scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Bernard Ramsahoye

Bio: Bernard Ramsahoye is an academic researcher from University of Edinburgh. The author has contributed to research in topics: DNA methylation & Methylation. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 29 publications receiving 4212 citations. Previous affiliations of Bernard Ramsahoye include Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre & Western General Hospital.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Findings indicate random loss rather than specific maintenance of methylation in Dnmt[1kd,3a−/−,3b−/ −] cells, and suggest that random shotgun bisulfite sequencing can be scaled to a genome-wide approach.
Abstract: We describe a large-scale random approach termed reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) for analyzing and comparing genomic methylation patterns. BglII restriction fragments were size-selected to 500-600 bp, equipped with adapters, treated with bisulfite, PCR amplified, cloned and sequenced. We constructed RRBS libraries from murine ES cells and from ES cells lacking DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and 3b and with knocked-down (kd) levels of Dnmt1 (Dnmt[1(kd),3a-/-,3b-/-]). Sequencing of 960 RRBS clones from Dnmt[1(kd),3a-/-,3b-/-] cells generated 343 kb of non-redundant bisulfite sequence covering 66212 cytosines in the genome. All but 38 cytosines had been converted to uracil indicating a conversion rate of >99.9%. Of the remaining cytosines 35 were found in CpG and 3 in CpT dinucleotides. Non-CpG methylation was >250-fold reduced compared with wild-type ES cells, consistent with a role for Dnmt3a and/or Dnmt3b in CpA and CpT methylation. Closer inspection revealed neither a consensus sequence around the methylated sites nor evidence for clustering of residual methylation in the genome. Our findings indicate random loss rather than specific maintenance of methylation in Dnmt[1(kd),3a-/-,3b-/-] cells. Near-complete bisulfite conversion and largely unbiased representation of RRBS libraries suggest that random shotgun bisulfite sequencing can be scaled to a genome-wide approach.

1,073 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Analysis of genomic methylation in transgenic Drosophila expressing Dnmt3a reveals that DnMT3a is predominantly a CpG methylase but also is able to induce methylation at CpA and at CPT.
Abstract: Current evidence indicates that methylation of cytosine in mammalian DNA is restricted to both strands of the symmetrical sequence CpG, although there have been sporadic reports that sequences other than CpG may also be methylated. We have used a dual-labeling nearest neighbor technique and bisulphite genomic sequencing methods to investigate the nearest neighbors of 5-methylcytosine residues in mammalian DNA. We find that embryonic stem cells, but not somatic tissues, have significant cytosine-5 methylation at CpA and, to a lesser extent, at CpT. As the expression of the de novo methyltransferase Dnmt3a correlates well with the presence of non-CpG methylation, we asked whether Dnmt3a might be responsible for this modification. Analysis of genomic methylation in transgenic Drosophila expressing Dnmt3a reveals that Dnmt3a is predominantly a CpG methylase but also is able to induce methylation at CpA and at CpT.

997 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
30 Nov 2000-Nature
TL;DR: It is shown that DNA is methylated, but that Drosophila genomic methylation is restricted to the early stages of embryonic development.
Abstract: Certain cytosine residues of eukaryotic DNA are methylated in inactive regions of the genome. For a long time the fruitfly Drosophila was thought to be an exception1,2,3,4, but now the evidence points to the existence of a functional DNA-methylation system in Drosophila as well5,6,7,9. Here we show that DNA is methylated, but that Drosophila genomic methylation is restricted to the early stages of embryonic development.

462 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that successful terminal differentiation is not dependent simply on adequate methylation levels, and there is an absolute requirement that the methylation be delivered by the maintenance enzyme Dnmt1.
Abstract: It has been reported that DNA methyltransferase 1-deficient (Dnmt1−/−) embryonic stem (ES) cells are hypomethylated (20% CpG methylation) and die through apoptosis when induced to differentiate. Here, we show that Dnmt[3a−/−,3b−/−] ES cells with just 0.6% of their CpG dinucleotides behave differently: the majority of cells within the culture are partially or completely blocked in their ability to initiate differentiation, remaining viable while retaining the stem cell characteristics of alkaline phosphatase and Oct4 expression. Restoration of DNA methylation levels rescues these defects. Severely hypomethylated Dnmt[3a−/−,3b−/−] ES cells have increased histone acetylation levels, and those cells that can differentiate aberrantly express extraembryonic markers of differentiation. Dnmt[3a−/−,3b−/−] ES cells with >10% CpG methylation are able to terminally differentiate, whereas Dnmt1−/− ES cells with 20% of the CpG methylated cannot differentiate. This demonstrates that successful terminal differentiation is not dependent simply on adequate methylation levels. There is an absolute requirement that the methylation be delivered by the maintenance enzyme Dnmt1.

