scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Catharina Lavebratt

Bio: Catharina Lavebratt is an academic researcher from Karolinska University Hospital. The author has contributed to research in topics: Bipolar disorder & Population. The author has an hindex of 40, co-authored 167 publications receiving 6030 citations. Previous affiliations of Catharina Lavebratt include Royal Institute of Technology & Karolinska Institutet.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Eli A. Stahl1, Eli A. Stahl2, Gerome Breen3, Andreas J. Forstner  +339 moreInstitutions (107)
TL;DR: Genome-wide analysis identifies 30 loci associated with bipolar disorder, allowing for comparisons of shared genes and pathways with other psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia and depression.
Abstract: Bipolar disorder is a highly heritable psychiatric disorder. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) including 20,352 cases and 31,358 controls of European descent, with follow-up analysis of 822 variants with P < 1 × 10-4 in an additional 9,412 cases and 137,760 controls. Eight of the 19 variants that were genome-wide significant (P < 5 × 10-8) in the discovery GWAS were not genome-wide significant in the combined analysis, consistent with small effect sizes and limited power but also with genetic heterogeneity. In the combined analysis, 30 loci were genome-wide significant, including 20 newly identified loci. The significant loci contain genes encoding ion channels, neurotransmitter transporters and synaptic components. Pathway analysis revealed nine significantly enriched gene sets, including regulation of insulin secretion and endocannabinoid signaling. Bipolar I disorder is strongly genetically correlated with schizophrenia, driven by psychosis, whereas bipolar II disorder is more strongly correlated with major depressive disorder. These findings address key clinical questions and provide potential biological mechanisms for bipolar disorder.

1,090 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Phil Lee, Verneri Anttila, Hyejung Won1, Yen-Chen Anne Feng1  +603 moreInstitutions (10)
12 Dec 2019-Cell
TL;DR: Genetic influences on psychiatric disorders transcend diagnostic boundaries, suggesting substantial pleiotropy of contributing loci within genes that show heightened expression in the brain throughout the lifespan, beginning prenatally in the second trimester, and play prominent roles in neurodevelopmental processes.

781 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Mirko Manchia1, Mazda Adli2, Nirmala Akula3, Raffaella Ardau, Jean-Michel Aubry4, Lena Backlund5, Claudio E. M. Banzato6, Bernhard T. Baune7, Frank Bellivier8, Susanne Bengesser9, Joanna M. Biernacka10, Clara Brichant-Petitjean8, Elise Bui3, Cynthia V. Calkin1, Andrew T. A. Cheng11, Caterina Chillotti, Sven Cichon12, Scott R. Clark7, Piotr M. Czerski, Clarissa de Rosalmeida Dantas6, Maria Del Zompo13, J. Raymond DePaulo14, Sevilla D. Detera-Wadleigh3, Bruno Etain15, Peter Falkai16, Louise Frisén5, Mark A. Frye10, Janice M. Fullerton17, Sébastien Gard, Julie Garnham1, Fernando S. Goes14, Paul Grof18, Oliver Gruber19, Ryota Hashimoto20, Joanna Hauser, Urs Heilbronner19, Rebecca Hoban21, Rebecca Hoban22, Liping Hou3, Stéphane Jamain15, Jean-Pierre Kahn, Layla Kassem3, Tadafumi Kato, John