In the United States, approximately 35% of adults with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) have clinical evidence of nephritis at the time of diagnosis; with an estimated total of 50–60% developing nephritis during the first 10 years of disease [1–4]. The prevalence of nephritis is significantly higher in African Americans and Hispanics than in Caucasians, and is higher in men than in women. Renal damage is more likely to develop in non-Caucasian groups [2–4]. Overall survival in patients with SLE is approximately 95% at 5 years after diagnosis and 92% at 10 years [5, 6]. The presence of lupus nephritis significantly reduces survival, to approximately 88% at 10 years, with even lower survival in African Americans [5, 6].

The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) last published guidelines for management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 1999 [7]. That publication was designed primarily for education of primary care physicians and recommended therapeutic and management approaches for many manifestations of SLE. Recommendations for management of lupus nephritis (LN) consisted of pulse glucocorticoids followed by high dose daily glucocorticoids in addition to an immunosuppressive medication, with cyclophosphamide viewed as the most effective immunosuppressive medication for diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis. Mycophenolate mofetil was not yet in use for lupus nephritis and was not mentioned. Since that time, many clinical trials of glucocorticoids-plus-immunosuppressive interventions have been published, some of which are high quality prospective trials, and some not only prospective but also randomized. Thus, the ACR determined that a new set of management recommendations was in order. A combination of extensive literature review and the opinions of highly qualified experts, including rheumatologists, nephrologists and pathologists, has been used to reach the recommendations. The management strategies discussed here apply to lupus nephritis in adults, particularly to those receiving care in the United States of America, and include interventions that were available in the United States as of April 2011.

While these recommendations were developed using rigorous methodology, guidelines do have inherent limitations in informing individual patient care; hence the selection of the term “recommendations.” While they should not supplant clinical judgment or limit clinical judgment, they do provide expert advice to the practicing physician managing patients with lupus nephritis.

/pdf/american-college-of-rheumatology-guidelines-for-screening-4d97m7oefx.pdf

American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis

Objective
B cells are likely to contribute to the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and rituximab induces depletion of B cells. The Exploratory Phase II/III SLE Evaluation of Rituximab (EXPLORER) trial tested the efficacy and safety of rituximab versus placebo in patients with moderately-to-severely active extrarenal SLE.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/art.27233

Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Moderately-to-Severely Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: The Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase II/III Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Evaluation of Rituximab Trial

Our objective was to update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), based on emerging new evidence. We performed a systematic literature review (01/2007-12/2017), followed by modified Delphi method, to form questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus. Treatment in SLE aims at remission or low disease activity and prevention of flares. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended in all patients with lupus, at a dose not exceeding 5 mg/kg real body weight. During chronic maintenance treatment, glucocorticoids (GC) should be minimised to less than 7.5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Appropriate initiation of immunomodulatory agents (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) can expedite the tapering/discontinuation of GC. In persistently active or flaring extrarenal disease, add-on belimumab should be considered; rituximab (RTX) may be considered in organ-threatening, refractory disease. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric, haematological and renal disease. Patients with SLE should be assessed for their antiphospholipid antibody status, infectious and cardiovascular diseases risk profile and preventative strategies be tailored accordingly. The updated recommendations provide physicians and patients with updated consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence-base and expert-opinion.

https://ard.bmj.com/content/annrheumdis/78/6/736.full.pdf

2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

142 Summary of Recommendation Statements 143 Chapter 1: Introduction 154 Chapter 2: General principles in the management of glomerular disease 156 Chapter 3: Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children 163 Chapter 4: Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children 172 Chapter 5: Minimal-change disease in adults 177 Chapter 6: Idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in adults 181 Chapter 7: Idiopathic membranous nephropathy 186 Chapter 8: Idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis 198 Chapter 9: Infection-related glomerulonephritis 200 Chapter 10: Immunoglobulin A nephropathy 209 Chapter 11: Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis 218 Chapter 12: Lupus nephritis 221 Chapter 13: Pauci-immune focal and segmental necrotizing glomerulonephritis 233 Chapter 14: Anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody glomerulonephritis 240 Methods for guideline development 243 Biographic and Disclosure Information 252