341 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The intrinsic difference between the imprinted region of Igf2 and H19 and of other imprinted genes to postzygotic de novo methylation may be the molecular basis for the frequently observed de noVO methylation and upregulation of IgF2 in neoplastic cells and tumors.
Abstract: Biallelic expression of Igf2 is frequently seen in cancers because Igf2 functions as a survival factor. In many tumors the activation of Igf2 expression has been correlated with de novo methylation of the imprinted region. We have compared the intrinsic susceptibilities of the imprinted region of Igf2 and H19, other imprinted genes, bulk genomic DNA, and repetitive retroviral sequences to Dnmt1 overexpression. At low Dnmt1 methyltransferase levels repetitive retroviral elements were methylated and silenced. The nonmethylated imprinted region of Igf2 and H19 was resistant to methylation at low Dnmt1 levels but became fully methylated when Dnmt1 was overexpressed from a bacterial artificial chromosome transgene. Methylation caused the activation of the silent Igf2 allele in wild-type and Dnmt1 knockout cells, leading to biallelic Igf2 expression. In contrast, the imprinted genes Igf2r, Peg3, Snrpn, and Grf1 were completely resistant to de novo methylation, even when Dnmt1 was overexpressed. Therefore, the intrinsic difference between the imprinted region of Igf2 and H19 and of other imprinted genes to postzygotic de novo methylation may be the molecular basis for the frequently observed de novo methylation and upregulation of Igf2 in neoplastic cells and tumors. Injection of Dnmt1-overexpressing embryonic stem cells in diploid or tetraploid blastocysts resulted in lethality of the embryo, which resembled embryonic lethality caused by Dnmt1 deficiency.

268 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The heritability of methylation states and the secondary nature of the decision to invite or exclude methylation support the idea that DNA methylation is adapted for a specific cellular memory function in development.
Abstract: The character of a cell is defined by its constituent proteins, which are the result of specific patterns of gene expression. Crucial determinants of gene expression patterns are DNA-binding transcription factors that choose genes for transcriptional activation or repression by recognizing the sequence of DNA bases in their promoter regions. Interaction of these factors with their cognate sequences triggers a chain of events, often involving changes in the structure of chromatin, that leads to the assembly of an active transcription complex (e.g., Cosma et al. 1999). But the types of transcription factors present in a cell are not alone sufficient to define its spectrum of gene activity, as the transcriptional potential of a genome can become restricted in a stable manner during development. The constraints imposed by developmental history probably account for the very low efficiency of cloning animals from the nuclei of differentiated cells (Rideout et al. 2001; Wakayama and Yanagimachi 2001). A “transcription factors only” model would predict that the gene expression pattern of a differentiated nucleus would be completely reversible upon exposure to a new spectrum of factors. Although many aspects of expression can be reprogrammed in this way (Gurdon 1999), some marks of differentiation are evidently so stable that immersion in an alien cytoplasm cannot erase the memory. The genomic sequence of a differentiated cell is thought to be identical in most cases to that of the zygote from which it is descended (mammalian B and T cells being an obvious exception). This means that the marks of developmental history are unlikely to be caused by widespread somatic mutation. Processes less irrevocable than mutation fall under the umbrella term “epigenetic” mechanisms. A current definition of epigenetics is: “The study of mitotically and/or meiotically heritable changes in gene function that cannot be explained by changes in DNA sequence” (Russo et al. 1996). There are two epigenetic systems that affect animal development and fulfill the criterion of heritability: DNA methylation and the Polycomb-trithorax group (Pc-G/trx) protein complexes. (Histone modification has some attributes of an epigenetic process, but the issue of heritability has yet to be resolved.) This review concerns DNA methylation, focusing on the generation, inheritance, and biological significance of genomic methylation patterns in the development of mammals. Data will be discussed favoring the notion that DNA methylation may only affect genes that are already silenced by other mechanisms in the embryo. Embryonic transcription, on the other hand, may cause the exclusion of the DNA methylation machinery. The heritability of methylation states and the secondary nature of the decision to invite or exclude methylation support the idea that DNA methylation is adapted for a specific cellular memory function in development. Indeed, the possibility will be discussed that DNA methylation and Pc-G/trx may represent alternative systems of epigenetic memory that have been interchanged over evolutionary time. Animal DNA methylation has been the subject of several recent reviews (Bird and Wolffe 1999; Bestor 2000; Hsieh 2000; Costello and Plass 2001; Jones and Takai 2001). For recent reviews of plant and fungal DNA methylation, see Finnegan et al. (2000), Martienssen and Colot (2001), and Matzke et al. (2001).

