C. Béhar

Bio: C. Béhar is an academic researcher from Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Tourette syndrome & Subthalamic nucleus. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 11 publications receiving 1455 citations. Previous affiliations of C. Béhar include French Institute of Health and Medical Research.

Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease: A distressed mind in a repaired body?

Abstract: Schupbach et al. demonstrated discrepancy between motor and social impact of subthalamic stimulation (STN DBS) on patients with Parkinson disease (PD). While motor symptoms improved, social adaptation remained unsolved, with new conflicts and life problems.1 During the past 7 years, we have treated 74 patients with PD bilaterally with STN DBS. We have never encountered social, marital, or professional troubles. After a mean of 34.2 months after surgery, sole STN DBS provided a 63.5% improvement of the general motor function. Clinical complications decreased by 86% when compared to preoperative condition. Twelve of our patients retired before surgery because of PD and were still age-fit for work and 6 (50%) resumed full-time work after surgery. Of the total series, 4 patients were transferred to part-time positions or were about to quit work because of PD. All resumed full-time work responsibilities after surgery. Twenty-two (except one patient) maintained full active professional status. …

Neurosurgery at an earlier stage of Parkinson disease: a randomized, controlled trial.

Abstract: Background: Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson disease (PD) and is currently performed after a mean disease duration of 14 years, when severe motor complications have resulted in marked loss of quality of life. We examined whether surgery at an early stage would maintain quality of life as well as improve motor function. Methods: Twenty patients with PD of short duration (time elapsed since first symptom ± SD: 6.8 ± 1.0 years) with mild to moderate motor signs (Unified Parkinson9s Disease Rating Scale III “off” medication: 29 ± 12) who responded well to levodopa treatment were included in pairs, matched for age, duration and severity of disease, and impairment in socioprofessional functioning. Patients were prospectively randomized to undergo bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation (n = 10) or receive optimized medical treatment (n = 10). Parkinsonian motor scores, quality of life, cognition, and psychiatric morbidity were assessed at inclusion and at 6, 12, and 18 months after randomization. Results: Quality of life was improved by 24% in surgical and 0% in nonsurgical patients ( p p Conclusions: Subthalamic nucleus stimulation should be considered a therapeutic option early in the course of Parkinson disease.

Parkinson’s disease with camptocormia

Abstract: Background: Camptocormia is defined as an abnormal flexion of the trunk that appears when standing or walking and disappears in the supine position. The origin of the disorder is unknown, but it is usually attributed either to a primary or a secondary paravertebral muscle myopathy or a motor neurone disorder. Camptocormia is also observed in a minority of patients with parkinsonism. Objective: To characterise the clinical and electrophysiological features of camptocormia and parkinsonian symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease and camptocormia compared with patients with Parkinson’s disease without camptocormia. Methods: Patients with parkinsonism and camptocormia (excluding patients with multiple system atrophy) prospectively underwent a multidisciplinary clinical (neurological, neuropsychological, psychological, rheumatological) and neurophysiological (electromyogram, ocular movement recording) examination and were compared with age-matched patients with Parkinson’s disease without camptocormia. Results: The camptocormia developed after 8.5 (SD 5.3) years of parkinsonism, responded poorly to levodopa treatment (20%) and displayed features consistent with axial dystonia. Patients with camptocormia were characterised by prominent levodopa-unresponsive axial symptoms (ie, axial rigidity, gait disorder and postural instability), along with a tendency for greater error in the antisaccade paradigm. Conclusion: We suggest that (1) the salient features of parkinsonism observed in patients with camptocormia are likely to represent a specific form of Parkinson’s disease and camptocormia is an axial dystonia and (2) both camptocormia and parkinsonism in these patients might result from additional, non-dopaminergic neuronal dysfunction in the basal ganglia.

Parkinson’s disease: clinical features and diagnosis

Abstract: Objective: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurological disorder characterised by a large number of motor and non-motor features that can impact on function to a variable degree. This review describes the clinical characteristics of PD with emphasis on those features that differentiate the disease from other parkinsonian disorders. Methods: A MedLine search was performed to identify studies that assess the clinical characteristics of PD. Search terms included “Parkinson’s disease”, “diagnosis” and “signs and symptoms”. Results: Because there is no definitive test for the diagnosis of PD, the disease must be diagnosed based on clinical criteria. Rest tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity and loss of postural reflexes are generally considered the cardinal signs of PD. The presence and specific presentation of these features are used to differentiate PD from related parkinsonian disorders. Other clinical features include secondary motor symptoms (eg, hypomimia, dysarthria, dysphagia, sialorrhoea, micrographia, shuffling gait, festination, freezing, dystonia, glabellar reflexes), non-motor symptoms (eg, autonomic dysfunction, cognitive/neurobehavioral abnormalities, sleep disorders and sensory abnormalities such as anosmia, paresthesias and pain). Absence of rest tremor, early occurrence of gait difficulty, postural instability, dementia, hallucinations, and the presence of dysautonomia, ophthalmoparesis, ataxia and other atypical features, coupled with poor or no response to levodopa, suggest diagnoses other than PD. Conclusions: A thorough understanding of the broad spectrum of clinical manifestations of PD is essential to the proper diagnosis of the disease. Genetic mutations or variants, neuroimaging abnormalities and other tests are potential biomarkers that may improve diagnosis and allow the identification of persons at risk.