R. Kelsoe21, John R. Kelsoe22, Sarah Kittel-Schneider23, Sebastian Kliwicki, Po-Hsiu Kuo24, Ichiro Kusumi25, Gonzalo Laje3, Catharina Lavebratt5, Marion Leboyer15, Susan G. Leckband21, Susan G. Leckband22, Carlos Jaramillo26, Mario Maj27, Alain Malafosse4, Lina Martinsson5, Takuya Masui25, Philip B. Mitchell28, Frank Mondimore14, Palmiero Monteleone27, Audrey Nallet4, Maria Neuner23, Tomas Novak3, Claire O'Donovan1, Urban Ösby5, Norio Ozaki29, Norio Ozaki30, Roy H. Perlis31, Andrea Pfennig32, James B. Potash33, James B. Potash14, Daniela Reich-Erkelenz19, Andreas Reif23, Eva Z. Reininghaus9, Sara Richardson3, Guy A. Rouleau34, Janusz K. Rybakowski, Martin Schalling5, Peter R. Schofield17, O. Schubert7, Barbara W. Schweizer14, Florian Seemüller16, Maria Grigoroiu-Serbanescu, Giovanni Severino13, Lisa R. Seymour10, Claire Slaney1, Jordan W. Smoller31, Alessio Squassina13, Thomas Stamm2, Jo Steele3, Pavla Stopkova3, Sarah K. Tighe14, Alfonso Tortorella27, Gustavo Turecki, Naomi R. Wray35, Adam Wright28, Peter P. Zandi14, David Zilles19, Michael Bauer32, Marcella Rietschel36, Francis J. McMahon3, Thomas G. Schulze, Martin Alda1 
19 Jun 2013
TL;DR: The key phenotypic measures of the “Retrospective Criteria of Long-Term Treatment Response in Research Subjects with Bipolar Disorder” scale currently used in the Consortium on lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) study are reported.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The assessment of response to lithium maintenance treatment in bipolar disorder (BD) is complicated by variable length of treatment, unpredictable clinical course, and often inconsistent compliance. Prospective and retrospective methods of assessment of lithium response have been proposed in the literature. In this study we report the key phenotypic measures of the "Retrospective Criteria of Long-Term Treatment Response in Research Subjects with Bipolar Disorder" scale currently used in the Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine ConLiGen sites took part in a two-stage case-vignette rating procedure to examine inter-rater agreement [Kappa (κ)] and reliability [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)] of lithium response. Annotated first-round vignettes and rating guidelines were circulated to expert research clinicians for training purposes between the two stages. Further, we analyzed the distributional properties of the treatment response scores available for 1,308 patients using mixture modeling. RESULTS: Substantial and moderate agreement was shown across sites in the first and second sets of vignettes (κ = 0.66 and κ = 0.54, respectively), without significant improvement from training. However, definition of response using the A score as a quantitative trait and selecting cases with B criteria of 4 or less showed an improvement between the two stages (ICC1 = 0.71 and ICC2 = 0.75, respectively). Mixture modeling of score distribution indicated three subpopulations (full responders, partial responders, non responders). CONCLUSIONS: We identified two definitions of lithium response, one dichotomous and the other continuous, with moderate to substantial inter-rater agreement and reliability. Accurate phenotypic measurement of lithium response is crucial for the ongoing ConLiGen pharmacogenomic study.