6,691 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Advances in the understanding of the mechanism and role of DNA methylation in biological processes are reviewed, showing that epigenetic mechanisms seem to allow an organism to respond to the environment through changes in gene expression.
Abstract: Cells of a multicellular organism are genetically homogeneous but structurally and functionally heterogeneous owing to the differential expression of genes. Many of these differences in gene expression arise during development and are subsequently retained through mitosis. Stable alterations of this kind are said to be 'epigenetic', because they are heritable in the short term but do not involve mutations of the DNA itself. Research over the past few years has focused on two molecular mechanisms that mediate epigenetic phenomena: DNA methylation and histone modifications. Here, we review advances in the understanding of the mechanism and role of DNA methylation in biological processes. Epigenetic effects by means of DNA methylation have an important role in development but can also arise stochastically as animals age. Identification of proteins that mediate these effects has provided insight into this complex process and diseases that occur when it is perturbed. External influences on epigenetic processes are seen in the effects of diet on long-term diseases such as cancer. Thus, epigenetic mechanisms seem to allow an organism to respond to the environment through changes in gene expression. The extent to which environmental effects can provoke epigenetic responses represents an exciting area of future research.

5,760 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Anshul Kundaje1, Wouter Meuleman1, Wouter Meuleman2, Jason Ernst3, Misha Bilenky4, Angela Yen2, Angela Yen1, Alireza Heravi-Moussavi4, Pouya Kheradpour2, Pouya Kheradpour1, Zhizhuo Zhang1, Zhizhuo Zhang2, Jianrong Wang2, Jianrong Wang1, Michael J. Ziller2, Viren Amin5, John W. Whitaker, Matthew D. Schultz6, Lucas D. Ward2, Lucas D. Ward1, Abhishek Sarkar2, Abhishek Sarkar1, Gerald Quon2, Gerald Quon1, Richard Sandstrom7, Matthew L. Eaton2, Matthew L. Eaton1, Yi-Chieh Wu1, Yi-Chieh Wu2, Andreas R. Pfenning2, Andreas R. Pfenning1, Xinchen Wang1, Xinchen Wang2, Melina Claussnitzer1, Melina Claussnitzer2, Yaping Liu2, Yaping Liu1, Cristian Coarfa5, R. Alan Harris5, Noam Shoresh2, Charles B. Epstein2, Elizabeta Gjoneska1, Elizabeta Gjoneska2, Danny Leung8, Wei Xie8, R. David Hawkins8, Ryan Lister6, Chibo Hong9, Philippe Gascard9, Andrew J. Mungall4, Richard A. Moore4, Eric Chuah4, Angela Tam4, Theresa K. Canfield7, R. Scott Hansen7, Rajinder Kaul7, Peter J. Sabo7, Mukul S. Bansal10, Mukul S. Bansal1, Mukul S. Bansal2, Annaick Carles4, Jesse R. Dixon8, Kai How Farh2, Soheil Feizi1, Soheil Feizi2, Rosa Karlic11, Ah Ram Kim1, Ah Ram Kim2, Ashwinikumar Kulkarni12, Daofeng Li13, Rebecca F. Lowdon13, Ginell Elliott13, Tim R. Mercer14, Shane Neph7, Vitor Onuchic5, Paz Polak2, Paz Polak15, Nisha Rajagopal8, Pradipta R. Ray12, Richard C Sallari1, Richard C Sallari2, Kyle Siebenthall7, Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong1, Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong2, Michael Stevens13, Robert E. Thurman7, Jie Wu16, Bo Zhang13, Xin Zhou13, Arthur E. Beaudet5, Laurie A. Boyer1, Philip L. De Jager15, Philip L. De Jager2, Peggy J. Farnham17, Susan J. Fisher9, David Haussler18, Steven J.M. Jones19, Steven J.M. Jones4, Wei Li5, Marco A. Marra4, Michael T. McManus9, Shamil R. Sunyaev2, Shamil R. Sunyaev15, James A. Thomson20, Thea D. Tlsty9, Li-Huei Tsai1, Li-Huei Tsai2, Wei Wang, Robert A. Waterland5, Michael Q. Zhang21, Lisa Helbling Chadwick22, Bradley E. Bernstein15, Bradley E. Bernstein6, Bradley E. Bernstein2, Joseph F. Costello9, Joseph R. Ecker11, Martin Hirst4, Alexander Meissner2, Aleksandar Milosavljevic5, Bing Ren8, John A. Stamatoyannopoulos7, Ting Wang13, Manolis Kellis2, Manolis Kellis1 
19 Feb 2015-Nature
TL;DR: It is shown that disease- and trait-associated genetic variants are enriched in tissue-specific epigenomic marks, revealing biologically relevant cell types for diverse human traits, and providing a resource for interpreting the molecular basis of human disease.
Abstract: The reference human genome sequence set the stage for studies of genetic variation and its association with human disease, but epigenomic studies lack a similar reference. To address this need, the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium generated the largest collection so far of human epigenomes for primary cells and tissues. Here we describe the integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes generated as part of the programme, profiled for histone modification patterns, DNA accessibility, DNA methylation and RNA expression. We establish global maps of regulatory elements, define regulatory modules of coordinated activity, and their likely activators and repressors. We show that disease- and trait-associated genetic variants are enriched in tissue-specific epigenomic marks, revealing biologically relevant cell types for diverse human traits, and providing a resource for interpreting the molecular basis of human disease. Our results demonstrate the central role of epigenomic information for understanding gene regulation, cellular differentiation and human disease.

