scispace - formally typeset
C

Chajoong Kim

Researcher at Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology

Publications -  29
Citations -  128

Chajoong Kim is an academic researcher from Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Usability & User experience design. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 26 publications receiving 92 citations. Previous affiliations of Chajoong Kim include Delft University of Technology.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of TV commercials using neurophysiological responses.

TL;DR: The results demonstrated that the neurophysiological indices developed in this study may provide a useful tool for evaluating TV commercials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Designing for Positive Emotions: Issues and Emerging Research Directions

TL;DR: In this article, the question of how designers can be supported to deliberately facilitate positive emotional experiences is addressed, and the authors provide an overview of the role of designers in this process.
Journal ArticleDOI

‘Soft’ usability problems with consumer electronics: the interaction between user characteristics and usability

TL;DR: In this article, a study into consumers' "soft" usability problems they experience using electronic household products is presented. But the problems cannot be traced back to a specification violation failure, classified as no failure found (NFF).
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploring the First Momentary Unboxing Experience with Aesthetic Interaction

TL;DR: In this paper, the unboxing experience is regarded as a critical moment in product appraisal, and designers and companies should pay more attention to product packaging due to this increased in importance.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Towards Emotional Well-Being by Design: 17 Opportunities for Emotion Regulation for User-Centered Healthcare Design

TL;DR: A framework that delineates 17 emotion regulation strategies based on the theories of emotion regulation is introduced, enabling designers to compare differences and overlaps of the strategies.