407 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors performed a genome-wide association study of 41,917 bipolar disorder cases and 371,549 controls of European ancestry, which identified 64 associated genomic loci, including genes encoding targets of antipsychotics, calcium channel blockers, antiepileptics and anesthetics.
Abstract: Bipolar disorder is a heritable mental illness with complex etiology. We performed a genome-wide association study of 41,917 bipolar disorder cases and 371,549 controls of European ancestry, which identified 64 associated genomic loci. Bipolar disorder risk alleles were enriched in genes in synaptic signaling pathways and brain-expressed genes, particularly those with high specificity of expression in neurons of the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Significant signal enrichment was found in genes encoding targets of antipsychotics, calcium channel blockers, antiepileptics and anesthetics. Integrating expression quantitative trait locus data implicated 15 genes robustly linked to bipolar disorder via gene expression, encoding druggable targets such as HTR6, MCHR1, DCLK3 and FURIN. Analyses of bipolar disorder subtypes indicated high but imperfect genetic correlation between bipolar disorder type I and II and identified additional associated loci. Together, these results advance our understanding of the biological etiology of bipolar disorder, identify novel therapeutic leads and prioritize genes for functional follow-up studies.

378 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Liping Hou1, Urs Heilbronner2, Urs Heilbronner3, Franziska Degenhardt4, Mazda Adli5, Kazufumi Akiyama6, Nirmala Akula1, Raffaella Ardau, Bárbara Arias7, Lena Backlund8, Claudio E. M. Banzato9, Antoni Benabarre7, Susanne Bengesser10, Abesh Kumar Bhattacharjee11, Joanna M. Biernacka12, Armin Birner10, Clara Brichant-Petitjean13, Elise T. Bui1, Pablo Cervantes14, Guo-Bo Chen15, Hsi-Chung Chen16, Caterina Chillotti, Sven Cichon4, Sven Cichon17, Scott R. Clark18, Francesc Colom7, David A. Cousins19, Cristiana Cruceanu20, Piotr M. Czerski21, Clarissa de Rosalmeida Dantas9, Alexandre Dayer22, Bruno Etain23, Peter Falkai3, Andreas J. Forstner4, Louise Frisén8, Janice M. Fullerton24, Janice M. Fullerton25, Sébastien Gard, Julie Garnham26, Fernando S. Goes27, Paul Grof, Oliver Gruber2, Ryota Hashimoto28, Joanna Hauser21, Stefan Herms17, Stefan Herms4, Per Hoffmann17, Per Hoffmann4, Andrea Hofmann4, Stéphane Jamain23, Esther Jiménez7, Jean-Pierre Kahn29, Layla Kassem1, Sarah Kittel-Schneider30, Sebastian Kliwicki21, Barbara König, Ichiro Kusumi31, N. Lackner10, Gonzalo Laje1, Mikael Landén32, Mikael Landén33, Catharina Lavebratt8, Marion Leboyer, Susan G. Leckband8, Susan G. Leckband34, Carlos Jaramillo35, Glenda MacQueen36, Mirko Manchia37, Mirko Manchia26, Lina Martinsson33, Manuel Mattheisen38, Michael McCarthy34, Susan L. McElroy39, Marina Mitjans7, Francis M. Mondimore27, Palmiero Monteleone40, Palmiero Monteleone41, Caroline M. Nievergelt11, Markus M. Nöthen4, Urban Ösby8, Norio Ozaki42, Roy H. Perlis43, Andrea Pfennig44, Daniela Reich-Erkelenz3, Guy A. Rouleau45, Peter R. Schofield24, Peter R. Schofield25, K Oliver Schubert18, Barbara W. Schweizer27, Florian Seemüller3, Giovanni Severino37, Tatyana Shekhtman11, Tatyana Shekhtman46, Paul D. Shilling11, Kazutaka Shimoda6, Christian Simhandl, Claire Slaney26, Jordan W. Smoller43, Alessio Squassina37, Thomas Stamm5, Pavla Stopkova47, Sarah K. Tighe48, Sarah K. Tighe49, Alfonso Tortorella40, Gustavo Turecki20, Julia Volkert30, Stephanie H. Witt50, Adam Wright24, L. Trevor Young51, Peter P. Zandi27, James B. Potash48, J. Raymond DePaulo27, Michael Bauer44, Eva Z. Reininghaus10, Tomas Novak47, Jean-Michel Aubry22, Mario Maj40, Bernhard T. Baune18, Philip B. Mitchell24, Eduard Vieta7, Mark A. Frye12, Janusz K. Rybakowski21, Po-Hsiu Kuo16, Tadafumi Kato52, Maria Grigoroiu-Serbanescu, Andreas Reif30, Maria Del Zompo37, Frank Bellivier13, Martin Schalling8, Naomi R. Wray15, John R. Kelsoe11, John R. Kelsoe46, Martin Alda47, Martin Alda26, Marcella Rietschel50, Francis J. McMahon1, Thomas G. Schulze 
United States Department of Health and Human Services1, University of Göttingen2, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich3, University of Bonn4, Charité5, Dokkyo Medical University6, University of Barcelona7, Karolinska University Hospital8, State University of Campinas9, Medical University of Graz10, University of California, San Diego11, Mayo Clinic12, Paris Diderot University13, McGill University Health Centre14, University of Queensland15, National Taiwan University16, University Hospital of Basel17, University of Adelaide18, Newcastle University19, Douglas Mental Health University Institute20, Poznan University of Medical Sciences21, Geneva College22, French Institute of Health and Medical Research23, University of New South Wales24, Neuroscience Research Australia25, Dalhousie University26, Johns Hopkins University27, Osaka University28, University of Lorraine29, Goethe University Frankfurt30, Hokkaido University31, University of Gothenburg32, Karolinska Institutet33, Veterans Health Administration34, University of Antioquia35, University of Calgary36, University of Cagliari37, Aarhus University38, University of Cincinnati39, University of Naples Federico II40, University of Salerno41, Nagoya University42, Harvard University43, Dresden University of Technology44, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital45, United States Department of Veterans Affairs46, National Institutes of Health47, University of Iowa48, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine49, Heidelberg University50, University of Toronto51, RIKEN Brain Science Institute52
TL;DR: A genome-wide association study of lithium response in 2,563 patients collected by 22 participating sites from the International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen); the largest attempted so far finds a single locus of four linked SNPs on chromosome 21 met genome- wide significance criteria for association with lithium response.