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Glomerulonephritis

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that can affect many organs, including the skin, joints, the central nervous system and the kidneys. Women of childbearing age and certain racial groups are typically predisposed to developing the condition. Rare, inherited, single-gene complement deficiencies are strongly associated with SLE, but the disease is inherited in a polygenic manner in most patients. Genetic interactions with environmental factors, particularly UV light exposure, Epstein-Barr virus infection and hormonal factors, might initiate the disease, resulting in immune dysregulation at the level of cytokines, T cells, B cells and macrophages. Diagnosis is primarily clinical and remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of SLE. Classification criteria have aided clinical trials, but, despite this, only one drug (that is, belimumab) has been approved for use in SLE in the past 60 years. The 10-year mortality has improved and toxic adverse effects of older medications such as cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids have been partially offset by newer drugs such as mycophenolate mofetil and glucocorticoid-sparing regimes. However, further improvements have been hampered by the adverse effects of renal and neuropsychiatric involvement and late diagnosis. Adding to this burden is the increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease in SLE together with the risk of infection made worse by immunosuppressive therapy. Challenges remain with treatment-resistant disease and symptoms such as fatigue. Newer therapies may bring hope of better outcomes, and the refinement to stem cell and genetic techniques might offer a cure in the future.

Systemic lupus erythematosus.

Objective: To establish the prevalence of reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures, and risk factors for fractures, in a cross sectional study of a large cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) Methods: All SLE patients willing to take part in the study had bone densitometry in 1999/2000 and completed a questionnaire on risk factors for osteoporosis and on drugs used Accumulated damage was scored using the SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI) Only fractures occurring since the onset of SLE and unrelated to trauma were included, and the SDI score was modified to exclude osteoporotic fractures Statistical analysis was by χ 2 test, Fisher’s exact test, and binary logistic regression Results: 242 patients were studied, median age 399 years (range 18 to 80), median disease duration 70 years (range 0 to 42) Of these, 123 (508%) had reduced BMD (T score 10 mg daily were significantly associated with reduced BMD, while age and menopause were associated with osteoporosis The risk factors for fractures were reduced BMD and age Conclusions: Reduced BMD, osteoporosis, and fragility fractures appear to be prevalent in patients with SLE Steroids were not an independent risk factor for fractures, although their effect could be mediated through reduced bone mineral density

https://ard.bmj.com/content/annrheumdis/64/1/111.full.pdf

Prevalence and predictors of fragility fractures in systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective. To determine if there is any association between autoantibody profile and damage in a cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods. A prospective cohort of SLE patients attending two SLE clinics in Birmingham was analysed. All patients fulfilled ARA criteria for SLE. Detailed clinical and serological information was recorded at each visit. Damage according to the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SLICC/ACR DI) was recorded 6-monthly and the last score in the year 2000 or prior to death was used in the analysis. Univariate analysis was performed with the X 2 test, Fisher's exact test or univariate analysis of variance. Multivariate analysis was done with binary logistic regression. Results. A total of 348 patients (326 females) were studied, comprising 208 Caucasians, 65 Afro-Caribbeans, 59 Asians, four Orientals and 12 others. There were 32 (9.2%) deaths and 156 (44.8%) patients had damage recorded during follow-up. The presence of damage showed no significant association with race, sex or anti-cardiolipin, anti-Ro, anti-La, anti-Sm, anti-RNP and anti-dsDNA antibodies. Only age, disease duration and other antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) were found to be associated with the presence of damage. When individual organ damage was analysed, the only significant associations were of anti-Ro with ocular damage and of other anti-ENA antibodies (anti-Scl-70 and or anti-Jo-1) with premature gonadal failure. Other autoantibodies were not predictive of damage in individual organs. Conclusions. Although autoantibodies are useful in diagnosis and predicting disease activity in SLE, they do not appear to be useful in predicting damage in SLE.

