Committee for assessing progress on implementing the recommendations of the institute of medicine report the future of nursing: leading change, advancing health

In this article, Jonathan Cohen argues that the goals of education need to be reframed to prioritize not only academic learning, but also social, emotional, and ethical competencies. Surveying the current state of research in the fields of socialemotional education, character education, and school-based mental health in the United States, Cohen suggests that social-emotional skills, knowledge, and dispositions provide the foundation for participation in a democracy and improved quality of life. Cohen discusses contemporary best practices and policy in relation to creating safe and caring school climates, home-school partnerships, and a pedagogy informed by social-emotional and ethical concerns. He also emphasizes the importance of scientifically sound measures of social-emotional and ethical learning, and advocates for action research partnerships between researchers and practioners to develop authentic methods of evaluation. Cohen notes the gulf that exists between the evidence- based guidelines for soci...

Social, Emotional, Ethical, and Academic Education: Creating a Climate for Learning, Participation in Democracy, and Well-Being.

Why "social epidemiology"? Is not all epidemiology, after all, "social" epidemiology? In so far as people are simultaneously social and biological organisms, is any biological process ever expressed devoid of social context?--or any social process ever unmediated by the corporal reality of our profoundly generative and mortal bodies?(1, 2) Yet, despite the seeming truism that social as well as biological processes inherently shape population health--a truism recognized even in the founding days of epidemiology as a scientific discipline in the early 19th century-- not all epidemiology is "social epidemiology".(3, 4) Instead, "social epidemiology" (which first attained its name as such in English in 1950 (3, 5)) is distinguished by its insistence on explicitly investigating social determinants of population distributions of health, disease, and wellbeing, rather than treating such determinants as mere background to biomedical phenomena. Tackling this task requires attention to theories, concepts, and methods conducive to illuminating intimate links between our bodies and the body politic; toward this end, the glossary below provides a selection of critical terms for the field. One brief note of explanation. Some entries contain only one term; others include several related terms whose meanings are interdependent or refer to specific aspects of a broader construct. Additionally, each entry is cast in relation to its significance to social epidemiology; explication of salience to other disciplines is beyond the scope of this particular glossary. Language: en

A glossary for social epidemiology.

All countries fund safety net programs for the protection of their people Though an increasing number of safety net programs are extremely well thought out, adroitly implemented, and demonstrably effective, many others are not This book aims to assist those concerned with social policy to understand why countries need social assistance, what kind of safety programs will serve those best and how to develop such programs for maximum effectiveness Safety nets are part of a broader poverty reduction strategy interacting with and working alongside of social insurance; health, education, and financial services; the provision of utilities and roads; and other policies aimed at reducing poverty and managing risk Though useful, safety nets are not a panacea, and there are real concerns over whether they are affordable and administratively feasible or desirable in light of the various negative incentives they might create In most settings where there is political will to do so, such concerns can be managed through a number of prudent design and implementation features Much information and innovation exist on these topics; this book summarizes, references, and builds on this knowledge base to promote well-crafted safety nets and safety net policy

/pdf/for-protection-and-promotion-the-design-and-implementation-3ckufds40q.pdf

For Protection and Promotion: The Design and Implementation of Effective Safety Nets

Individuals from different backgrounds, social groups, and countries enjoy different levels of health. This article defines and distinguishes between unavoidable health inequalities and unjust and preventable health inequities. We describe the dimensions along which health inequalities are commonly examined, including across the global population, between countries or states, and within geographies, by socially relevant groupings such as race/ethnicity, gender, education, caste, income, occupation, and more. Different theories attempt to explain group-level differences in health, including psychosocial, material deprivation, health behavior, environmental, and selection explanations. Concepts of relative versus absolute; dose–response versus threshold; composition versus context; place versus space; the life course perspective on health; causal pathways to health; conditional health effects; and group-level versus individual differences are vital in understanding health inequalities. We close by reflecting on what conditions make health inequalities unjust, and to consider the merits of policies that prioritize the elimination of health disparities versus those that focus on raising the overall standard of health in a population. Keywords: health disparities; inequality; inequity; theory (Published: 24 June 2015) Citation:  Glob Health Action 2015,  8 : 27106 -  http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.27106

/pdf/inequalities-in-health-definitions-concepts-and-theories-1iknlcy4fx.pdf

Inequalities in health: definitions, concepts, and theories

It made it possible to improve people's lives. Now it prevents all forms of discrimination in the world. It helps to improve our world.

Chin

Papers

Universal Declaration of Human Rights