258 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal Article
TL;DR: For the next few weeks the course is going to be exploring a field that’s actually older than classical population genetics, although the approach it’ll be taking to it involves the use of population genetic machinery.
Abstract: So far in this course we have dealt entirely with the evolution of characters that are controlled by simple Mendelian inheritance at a single locus. There are notes on the course website about gametic disequilibrium and how allele frequencies change at two loci simultaneously, but we didn’t discuss them. In every example we’ve considered we’ve imagined that we could understand something about evolution by examining the evolution of a single gene. That’s the domain of classical population genetics. For the next few weeks we’re going to be exploring a field that’s actually older than classical population genetics, although the approach we’ll be taking to it involves the use of population genetic machinery. If you know a little about the history of evolutionary biology, you may know that after the rediscovery of Mendel’s work in 1900 there was a heated debate between the “biometricians” (e.g., Galton and Pearson) and the “Mendelians” (e.g., de Vries, Correns, Bateson, and Morgan). Biometricians asserted that the really important variation in evolution didn’t follow Mendelian rules. Height, weight, skin color, and similar traits seemed to

9,847 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
06 Jun 1986-JAMA
TL;DR: The editors have done a masterful job of weaving together the biologic, the behavioral, and the clinical sciences into a single tapestry in which everyone from the molecular biologist to the practicing psychiatrist can find and appreciate his or her own research.
Abstract: I have developed "tennis elbow" from lugging this book around the past four weeks, but it is worth the pain, the effort, and the aspirin. It is also worth the (relatively speaking) bargain price. Including appendixes, this book contains 894 pages of text. The entire panorama of the neural sciences is surveyed and examined, and it is comprehensive in its scope, from genomes to social behaviors. The editors explicitly state that the book is designed as "an introductory text for students of biology, behavior, and medicine," but it is hard to imagine any audience, interested in any fragment of neuroscience at any level of sophistication, that would not enjoy this book. The editors have done a masterful job of weaving together the biologic, the behavioral, and the clinical sciences into a single tapestry in which everyone from the molecular biologist to the practicing psychiatrist can find and appreciate his or

7,563 citations

01 Feb 2015
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes generated as part of the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, profiled for histone modification patterns, DNA accessibility, DNA methylation and RNA expression.
Abstract: The reference human genome sequence set the stage for studies of genetic variation and its association with human disease, but epigenomic studies lack a similar reference. To address this need, the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium generated the largest collection so far of human epigenomes for primary cells and tissues. Here we describe the integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes generated as part of the programme, profiled for histone modification patterns, DNA accessibility, DNA methylation and RNA expression. We establish global maps of regulatory elements, define regulatory modules of coordinated activity, and their likely activators and repressors. We show that disease- and trait-associated genetic variants are enriched in tissue-specific epigenomic marks, revealing biologically relevant cell types for diverse human traits, and providing a resource for interpreting the molecular basis of human disease. Our results demonstrate the central role of epigenomic information for understanding gene regulation, cellular differentiation and human disease.

4,409 citations

01 Jan 2010
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe a scenario where a group of people are attempting to find a solution to the problem of "finding the needle in a haystack" in the environment.
Abstract: 中枢神経系疾患の治療は正常細胞(ニューロン)の機能維持を目的とするが,脳血管障害のように機能障害の原因が細胞の死滅に基づくことは多い.一方,脳腫瘍の治療においては薬物療法や放射線療法といった腫瘍細胞の死滅を目標とするものが大きな位置を占める.いずれの場合にも,細胞死の機序を理解することは各種病態や治療法の理解のうえで重要である.現在のところ最も研究の進んでいる細胞死の型はアポトーシスである.そのなかで重要な位置を占めるミトコンドリアにおける反応および抗アポトーシス因子について概要を紹介する.

2,716 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Genetic loci associated with body mass index map near key hypothalamic regulators of energy balance, and one of these loci is near GIPR, an incretin receptor, which may provide new insights into human body weight regulation.
Abstract: Obesity is globally prevalent and highly heritable, but its underlying genetic factors remain largely elusive. To identify genetic loci for obesity susceptibility, we examined associations between body mass index and similar to 2.8 million SNPs in up to 123,865 individuals with targeted follow up of 42 SNPs in up to 125,931 additional individuals. We confirmed 14 known obesity susceptibility loci and identified 18 new loci associated with body mass index (P < 5 x 10(-8)), one of which includes a copy number variant near GPRC5B. Some loci (at MC4R, POMC, SH2B1 and BDNF) map near key hypothalamic regulators of energy balance, and one of these loci is near GIPR, an incretin receptor. Furthermore, genes in other newly associated loci may provide new insights into human body weight regulation.

2,632 citations