/pdf/association-of-damage-with-autoantibody-profile-age-race-sex-2xw1lf2lom.pdf

Association of damage with autoantibody profile, age, race, sex and disease duration in systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective The aim of this study was to describe the outcomes and predictors for development of damage in a large inception cohort of SLE patients. Methods This was a prospective longitudinal study of a cohort of SLE patients. SLE patients were included if they were recruited within 3 years of achieving the fourth ACR criterion for SLE. Data were collected on disease activity, damage and treatment. Information on death was provided by the Office for National Statistics. The censoring date for analysis was 31 December 2010. A standardized mortality ratio was calculated. Poisson regression was used to determine the incidence rate for damage accrual. Multistate Markov modelling was used to determine predictors for development of damage. Results There were 382 patients (92.4% females, 51.6% Caucasian, 22% South Asian, 20.7% Afro-Caribbean) with 12 072 assessments and total follow-up of 2958 patient-years. There were 300 items of damage (in 143 patients) and 37 deaths. The overall standardized mortality ratio was 2.0 (95% CI 1.5, 2.8) and the most common causes of death were infection (37.8%), cardiovascular (27%) and malignancy (13.5%). The predictors for damage accrual were higher prior damage, older age at diagnosis, active disease, systemic corticosteroid exposure and CYC exposure. Patients were more likely to develop new damage earlier in their disease than later. Ethnicity was not predictive of damage accrual or death in this cohort. Conclusion SLE patients have premature mortality. Active disease, corticosteroid exposure and CYC exposure were independently associated with the development of damage. Damage accrual is more likely to occur in early disease.

Birmingham SLE cohort: outcomes of a large inception cohort followed for up to 21 years

Objective: To compare the efficacy and side effects of intermittent pulse cyclophosphamide plus methylprednisolone with continuous oral cyclophosphamide plus prednisolone, followed by azathioprine, in patients with proliferative glomerulonephritis caused by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: A multicentre randomised controlled trial was conducted between June 1992 and May 1996 involving eight European centres. All patients satisfied the American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE and had biopsy proven proliferative lupus nephritis. All received corticosteroids in addition to cytotoxic drugs, as defined in the protocol, for two years. The trial was terminated after four years as recruitment was disappointing. Results: 32 SLE patients with lupus nephritis were recruited: 16 were randomised to intermittent pulse cyclophosphamide and 16 to continuous cyclophosphamide plus azathioprine. Mean duration of follow up was 3.7 years in the continuous group (range 0 to 5.6) and 3.3 years in the pulse group (range 0.25 to 6). Three patients were excluded from the pulse therapy group as they were later found to have pure mesangial glomerulonephritis. Two patients in the continuous therapy group developed end stage renal failure requiring dialysis, but none in the intermittent pulse therapy (p = 0.488; NS). There were similar numbers of side effects and withdrawals from treatment in both groups. There were three deaths: two in the intermittent pulse therapy group and one in the continuous therapy group. Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy and side effects between the two regimens. Infectious complications occurred commonly, so careful monitoring is required during treatment.

https://ard.bmj.com/content/annrheumdis/63/5/525.full.pdf

EULAR randomised controlled trial of pulse cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone versus continuous cyclophosphamide and prednisolone followed by azathioprine and prednisolone in lupus nephritis

We present a retrospective review of 11 patients with refractory systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treated with rituximab after failing corticosteroids and at least one other immunosuppressive drug. We measured clinical response using the Classic British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index, serum complement and reduction in maintenance prednisolone dose. B cells were measured using flow cytometry, and lung function testing was used to assess severe pulmonary disease (three patients). The median patient age was 42 years (range, 25-64) with median disease duration 6 years (range, 2-12). In all, 10 of 11 patients responded initially, with median global BILAG reduction of 7.5 at 6 months (P = 0.007), with loss of all A and B scores by 7 months. Rituximab treatment was associated with normalisation of complement (C3 P = 0.008, C4 P = 0.018) and reduction in steroid requirement, median reduction 15 mg/day (P = 0.036). In 9 of 10 patients who responded, all other immunosuppressants were stopped. There was no significant difference in anti-dsDNA antibody titres in these responders, but they were negative or had low titres at baseline. B-cell depletion continued for median 4 months (range, 2-9), and disease flare occurred at a median 6.6 months (range, 1.5-23) and was preceded by B-cell recovery in all but two patients. Rituximab was beneficial in refractory SLE including severe neurological and cardiorespiratory disease by inducing disease remission, allowing withdrawal of other agents and reduction in steroid requirement. Rituximab appeared to stabilise and possibly improve progressive lung disease.

Chee-Seng Yee

Papers

Prevalence and predictors of fragility fractures in systemic lupus erythematosus

Association of damage with autoantibody profile, age, race, sex and disease duration in systemic lupus erythematosus

Birmingham SLE cohort: outcomes of a large inception cohort followed for up to 21 years

EULAR randomised controlled trial of pulse cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone versus continuous cyclophosphamide and prednisolone followed by azathioprine and prednisolone in lupus nephritis

Effects of rituximab on resistant SLE disease including lung involvement.