Cheryl A. London

TL;DR: Rather than arguing for the importance of long-term database funding by granting agencies, BIND’s saga in fact argues for greater caution and more demanding oversight when these agencies elect to fund a database‘s initial development.

TL;DR: The human response evaluation criteria in solid tumours is used as a framework to establish standard procedures for response assessment in canine solid tumour assessment that is meant to be easy to use, repeatable and applicable across a variety of clinical trial structures in veterinary oncology.

TL;DR: A significant decrease in the importance of FeLV-associated types of lymphoma in cats is confirmed and Associations of intestinal lymphoma and inflammatory bowel disease and diet should be further considered.

TL;DR: These guidelines are intended only for use in dogs, where peripheral lymphadenopathy represents the principal component of their disease and as such do not critically assess extranodal disease (e.g., primary cutaneous, central nervous system, gastrointestinal).

TL;DR: Clinical and molecular evidence suggests that human and canine OSA share many key features, including tumor location, presence of microscopic metastatic disease at diagnosis, development of chemotherapy-resistant metastases, and altered expression/activation of several proteins, supporting the notion that these diseases are similar at the molecular level.