5,037 citations

01 Feb 2015
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes generated as part of the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, profiled for histone modification patterns, DNA accessibility, DNA methylation and RNA expression.
Abstract: The reference human genome sequence set the stage for studies of genetic variation and its association with human disease, but epigenomic studies lack a similar reference. To address this need, the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium generated the largest collection so far of human epigenomes for primary cells and tissues. Here we describe the integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes generated as part of the programme, profiled for histone modification patterns, DNA accessibility, DNA methylation and RNA expression. We establish global maps of regulatory elements, define regulatory modules of coordinated activity, and their likely activators and repressors. We show that disease- and trait-associated genetic variants are enriched in tissue-specific epigenomic marks, revealing biologically relevant cell types for diverse human traits, and providing a resource for interpreting the molecular basis of human disease. Our results demonstrate the central role of epigenomic information for understanding gene regulation, cellular differentiation and human disease.

4,409 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
19 Nov 2009-Nature
TL;DR: The first genome-wide, single-base-resolution maps of methylated cytosines in a mammalian genome, from both human embryonic stem cells and fetal fibroblasts, along with comparative analysis of messenger RNA and small RNA components of the transcriptome, several histone modifications, and sites of DNA-protein interaction for several key regulatory factors were presented in this article.
Abstract: DNA cytosine methylation is a central epigenetic modification that has essential roles in cellular processes including genome regulation, development and disease. Here we present the first genome-wide, single-base-resolution maps of methylated cytosines in a mammalian genome, from both human embryonic stem cells and fetal fibroblasts, along with comparative analysis of messenger RNA and small RNA components of the transcriptome, several histone modifications, and sites of DNA-protein interaction for several key regulatory factors. Widespread differences were identified in the composition and patterning of cytosine methylation between the two genomes. Nearly one-quarter of all methylation identified in embryonic stem cells was in a non-CG context, suggesting that embryonic stem cells may use different methylation mechanisms to affect gene regulation. Methylation in non-CG contexts showed enrichment in gene bodies and depletion in protein binding sites and enhancers. Non-CG methylation disappeared upon induced differentiation of the embryonic stem cells, and was restored in induced pluripotent stem cells. We identified hundreds of differentially methylated regions proximal to genes involved in pluripotency and differentiation, and widespread reduced methylation levels in fibroblasts associated with lower transcriptional activity. These reference epigenomes provide a foundation for future studies exploring this key epigenetic modification in human disease and development.

4,266 citations