Author
Cheng Hsiao
Other affiliations: City University of Hong Kong, National Tsing Hua University, University of California, Irvine ...read more
Bio: Cheng Hsiao is an academic researcher from University of Southern California. The author has contributed to research in topics: Estimator & Panel data. The author has an hindex of 52, co-authored 217 publications receiving 20818 citations. Previous affiliations of Cheng Hsiao include City University of Hong Kong & National Tsing Hua University.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Book•
25 Jul 1986TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a homogeneity test for linear regression models (analysis of covariance) and show that linear regression with variable intercepts is more consistent than simple regression with simple intercepts.
Abstract: 1. Introduction 2. Homogeneity test for linear regression models (analysis of covariance) 3. Simple regression with variable intercepts 4. Dynamic models with variable intercepts 5. Simultaneous-equations models 6. Variable-coefficient models 7. Discrete data 8. Truncated and censored data 9. Cross-sectional dependent panel data 10. Dynamic system 11. Incomplete panel data 12. Miscellaneous topics 13. A summary view.
6,234 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a statistical analysis of time series regression models for longitudinal data with and without lagged dependent variables under a variety of assumptions about the initial conditions of the processes being analyzed.
2,774 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, observations on N cross-section units at T time points are used to estimate a simple statistical model involving an autoregressive process with an additive term specific to the unit.
Abstract: Observations on N cross-section units at T time points are used to estimate a simple statistical model involving an autoregressive process with an additive term specific to the unit. Different assumptions about the initial conditions are (a) initial state fixed, (b) initial state random, (c) the unobserved individual effect independent of the unobserved dynamic process with the initial value fixed, and (d) the unobserved individual effect independent of the unobserved dynamic process with initial value random. Asymptotic properties of the maximum likelihood and “covariance” estimators are obtained when T → ∞ and when N → ∞. The relationship between the pseudo and conditional maximum likelihood estimators is clarified. A simple consistent estimator that is independent of the initial conditions and the way in which T or N → ∞ is also suggested.
2,372 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, a step-wise procedure based on Granger's concept of causality and Abaike's final prediction error criterion is suggested as a practical means to identify the order of lags of each variable in a multivariate autoregressive process.
783 citations
TL;DR: The proliferation of panel data studies is explained in terms of data availability, the more heightened capacity for modeling the complexity of human behavior than a single cross-section or time series data can possibly allow, and challenging methodology.
Abstract: We explain the proliferation of panel data studies in terms of (i) data availability, (ii) the more heightened capacity for modeling the complexity of human behavior than a single cross-section or time series data can possibly allow, and (iii) challenging methodology. Advantages and issues of panel data modeling are also discussed.
691 citations
Cited by
More filters
Book•
01 Jan 2001
TL;DR: This is the essential companion to Jeffrey Wooldridge's widely-used graduate text Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, 2001).
Abstract: The second edition of this acclaimed graduate text provides a unified treatment of two methods used in contemporary econometric research, cross section and data panel methods. By focusing on assumptions that can be given behavioral content, the book maintains an appropriate level of rigor while emphasizing intuitive thinking. The analysis covers both linear and nonlinear models, including models with dynamics and/or individual heterogeneity. In addition to general estimation frameworks (particular methods of moments and maximum likelihood), specific linear and nonlinear methods are covered in detail, including probit and logit models and their multivariate, Tobit models, models for count data, censored and missing data schemes, causal (or treatment) effects, and duration analysis. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data was the first graduate econometrics text to focus on microeconomic data structures, allowing assumptions to be separated into population and sampling assumptions. This second edition has been substantially updated and revised. Improvements include a broader class of models for missing data problems; more detailed treatment of cluster problems, an important topic for empirical researchers; expanded discussion of "generalized instrumental variables" (GIV) estimation; new coverage (based on the author's own recent research) of inverse probability weighting; a more complete framework for estimating treatment effects with panel data, and a firmly established link between econometric approaches to nonlinear panel data and the "generalized estimating equation" literature popular in statistics and other fields. New attention is given to explaining when particular econometric methods can be applied; the goal is not only to tell readers what does work, but why certain "obvious" procedures do not. The numerous included exercises, both theoretical and computer-based, allow the reader to extend methods covered in the text and discover new insights.
28,298 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator optimally exploits all the linear moment restrictions that follow from the assumption of no serial correlation in the errors, in an equation which contains individual effects, lagged dependent variables and no strictly exogenous variables.
Abstract: This paper presents specification tests that are applicable after estimating a dynamic model from panel data by the generalized method of moments (GMM), and studies the practical performance of these procedures using both generated and real data. Our GMM estimator optimally exploits all the linear moment restrictions that follow from the assumption of no serial correlation in the errors, in an equation which contains individual effects, lagged dependent variables and no strictly exogenous variables. We propose a test of serial correlation based on the GMM residuals and compare this with Sargan tests of over-identifying restrictions and Hausman specification tests.
26,580 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, two alternative linear estimators that are designed to improve the properties of the standard first-differenced GMM estimator are presented. But both estimators require restrictions on the initial conditions process.
19,132 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, a framework for efficient IV estimators of random effects models with information in levels which can accommodate predetermined variables is presented. But the authors do not consider models with predetermined variables that have constant correlation with the effects.
16,245 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider pooling cross-section time series data for testing the unit root hypothesis, and they show that the power of the panel-based unit root test is dramatically higher, compared to performing a separate unit-root test for each individual time series.
10,792 citations