of analysis. Although the theory has been modified and expanded

The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leadership Types

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the relative impact of different types of leadership on students' academic and nonacademic outcomes.Research Design:The methodology involved an analysis of findings from 27 published studies of the relationship between leadership and student outcomes. The first meta-analysis, including 22 of the 27 studies, involved a comparison of the effects of transformational and instructional leadership on student outcomes. The second meta-analysis involved a comparison of the effects of five inductively derived sets of leadership practices on student outcomes. Twelve of the studies contributed to this second analysis.Findings: The first meta-analysis indicated that the average effect of instructional leadership on student outcomes was three to four times that of transformational leadership. Inspection of the survey items used to measure school leadership revealed five sets of leadership practices or dimensions: establishing goals and expectations; resourcing strategi...

Does the Transactional-Transformational Leadership Paradigm Transcend Organizational and National Boundaries?

Abstract: There is universality in the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm. That is, the same conception of phenomena and relationships can be observed in a wide range of organizations and cultures. Exceptions can be understood as a consequence of unusual attributes of the organizations or cultures. Three corollaries are discussed. Supportive evidence has been gathered in studies conducted in organizations in business, education, the military, the government, and the independent sector. Likewise, supportive evidence has been accumulated from all but 1 continent to document the applicability of the paradigm.