Author
Bryan S. Turner
Other affiliations: King's College London, City University of New York, University of Sydney ...read more
Bio: Bryan S. Turner is an academic researcher from Australian Catholic University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Citizenship & Politics. The author has an hindex of 70, co-authored 511 publications receiving 21116 citations. Previous affiliations of Bryan S. Turner include King's College London & City University of New York.
Topics: Citizenship, Politics, Islam, Sociology of religion, Social theory
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
01 Jan 2008
TL;DR: The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) as mentioned in this paper is a set of rights and entitlements that have underpinned welfare systems in both liberal democracies and socialist regimes.
Abstract: The debate about the status and purpose of individual rights as against social rights depends a great deal on how we define these terms. Although it is difficult to come to a definitive philosophical or jurisprudential conclusion about social versus individual rights, textbooks on human rights recognize the difference between the two traditions (Gearon 2003). Furthermore, the difference between these two traditions is consequential in the real world. For example the so-called twin covenants embrace this distinction. There is the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which was promulgated on December 16, 1966, and came into effect on March 23, 1976. There is the parallel International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), which was promulgated on December 16, 1966, and came into effect on January 3, 1976. The ICCPR is often seen to embrace the classic liberal “negative freedoms,” namely a set of rights that are “freedom-from rights,” essentially freedom from oppression. By contrast, the ICESCR is regarded as embracing those rights and entitlements that have underpinned welfare systems in both liberal democracies and socialist regimes. They are the “positive freedoms” that provide people in need with resources to achieve certain desirable outcomes. These two covenants became somewhat entangled in cold war ideological conflicts between liberal capitalist democracies and socialist states. The controversial nature of the two covenants is illustrated by the fact that, while they were presented to the UN General Assembly in 1966, it took a further decade before they could be ratified in order for them to come into operation. It is often said that, while the West has recognized the ICCPR because it is compatible with liberal ideology, socialist states have felt more comfortable with the
1 citations
••
1 citations
•
01 Jan 2016
1 citations
Cited by
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this paper, Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism are discussed. And the history of European ideas: Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 721-722.
13,842 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, a variety of evidence is presented supporting this simple and compelling premise and implications for consumer behavior are derived for consumer behaviour because the construct of extended self involves consumer behavior rather than buyer behavior, it appears to be a much richer construct than previous formulations positing a relationship between selfconcept and consumer brand choice.
Abstract: Our possessions are a major contributor to and reflection of our identities A variety of evidence is presented supporting this simple and compelling premise Related streams of research are identified and drawn upon in developing this concept and implications are derived for consumer behavior Because the construct of extended self involves consumer behavior rather than buyer behavior, it appears to be a much richer construct than previous formulations positing a relationship between self-concept and consumer brand choice
7,705 citations
01 Jan 1982
Abstract: Introduction 1. Woman's Place in Man's Life Cycle 2. Images of Relationship 3. Concepts of Self and Morality 4. Crisis and Transition 5. Women's Rights and Women's Judgment 6. Visions of Maturity References Index of Study Participants General Index
7,539 citations
••
01 Sep 1989
TL;DR: We may not be able to make you love reading, but archaeology of knowledge will lead you to love reading starting from now as mentioned in this paper, and book is the window to open the new world.
Abstract: We may not be able to make you love reading, but archaeology of knowledge will lead you to love reading starting from now. Book is the window to open the new world. The world that you want is in the better stage and level. World will always guide you to even the prestige stage of the life. You know, this is some of how reading will give you the kindness. In this case, more books you read more knowledge you know, but it can mean also the bore is full.
5,075 citations