Carla Ascenso

Bio: Carla Ascenso is an academic researcher from Universidade Nova de Lisboa. The author has contributed to research in topics: Superoxide & Rubredoxin. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 9 publications receiving 236 citations. Previous affiliations of Carla Ascenso include Mayo Clinic.

Desulfoferrodoxin: a modular protein.

Abstract: The gene encoding the non-heme iron-containing desulfoferrodoxin from Desulfovibrio vulgaris was cloned in two fragments in order to obtain polypeptides corresponding to the N- and C-terminal domains observed in the tertiary structure. These fragments were expressed in Escherichia coli, purified to homogeneity and biochemically and spectroscopically characterized. Both recombinant fragments behaved as independent metal-binding domains. The N-terminal fragment exhibited properties similar to desulforedoxin, as expected by the presence of a Fe(S-Cys)4 metal binding motif. The C-terminal fragment, which accommodates a Fe(Ne-His)3(Nδ-His)(S-Cys) center, was shown to have properties similar to neelaredoxin, except for the reaction with superoxide. The activities of desulfoferrodoxin and of the expressed C-terminal fragment were tested with superoxide in the presence and absence of cytochrome c. The results are consistent with superoxide reductase activity and a possible explanation for the low superoxide consumption in the superoxide dismutase activity assays is proposed.

Superoxide dismutases and superoxide reductases

Abstract: Superoxide, O2•–, is formed in all living organisms that come in contact with air, and, depending upon its biological context, it may act as a signaling agent, a toxic species, or a harmless intermediate that decomposes spontaneously Its levels are limited in vivo by two different types of enzymes, superoxide reductase (SOR) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) Although superoxide has long been an important factor in evolution, it was not so when life first emerged on Earth at least 35 billion years ago At that time, the early biosphere was highly reducing and lacking in any significant concentrations of dioxygen (O2), very different from what it is today Consequently, there was little or no O2•– and therefore no reason for SOR or SOD enzymes to evolve Instead, the history of biological O2•– probably commences somewhere around 24 billion years ago, when the biosphere started to experience what has been termed the “Great Oxidation Event”, a transformation driven by the increase in O2 levels, formed by cyanobacteria as a product of oxygenic photosynthesis1 The rise of O2 on Earth caused a reshaping of existing metabolic pathways, and it triggered the development of new ones2 Its appearance led to the formation of the so-called “reactive oxygen species” (ROS), for example, superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radical, and to a need for antioxidant enzymes and other antioxidant systems to protect against the growing levels of oxidative damage to living systems Dioxygen is a powerful four-electron oxidizing agent, and the product of this reduction is water 1 When O2 is reduced in four sequential one-electron steps, the intermediates formed are the three major ROS, that is, O2•–, H2O2, and HO• 2 3 4 5 Each of these intermediates is a potent oxidizing agent The consequences of their presence to early life must have been an enormous evolutionary challenge In the case of superoxide, we find the SOD and SOR enzymes to be widely distributed throughout current living organisms, both aerobic and anaerobic, suggesting that, from the start of the rise of O2 on Earth, the chemistry of superoxide has been an important factor during evolution The SORs and three very different types of SOD enzymes are redox-active metalloenzymes that have evolved entirely independently from one another for the purpose of lowering superoxide concentrations SORs catalyze the one-electron reduction of O2•– to give H2O2, a reaction requiring two protons per superoxide reacted as well as an external reductant to provide the electron (eq 6) SODs catalyze the disproportionation of superoxide to give O2 and H2O2, a reaction requiring one proton per superoxide reacted, but no external reductant (eq 7) 6 7 All of the SOR enzymes contain only iron, while the three types of SODs are the nickel-containing SODs (NiSOD), the iron- or manganese-containing SODs (FeSOD and MnSOD), and the copper- and zinc-containing SODs (CuZnSOD) Although the structures and other properties of these four types of metalloenzymes are quite different, they all share several characteristics, including the ability to react rapidly and selectively with the small anionic substrate O2•– Consequently, there are some striking similarities between these otherwise dissimilar enzymes, many of which can be explained by considering the nature of the chemical reactivity of O2•– (see below) Numerous valuable reviews describing the SOD and SOR enzymes have appeared over the years, but few have covered and compared all four classes of these enzymes, as we attempt to do here Thus, the purpose of this Review is to describe, compare, and contrast the properties of the SOR and the four SOD enzymes; to summarize what is known about their evolutionary pathways; and to analyze the properties of these enzymes in light of what is known of the inherent chemical reactivity of superoxide

Metalloproteins containing cytochrome, iron-sulfur, or copper redox centers.

Abstract: Redox reactions play important roles in almost all biological processes, including photosynthesis and respiration, which are two essential energy processes that sustain all life on earth. It is thus not surprising that biology employs redox-active metal ions in these processes. It is largely the redox activity that makes metal ions uniquely qualified as biological cofactors and makes bioinorganic enzymology both fun to explore and challenging to study. Even though most metal ions are redox active, biology employs a surprisingly limited number of them for electron transfer (ET) processes. Prominent members of redox centers involved in ET processes include cytochromes, iron–sulfur clusters, and cupredoxins. Together these centers cover the whole range of reduction potentials in biology (Figure ​(Figure1).1). Because of their importance, general reviews about redox centers1−77 and specific reviews about cytochromes,8,24,78−90 iron–sulfur proteins,91−93 and cupredoxins94−104 have appeared in the literature. In this review, we provide both classification and description of each member of the above redox centers, including both native and designed proteins, as well as those proteins that contain a combination of these redox centers. Through this review, we examine structural features responsible for their redox properties, including knowledge gained from recent progress in fine-tuning the redox centers. Computational studies such as DFT calculations become more and more important in understanding the structure–function relationship and facilitating the fine-tuning of the ET properties and reduction potentials of metallocofactors in proteins. Since this aspect has been reviewed extensively before,105−110 and by other reviews in this thematic issue,2000,2001,2002 it will not be covered here. Open in a separate window Figure 1 Reduction potential range of redox centers in electron transfer processes.

Biological Basis for Syphilis

Abstract: Syphilis is a chronic sexually transmitted disease caused by Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum. Clinical manifestations separate the disease into stages; late stages of disease are now uncommon compared to the preantibiotic era. T. pallidum has an unusually small genome and lacks genes that encode many metabolic functions and classical virulence factors. The organism is extremely sensitive to environmental conditions and has not been continuously cultivated in vitro. Nonetheless, T. pallidum is highly infectious and survives for decades in the untreated host. Early syphilis lesions result from the host's immune response to the treponemes. Bacterial clearance and resolution of early lesions results from a delayed hypersensitivity response, although some organisms escape to cause persistent infection. One factor contributing to T. pallidum's chronicity is the paucity of integral outer membrane proteins, rendering intact organisms virtually invisible to the immune system. Antigenic variation of TprK, a putative surface-exposed protein, is likely to contribute to immune evasion. T. pallidum remains exquisitely sensitive to penicillin, but macrolide resistance has recently been identified in a number of geographic regions. The development of a syphilis vaccine, thus far elusive, would have a significant positive impact on global health.