Camilo Miguel Signorelli

Bio: Camilo Miguel Signorelli is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Consciousness & Cognition. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 22 publications receiving 82 citations. Previous affiliations of Camilo Miguel Signorelli include French Institute of Health and Medical Research & Pompeu Fabra University.

Can Computers Become Conscious and Overcome Humans

Abstract: Can computers be compared with humans? Can Computers become conscious? Can computers overcome human capabilities? These are paradoxical and controversial questions, particularly because there are many hidden assumptions. This article focuses on that issue putting on evidence some misconception related with future generations of machines and the understanding of the brain. It will be discussed to what extent computers might reach a distinctive set of human capabilities, and how it could be possible only if the computer is a conscious machine. Then, machines will be also classified according human types of cognition. However, it will be shown that if the computer is conscious, an interference process due to consciousness would affect the information processing of the system. Therefore, it might be possible to make conscious machines, which will have limitations as well as humans. In other words, trying to reach consciousness to overcome human capabilities with computers, it implies the paradoxical conclusion that a computer will never overcome human capabilities at all, or if the computer does, it should not be considered as a computer anymore.

Explanatory profiles of models of consciousness: towards a systematic classification

Abstract: Models of consciousness aim to inspire new experimental protocols and aid interpretation of empirical evidence to reveal the structure of conscious experience. Nevertheless, no current model is univocally accepted on either theoretical or empirical grounds. Moreover, a straightforward comparison is difficult for conceptual reasons. In particular, we argue that different models explicitly or implicitly subscribe to different notions of what constitutes a satisfactory explanation, use different tools in their explanatory endeavours and even aim to explain very different phenomena. We thus present a framework to compare existing models in the field with respect to what we call their ‘explanatory profiles’. We focus on the following minimal dimensions: mode of explanation, mechanisms of explanation and target of explanation. We also discuss the empirical consequences of the discussed discrepancies among models. This approach may eventually lead to identifying driving assumptions, theoretical commitments, experimental predictions and a better design of future testing experiments. Finally, our conclusion points to more integrative theoretical research, where axiomatic models may play a critical role in solving current theoretical and experimental contradictions.

A Compositional Model of Consciousness based on Consciousness-Only

Abstract: Scientific studies of consciousness rely on objects whose existence is assumed to be independent of any consciousness. On the contrary, we assume consciousness to be fundamental, and that one of the main features of consciousness is characterized as being other-dependent. We set up a framework which naturally subsumes this feature by defining a compact closed category where morphisms represent conscious processes. These morphisms are a composition of a set of generators, each being specified by their relations with other generators, and therefore co-dependent. The framework is general enough and fits well into a compositional model of consciousness. Interestingly, we also show how our proposal may become a step towards avoiding the hard problem of consciousness, and thereby address the combination problem of conscious experiences.

The Integrative Action of the Nervous System.

Abstract: In this book Professor Holmes discusses some of the evidence relating to one of the most baffling problems yet recognized by biologists-the factors involved in the regulation of growth and form. A wide range of possible influences, from enzymes to cellular competition, is considered. Numerous experiments and theories are described, with or without bibliographic citation. There is a list of references for each chapter and an index. The subject from a scientific standpoint is an exceedingly difficult one, for the reason that very little indeed is understood regarding such phenomena as differentiation. It follows that the problem offers fine opportunities for intellectual jousting by mechanists and vitalists, that hypotheses and theories must often be the weapons of choice, and philosophy the armor. Professor Holmes gives us a good seat from which to watch the combats, explains clearly what is going on, and occasionally slips away to enter the lists himself. This stereoscopic atlas of anatomy was designed as an aid in teaching neuro-anatomy for beginning medical students and as a review for physicians taking Board examinations in Psychiatry and Neurology. Each plate consists of a pair of stereoscopic photographs and a labelled diagram of the important parts seen in the photograph. Perhaps in this day of scarcity of materials, particularly of human brains hardened for dissection, photographs of this kind conceivably can be used as a substitute. Successive stages of dissection are presented in such a fashion that, used in conjunction with the dissecting manual, a student should be able to identify most of the important components of the nervous system without much outside help. The area covered is limited to the gross features of the brain and brain stem and perhaps necessarily does not deal with any of the microscopic structure. So much more can be learned from the dissection of the actual brain that it is doubtful if this atlas would be useful except where brains are not available. A good deal of effort has been spent on the preparation of this atlas, with moderately successful results.

Quantum cognition: A new theoretical approach to psychology

Abstract: What type of probability theory best describes the way humans make judgments under uncertainty and decisions under conflict? Although rational models of cognition have become prominent and have achieved much success, they adhere to the laws of classical probability theory despite the fact that human reasoning does not always conform to these laws. For this reason we have seen the recent emergence of models based on an alternative probabilistic framework drawn from quantum theory. These quantum models show promise in addressing cognitive phenomena that have proven recalcitrant to modeling by means of classical probability theory. This review compares and contrasts probabilistic models based on Bayesian or classical versus quantum principles, and highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Theories of consciousness

Abstract: Recent years have seen a blossoming of theories about the biological and physical basis of consciousness. Good theories guide empirical research, allowing us to interpret data, develop new experimental techniques and expand our capacity to manipulate the phenomenon of interest. Indeed, it is only when couched in terms of a theory that empirical discoveries can ultimately deliver a satisfying understanding of a phenomenon. However, in the case of consciousness, it is unclear how current theories relate to each other, or whether they can be empirically distinguished. To clarify this complicated landscape, we review four prominent theoretical approaches to consciousness: higher-order theories, global workspace theories, re-entry and predictive processing theories and integrated information theory. We describe the key characteristics of each approach by identifying which aspects of consciousness they propose to explain, what their neurobiological commitments are and what empirical data are adduced in their support. We consider how some prominent empirical debates might distinguish among these theories, and we outline three ways in which theories need to be developed to deliver a mature regimen of theory-testing in the neuroscience of consciousness. There are good reasons to think that the iterative development, testing and comparison of theories of consciousness will lead to a deeper understanding of this most profound of mysteries.