scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Carol Appadurai Breckenridge

Bio: Carol Appadurai Breckenridge is an academic researcher from Cornell University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Redistribution (cultural anthropology) & Honour. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 135 citations.

Papers
More filters

Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The general semiotic properties of food take particularly intense forms in the context of gastro-politics where food is the medium and sometimes the message, of conflict as mentioned in this paper, and food serves two diametrically opposed functions: it can either homogenize the actors who transact in it, or it can serve to heterogenize them.
Abstract: The general semiotic properties of food take particularly intense forms in the context of gastro-politics – where food is the medium, and sometimes the message, of conflict. In South Asia, where beliefs about food encode a complex set of social and moral propositions, food serves two diametrically opposed semiotic functions: it can either homogenize the actors who transact in it, or it can serve to heterogenize them. In the Tamil Brahmin community of South India, this underlying tension takes three particular forms in the arenas of the household, the marriage feast, and the temple. [food, symbolism, semiotics, politics, South India]

614 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Humanities Open Book Program (HOOPP) is a joint initiative of the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation (OWM).
Abstract: Humanities Open Book Program, a joint initiative of the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation

192 citations

Book ChapterDOI
17 Oct 2006

131 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In the last five years, monographys on South Asia related historical subjects have been published by presses in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, France, the Soviet Union and Japan as well as, of course, India and Pakistan, the rest of the Commonwealth and the United States as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Over the last fifteen to twenty years, interest in the history of early modern and modern South Asia has grown enormously and has engaged the attention of an increasingly international audience. Whereas, at the end of the 1960s, research in the subject was largely confined to universities in South Asia itself and the rest of the British Commonwealth, today a variety of projects, conferences and regular workshops link together scholars from South Asia and the Commonwealth with those in Japan, Indonesia, France, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Germany, Italy, Eastern Europe and the United States. Equally, whereas twenty years ago the publication of South Asia-related research was restricted to a few specialist journals, today this research provides the staple of at least four quarterlies with major international circulations and appears regularly in most of the leading historical periodicals. In the last five years, monographys on South Asia related historical subjects have been published by presses in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, France, the Soviet Union and Japan as well as, of course, India and Pakistan, the rest of the Commonwealth and the United States.

123 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 1993
TL;DR: In the pre-nineteenth-century world, Southeast Asia was eulogized as a land of immense wealth; developments there were of crucial importance to the entirety of world history as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: In the pre-nineteenth-century world, the Southeast Asian region was eulogized as a land of immense wealth; developments there were of crucial importance to the entirety of world history in the pre-1600 period. Writers, travelers, sailors, merchants, and officials from every continent of the eastern hemisphere knew of Southeast Asia’s wealth, and by the second millennium of the Christian era, most were aware of its power and prestige. By contrast, the early history of Southeast Asia and its international significance is not appreciated in the contemporary age. In the early centuries CE Indians and Westerners called Southeast Asia the ‘Golden Khersonese’, the ‘Land of Gold’, and it was not long thereafter that the region became known for its pepper and the products of its rainforests, first aromatic woods and resins, and then the finest and rarest of spices. From the seventh to the tenth centuries Arabs and Chinese thought of Southeast Asia’s gold, as well as the spices that created it; by the fifteenth century sailors from ports on the Atlantic, at the opposite side of the hemisphere, would sail into unknown oceans in order to find these Spice Islands. They all knew that Southeast Asia was the spice capital of the world. From roughly 1000 CE until the nineteenth-century ‘industrial age’, all world trade was more or less governed by the ebb and flow of spices in and out of Southeast Asia.

84 citations