The Movement Disorder Society Evidence-Based Medicine Review Update: Treatments for the non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease

Abstract: The Movement Disorder Society (MDS) Task Force on Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) Review of Treatments for Parkinson's Disease (PD) was first published in 2002 and was updated in 2005 to cover clinical trial data up to January 2004 with the focus on motor symptoms of PD. In this revised version the MDS task force decided it was necessary to extend the review to non-motor symptoms. The objective of this work was to update previous EBM reviews on treat- ments for PD with a focus on non-motor symptoms. Level-I (randomized controlled trial, RCT) reports of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for the non-motor symptoms of PD, published as full

Neurostimulation for Parkinson's Disease with Early Motor Complications

Abstract: A B S T R AC T BACKGROUND Subthalamic stimulation reduces motor disability and improves quality of life in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease who have severe levodopa-induced motor complications. We hypothesized that neurostimulation would be beneficial at an earlier stage of Parkinson’s disease. METHODS In this 2-year trial, we randomly assigned 251 patients with Parkinson’s disease and early motor complications (mean age, 52 years; mean duration of disease, 7.5 years) to undergo neurostimulation plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone. The primary end point was quality of life, as assessed with the use of the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) summary index (with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating worse function). Major secondary outcomes included parkinsonian motor disability, activities of daily living, levodopa-induced motor com plications (as assessed with the use of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, parts III, II, and IV, respectively), and time with good mobility and no dyskinesia. RESULTS For the primary outcome of quality of life, the mean score for the neurostimulation group improved by 7.8 points, and that for the medical-therapy group worsened by 0.2 points (between-group difference in mean change from baseline to 2 years, 8.0 points; P = 0.002). Neurostimulation was superior to medical therapy with respect to motor disability (P<0.001), activities of daily living (P<0.001), levodopa-induced motor complications (P<0.001), and time with good mobility and no dyskinesia (P = 0.01). Serious adverse events occurred in 54.8% of the patients in the neuro stimulation group and in 44.1% of those in the medical-therapy group. Serious adverse events related to surgical implantation or the neurostimulation device oc curred in 17.7% of patients. An expert panel confirmed that medical therapy was consistent with practice guidelines for 96.8% of the patients in the neurostimula tion group and for 94.5% of those in the medical-therapy group. CONCLUSIONS Subthalamic stimulation was superior to medical therapy in patients with Parkinson’s disease and early motor complications. (Funded by the German Ministry of Research and others; EARLYSTIM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00354133.)

Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease: An Expert Consensus and Review of Key Issues

Abstract: Objective: To provide recommendations to patients, physicians, and other health care providers on several issues involving deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson disease (PD). Data Sources and Study Selection: An international consortium of experts organized, reviewed the literature, and attended the workshop. Topics were introduced at the workshop, followed by group discussion. Data Extraction and Synthesis: A draft of a consensus statement was presented and further edited after plenary debate. The final statements were agreed on by all members. Conclusions: (1) Patients with PD without significant active cognitive or psychiatric problems who have medically intractable motor fluctuations, intractable tremor, or intolerance of medication adverse effects are good candidates for DBS. (2) Deep brain stimulation surgery is best performed by an experienced neurosurgeon with expertise in stereotactic neurosurgery who is working as part of a interprofessional team. (3) Surgical complication rates are extremely variable, with infection being the most commonly reported complication of DBS. (4) Deep brain stimulation programming is best accomplished by a highly trained clinician and can take 3 to 6 months to obtain optimal results. (5) Deep brain stimulation improves levodopa-responsive symptoms, dyskinesia, and tremor; benefits seem to be long-lasting in many motor domains. (6) Subthalamic nuclei DBS may be complicated by increased depression, apathy, impulsivity, worsened verbal fluency, and executive dysfunction in a subset of patients. (7) Both globus pallidus pars interna and subthalamic nuclei DBS have been shown to be effective in addressing the motor symptoms of PD. (8) Ablative therapy is still an effective alternative and should be considered in a select group of appropriate patients. Arch Neurol. 2011; 68(2):165-171. Published online October 11, 2010. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2010.260